[Venesara]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:01 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 12:23 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

If I do go down, my alignment, strategy and intentions will be very clearly town.
If I don't go down, let's not talk about that. in the mean-time, I'd like to call attention to the following, which partly set up my current lynch.

Venesara, on 07 May 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 05 May 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:

Second, and out again - this is purely a courtesy visit. I will post more in 12-14 hours when at work.

So he had time to post at work but all he gave us was this...

Hentos Ilm, on 06 May 2014 - 12:26 PM, said:

Well, disappointing amount of replies, but that makes it at the very least easy to catch up.

Regarding the taking of contracts: since there are priority lists, it seems to me as if the confirmed contracts were the top of the priority-lists. If someone at a low priority requests a contract and higher prio players haven't checked in/submitted yet, those would be on hold, I imagine.

Let's see. That first post was the second player post of the game. The second quoted post was.... drumroll.... post # 37. Page 1. When Ven themselves was voting for a player for a misspelling of their name, several of the players hadn't checked in and we were firmly in no-content-land from just about everyone.

For those who don't bother checking back, it might seem a decent 'non-content' summary. Once you do check back, see that post in the context, it becomes a cheap shot and a bit of a silly case. To provide full context, I might add that, even if in the hour after that post, conversation catches up a bit.

That is not why you are being voted for. So what are you trying to say here?

Who would you vote for?

It might not be what I am voted for, (what the fuck am I voted for apart from no content, which is what your case is?) it is still a related set up due to bad reasoning.


I'd vote you, first and foremost. People fall over themselves to PI you on day 2 after a day 1 that was lynchless, and there have been multiple weird suggestions from you as well as the odd... let's call it... wording surrounding the contract. We are two days into the game and yet you start saying already that half the town doesn't react in its interests. Who are you to judge? In the same vein, your 'suggestion' that people shouldn't pick up the new contracts. Why? Half your posts are judgments, the others are recommendations without explanations.
Your voting pattern is odd, as well: you're jumping a lot. I also don't like how Demelain is giving you blowjobs every time he reacts to you.

So yeah, I'd search there.

Otherwise, Korbas' case is shaky (and probably rightly ignored) but it's original. He does a lot to deflate it, yet Tholen wants to bring it up again. That tickles my fancy as well.

I think it is the FACT that I relinquished a contract today mate for the sole purpose of letting you guys know which one I had. Someone else dropped one too but neither was a killing contract. So there are two people out there with a killing contract and one of them isn't me, FACT.

So the fact you didn't have a killing contract makes you no scum, is that your reasoning? That's very circumstantial and can even easily be plotted in advance if there's more than 3 scum by submitting a list of contracts you want. What you are actually saying here is: "Look at me being town, I even give you free info about me!"

WTF. If you feel so incredibly town and work so hard to PI yourself, why do you then release the contract that can best protect you and cause scum the loss of a NK, hmmm?


And not to detract from your reasoning, but actually, there's 3 contracts. Anti-Tank, Rupture and Blood-Induced Matter Transportation.



But who cares anyway, I am the consensus lynch.

I don't get you, a relinquished contract can be picked up again by anyone

[Ryllandaras]

Demelain said:

1399558027[/url]' post='1123242']
sure thats cool.

i do admit if my hunch is wrong im gonna look funny. if ven is scum im gonna look really ba. as would you turning out town.

my main thing is last game we lost players worth keeping to poor lynch decisions. this time id like to try keep as many players we can PI in game.

i did start of saying as much. we're playing a game where players can and should be looking to pi each other. we can zone out scum early. thats all im trying to do.

players who can look into questionable players should make this easy if we work it out systematically.

I agree. There are many ways for town to PI each other using the effects and side effects of abilities. Lynches aren't necessarily the be all and end all yet.

[Venesara]

You may be right, but two kills a night does not bode well for town, we'll lose our tool of getting rid of scum.

[Hentos Ilm]

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 02:13 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:01 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 12:23 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

If I do go down, my alignment, strategy and intentions will be very clearly town.
If I don't go down, let's not talk about that. in the mean-time, I'd like to call attention to the following, which partly set up my current lynch.

Venesara, on 07 May 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 05 May 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:

Second, and out again - this is purely a courtesy visit. I will post more in 12-14 hours when at work.

