Malazan Empire: Mafia 110: I spy, with my little eye.... - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 63 Pages +
  • « First
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Mafia 110: I spy, with my little eye.... back to where I started

#361 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:27 PM

Tiam continued:



Quote


2. The support of a high posting Day 1

3.Somewhat unusual interpolation of events



Just piggy back on everything already highlighted.

Tiam has always said he liked the drive for numbers but a few times he claims to follow the reasoning behind Rikkters strategy.

He supported the loudest player after this admission and frowned on any one Low posting. I'm calling this a look left and go right manouevre and he is gooood at it. I don't think I need to go back and quote that many individual instances as several of you guys already have.
Tiams said he hoped to unleash his level 5 powers...well here we are driving for it. too bad its his history that has the most interesting content.

I will quote my original case on Tiam. I admit from here I jumped to monok and then on to GL. There was a lot bothering about Tiam beforehand though.

My commentary with Day 2 insight in bracketed red.

View PostBek Okhan, on 31 March 2014 - 11:12 PM, said:

View PostTiamatha, on 31 March 2014 - 03:19 PM, said:

View PostAmpelas, on 31 March 2014 - 03:16 PM, said:

View PostTiamatha, on 31 March 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:

I don't understand the votes on either GL or Ampelas. Surely the vote should go on Monok for being the actual gorilla? (SUPPORT)


well done watson! monok didn't mention any gorillas so why pull him into this atm? you did though and now you are already deflecting!!!



Well, because by your logic then surely I'm a symp and Monok is the master, that's why. Of course, your logic has relied heavily on the dumbass factor so far, but you should at least be consistent with it. (Paints Monok as master)


Not even batting an eye at sending the vote at Monok, following Ampelas to the next not so logical conclusion. not scummy but fanning the flames of an already odd signalling case.

View PostTiamatha, on 31 March 2014 - 06:15 PM, said:

Without knowing what, if anything, scum receive on earlier levels, I can only think the more town who reach level 5 the better.


Statistically speaking - and this is really pointing out the obvious - town are more numerous earlier in the game. So, following on from that reasoning, the sooner we reach level 5, the better, as more townies *should* receive their bonuses.


I say *should* because of course there is the unknown factor as to what scum might receive earlier, which could throw the above reasoning out the window, depending on what it is. (Look left and go right? very inconsistent messege)


But one can only work with the information one has, which says more posting = more leveling, more posting sooner = more townies at level 5. Otherwise, the other course of action is stagnation, and freezing in the face of the unknown.


EVERY thing about the underlined and following logic pings my scumdar. Town can't assume rushing to level 5 is helpful. PS seriously disadvises. If we assume that to be an informed warning scums incentive to level up is great. shooting the game from TMDI 2 to TMDI 7!
Thats a crazy level of complication. Town should think about that and realize how level 5 could be undermined by powerful scum, veterans should understand.

(I got several things wrong here. SEVERAL. but I was right to worry about a sudden rush towards leveling without knowing what Scum were working with.)

View PostTiamatha, on 31 March 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:

View PostKessobahn, on 31 March 2014 - 09:31 PM, said:

So are we pursuing a "Level Quickly" Approach or a "Level Slowly" approach?


We appear conflicted (gasp - diverging opinions in mafia!). I would pursue a level quickly approach as I reasoned in an earlier post.

To me, the argument which Rikkter presents, suggesting we take it slow today and spam away day 2, also doesn't make sense. The fear is that scum gain other powers sooner. But surely that's going to happen anyway (It turns out it wasn't. Scum had no powers and this can be seen as fear mongering.. That's not something we can stop, except by not posting at all. So better it happen sooner, when there are more of us around to take the hit, as it were, and more chance of those who might be less essential power-wise to take the flak, than later.

That makes sense to me anyway.



Edit: Changed 'Monok' to 'Rikkter'.


This supports my suspicion of Tiam. scum will thrive in a heard of overactive town trying to rush for levels. scum wants a loud noisy game. Rikkters strategy is sound. our day 1 should go off info collected already in regards to activity and content. the obvious targets perk up pretty quickly and those not so obvious will wind it hard to stay silent if town get good lynch momentum. picking out candidates off history rather than relying on a level 5 power which in our rush to achieve makes it easier to level up scum.


