I just finished Gardens...and I think I hate it...
#61
Posted 07 January 2014 - 02:52 PM
i think that if the Azav tree thingy as it is now called (which i love!) had been introduced too early it would have been too odd and random personally, what with the introduction of super magic weilding at Pale, mega Tiste Andii dragon Soultakens and Tyrant craziness the tree thing might have pushed the whole lot over the edge lol. I also think that magic, and super dark swords of epicness and dragons are more 'main stream' and thus maybe easier to swallow thus the later introduction? Maybe the Azav was supposed to be an unkown given the fact that the Azav are super secret and sneaky and unknown throughout the whole series. That being said, i had zero problem reading GoTM and followed everything happily enough to buy a Kindle Paperwhite and buy the rest of the books and dissolve my real life into them! haha. Not saying I fully understood EVERYTHING first go as a lot was being introduced, that being said I am not pro experienced reader either, my complete reading experience is ASoIaF and the Malazan books as a whole (just about to finish The Healthy Dead) .Peoples minds are wired differently, why do I like Iron Maiden and Metallica but not AC/DC? who knows! but that is just how it is!
"There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail — should we fall — we will know that we have lived." ― Anomander Rake, Son of Darkness
#62
Posted 07 January 2014 - 02:53 PM
Everyone tried to help the best we could.
How do you describe these books? How do you explain the depth of emotion? Where would you start?
All we can do is encourage people to read on. If the reasons we give are not good enough reasons...then don't. I don't think anyone here feels a responsibility to sell the book to anyone. Especially a stranger who spouts negativity to every sincere reply. This set speaks for its self as far as I'm concerned.
No avid reader needs to be sold on a set. Either they read it or they don't...
And if this is a joke by some other member...its a pretty good one....a good joke
How do you describe these books? How do you explain the depth of emotion? Where would you start?
All we can do is encourage people to read on. If the reasons we give are not good enough reasons...then don't. I don't think anyone here feels a responsibility to sell the book to anyone. Especially a stranger who spouts negativity to every sincere reply. This set speaks for its self as far as I'm concerned.
No avid reader needs to be sold on a set. Either they read it or they don't...
And if this is a joke by some other member...its a pretty good one....a good joke
#63
Posted 07 January 2014 - 03:14 PM
Maybe Mr Knightmare is larl_Agongorry reincarnate!
The love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain.
"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." ― Iain Banks
"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." ― Iain Banks
#64
Posted 07 January 2014 - 03:35 PM
Sad, sad day for the OP. It also, for me anyhow, illustrates the different types of people in the world and why the human race has so many conflicts. Super simplified, there are those which the world is either black or white (belief in one specific thing and it takes going to hell and back to change that view) and those who can see the the shades of gray (does not take things on face view, question things, etc).
OP, I can say that GotM was not may introduction into this world, in fact I rarely read fantasy, as I am more of a scifi person. I have read WoT (2nd novel 1st - everyone was passed out and it was just laying there on the table..) and the Tolkien trilogy (but only after I had saw the 1st movie). I also was looking for something, if fantasy, did not have ogres, elves, dwarves, trolls, wizards, witches etc. And I have only read those books only once, never had the inclination to reread them, even to catch up on things. I could not stomach the novels about Drizzt. I picked up two of them in the same way I did the Malazan Books of the Fallen.
So,I was bored and was looking at something to grab my attention that was not a 1 book show and it was initially the cover of Deadhouse Gates with the fiery orange flames, the men on horseback and demon dogs (actual names require more reading
) ready to clamp down. I have happen to have gotten into the habit of picking a random page to read to see if it was good enough to even look at the others. Lets just say the description of some of the bodily functions after being zapped with lightning and the clean up afterwards had me saying a few expletives.
If I had picked up GotM by itself, I am not sure if I would have read anymore of the books. And I did not have the benefit of this forum until after I had read several others, waiting on the next one. The friends (and they their family/friends, around 75 now) that I got hooked onto this series, for the most part also had the same sentiments. For many they had to start with Deathhouse Gate first then went back and read GotM and for a few, they had a better understanding of GotM after being informed it was game played out and setup as a movie script, and of those most of them are in RPG games, so on reflection they could see the game play. A few of the authors in the Battletech world also gameplayed their mech combat.