So he had time to post at work but all he gave us was this...

Hentos Ilm, on 06 May 2014 - 12:26 PM, said:

Well, disappointing amount of replies, but that makes it at the very least easy to catch up.

Regarding the taking of contracts: since there are priority lists, it seems to me as if the confirmed contracts were the top of the priority-lists. If someone at a low priority requests a contract and higher prio players haven't checked in/submitted yet, those would be on hold, I imagine.

Let's see. That first post was the second player post of the game. The second quoted post was.... drumroll.... post # 37. Page 1. When Ven themselves was voting for a player for a misspelling of their name, several of the players hadn't checked in and we were firmly in no-content-land from just about everyone.

For those who don't bother checking back, it might seem a decent 'non-content' summary. Once you do check back, see that post in the context, it becomes a cheap shot and a bit of a silly case. To provide full context, I might add that, even if in the hour after that post, conversation catches up a bit.

That is not why you are being voted for. So what are you trying to say here?

Who would you vote for?

It might not be what I am voted for, (what the fuck am I voted for apart from no content, which is what your case is?) it is still a related set up due to bad reasoning.


I'd vote you, first and foremost. People fall over themselves to PI you on day 2 after a day 1 that was lynchless, and there have been multiple weird suggestions from you as well as the odd... let's call it... wording surrounding the contract. We are two days into the game and yet you start saying already that half the town doesn't react in its interests. Who are you to judge? In the same vein, your 'suggestion' that people shouldn't pick up the new contracts. Why? Half your posts are judgments, the others are recommendations without explanations.
Your voting pattern is odd, as well: you're jumping a lot. I also don't like how Demelain is giving you blowjobs every time he reacts to you.

So yeah, I'd search there.

Otherwise, Korbas' case is shaky (and probably rightly ignored) but it's original. He does a lot to deflate it, yet Tholen wants to bring it up again. That tickles my fancy as well.

I think it is the FACT that I relinquished a contract today mate for the sole purpose of letting you guys know which one I had. Someone else dropped one too but neither was a killing contract. So there are two people out there with a killing contract and one of them isn't me, FACT.

So the fact you didn't have a killing contract makes you no scum, is that your reasoning? That's very circumstantial and can even easily be plotted in advance if there's more than 3 scum by submitting a list of contracts you want. What you are actually saying here is: "Look at me being town, I even give you free info about me!"

WTF. If you feel so incredibly town and work so hard to PI yourself, why do you then release the contract that can best protect you and cause scum the loss of a NK, hmmm?


And not to detract from your reasoning, but actually, there's 3 contracts. Anti-Tank, Rupture and Blood-Induced Matter Transportation.



But who cares anyway, I am the consensus lynch.

I don't get you, a relinquished contract can be picked up again by anyone

Yup. And if you are scum, you'll still pick first so there's no harm in relinquishing contracts until a better one shows up. So what does it prove? Nothing at all because it costs you nothing.

@ Demelain: circular argument. You want to keep the PIs around but the PI you want to keep around can easily turn into a questionable person. It's very funny that Karatallid, myself and Anthras all think Ven is scummy and all that happens is him and you shouting LALALALALALALALA CAN'T HEAR YOU, LOOK HE RELINQUISHED A CONTRACT LALALALALALALA.

For all you know, I could be a person worth keeping around, too, but I don't see you hesitate in this case.

[Korvalain]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:01 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 12:23 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

If I do go down, my alignment, strategy and intentions will be very clearly town.
If I don't go down, let's not talk about that. in the mean-time, I'd like to call attention to the following, which partly set up my current lynch.

Venesara, on 07 May 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 05 May 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:

Second, and out again - this is purely a courtesy visit. I will post more in 12-14 hours when at work.

So he had time to post at work but all he gave us was this...

Hentos Ilm, on 06 May 2014 - 12:26 PM, said:

Well, disappointing amount of replies, but that makes it at the very least easy to catch up.

Regarding the taking of contracts: since there are priority lists, it seems to me as if the confirmed contracts were the top of the priority-lists. If someone at a low priority requests a contract and higher prio players haven't checked in/submitted yet, those would be on hold, I imagine.

