The Prologue
#102
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:28 AM
quote:Originally posted by Set'alahd Crool:
You think she might wake up beside a lone Imass head?
'Uh,what did I drink last night?I can't remember a thing...'
Trake died. Look how THAT turned out.
So did Baudin and Ganoes Paran for that matter.
And correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't Hood himself prowling around the night of the convergence in HoC. Maybe he was on a recruiting drive.
- Abyss, hates those mornings where you wake up next to a disembodied head wondering what happened last night...
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#103
Posted 12 April 2005 - 12:16 AM
I'm probably just too fond of Icarium, but if he can kill an Azath, capture Calm and so on, I doubt a creature such as that could defeat him.. Ofc, once he'd killed it, the rest of seven cities may go with it, but nevertheless I believe Icarium would succeed
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#104
Posted 16 May 2005 - 04:13 PM
You think she might wake up beside a lone Imass head?
'Uh,what did I drink last night?I can't remember a thing...'
'Uh,what did I drink last night?I can't remember a thing...'
#105
Posted 06 May 2005 - 11:28 PM
Wrong group Korik... although it was a female Imass that Karsa destroyed

#106
Posted 20 June 2005 - 01:57 PM
These two quotes interest me:
and
Does Spite have something to do with the ottataral dragon, or something along those lines, is what I'm thinking.
quote:They waited. For the twelfth Nameless One to speak. Yet she said nothing, instead reaching out a slim, rust-red, scaled hand that was anything but human.
And Dejim Nebrahl sensed a presence. An intelligence, cold and brutal, seeping down from above, and the D’ivers was suddenly afraid.
and
quote:She said, “In the name of the Warren of Starvald Demelain, I invoke the ritual of release.†And from her words descended, through dead tree root, through stone and sand, dissolving ward after ward, a force of entropy, known to the world as Otataral.
Does Spite have something to do with the ottataral dragon, or something along those lines, is what I'm thinking.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#107
Posted 21 June 2005 - 03:05 PM
barathol is not tiste andi...he is actually *****'s ******.
#108 Guest_makea_cardyn_*
Posted 08 May 2005 - 04:05 PM
*Mr. Burns style*
Excellent...
Muwhahaha.
Excellent...
Muwhahaha.
#109
Posted 15 May 2005 - 07:23 PM
Folken it says Felisin (b. 1146) not the date it was written.
#111 Guest_pop-up-pirate_*
Posted 24 May 2005 - 11:16 AM
whats this about an advance copy? any chance santa could get hold of it? he's never failed me before.
#112 Guest_BAD_*
Posted 20 April 2005 - 10:20 PM
At last some more Erikson. Good prologue again, as always. Some nice plotines already set in motion. A new comical soldier, Hellian, always nice to lighten the mood, a bada$$ G'ral set to take on an uber D'ivers (now that's gonna be some showdown), Spite finally gets more than one line in the series, is Banaschar Tayschrenn in another of his disguises and what was he up to and some much needed history and devlopment for the Nameless Ones and Dessimbelackis. Oh yeah and that's not to mention this new (?) Mekhar guy. . .
All in all safe as houses.
All in all safe as houses.

#113
Posted 16 May 2005 - 02:02 PM
quote:And no poem was written by Ganoes's sister Felisin. She is what 16 or 17 in Deadhouse, so 1146+17 = 1163
eh? we know feslin elder (parans sister) and feslin younger wrote quite a few poems, so presumably if teh feslin who wrote the poem was born in 1146 that would mean it has to be felsin elder, unless feslin younger is older than feslin elder?
#114 Guest_chadley78_*
Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:14 AM
Oh boy oh boy oh boy. I've just read I.C.E's interview (i know i just noticed that too,I.C.E, hilarious!)and he explains that NoK contains info on Daseem Ultor's death on Y’Ghatan and this place's incorporation into the bone hunters. Any ideas where that's going?
#115 Guest_Dakkareth_*
Posted 16 May 2005 - 04:09 PM
I noticed the ... avoidance of a flat-out statement there too, but I didn't make the connection to the First Empiry alchemy. It may be possible ...
#116
Posted 10 April 2005 - 07:34 AM
I don't know. I still reckon 22 is a mistake. 12 or 13 makes much more sense. Erikson hasn't had any issues with the main timeline, the issues arise with history and what not. Since HoC was a part of the main timeline I'd say 12 makes much more sense. Can't understand how he'd make such a mistake though...12 to 22
.

<div align='center'>You must always strive to be the best, but you must never believe that you are - Juan Manuel Fangio</div>
#117
Posted 16 May 2005 - 12:50 PM
yeah Hetan corrected me already...meh, wheels were set in motion last nite when I read the poem while writing up some summaries. They've stopped turning now lol, and timeline issue has left my mind again
And no poem was written by Ganoes's sister Felisin. She is what 16 or 17 in Deadhouse, so 1146+17 = 1163

And no poem was written by Ganoes's sister Felisin. She is what 16 or 17 in Deadhouse, so 1146+17 = 1163
<div align='center'>You must always strive to be the best, but you must never believe that you are - Juan Manuel Fangio</div>
#118
Posted 10 April 2005 - 11:58 PM
quote:Originally posted by Folken Fanel:
I don't know. I still reckon 22 is a mistake. 12 or 13 makes much more sense. Erikson hasn't had any issues with the main timeline, the issues arise with history and what not. Since HoC was a part of the main timeline I'd say 12 makes much more sense. Can't understand how he'd make such a mistake though...12 to 22.
No issues with the timeline????
I think 22 makes sense - if you then advance the other timelimes over the same time period

It gives Adjunct Lorn time to have grown up from being a girl in the Mouse quarter, it makes more sense of the ages of Fiddler etc. It gives Trull Sengar time to hang around on chained to a wall, adds a few more years to Karsa.. lol... I could go on.
#119
Posted 03 August 2005 - 02:49 AM
I think the timeline makes sense, even with its little inconsistencies (which as we all know is the point).
In fact, even if most (if not all) of them were not intentional, it would not be suprising of such a complex storyline. Less complex series, where the author goes out of his way to avoid dates and such (such as Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire), still manage to have their own inconsistencies.
And aye, 22 years does make sense. It's always been difficult to reconcile Whiskeyjack's and Fiddler's ages in GotM then MoI.
In any case, with such a great story, any such inconsistencies should be forgiven.
Itkovian
In fact, even if most (if not all) of them were not intentional, it would not be suprising of such a complex storyline. Less complex series, where the author goes out of his way to avoid dates and such (such as Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire), still manage to have their own inconsistencies.
And aye, 22 years does make sense. It's always been difficult to reconcile Whiskeyjack's and Fiddler's ages in GotM then MoI.
In any case, with such a great story, any such inconsistencies should be forgiven.

Itkovian
#120
Posted 03 August 2005 - 08:25 PM
sorry to go off topic but I have not noticed any in asoif can you point them out it will be intresting to see what I missed. anything serious?