View PostTiamatha, on 31 March 2014 - 09:58 PM, said:

Having said all that, I've just read something in the OP which revises my opinion somewhat.

Quote

P-S announces what level everyone is at the start of night and start of day.



As we know that town will get nothing from Level 1, but we don't know one way or the other if scum will get anything at level 1, it may indeed be worth pursuing Rikkter's idea of not reaching 120 posts before the end of the day, thus avoiding at least one night with killers potentially having another power.

My instinct is to say it probably makes little difference, but it's certainly something worth considering. Apologies to Rikkter, then.


This is Tiams only redeeming post and it feels iffy. I really find it out of place and don't really trust it, the when and how seems to reflect sudden self-consciousness. Perhaps as I watch the thread I will be dissuaded from it but my current read of this game has me suspecting Tiam more than anyone else to be scum.

Tiam is my current vote. If we get trains on one of the other noisier players like Ampelas or GL I'll support it with my vote, otherwise I think I said all I need to.

Vote Tiamatha





After that last red underline...can't think Tiam altered or considered, supported or even reflected Rikkters strategy over GLs push for thread content. Any support of GL after contradicts the admission Rikkters idea is on point.

I find this coupled with his attitude on the train to be highly suspicious. and worthy of scum

#362 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:28 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 06:59 PM, said:

View PostRikkter, on 01 April 2014 - 11:13 AM, said:

Reading comprehension fail. Go and read the OP about when level is announced.

Now that we're past 120 we have a bit of slack for actual play so long as our spamming player do things like manswer lost of things in a single post rather than the series of posts like they are...



This is completely unrelated to anything... but....

I WANT MANSWERS!!!!


Posted Image

#363 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:36 PM

Ok point 5

Quote

5.Open Support of GL


has already been addressed and is evident in every quote running the Tiam as scum angle.

I think Tiam deserves a lynch. Im gonna vote on him but maybe the train can be a bit relaxed? we need to pad our post count and stay well away from hammering till maybe the last two hours or less.

Vote Tiamatha

#364 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:39 PM

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 06:50 PM, said:

@ Denul: Keep reading. hope you see the logic behind that as you continue. scum wanted lethal powers and Day 1 level one wouldn't work for them. we shooting for level 5 as we speak so post up!



So as far as I can read, you've completely 180'd on your opinion about leveling up, but that's not supposed to be suspicious?

I think it's possible, also, that Galayn Lord was voting for you to distance himself from you. I'm still finishing up the reread, I want to see what the other cases are about.

#365 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:40 PM

Starling totally saw you (@_@)

Ok so I'm gonna look back and see if theres a player both Tiam and GL avoided to address at all. If Tiam and GL are scum guess a pattern must exist that lines up with all the signalling.

If I'm wrong about Tiam maybe it will be evident in how they react to any of the other players. all other vote trains need a look too...

#366 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:40 PM

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 07:36 PM, said:

Ok point 5

Quote

5.Open Support of GL


has already been addressed and is evident in every quote running the Tiam as scum angle.

I think Tiam deserves a lynch. Im gonna vote on him but maybe the train can be a bit relaxed? we need to pad our post count and stay well away from hammering till maybe the last two hours or less.

Vote Tiamatha


While I was reading the Day 1 crap, Tiam was the one who stuck out most to me. Problem is, it's basically for pushing so hard to level up. He and GL spent a good chunk of time spamming away.

#367 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:43 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:39 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 06:50 PM, said:

@ Denul: Keep reading. hope you see the logic behind that as you continue. scum wanted lethal powers and Day 1 level one wouldn't work for them. we shooting for level 5 as we speak so post up!



So as far as I can read, you've completely 180'd on your opinion about leveling up, but that's not supposed to be suspicious?

I think it's possible, also, that Galayn Lord was voting for you to distance himself from you. I'm still finishing up the reread, I want to see what the other cases are about.


How have I 180'd? I wanted a low post Day 1. Day 2 would be a safe drive for 600 posts needed to get to level 5 and we have our info as to where scum started so we can gauge new levels between 1 and 5 probably help scum. as we are already well into that we might aswell push for level 5 in earnest. its all there in Rikkters post I'll find it for you.