Let's see. That first post was the second player post of the game. The second quoted post was.... drumroll.... post # 37. Page 1. When Ven themselves was voting for a player for a misspelling of their name, several of the players hadn't checked in and we were firmly in no-content-land from just about everyone.

For those who don't bother checking back, it might seem a decent 'non-content' summary. Once you do check back, see that post in the context, it becomes a cheap shot and a bit of a silly case. To provide full context, I might add that, even if in the hour after that post, conversation catches up a bit.

That is not why you are being voted for. So what are you trying to say here?

Who would you vote for?

It might not be what I am voted for, (what the fuck am I voted for apart from no content, which is what your case is?) it is still a related set up due to bad reasoning.


I'd vote you, first and foremost. People fall over themselves to PI you on day 2 after a day 1 that was lynchless, and there have been multiple weird suggestions from you as well as the odd... let's call it... wording surrounding the contract. We are two days into the game and yet you start saying already that half the town doesn't react in its interests. Who are you to judge? In the same vein, your 'suggestion' that people shouldn't pick up the new contracts. Why? Half your posts are judgments, the others are recommendations without explanations.
Your voting pattern is odd, as well: you're jumping a lot. I also don't like how Demelain is giving you blowjobs every time he reacts to you.

So yeah, I'd search there.

Otherwise, Korbas' case is shaky (and probably rightly ignored) but it's original. He does a lot to deflate it, yet Tholen wants to bring it up again. That tickles my fancy as well.

I think it is the FACT that I relinquished a contract today mate for the sole purpose of letting you guys know which one I had. Someone else dropped one too but neither was a killing contract. So there are two people out there with a killing contract and one of them isn't me, FACT.

So the fact you didn't have a killing contract makes you no scum, is that your reasoning? That's very circumstantial and can even easily be plotted in advance if there's more than 3 scum by submitting a list of contracts you want. What you are actually saying here is: "Look at me being town, I even give you free info about me!"

WTF. If you feel so incredibly town and work so hard to PI yourself, why do you then release the contract that can best protect you and cause scum the loss of a NK, hmmm?


And not to detract from your reasoning, but actually, there's 3 contracts. Anti-Tank, Rupture and Blood-Induced Matter Transportation.



But who cares anyway, I am the consensus lynch.

The fact he had a contract that WAS NOT ONE OF THE FIRST FIVE TAKEN makes him not-scum. Unless you think we have 5 or more scum in game.

[Hentos Ilm]

Korvalain, on 08 May 2014 - 02:40 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:01 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 12:23 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

If I do go down, my alignment, strategy and intentions will be very clearly town.
If I don't go down, let's not talk about that. in the mean-time, I'd like to call attention to the following, which partly set up my current lynch.

Venesara, on 07 May 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 05 May 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:

Second, and out again - this is purely a courtesy visit. I will post more in 12-14 hours when at work.

So he had time to post at work but all he gave us was this...

Hentos Ilm, on 06 May 2014 - 12:26 PM, said:

Well, disappointing amount of replies, but that makes it at the very least easy to catch up.

Regarding the taking of contracts: since there are priority lists, it seems to me as if the confirmed contracts were the top of the priority-lists. If someone at a low priority requests a contract and higher prio players haven't checked in/submitted yet, those would be on hold, I imagine.

Let's see. That first post was the second player post of the game. The second quoted post was.... drumroll.... post # 37. Page 1. When Ven themselves was voting for a player for a misspelling of their name, several of the players hadn't checked in and we were firmly in no-content-land from just about everyone.

For those who don't bother checking back, it might seem a decent 'non-content' summary. Once you do check back, see that post in the context, it becomes a cheap shot and a bit of a silly case. To provide full context, I might add that, even if in the hour after that post, conversation catches up a bit.

That is not why you are being voted for. So what are you trying to say here?

Who would you vote for?

It might not be what I am voted for, (what the fuck am I voted for apart from no content, which is what your case is?) it is still a related set up due to bad reasoning.


