[Denul]

Ampelas, on 22 May 2014 - 02:40 PM, said:

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:34 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 22 May 2014 - 02:32 PM, said:

@ denul re:kaschan

Even the people who said in signups "I will be a low poster" should still be able to come up with some sort of thought on a mere 3 pages of play. So yeah, boo kaschan.

Yeah I agree. That's why I won't vote a low poster for low posting, I will vote them for not playing, ie giving us what they think.

barghast?

To be fair that is a shit vote but like I just said, I don't want to keep moving it around. It's shameful.

remove vote

[Denul]

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 02:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 22 May 2014 - 02:32 PM, said:

@ denul re:kaschan

Even the people who said in signups "I will be a low poster" should still be able to come up with some sort of thought on a mere 3 pages of play. So yeah, boo kaschan.

I am here and working at the same time. I posted some thoughts and will be back on to post thoughts as my day goes along. Just because you can get on and post when ever you fucking are able to doesn't mean that everyone else can. So umm suck it hard on the big bag of dicks that you keep behind your pillow.

Hi Kaschan!

You just come on and said no one is scummy. Most people can come on and say that. There are snippets of things here and there for you to comment on though as you see fit.

[Ampelas]

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:

So after reading all of that. I don't see anything particularly that jumps out to me as scummy. Pallid's response to the second vote on Fener seemed like a reasonable reaction to what looked like someone attempting to build a second joke train. I wouldn't have reacted like that but Fener getting several votes on day 1 is pretty traditional.

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 02:41 PM, said:

I am here and working at the same time. I posted some thoughts and will be back on to post thoughts as my day goes along. Just because you can get on and post when ever you fucking are able to doesn't mean that everyone else can. So umm suck it hard on the big bag of dicks that you keep behind your pillow.

Glad to see you didn't claim "working at being here", because I would've called that for what it is.

[Eloth]

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 02:41 PM, said:

I am here and working at the same time. I posted some thoughts and will be back on to post thoughts as my day goes along. Just because you can get on and post when ever you fucking are able to doesn't mean that everyone else can. So umm suck it hard on the big bag of dicks that you keep behind your pillow.

Surely everyone can post when they are able to?

[Denul]

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 02:41 PM, said:

Ampelas, on 22 May 2014 - 02:32 PM, said:

@ denul re:kaschan

Even the people who said in signups "I will be a low poster" should still be able to come up with some sort of thought on a mere 3 pages of play. So yeah, boo kaschan.

I am here and working at the same time. I posted some thoughts and will be back on to post thoughts as my day goes along. Just because you can get on and post when ever you fucking are able to doesn't mean that everyone else can. So umm suck it hard on the big bag of dicks that you keep behind your pillow.

what did you say suck?

Spoiler

[Denul]

Eloth, on 22 May 2014 - 02:42 PM, said:

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:26 PM, said:

Out of the current crop of people that are around and reading up I could definitely vote for any of them.

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 12:43 PM, said:

Ok so not a whole lot happening that really means anything. Typical Day 1. My push back on Lio got a quick reaction in that he crumpled like a wad of paper. Not quite sure what to make of that yet, I will have to hear some more from him to decide. Pallid being all prickly and stuff is nice since its getting reactions and at least a few of us talking. GL has done nothing but RP. And we have Capt & Denul flailing around like Doc OC at a stripper convention.

So out of the guys you mention, do any of them warrant a vote, who would you like to pressure more?
I'd say he backed off because he was getting a lot of flak for a Fener vote, if there was no substance to the vote (which as a joke there obviously wasnt) why wouldn't he drop it once people started taking aim at him?

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:

So after reading all of that. I don't see anything particularly that jumps out to me as scummy. Pallid's response to the second vote on Fener seemed like a reasonable reaction to what looked like someone attempting to build a second joke train. I wouldn't have reacted like that but Fener getting several votes on day 1 is pretty traditional.

Again, nothing jumps out you, anything you want to like add to the group. I don't see this type of post holding any water. Are you not concerned that there are people out there who want to do you harm? Or are you a killer feigning interest but not actively looking for scum?
Kaschan is right, there hasn't been much scummy behavior or anything that has been communicated between/by scum has flown below our radar. What exactly would you like him to add beyond "no one looks worryingly suspicious"? His assessment of the thread so far is that it is faily innocuous. Which is a fair assessment I think.

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

I'm in and out - busy at work but should be able to drop a few posts in here and there.

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

Pallid, on 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM, said:

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.

edit, info to inno

Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan

I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.