Read Deathhouse Gates, then the next, and so on. If you have read any of the threads in these forums, most of us have laughed, cried out in despair and anguish, shed a tear in sorrow to the point of having to put the book down and walk away for a bit. Are you able to say the same thing for WoT or LotR? Or for others, were your reactions as extreme and often as it has been with MBotF series as a whole?
Again, it is sad. It falls in line with you can not really judge a book by its cover but with the MBofF series, you can not judge the series by the 1st book, especially since the book was not originally written as the 1st of a series.
OP, I can say that GotM was not may introduction into this world, in fact I rarely read fantasy, as I am more of a scifi person. I have read WoT (2nd novel 1st - everyone was passed out and it was just laying there on the table..) and the Tolkien trilogy (but only after I had saw the 1st movie). I also was looking for something, if fantasy, did not have ogres, elves, dwarves, trolls, wizards, witches etc. And I have only read those books only once, never had the inclination to reread them, even to catch up on things. I could not stomach the novels about Drizzt. I picked up two of them in the same way I did the Malazan Books of the Fallen.
So,I was bored and was looking at something to grab my attention that was not a 1 book show and it was initially the cover of Deadhouse Gates with the fiery orange flames, the men on horseback and demon dogs (actual names require more reading

If I had picked up GotM by itself, I am not sure if I would have read anymore of the books. And I did not have the benefit of this forum until after I had read several others, waiting on the next one. The friends (and they their family/friends, around 75 now) that I got hooked onto this series, for the most part also had the same sentiments. For many they had to start with Deathhouse Gate first then went back and read GotM and for a few, they had a better understanding of GotM after being informed it was game played out and setup as a movie script, and of those most of them are in RPG games, so on reflection they could see the game play. A few of the authors in the Battletech world also gameplayed their mech combat.
Read Deathhouse Gates, then the next, and so on. If you have read any of the threads in these forums, most of us have laughed, cried out in despair and anguish, shed a tear in sorrow to the point of having to put the book down and walk away for a bit. Are you able to say the same thing for WoT or LotR? Or for others, were your reactions as extreme and often as it has been with MBotF series as a whole?
Again, it is sad. It falls in line with you can not really judge a book by its cover but with the MBofF series, you can not judge the series by the 1st book, especially since the book was not originally written as the 1st of a series.
#65
Posted 07 January 2014 - 04:55 PM
Everything you hate about it is something I liked. Am I a hipster? What the hell is a hipster anyway?
#66
Posted 07 January 2014 - 04:58 PM
I am pretty sure Kallor is a Hipster. He walked this land when the Imass were but children.
#67
Posted 07 January 2014 - 07:29 PM
Not Brent Weeks, on 07 January 2014 - 08:33 AM, said:
[Puts on fake Moderator mask]
Guys how about we try to keep it civil. The tone has steadily become more and more antagonistic. If you need to resort to calling people trolls maybe it is time to take a step back and breathe for an hour.
[removes fake Moderator mask]
Seriously now, we've had these discussions a thousand times. Don't start calling the guy a troll when the regulars are themselves going out of the way to pick on Knightmare.
Try to stick to the high road and don't just keep on repeating that the guy must obviously be dumb.
Guys how about we try to keep it civil. The tone has steadily become more and more antagonistic. If you need to resort to calling people trolls maybe it is time to take a step back and breathe for an hour.
[removes fake Moderator mask]
Seriously now, we've had these discussions a thousand times. Don't start calling the guy a troll when the regulars are themselves going out of the way to pick on Knightmare.
Try to stick to the high road and don't just keep on repeating that the guy must obviously be dumb.
Are you saying that I am not a regular? Calling someone a Troll is a breather for me. Usually if I am angry at a person I make disparaging remarks about conjugal visits that their mother had with a wandering donkey/ape/raccoon/Elmer Fud/Yosemite Sam/Raglefant at a road side brothel of your choice. In this case I was just calling it as I saw it. He was acting Trollish.

How many fucking people do I have to hammer in order to get that across.
Hinter - Vengy - DIE. I trusted you you bastard!!!!!!!
Steven Erikson made drowning in alien cum possible - Obdigore
Hinter - Vengy - DIE. I trusted you you bastard!!!!!!!
Steven Erikson made drowning in alien cum possible - Obdigore
#68
Posted 07 January 2014 - 10:24 PM
Jade-Green Pig-Hog Swine-Beast, on 07 January 2014 - 03:14 PM, said:
Maybe Mr Knightmare is larl_Agongorry reincarnate!
Blasphemer, Iarl_Agongorry will not be mocked!