I'd vote you, first and foremost. People fall over themselves to PI you on day 2 after a day 1 that was lynchless, and there have been multiple weird suggestions from you as well as the odd... let's call it... wording surrounding the contract. We are two days into the game and yet you start saying already that half the town doesn't react in its interests. Who are you to judge? In the same vein, your 'suggestion' that people shouldn't pick up the new contracts. Why? Half your posts are judgments, the others are recommendations without explanations.
Your voting pattern is odd, as well: you're jumping a lot. I also don't like how Demelain is giving you blowjobs every time he reacts to you.

So yeah, I'd search there.

Otherwise, Korbas' case is shaky (and probably rightly ignored) but it's original. He does a lot to deflate it, yet Tholen wants to bring it up again. That tickles my fancy as well.

I think it is the FACT that I relinquished a contract today mate for the sole purpose of letting you guys know which one I had. Someone else dropped one too but neither was a killing contract. So there are two people out there with a killing contract and one of them isn't me, FACT.

So the fact you didn't have a killing contract makes you no scum, is that your reasoning? That's very circumstantial and can even easily be plotted in advance if there's more than 3 scum by submitting a list of contracts you want. What you are actually saying here is: "Look at me being town, I even give you free info about me!"

WTF. If you feel so incredibly town and work so hard to PI yourself, why do you then release the contract that can best protect you and cause scum the loss of a NK, hmmm?


And not to detract from your reasoning, but actually, there's 3 contracts. Anti-Tank, Rupture and Blood-Induced Matter Transportation.



But who cares anyway, I am the consensus lynch.

The fact he had a contract that WAS NOT ONE OF THE FIRST FIVE TAKEN makes him not-scum. Unless you think we have 5 or more scum in game.

In that case, why don't we all fucking drop our contracts, hmmm?

[Hentos Ilm]

In other words, I doubt it really matters. I can see scum being able of naming one contract, that might be taken before it's his turn. He has nothing else named, so he passes. Then, once all passes have happened, he picks another contract.

Example;

Scummy McScummerson has the #3 pick. He picks AT rifle.
AT Rifle is picked by player #1.

D'rek moves resolves 2, tells Scummy McScummerson AT Rifle is taken, that there is no second choice, and moves on, resolves player #4, #5 and player #6.
Scummy McScummerson logs on, selects an open contract, and submits that.


Problem solved, doesn't take a genius either.

[Venesara]

Seriously, not long left to go. Hentos who would you pick right now?

Stop getting butt hurt because we are currently on your train, your defense feels quite... sulky!

[Venesara]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

In other words, I doubt it really matters. I can see scum being able of naming one contract, that might be taken before it's his turn. He has nothing else named, so he passes. Then, once all passes have happened, he picks another contract.

Example;

Scummy McScummerson has the #3 pick. He picks AT rifle.
AT Rifle is picked by player #1.

D'rek moves resolves 2, tells Scummy McScummerson AT Rifle is taken, that there is no second choice, and moves on, resolves player #4, #5 and player #6.
Scummy McScummerson logs on, selects an open contract, and submits that.

Problem solved, doesn't take a genius either.

No doesn't work that way. From what I can tell you put in what you want first and then a provisional list of what you want next. The BP wasn't the first thing I asked for yesterday, shit I don't know if I can say what it is I asked for because I haven't had it.

The BP was the one I ended up with yesterday though, and relinquished it today to stop a lazy lynch

I knew I had to because you had your chance day one and didn't take it.

[Korvalain]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:52 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 08 May 2014 - 02:40 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:01 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 12:23 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:

If I do go down, my alignment, strategy and intentions will be very clearly town.
If I don't go down, let's not talk about that. in the mean-time, I'd like to call attention to the following, which partly set up my current lynch.

Venesara, on 07 May 2014 - 11:03 AM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 05 May 2014 - 06:12 PM, said:

Second, and out again - this is purely a courtesy visit. I will post more in 12-14 hours when at work.

So he had time to post at work but all he gave us was this...

Hentos Ilm, on 06 May 2014 - 12:26 PM, said:

Well, disappointing amount of replies, but that makes it at the very least easy to catch up.

Regarding the taking of contracts: since there are priority lists, it seems to me as if the confirmed contracts were the top of the priority-lists. If someone at a low priority requests a contract and higher prio players haven't checked in/submitted yet, those would be on hold, I imagine.

