[Ryllandaras]

Korbas said:

1400254355[/url]' post='1125350']

Ryllandaras said:

1400253869[/url]' post='1125347']

Korbas said:

1400253441[/url]' post='1125344']
Rhyll, what were your song titles? i.e. posts.

Nothing to Hide, by Rebel Souljhaz. I thought it was apt.

I meant the posts themselves. A bit of proof that you did indeed have pyro.



5 players. 6 contracts registered.

It was like 5 posts in a row. Hang on while i look.

[Ryllandaras]

1376, 79, 80, 81, 83.

[Okaros]

So are we really going to try winning thus game by not doing anything?

[Korbas]

We've got lots of time yet, so

Remove Vote

[Korbas]

Okaros, on 16 May 2014 - 03:56 PM, said:

So are we really going to try winning thus game by not doing anything?

I dislike that idea entirely. But I need to work on my hypothesis a bit first.

And Kara will want to respond I'm sure.

[Korbas]

Okaros, I think you should keep your vote on him though.

[Korbas]

Okaros, what was your opinion of Korvalain. Town or scum?

[Korbas]

Actually that's a question for everyone.

[Ryllandaras]

Scum, his story was convoluted and I'm pretty sure it had a couple of holes in it.

[Okaros]

Korbas, on 16 May 2014 - 04:01 PM, said:

Okaros, what was your opinion of Korvalain. Town or scum?

I think he was most likely scum.

[Korbas]

Hormonal contractor: again, don't target me. I am a leper due to the remuneration.

[Ryllandaras]

Okaros said:

1400255798[/url]' post='1125357']
So are we really going to try winning thus game by not doing anything?

Normally I'm all for pro-active gung-ho action, but Kara's plan seems pretty sensible to me, forces the SK to be flushed out.

[Korbas]

My problem with Kara's plan is simple: if Korv was town, then there could still be a 3rd scum.

Which is why I'm not willing to take Kara at his word. I want some sort of proof. Regardless of time zones, my Possessor did basically tell me to piss off. That was before I put in an order to register Inert. Kara's claim that he couldn't talk to me because of inert is not true.

[Korbas]

My understanding of what Kara is proposing:


Day 6 times out:

Night 6 no kills due to AntiTank being on cooldown.

Day 7, 5 players, no lynch:

Night 7: One NK. AntiTank is burned out.

Dawn 8: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 8: no kills.

Day 9: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 9: no kill

Dawn 10: SK dies due to Consume.


Is my understanding correct?

[Okaros]

Korbas, on 16 May 2014 - 04:22 PM, said:

My understanding of what Kara is proposing:


Day 6 times out:

Night 6 no kills due to AntiTank being on cooldown.

Day 7, 5 players, no lynch:

Night 7: One NK. AntiTank is burned out.

Dawn 8: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 8: no kills.

Day 9: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 9: no kill

Dawn 10: SK dies due to Consume.


Is my understanding correct?

As far as I can tell, yes.

[Ryllandaras]

Sigh. What a dull plan when it's put like that.

[Korbas]

Korbas, on 16 May 2014 - 04:22 PM, said:

My understanding of what Kara is proposing:


Day 6 times out:

Night 6 no kills due to AntiTank being on cooldown.

Day 7, 5 players, no lynch:

Night 7: One NK. AntiTank is burned out.

Dawn 8: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 8: no kills.

Day 9: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 9: no kill

Dawn 10: SK dies due to Consume.


Is my understanding correct?

So I will add RIO to the mix and assume the SK has possession:


Day 6 times out:

Night 6 no kills due to AntiTank being on cooldown.

Day 7, 5 players, no lynch:

Night 7: One NK. AntiTank is burned out.

Dawn 8: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. SK registers RIO and let's AntiTank go. Let day timeout.

Night 8: no kills. RIO is used.

Day 9: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. One minute to timeout: SK votes for RIO'd target. Let day timeout.

Night 9: RIO target dies.

Dawn 10: 3 players. 2 town and one SK. SK possesses townie. Unpossessed townie is lynched.

Night 10: RIO is used.

Day 11: 2 players. Sk votes night.

[Ryllandaras]

I mean, sensible...but talk about sapping all life out of the game.

[Ryllandaras]

I actually thought about that possibility, Korbas. But all town would have to do is vote night rather than let day time out on day 8 - thus actually killing the SK because they didn't get the chance to vote for their victim. It forces them to vote earlier - but if that happens then instead of voting night we just vote them.

[Okaros]

Korbas, on 16 May 2014 - 04:31 PM, said:

Korbas, on 16 May 2014 - 04:22 PM, said:

My understanding of what Kara is proposing:


Day 6 times out:

Night 6 no kills due to AntiTank being on cooldown.

Day 7, 5 players, no lynch:

Night 7: One NK. AntiTank is burned out.

Dawn 8: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 8: no kills.

Day 9: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. Let day timeout.

Night 9: no kill

Dawn 10: SK dies due to Consume.


Is my understanding correct?

So I will add RIO to the mix and assume the SK has possession:


Day 6 times out:

Night 6 no kills due to AntiTank being on cooldown.

Day 7, 5 players, no lynch:

Night 7: One NK. AntiTank is burned out.

Dawn 8: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. SK registers RIO and let's AntiTank go. Let day timeout.

Night 8: no kills. RIO is used.

Day 9: 4 players. 3 town and one sk. It takes 3 to lynch, so even possession won't get a lynch. One minute to timeout: SK votes for RIO'd target. Let day timeout.

Night 9: RIO target dies.

Dawn 10: 3 players. 2 town and one SK. SK possesses townie. Unpossessed townie is lynched.

Night 10: RIO is used.

Day 11: 2 players. Sk votes night.

The SK would HAVE to possess the RIO'd target, otherwise they could just say on thread that they've been Ruptured, and we can lynch them, thus killing the SK the night he expects to get a death to consume.