HiddenOne. You son of a bitch. You slimy, skulking, low-posting scumbag. You knew it would come to this. Roundabout, maybe. Tortuous, certainly. But here we are, you and me again. I started the train on you so many many hours ago, and now I'm going to finish it. Die HO. Die. This is for last time, and this is for this game too. This is for all the people who died to your backstabbing, treacherous, "I sure don't know what's going on around here" filthy lying, deceitful ways. You son of a bitch. Whatever happens, this is justice. For me, this is justice. Vote HiddenOne Finally, I am at peace.
#69
Posted 07 January 2014 - 10:57 PM
I beg forgiveness!
The love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain.
"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." ― Iain Banks
"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." ― Iain Banks
#70
Posted 07 January 2014 - 11:06 PM
Not Brent Weeks, on 07 January 2014 - 08:33 AM, said:
[Puts on fake Moderator mask]
Guys how about we try to keep it civil. The tone has steadily become more and more antagonistic. If you need to resort to calling people trolls maybe it is time to take a step back and breathe for an hour.
[removes fake Moderator mask]
Seriously now, we've had these discussions a thousand times. Don't start calling the guy a troll when the regulars are themselves going out of the way to pick on Knightmare.
Try to stick to the high road and don't just keep on repeating that the guy must obviously be dumb.
Personally I find it more interesting to hear peoples dislikes of the books, than reading another ZOMG THIS IS THE BEST thread.
Guys how about we try to keep it civil. The tone has steadily become more and more antagonistic. If you need to resort to calling people trolls maybe it is time to take a step back and breathe for an hour.
[removes fake Moderator mask]
Seriously now, we've had these discussions a thousand times. Don't start calling the guy a troll when the regulars are themselves going out of the way to pick on Knightmare.
Try to stick to the high road and don't just keep on repeating that the guy must obviously be dumb.
Personally I find it more interesting to hear peoples dislikes of the books, than reading another ZOMG THIS IS THE BEST thread.
Telling someone the series might not be for them after a pretty vigorous discussion isn't antagonistic. That being said, once the fingers went into the ears and "No! No! No!" was the content being provided what more do you expect?
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#71
#73
Posted 08 January 2014 - 03:17 PM
The face of Mr Knightmare, forever.
The love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain.
"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." ― Iain Banks
"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." ― Iain Banks
#74
Posted 11 January 2014 - 11:21 PM
Vengeance, on 06 January 2014 - 08:24 PM, said:
Mr Knightmare, on 06 January 2014 - 08:21 PM, said:
Quote
Judging this story by the first book is like judging the lotr story by the first 50 pages...in other words...Erikson is just getting started...
And this is part of the problem. I HATE people telling me that "you can't judge a series just by the first book/first three episodes/first movie in the trilogy etc.
Yes I can. Nothing is beyond judgment I can very well say that the soup tasted like an Ogre's armpit even tough I have a great barbeque coming my way.
If the first of ANYTHING doesn't grab me than what's the point? Isn't that the point of the first book? To make me want more? To make me fall in love with the world or the character so that I crave to learn more about it and them?
If I didn't get DH for free I would NEVER go and read it because I tough that GoTM was awful. Why waste my time on an 800+ page book when I have already read one from the same author and I have an experience with it and I hated it? I could be spending that time with another book that I might enjoy.
Obviously the book had a profound effect on you. So much so that you felt the need to come on a forum about the series where you are sure to run into people who like and enjoy the book and spout off how much you hate the book. Thus leading me to one conclusion above all others
TROLL BEGONE!!! BEGONE I SAY!!!
Well said, he strikes me as an articulate troll. Pushing buttons in a civilized enough way to elicit real responses. Also if it takes him five rereads to comprehend something, there is always the young adult section..... these books have more characters but keeping up with the storyline is NOT hard. If you get lost read the dramatis personae (spl).
Anyways all the suggestions given to the OP are pretty good. I honestly would tell him NOT to read the books.
There is something you can’t give up. There is something you want to protect. There is a time you must take a stand no matter what kind of pain awaits us. The man clad in the red coat took up his gun once again, in order to stop the sadness, in order to stop the hate. I keep the word of the red geranium which I was taught so long ago. I keep the courage and determination, deep in my heart.
- Vash the Stampede, The Humanoid Typhoon
- Vash the Stampede, The Humanoid Typhoon
#75
Posted 26 January 2014 - 04:36 PM
I finished GotM 3 weeks ago, and now I'm half way through DG. I really enjoyed GotM, but so far I'm I'm LOVING DG. GotM was good, but DG seems so much better. I think Erikson really stepped it up after GotM.