Let's see. That first post was the second player post of the game. The second quoted post was.... drumroll.... post # 37. Page 1. When Ven themselves was voting for a player for a misspelling of their name, several of the players hadn't checked in and we were firmly in no-content-land from just about everyone.

For those who don't bother checking back, it might seem a decent 'non-content' summary. Once you do check back, see that post in the context, it becomes a cheap shot and a bit of a silly case. To provide full context, I might add that, even if in the hour after that post, conversation catches up a bit.

That is not why you are being voted for. So what are you trying to say here?

Who would you vote for?

It might not be what I am voted for, (what the fuck am I voted for apart from no content, which is what your case is?) it is still a related set up due to bad reasoning.


I'd vote you, first and foremost. People fall over themselves to PI you on day 2 after a day 1 that was lynchless, and there have been multiple weird suggestions from you as well as the odd... let's call it... wording surrounding the contract. We are two days into the game and yet you start saying already that half the town doesn't react in its interests. Who are you to judge? In the same vein, your 'suggestion' that people shouldn't pick up the new contracts. Why? Half your posts are judgments, the others are recommendations without explanations.
Your voting pattern is odd, as well: you're jumping a lot. I also don't like how Demelain is giving you blowjobs every time he reacts to you.

So yeah, I'd search there.

Otherwise, Korbas' case is shaky (and probably rightly ignored) but it's original. He does a lot to deflate it, yet Tholen wants to bring it up again. That tickles my fancy as well.

I think it is the FACT that I relinquished a contract today mate for the sole purpose of letting you guys know which one I had. Someone else dropped one too but neither was a killing contract. So there are two people out there with a killing contract and one of them isn't me, FACT.

So the fact you didn't have a killing contract makes you no scum, is that your reasoning? That's very circumstantial and can even easily be plotted in advance if there's more than 3 scum by submitting a list of contracts you want. What you are actually saying here is: "Look at me being town, I even give you free info about me!"

WTF. If you feel so incredibly town and work so hard to PI yourself, why do you then release the contract that can best protect you and cause scum the loss of a NK, hmmm?


And not to detract from your reasoning, but actually, there's 3 contracts. Anti-Tank, Rupture and Blood-Induced Matter Transportation.



But who cares anyway, I am the consensus lynch.

The fact he had a contract that WAS NOT ONE OF THE FIRST FIVE TAKEN makes him not-scum. Unless you think we have 5 or more scum in game.

In that case, why don't we all fucking drop our contracts, hmmm?

Because then we'd be back where we started. There was two contracts dropped. Both were signed up *after* scum had theirs. Both those holders cannot be scum due to contract selection order. One is owned up to and no-one has counter-claimed so it is a solid claim.

[Venesara]

Path-Shaper, on 08 May 2014 - 01:23 PM, said:

It is Day 2. 3 hours and 38 minutes remain.

12 players are alive: Anthras, Demelain, Hanas, Hentos Ilm, Karatallid, Kaschan, Korbas, Korvalain, Pran Chole, Ryllandaras, Tholen, Venesara

7 votes to lynch. 6 votes to go to night.

3 votes for Hentos Ilm (Korbas, Venesara, Demelain, Korvalain)

Is this right?

[Venesara]

Which contract has a vote blocking ability?

[Korvalain]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

In other words, I doubt it really matters. I can see scum being able of naming one contract, that might be taken before it's his turn. He has nothing else named, so he passes. Then, once all passes have happened, he picks another contract.

Example;

Scummy McScummerson has the #3 pick. He picks AT rifle.
AT Rifle is picked by player #1.

D'rek moves resolves 2, tells Scummy McScummerson AT Rifle is taken, that there is no second choice, and moves on, resolves player #4, #5 and player #6.
Scummy McScummerson logs on, selects an open contract, and submits that.


Problem solved, doesn't take a genius either.

A genius like you who didn't read the OP, sure.

Contract claiming is held up by the lack of choice, it does not skip them - they make a call on contracts from the available list, until then PS holds up and waits. Hence Korbs catches of contract claim order on Day 1 being important

[Hentos Ilm]

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

Seriously, not long left to go. Hentos who would you pick right now?

Stop getting butt hurt because we are currently on your train, your defense feels quite... sulky!