#368 User is offline   Rikkter 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:43 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:40 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 07:36 PM, said:

Ok point 5

Quote

5.Open Support of GL


has already been addressed and is evident in every quote running the Tiam as scum angle.

I think Tiam deserves a lynch. Im gonna vote on him but maybe the train can be a bit relaxed? we need to pad our post count and stay well away from hammering till maybe the last two hours or less.

Vote Tiamatha


While I was reading the Day 1 crap, Tiam was the one who stuck out most to me. Problem is, it's basically for pushing so hard to level up. He and GL spent a good chunk of time spamming away.


I anticipate the same charge levelled my way tomorrow. Tiam / Ampelas are my 2 top candidates at the moment. Ampelas has done a complete about turn on their posting, 37 D1 to none today so far.

#369 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:44 PM

Can someone explain to me how GL's CF means he's scum? It says he's part of the EU - and in the OP, Scum are noted as being from Hong Kong, the Hau Fat crew, no? Am I just misreading? I assumed EU meant that GL was part of the United Nations Security Council.

#370 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:47 PM

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 07:43 PM, said:

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:39 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 06:50 PM, said:

@ Denul: Keep reading. hope you see the logic behind that as you continue. scum wanted lethal powers and Day 1 level one wouldn't work for them. we shooting for level 5 as we speak so post up!



So as far as I can read, you've completely 180'd on your opinion about leveling up, but that's not supposed to be suspicious?

I think it's possible, also, that Galayn Lord was voting for you to distance himself from you. I'm still finishing up the reread, I want to see what the other cases are about.


How have I 180'd? I wanted a low post Day 1. Day 2 would be a safe drive for 600 posts needed to get to level 5 and we have our info as to where scum started so we can gauge new levels between 1 and 5 probably help scum. as we are already well into that we might aswell push for level 5 in earnest. its all there in Rikkters post I'll find it for you.


So we're basing this on conjecture, then? I mean, there's merit to what Rikkter has said, but you're ready to just believe him? Base your strategy on him?

#371 User is offline   Rikkter 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:47 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 06:59 PM, said:

View PostRikkter, on 01 April 2014 - 11:13 AM, said:

Reading comprehension fail. Go and read the OP about when level is announced.

Now that we're past 120 we have a bit of slack for actual play so long as our spamming player do things like manswer lost of things in a single post rather than the series of posts like they are...



This is completely unrelated to anything... but....

I WANT MANSWERS!!!!


Heh

http://gotmanswers.blogspot.co.uk/

#372 User is offline   Rikkter 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:48 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:44 PM, said:

Can someone explain to me how GL's CF means he's scum? It says he's part of the EU - and in the OP, Scum are noted as being from Hong Kong, the Hau Fat crew, no? Am I just misreading? I assumed EU meant that GL was part of the United Nations Security Council.


He didn't CF as RI, he CF'd as Henchman. PS states RI for town or <unknown> for scum. Henchman = scum

#373 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:50 PM

View PostRikkter, on 02 April 2014 - 07:48 PM, said:

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:44 PM, said:

Can someone explain to me how GL's CF means he's scum? It says he's part of the EU - and in the OP, Scum are noted as being from Hong Kong, the Hau Fat crew, no? Am I just misreading? I assumed EU meant that GL was part of the United Nations Security Council.


He didn't CF as RI, he CF'd as Henchman. PS states RI for town or <unknown> for scum. Henchman = scum



Ah, I missed that - I stand corrected!

#374 User is offline   Rikkter 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:51 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:47 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 07:43 PM, said:

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:39 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 06:50 PM, said:

@ Denul: Keep reading. hope you see the logic behind that as you continue. scum wanted lethal powers and Day 1 level one wouldn't work for them. we shooting for level 5 as we speak so post up!



So as far as I can read, you've completely 180'd on your opinion about leveling up, but that's not supposed to be suspicious?

I think it's possible, also, that Galayn Lord was voting for you to distance himself from you. I'm still finishing up the reread, I want to see what the other cases are about.


