Malazan Empire: Mafia 112.5 - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 55 Pages +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Mafia 112.5 Betrayal at House on the Hill

#101 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 22 May 2014 - 11:21 AM

Denul you are treating everything after that post as genuine and serious, when I think most of them are still humorous/joking. It wasn't until you started posting about it that things heated up.

Not sure I like where you are trying to take this thread, you admit he's unlikely to be scum then continue trying to vilify him and make others hostile to him as well. You are within the same post contradicting yourself here. Why?

#102 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 22 May 2014 - 11:24 AM

I don't think any symp would be so reactionary and vehement about a couple of joke posts, they might sweat a bit but this is not a proportional or reasonable response a symp would have. I think you are reaching here.

#103 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 11:33 AM

View PostEloth, on 22 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

I don't think any symp would be so reactionary and vehement about a couple of joke posts, they might sweat a bit but this is not a proportional or reasonable response a symp would have. I think you are reaching here.



I see you voted for Pallid, was that just a joke?

So you think Pallid is joking with his posts?

I am not taking the thread anywhere. What else do you want me to focus on?

Ampelas made a point about Hood putting two people in his little post, like a signal to a master. That is more symp like, subtle, but HP would know we look out for that sort of stuff. You can wifom how town and scum play all you like, but I personally don't get Pallid's reaction to Fener's vote.

#104 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 11:55 AM

I am here and getting caught up

#105 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:01 PM

View PostDenul, on 22 May 2014 - 11:33 AM, said:

View PostEloth, on 22 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

I don't think any symp would be so reactionary and vehement about a couple of joke posts, they might sweat a bit but this is not a proportional or reasonable response a symp would have. I think you are reaching here.



I see you voted for Pallid, was that just a joke?
And now for something completely different is a well known Monty Python phrase between bits, it signalled the end of one line of thought and the begining of another, yes it was a joke

So you think Pallid is joking with his posts?
No not joking, pallid responded very aggressively to the double vote, and I don't yet know why, it of course is worth further consideration, but we can't draw any conclusions from it I think.

I am not taking the thread anywhere. What else do you want me to focus on?
Learning how to pole-dance, obviously.

Ampelas made a point about Hood putting two people in his little post, like a signal to a master. That is more symp like, subtle, but HP would know we look out for that sort of stuff. You can wifom how town and scum play all you like, but I personally don't get Pallid's reaction to Fener's vote.

I don't think there is a lot to understand about Pallid's reaction, he saw something he didn't like and went for the throat, like a wolf! You are right that it does bear monitoring but more than that? *shrug*


Answered in red

Edit: Fixed beat to bear

This post has been edited by Eloth: 22 May 2014 - 12:03 PM


#106 User is offline   Pallid 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.






edit, info to inno

This post has been edited by Pallid: 22 May 2014 - 12:11 PM


#107 User is offline   Fener 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:12 PM

Getting caught up. My posts will be short for most of the day as my work comp is fucked. I turned the damn thing on this morning and it said my OS is missing. Guess it decided to take a vacation.

#108 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM

View PostPallid, on 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM, said:

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.






edit, info to inno


Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan


I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.

#109 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:25 PM

Anyone here?

#110 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:25 PM

PS can we get a time update please.

#111 User is offline   Fener 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:29 PM

Yeah Im here reading up a bit. My iPad doesnt like the sight for some reason so its taking some time

#112 User is offline   Fener 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:43 PM

Ok so not a whole lot happening that really means anything. Typical Day 1. My push back on Lio got a quick reaction in that he crumpled like a wad of paper. Not quite sure what to make of that yet, I will have to hear some more from him to decide. Pallid being all prickly and stuff is nice since its getting reactions and at least a few of us talking. GL has done nothing but RP. And we have Capt & Denul flailing around like Doc OC at a stripper convention.

#113 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM

So after reading all of that. I don't see anything particularly that jumps out to me as scummy. Pallid's response to the second vote on Fener seemed like a reasonable reaction to what looked like someone attempting to build a second joke train. I wouldn't have reacted like that but Fener getting several votes on day 1 is pretty traditional.