As soon as Pallid accuses you of voting for Liosan here you switch to vote for Liosan. I'm wondering if perhaps you're a bit too afraid of getting tagged as scummy on Day 1?

Finally, HP, latching on to something without progressing his thoughts any further. I responded to him, etiquette dictates he should come back with a reply of his own, or another observation.
Both of you are reacting oddly here


Is all the above good town play?

Answered in red
Not GOOD town play, but certainly not unexpected or bad town play for day 1. I just wish the people who have been not posting would start.

Denul so far you have trying very hard to congtrol the direction and flow of the game, what I'm not sure of yet is whether you are a very bold scum or a townie with a head the size of Fener.

Control by responding? No, just not sitting back and waiting to be killed.

I don't see how I am controlling the thread. Thank you I guess, if you think I have that much influence but I won't be here come timeout, so the controlling of the thread coms later, for those who have sat back.

[Fener]

Liosan's initial jumpiness and subsequent silence pushes me towards him being scum, but i would like to see a little more of the day go by before I drop a vote, who knows maybe he will surprise me. I would definitely like to hear from some of the non-entities that are cruising around out there as well. Nimander dropped by to stir the pot and then disappeared, which simply made the waters even more murky. There just really isnt a whole lot new to go on at this point. Like Johnny 5 "Need Input!"

[Hood's Path]

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:26 PM, said:

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

I'm in and out - busy at work but should be able to drop a few posts in here and there.

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan

I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.

As soon as Pallid accuses you of voting for Liosan here you switch to vote for Liosan. I'm wondering if perhaps you're a bit too afraid of getting tagged as scummy on Day 1?

Finally, HP, latching on to something without progressing his thoughts any further. I responded to him, etiquette dictates he should come back with a reply of his own, or another observation.

Is all the above good town play?

You asked something along the lines of "Do you have anything more to add?", to which the answer is...not really. It was a stray observation, I thought I might as well see how you respond to indirect pressure. You were right though - you had already expressed suspicion of Liosan, so actually Pallid's assertion that you might be symping him was completely off base.

[Hood's Path]

I guess I'll ask, since nobody seems to have commented on it - what do you guys think about Galayn Lord? I dropped a vote on him because I felt that was actively ignoring the talking points of the time in an attempt to stay on the quiet, but I'm a little put out by the fact that nobody else has really mentioned it.

If you haven't noticed yet, a running theme in the way I'm thinking about the game today is that avoiding getting embroiled in the Day 1 randomness is probably high on the list of scum priorities. As such, I'm in favour of trying to search for people who are seeking to stay out of sight - I like Ampelas' reasoning behind his vote on Eloth for this reason.

[Hood's Path]

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 02:52 PM, said:

Liosan's initial jumpiness and subsequent silence pushes me towards him being scum, but i would like to see a little more of the day go by before I drop a vote, who knows maybe he will surprise me. I would definitely like to hear from some of the non-entities that are cruising around out there as well. Nimander dropped by to stir the pot and then disappeared, which simply made the waters even more murky. There just really isnt a whole lot new to go on at this point. Like Johnny 5 "Need Input!"

This doesn't seem like a very healthy attitude to me - if you need input, then perhaps you should be trying to generate it for yourself rather than relying on others to do it for you?

[Kaschan]

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:49 PM, said:

Eloth, on 22 May 2014 - 02:42 PM, said:

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:26 PM, said:

Out of the current crop of people that are around and reading up I could definitely vote for any of them.

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 12:43 PM, said:

Ok so not a whole lot happening that really means anything. Typical Day 1. My push back on Lio got a quick reaction in that he crumpled like a wad of paper. Not quite sure what to make of that yet, I will have to hear some more from him to decide. Pallid being all prickly and stuff is nice since its getting reactions and at least a few of us talking. GL has done nothing but RP. And we have Capt & Denul flailing around like Doc OC at a stripper convention.

So out of the guys you mention, do any of them warrant a vote, who would you like to pressure more?
I'd say he backed off because he was getting a lot of flak for a Fener vote, if there was no substance to the vote (which as a joke there obviously wasnt) why wouldn't he drop it once people started taking aim at him?

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:

So after reading all of that. I don't see anything particularly that jumps out to me as scummy. Pallid's response to the second vote on Fener seemed like a reasonable reaction to what looked like someone attempting to build a second joke train. I wouldn't have reacted like that but Fener getting several votes on day 1 is pretty traditional.