How have I 180'd? I wanted a low post Day 1. Day 2 would be a safe drive for 600 posts needed to get to level 5 and we have our info as to where scum started so we can gauge new levels between 1 and 5 probably help scum. as we are already well into that we might aswell push for level 5 in earnest. its all there in Rikkters post I'll find it for you.


So we're basing this on conjecture, then? I mean, there's merit to what Rikkter has said, but you're ready to just believe him? Base your strategy on him?


What would your alternative Day 1 strategy have been?

#375 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 07:51 PM

Rikkters suggested strategy: For even further ease of reference, highlighted below

View PostRikkter, on 01 April 2014 - 10:12 PM, said:

For ease of reference, repeated below

View PostRikkter, on 31 March 2014 - 04:57 PM, said:

View PostGalayn Lord, on 31 March 2014 - 04:17 PM, said:

View PostAmpelas, on 31 March 2014 - 04:15 PM, said:

also, gl, why do you assume scum already have abilities.... ?


WCS dictates they do. It's only logical.


WCS also says that scum gain abilities at levels 1, 2, 3 and 4 because otherwise why not have just level 0 (scum abilities only) and 1 (town get one-shot abilities.)

I'd rather a quiet Day 1 and we see what scum start with at level 0 and then spam discuss the hell out of Day 2 to get to level 5.

On the basis that scum probably want to level up that bit more on Day 1 than town do,

Vote Galayn Lord

who is almost (27/120) a quarter of the way to levelling everyone up to level 1 by themself.



Thats what I'm operating on and its a strategy I've followed since PS corrected me.

#376 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 08:05 PM

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:47 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 07:43 PM, said:

View PostDenul, on 02 April 2014 - 07:39 PM, said:

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 06:50 PM, said:

@ Denul: Keep reading. hope you see the logic behind that as you continue. scum wanted lethal powers and Day 1 level one wouldn't work for them. we shooting for level 5 as we speak so post up!



So as far as I can read, you've completely 180'd on your opinion about leveling up, but that's not supposed to be suspicious?

I think it's possible, also, that Galayn Lord was voting for you to distance himself from you. I'm still finishing up the reread, I want to see what the other cases are about.


How have I 180'd? I wanted a low post Day 1. Day 2 would be a safe drive for 600 posts needed to get to level 5 and we have our info as to where scum started so we can gauge new levels between 1 and 5 probably help scum. as we are already well into that we might aswell push for level 5 in earnest. its all there in Rikkters post I'll find it for you.


So we're basing this on conjecture, then? I mean, there's merit to what Rikkter has said, but you're ready to just believe him? Base your strategy on him?


The read on Rikkters posts line up well with my own and honestly thats what I expect town to do. Scum won't want the playing field to be level, especially one man down. Level 5 is "theoretically" in our favor.

Rikkters strategy flew in the face of what GL was hoping to achieve at every level. I think he's played a good town game and I need to trust my own read of players to make deductions.

Its up to you if you want to delve deeper into Rikkter or myself, build a case if you like. It helps town if more of us are close to certain of each other.

#377 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 08:12 PM

also Denul you arent above suspicion because you're new.I'll have a look and see what GL and Tiam had to say about you. something rings a bell.

#378 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 08:25 PM

View PostTiamatha, on 01 April 2014 - 08:04 PM, said:

View PostAmpelas, on 01 April 2014 - 07:46 PM, said:

question

so the lock vote is kinda out of nowhere, we have just a few hours or less left and you are putting your vote on a new train? that doesn't seem like you are trying to get a lynch today. would you prefer a no-lynch? didn't you suggest just voting night at some point? basically you're either trying to derail the day 1 lynch, you want distance from GL, or you are voting lock mostly based on gut as you said. i'm not going to hassle you about your vote choice but are you willling/not willing to switch to gl to get a lynch? your suspicion of lock has been registered, perhaps unnecessarily. also that you are conviced gl is town, well, it is still day 1. i agree his actions seem to line up that way but at this point i don't know how you PI somebody on day 1 without some clear evidence

who else would you vote besides lock? you didn't really say, but basically just cleared alkend, mo, and gl from your list and pulled lock's name out of a hat.

anyway curious to hear your thoughts back...



