Help
Pallid, on 22 May 2014 - 06:04 AM, said:
fuck this
vote Liosan
entirely too vehement a reaction to suspicion on him, day one or not, his jump was not haha jokey to me, it was opportunist. There's multiple options out there for joke votes, none of them a second on a train
vote Liosan
entirely too vehement a reaction to suspicion on him, day one or not, his jump was not haha jokey to me, it was opportunist. There's multiple options out there for joke votes, none of them a second on a train
This is interesting to me because Liosan sits as my current top choice for scum, but Pallid is a close second. This helps lend credence to choosing Liosan to be lynched, because if he is scum, then it will help to clear Pallid from my focus for the most part, and if he isn't then we still are left with another viable alternative.
Pallid, on 22 May 2014 - 10:46 AM, said:
fire drill at work, equals check up time.
you all fell into my trap, are you the priests???
Right now denul is pushing my buttons by suggesting sympage, and trying to direct traffic. But I still want to hear more from lio
you all fell into my trap, are you the priests???
Right now denul is pushing my buttons by suggesting sympage, and trying to direct traffic. But I still want to hear more from lio
This post is extremely uncomfortable somehow. I'm not quite sure of what Pallid is trying to convey, but again it reinforces his suspicion of Liosan. The first time could have been distancing, but the second time helps establish the assumption as correct.
Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 11:02 AM, said:
Eloth, on 22 May 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Hood, on 22 May 2014 - 10:01 AM, said:
Eloth, on 22 May 2014 - 07:34 AM, said:
**SERIOUS MODE ACTIVATE!**
The second joke vote on Fener was not necessary, yeah it was probably a joke, but starting a train for a laugh is something people generally avoid...
I don't think that any of this is enough to warrant getting serious yet, but people jump all over whatever snippets they think they find on day 1.
**Alert, serious mode battery depleted**
That Fener avatar looks great, but it just isn't big enough. In my head he's larger than the hounds, not a "slightly bigger than normal" boar.
The second joke vote on Fener was not necessary, yeah it was probably a joke, but starting a train for a laugh is something people generally avoid...
I don't think that any of this is enough to warrant getting serious yet, but people jump all over whatever snippets they think they find on day 1.
**Alert, serious mode battery depleted**
That Fener avatar looks great, but it just isn't big enough. In my head he's larger than the hounds, not a "slightly bigger than normal" boar.
I dunno, it seems to me that getting serious early is a good thing. There'll be connections all over the shop and you might be able to induce a false reaction in someone with an early vote. The problem we have normally is that we don't pressure enough people - if you only get a read on a small fraction of players, the chances are pretty low that you've found something that legitimately leads to scum. If you get a read on everybody then there's a much better chance that there is actually some gold amongst the dirt, you just have to sift through the rubbish to find it. I'd much prefer the latter...
EDIT: X-post
Excellent cross post. Just after I try to get more people involved you suggest it is better for us to get more people involved. Synchronicity!
Glad to see we're on the same page
. Barghast and Kaschan both need to show up properly too. I've never understood people who do a 'Check in' style post and then just leave without saying anything else, it seems...rude, I guess. At least say "Can't talk now, will be back later" if that's what the problem is...Kiss my ass. There was plenty of time left in the day at this point for having patience.
Fener, on 22 May 2014 - 02:52 PM, said:
Liosan's initial jumpiness and subsequent silence pushes me towards him being scum, but i would like to see a little more of the day go by before I drop a vote, who knows maybe he will surprise me. I would definitely like to hear from some of the non-entities that are cruising around out there as well. Nimander dropped by to stir the pot and then disappeared, which simply made the waters even more murky. There just really isnt a whole lot new to go on at this point. Like Johnny 5 "Need Input!"
This reads to me as if Fener wants to be seen advocating a Liosan lynch without having to stand ground. This furthers my choice for Liosan as far as gaining information post lynch on one of my other two considerations.
Kaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 03:49 PM, said:
Atrahal, on 22 May 2014 - 06:51 AM, said:
'llo there. You all seem jumpy as fuck.
Fener being voted for being a mysogenistic wanker and people defending him is interesting, though.
Fener being voted for being a mysogenistic wanker and people defending him is interesting, though.
Possible signal to Liosan?
Lastly, why not. Just another route to retrace if Liosan is indeed scum.
That's about all I have for now. Apologies for having to cram it all into one sitting. Some of us can't get on thread as often as others. However, I do plan on making it back before day end. In the case that I can't, I'm leaving a vote for Liosan. Most of the reasoning I have is circumstantial at best, but I believe that it's a very good shot, and a cf will provide us other paths to look down regardless of the outcome, which is the most we can hope to achieve.
vote Liosan