Again, nothing jumps out you, anything you want to like add to the group. I don't see this type of post holding any water. Are you not concerned that there are people out there who want to do you harm? Or are you a killer feigning interest but not actively looking for scum?
Kaschan is right, there hasn't been much scummy behavior or anything that has been communicated between/by scum has flown below our radar. What exactly would you like him to add beyond "no one looks worryingly suspicious"? His assessment of the thread so far is that it is faily innocuous. Which is a fair assessment I think.

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

I'm in and out - busy at work but should be able to drop a few posts in here and there.

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

Pallid, on 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM, said:

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.

edit, info to inno

Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan

I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.

As soon as Pallid accuses you of voting for Liosan here you switch to vote for Liosan. I'm wondering if perhaps you're a bit too afraid of getting tagged as scummy on Day 1?

Finally, HP, latching on to something without progressing his thoughts any further. I responded to him, etiquette dictates he should come back with a reply of his own, or another observation.
Both of you are reacting oddly here


Is all the above good town play?

Answered in red
Not GOOD town play, but certainly not unexpected or bad town play for day 1. I just wish the people who have been not posting would start.

Denul so far you have trying very hard to congtrol the direction and flow of the game, what I'm not sure of yet is whether you are a very bold scum or a townie with a head the size of Fener.

Control by responding? No, just not sitting back and waiting to be killed.

I don't see how I am controlling the thread. Thank you I guess, if you think I have that much influence but I won't be here come timeout, so the controlling of the thread coms later, for those who have sat back.

It isn't that your controlling the thread it seems more that you have posted a lot and have opinions out on everything.

[Fener]

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 03:35 PM, said:

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 02:52 PM, said:

Liosan's initial jumpiness and subsequent silence pushes me towards him being scum, but i would like to see a little more of the day go by before I drop a vote, who knows maybe he will surprise me. I would definitely like to hear from some of the non-entities that are cruising around out there as well. Nimander dropped by to stir the pot and then disappeared, which simply made the waters even more murky. There just really isnt a whole lot new to go on at this point. Like Johnny 5 "Need Input!"

This doesn't seem like a very healthy attitude to me - if you need input, then perhaps you should be trying to generate it for yourself rather than relying on others to do it for you?

The input I'm looking for is anyone new finally posting something worth reading. The posts thus far have been sliced and diced till all we can cut is our own fingers. Im with you on GL's complete head in the clouds routine and it certainly bears thinking about that he could just be watching us run around in circles while hiding in a cloud of low posters who havent really had anything of consequence to say. As for new thoughts like most others I dont really have any with substance as of yet

[Kaschan]

Atrahal, on 22 May 2014 - 06:51 AM, said:

'llo there. You all seem jumpy as fuck.
Fener being voted for being a mysogenistic wanker and people defending him is interesting, though.

Possible signal to Liosan?

[Denul]

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 02:52 PM, said:

Liosan's initial jumpiness and subsequent silence pushes me towards him being scum, but i would like to see a little more of the day go by before I drop a vote, who knows maybe he will surprise me. I would definitely like to hear from some of the non-entities that are cruising around out there as well. Nimander dropped by to stir the pot and then disappeared, which simply made the waters even more murky. There just really isnt a whole lot new to go on at this point. Like Johnny 5 "Need Input!"

See that is why I have said I would vote that way.

This was a better post than the one before, it feels like you're committing to something

[Denul]

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 03:39 PM, said:

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:49 PM, said:

Eloth, on 22 May 2014 - 02:42 PM, said:

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 02:26 PM, said:

Out of the current crop of people that are around and reading up I could definitely vote for any of them.

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 12:43 PM, said:

Ok so not a whole lot happening that really means anything. Typical Day 1. My push back on Lio got a quick reaction in that he crumpled like a wad of paper. Not quite sure what to make of that yet, I will have to hear some more from him to decide. Pallid being all prickly and stuff is nice since its getting reactions and at least a few of us talking. GL has done nothing but RP. And we have Capt & Denul flailing around like Doc OC at a stripper convention.

So out of the guys you mention, do any of them warrant a vote, who would you like to pressure more?
I'd say he backed off because he was getting a lot of flak for a Fener vote, if there was no substance to the vote (which as a joke there obviously wasnt) why wouldn't he drop it once people started taking aim at him?

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:

So after reading all of that. I don't see anything particularly that jumps out to me as scummy. Pallid's response to the second vote on Fener seemed like a reasonable reaction to what looked like someone attempting to build a second joke train. I wouldn't have reacted like that but Fener getting several votes on day 1 is pretty traditional.