I should have voted earlier to be fair, but I was hoping something more concrete might come up. It didn't, so I'm putting out where my suspicions lie, even if they're not backed up by strong evidence.

My statement of voting night was sarcastic in the extreme, not serious.

I do want to get a lynch today, even though we likely have Denul's modkill coming up. I just don't think GL is the right way to go, and out of the people with votes currently on them, I'm most convinced by that out of all of them. Out of the other ones with votes on them, I would be least against voting for Bek Okhan.



If you look at the way Tiam talks about modkill it all but echoes GL

View PostGalayn Lord, on 01 April 2014 - 01:09 PM, said:

It looks like Denul will get Modkilled at this rate. I hope not but there is no point in voting for them. I have only just noticed Okral Lom hasn't posted either.Remove VoteI want to go back and have a look at Bek Okhan, he rubbed me the wrong way on a few posts.


Both of them seem a bit hard pressed about this modkill possibility...I wonder

If Denul was absent during night that would also explain our lack of a night event assuming Denul is a killer that is. and that the story behind not being online at all and not knowing when the game would start is true....

hmmn. I don't know if I'm reaching but it just looks really strange to have a signalling case attached to GLs vote on Denul and then this echoed lament.

#379 User is offline   Bek Okhan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 08:39 PM

5 people in thread. wow. I'd expect a riot by now.

I can post up more tommorow but its pretty late for me and If i'm to get into dialogue with anyone I'm in for atleast another 45 minutes.

#380 User is offline   Denul 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 20-March 13

Posted 02 April 2014 - 08:45 PM

View PostBek Okhan, on 02 April 2014 - 08:25 PM, said:

View PostTiamatha, on 01 April 2014 - 08:04 PM, said:

View PostAmpelas, on 01 April 2014 - 07:46 PM, said:

question

so the lock vote is kinda out of nowhere, we have just a few hours or less left and you are putting your vote on a new train? that doesn't seem like you are trying to get a lynch today. would you prefer a no-lynch? didn't you suggest just voting night at some point? basically you're either trying to derail the day 1 lynch, you want distance from GL, or you are voting lock mostly based on gut as you said. i'm not going to hassle you about your vote choice but are you willling/not willing to switch to gl to get a lynch? your suspicion of lock has been registered, perhaps unnecessarily. also that you are conviced gl is town, well, it is still day 1. i agree his actions seem to line up that way but at this point i don't know how you PI somebody on day 1 without some clear evidence

who else would you vote besides lock? you didn't really say, but basically just cleared alkend, mo, and gl from your list and pulled lock's name out of a hat.

anyway curious to hear your thoughts back...



I should have voted earlier to be fair, but I was hoping something more concrete might come up. It didn't, so I'm putting out where my suspicions lie, even if they're not backed up by strong evidence.

My statement of voting night was sarcastic in the extreme, not serious.

I do want to get a lynch today, even though we likely have Denul's modkill coming up. I just don't think GL is the right way to go, and out of the people with votes currently on them, I'm most convinced by that out of all of them. Out of the other ones with votes on them, I would be least against voting for Bek Okhan.



If you look at the way Tiam talks about modkill it all but echoes GL

View PostGalayn Lord, on 01 April 2014 - 01:09 PM, said:

It looks like Denul will get Modkilled at this rate. I hope not but there is no point in voting for them. I have only just noticed Okral Lom hasn't posted either.Remove VoteI want to go back and have a look at Bek Okhan, he rubbed me the wrong way on a few posts.


Both of them seem a bit hard pressed about this modkill possibility...I wonder

If Denul was absent during night that would also explain our lack of a night event assuming Denul is a killer that is. and that the story behind not being online at all and not knowing when the game would start is true....

hmmn. I don't know if I'm reaching but it just looks really strange to have a signalling case attached to GLs vote on Denul and then this echoed lament.



Well, given that most modkills happen after 36 hours of non-activity, I was sure I was going to be modkilled. I lucked out with Tapper letting me continue playing, after the game has been running for like over 48 hours, and have apologized to him for it.

Anyway, you could be right, I could be scum, best you keep your suspicions, just in case!

Share this topic:


  • 63 Pages +
  • « First
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

7 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users