You, you stupid dick. How many times do I have to repeat myself? You are scum. Plain and simple, and your own dodgy logic aside, you have two little helpers with very little reasoning apart from naive, easily disarmed suppositions going on.


Furthermore, knowing what I had planned, I am pretty sure you guys will feel more hurt in the butt upon CF than my forehead is feeling from the repeated facepalming I am doing.


Seriously, the amount of defense you're getting, should raise all alarmbells .

[Korvalain]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 03:01 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

Seriously, not long left to go. Hentos who would you pick right now?

Stop getting butt hurt because we are currently on your train, your defense feels quite... sulky!

You, you stupid dick. How many times do I have to repeat myself? You are scum. Plain and simple, and your own dodgy logic aside, you have two little helpers with very little reasoning apart from naive, easily disarmed suppositions going on.


Furthermore, knowing what I had planned, I am pretty sure you guys will feel more hurt in the butt upon CF than my forehead is feeling from the repeated facepalming I am doing.


Seriously, the amount of defense you're getting, should raise all alarmbells .

I'll counter that with the amount of stupidity you're showing warrants putting down.

Read the OP. Read it good. Now apply all you read there to the situation we had.

[Venesara]

Step back Hentos. As town you need to be flexible.

If I am not scum.

Who is setting me up? Does it benefit them to no lynch day one and keep focus on me?

What do you suggest going forward?

If you keep harping on about me being scum I have lost hope that you are indeed a town player. I cannot see you being a dumb player because there are none.

[Korvalain]

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 02:59 PM, said:

Which contract has a vote blocking ability?

And whose vote is blocked?

One way to find out - this is for test only and will be going back to Hentos once PS updates again...

Remove Vote

Vote Karatallid

[Hentos Ilm]

Korvalain, on 08 May 2014 - 03:00 PM, said:

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 02:56 PM, said:

In other words, I doubt it really matters. I can see scum being able of naming one contract, that might be taken before it's his turn. He has nothing else named, so he passes. Then, once all passes have happened, he picks another contract.

Example;

Scummy McScummerson has the #3 pick. He picks AT rifle.
AT Rifle is picked by player #1.

D'rek moves resolves 2, tells Scummy McScummerson AT Rifle is taken, that there is no second choice, and moves on, resolves player #4, #5 and player #6.
Scummy McScummerson logs on, selects an open contract, and submits that.

Problem solved, doesn't take a genius either.

A genius like you who didn't read the OP, sure.

Contract claiming is held up by the lack of choice, it does not skip them - they make a call on contracts from the available list, until then PS holds up and waits. Hence Korbs catches of contract claim order on Day 1 being important

Well. All I can say: Ven's playstyle screams scum. Maybe I reach too, but I doubt the game could be solved that easily.

[Hentos Ilm]

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 03:03 PM, said:

Step back Hentos. As town you need to be flexible.

If I am not scum.

Who is setting me up? Does it benefit them to no lynch day one and keep focus on me?

What do you suggest going forward?

If you keep harping on about me being scum I have lost hope that you are indeed a town player. I cannot see you being a dumb player because there are none.

Oh wait, I am not allowed to fucking stick to my fucking guns when it concerns you because "I need to be flexible?"
"I give up hope you are indeed a town player."

As if "we don't need the information from the lynch and it is toooooooooo late to switch."

[Venesara]

Hentos Ilm, on 08 May 2014 - 03:09 PM, said:

Venesara, on 08 May 2014 - 03:03 PM, said:

Step back Hentos. As town you need to be flexible.

If I am not scum.

Who is setting me up? Does it benefit them to no lynch day one and keep focus on me?

What do you suggest going forward?

If you keep harping on about me being scum I have lost hope that you are indeed a town player. I cannot see you being a dumb player because there are none.

Oh wait, I am not allowed to fucking stick to my fucking guns when it concerns you because "I need to be flexible?"
"I give up hope you are indeed a town player."

As if "we don't need the information from the lynch and it is toooooooooo late to switch."

No it is not too late to switch.

It looks as though we won't get enough anyway, but I would prefer to move targets if that is what it takes to get the lynch. Though even if we do gain your vote, someone went to bed, Dem?

I feel sorry for D'rek to be honest. This game seems awesome and people are not getting their teeth stuck into it.