Again, nothing jumps out you, anything you want to like add to the group. I don't see this type of post holding any water. Are you not concerned that there are people out there who want to do you harm? Or are you a killer feigning interest but not actively looking for scum?
Kaschan is right, there hasn't been much scummy behavior or anything that has been communicated between/by scum has flown below our radar. What exactly would you like him to add beyond "no one looks worryingly suspicious"? His assessment of the thread so far is that it is faily innocuous. Which is a fair assessment I think.

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

I'm in and out - busy at work but should be able to drop a few posts in here and there.

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

Pallid, on 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM, said:

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.

edit, info to inno

Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan

I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.

As soon as Pallid accuses you of voting for Liosan here you switch to vote for Liosan. I'm wondering if perhaps you're a bit too afraid of getting tagged as scummy on Day 1?

Finally, HP, latching on to something without progressing his thoughts any further. I responded to him, etiquette dictates he should come back with a reply of his own, or another observation.
Both of you are reacting oddly here


Is all the above good town play?

Answered in red
Not GOOD town play, but certainly not unexpected or bad town play for day 1. I just wish the people who have been not posting would start.

Denul so far you have trying very hard to congtrol the direction and flow of the game, what I'm not sure of yet is whether you are a very bold scum or a townie with a head the size of Fener.

Control by responding? No, just not sitting back and waiting to be killed.

I don't see how I am controlling the thread. Thank you I guess, if you think I have that much influence but I won't be here come timeout, so the controlling of the thread coms later, for those who have sat back.

It isn't that your controlling the thread it seems more that you have posted a lot and have opinions out on everything.

There's nothing I can do about that, I am at a computer and I have some time. Tomorrow I may not have much, later I won't for sure. So I want my reactions to posts on thread for later analysis if it comes that way. Although I did just take a step back and HP seems to have posted his thoughts which I like.

[Denul]

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 03:32 PM, said:

I guess I'll ask, since nobody seems to have commented on it - what do you guys think about Galayn Lord? I dropped a vote on him because I felt that was actively ignoring the talking points of the time in an attempt to stay on the quiet, but I'm a little put out by the fact that nobody else has really mentioned it.

If you haven't noticed yet, a running theme in the way I'm thinking about the game today is that avoiding getting embroiled in the Day 1 randomness is probably high on the list of scum priorities. As such, I'm in favour of trying to search for people who are seeking to stay out of sight - I like Ampelas' reasoning behind his vote on Eloth for this reason.

Personally all the people who tried a little RP are okay in my books. I don't see scum doing what GL did which is probably the point of his style this game. Be identified early as town. That's what I think anyway. He hasn't done anything scummy that I can see as of yet.

I guess voting patterns will sort him out.

[Denul]

Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 03:35 PM, said:

Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 02:52 PM, said:

Liosan's initial jumpiness and subsequent silence pushes me towards him being scum, but i would like to see a little more of the day go by before I drop a vote, who knows maybe he will surprise me. I would definitely like to hear from some of the non-entities that are cruising around out there as well. Nimander dropped by to stir the pot and then disappeared, which simply made the waters even more murky. There just really isnt a whole lot new to go on at this point. Like Johnny 5 "Need Input!"

This doesn't seem like a very healthy attitude to me - if you need input, then perhaps you should be trying to generate it for yourself rather than relying on others to do it for you?

See I agree with this, but he does actually give a read on Lio. That's more than Kaschan's, "I see nothing scummy" post.

[Denul]

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 03:49 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 22 May 2014 - 06:51 AM, said:

'llo there. You all seem jumpy as fuck.
Fener being voted for being a mysogenistic wanker and people defending him is interesting, though.

Possible signal to Liosan?

Possible, yes. Atrahal is on the back of my "to watch" list. Behind HP and Pallid.

That is, potential symps.

[Denul]

Time to go. I may be back a bit later, in case I won't I am going to leave my vote on Liosan until he explains himself further.



Remove Vote


Vote Liosan

[Kaschan]

Denul, on 22 May 2014 - 03:51 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 03:39 PM, said:

It isn't that your controlling the thread it seems more that you have posted a lot and have opinions out on everything.

There's nothing I can do about that, I am at a computer and I have some time. Tomorrow I may not have much, later I won't for sure. So I want my reactions to posts on thread for later analysis if it comes that way. Although I did just take a step back and HP seems to have posted his thoughts which I like.

Yeah I am not going to be around tomorrow either.