#114 User is offline   Ampelas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM

View PostKaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 11:55 AM, said:

I am here and getting caught up


...and then?

#115 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM

View PostFener, on 22 May 2014 - 12:43 PM, said:

Ok so not a whole lot happening that really means anything. Typical Day 1. My push back on Lio got a quick reaction in that he crumpled like a wad of paper. Not quite sure what to make of that yet, I will have to hear some more from him to decide. Pallid being all prickly and stuff is nice since its getting reactions and at least a few of us talking. GL has done nothing but RP. And we have Capt & Denul flailing around like Doc OC at a stripper convention.


Hmmm a stripper convention

#116 User is offline   Ampelas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM

Wa hahaha, nice.

#117 User is offline   Kaschan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM

View PostAmpelas, on 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:

View PostKaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 11:55 AM, said:

I am here and getting caught up


...and then?


Suck it lizard boy

#118 User is offline   Hood's Path 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM

I'm in and out - busy at work but should be able to drop a few posts in here and there.

View PostDenul, on 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

View PostPallid, on 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM, said:

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.

edit, info to inno


Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan


I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.


As soon as Pallid accuses you of voting for Liosan here you switch to vote for Liosan. I'm wondering if perhaps you're a bit too afraid of getting tagged as scummy on Day 1?

#119 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 12:55 PM

View PostKaschan, on 22 May 2014 - 12:52 PM, said:

View PostFener, on 22 May 2014 - 12:43 PM, said:

Ok so not a whole lot happening that really means anything. Typical Day 1. My push back on Lio got a quick reaction in that he crumpled like a wad of paper. Not quite sure what to make of that yet, I will have to hear some more from him to decide. Pallid being all prickly and stuff is nice since its getting reactions and at least a few of us talking. GL has done nothing but RP. And we have Capt & Denul flailing around like Doc OC at a stripper convention.


Hmmm a stripper convention


Yes. I like it.

#120 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 22 May 2014 - 01:00 PM

View PostHood, on 22 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

I'm in and out - busy at work but should be able to drop a few posts in here and there.

View PostDenul, on 22 May 2014 - 12:15 PM, said:

View PostPallid, on 22 May 2014 - 12:10 PM, said:

post eaten, trying again.

the gist of it was:

blah blah blah, labelling symp is an easy way to coast through two lynches, I cf inno 'aha symp!' you chase my 'master' they inno, the symp was clearly distracting by fake symping! Lynch him before he causes any more confusion!

its a tactic we've seen before and hey, I've used it before, all of a sudden people will not be happy until fener is lynched, because lio dropped the second vote bam straight ul after the first, and I didn't like that, had there been a case I could have been accused of defending him, but there's not, its being written off as 'oh well chuckle chuckle its fener, gotta expect a few votes as fener' bollocks. The first vote slid as the chuckle its fener vote, anything after is opportunism and no more. So denul, kindly stop trying to shepherd this thread in the direction you want it to go, because it ain't happening, we west the big boy pants now, and can do what we want without you telling us how it should be.
How about this, you're symping Lio by defending him!! Just as stupid as what you are aiming at me, so deal with it.

back to normal service, my votes staying where it is for now, because I like it and beyond denul I don't fancy sticking it anywhere else just now.

edit, info to inno


Very tunnel visioned of you. Ignore the rest of the thread. This response pleases me and I wouldn't have got it without prodding you further.

So let's see why Lio jumped onto the Fener vote and then removed himself so sheepishly when people say it looked bad.

Remove Vote

Vote Liosan


I don't mind pushing in a different direction. I'd prefer an open mind early in the day until I get better reads and more information.


As soon as Pallid accuses you of voting for Liosan here you switch to vote for Liosan. I'm wondering if perhaps you're a bit too afraid of getting tagged as scummy on Day 1?



I don't mind been tagged as anything HP. You got anything else to add? After Pallid explained himself, I was a lot happier with his response. If you go back to my read before this response by Pallid...

Spoiler


You can see I thought his dropped vote was suspicious. People found his vote suspicious whereas I didn't like the way he dropped it when people give him a negative reaction towards it. Kind of like he didn't want the pressure.

Share this topic:


  • 55 Pages +
  • « First
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users