#76
Posted 06 February 2014 - 01:25 PM
Just finished it myself in a 3 day binge, had the advantage of being off work sick though.
Gotta say, as someone who loves the first person POV and brilliant in depth characterization like Farseer or Kingkiller I have put this series off for so damn long expecting to be reading a game of D&D rather than a story.
Very surprised how addicted I am, the characters are actually pretty good, sorta reminds me of Joe Abercrombie, the Phoenix Inn regulars were prob my favorites, Crokus and Kruppe in particular, though I was calling Crokus Corkus the entire book - also really liked Sorry and Hairlock, though I keep picturing Hairlock looking exactly like the gingerbread man.
What probably kept me interested the most is the need to know what the hell is actually going on, that and I love assassins - Cotillion and Ammanas are awesome, also love the twin jesters and the idea of gods at war. Infact theres so much to write about I don't know where to start really so ill just carry on reading.
It wasn't all that confusing as I thought it might have been going off the reviews, also the tor re-read really helped early on.
Oh had to google the challenge question to register to this forum, make sure I got the spelling right and got a massive spoiler from Toll the Hounds, not impressed like... turns out the wiki page has all the characters circumstances after the crippled god so no more google.
Anyways 20% into DG and loving it.
Gotta say, as someone who loves the first person POV and brilliant in depth characterization like Farseer or Kingkiller I have put this series off for so damn long expecting to be reading a game of D&D rather than a story.
Very surprised how addicted I am, the characters are actually pretty good, sorta reminds me of Joe Abercrombie, the Phoenix Inn regulars were prob my favorites, Crokus and Kruppe in particular, though I was calling Crokus Corkus the entire book - also really liked Sorry and Hairlock, though I keep picturing Hairlock looking exactly like the gingerbread man.
What probably kept me interested the most is the need to know what the hell is actually going on, that and I love assassins - Cotillion and Ammanas are awesome, also love the twin jesters and the idea of gods at war. Infact theres so much to write about I don't know where to start really so ill just carry on reading.
It wasn't all that confusing as I thought it might have been going off the reviews, also the tor re-read really helped early on.
Oh had to google the challenge question to register to this forum, make sure I got the spelling right and got a massive spoiler from Toll the Hounds, not impressed like... turns out the wiki page has all the characters circumstances after the crippled god so no more google.
Anyways 20% into DG and loving it.
#77
Posted 06 February 2014 - 03:38 PM
Andor, on 06 February 2014 - 01:25 PM, said:
Anyways 20% into DG and loving it.
I envy your virginity. ONE OF USSSSSSSSSS......
Theorizing that one could poop within his own lifetime, Doctor Poopet led an elite group of scientists into the desert to develop a top secret project, known as QUANTUM POOP. Pressured to prove his theories or lose funding, Doctor Poopet, prematurely stepped into the Poop Accelerator and vanished. He awoke to find himself in the past, suffering from partial amnesia and facing a mirror image that was not his own. Fortunately, contact with his own bowels was made through brainwave transmissions, with Al the Poop Observer, who appeared in the form of a hologram that only Doctor Poopet could see and hear. Trapped in the past, Doctor Poopet finds himself pooping from life to life, pooping things right, that once went wrong and hoping each time, that his next poop will be the poop home.
#78
Posted 06 February 2014 - 04:22 PM
Mr Knightmare, on 06 January 2014 - 08:21 PM, said:
Quote
Judging this story by the first book is like judging the lotr story by the first 50 pages...in other words...Erikson is just getting started...
And this is part of the problem. I HATE people telling me that "you can't judge a series just by the first book/first three episodes/first movie in the trilogy etc.
Yes I can. Nothing is beyond judgment I can very well say that the soup tasted like an Ogre's armpit even tough I might have a great barbeque coming my way. And if the main course does end up as the most amazing thing ever that still doesn't change the fact that I tasted an Ogre's armpit.
If the first of ANYTHING doesn't grab me than what's the point? Isn't that the point of the first book? To make me want more? To make me fall in love with the world or the character so that I crave to learn more about it and them?
If I didn't get DH for free I would NEVER go and read it because I tough that GoTM was awful. Why waste my time on an 800+ page book when I have already read one from the same author and I have an experience with it and I hated it? I could be spending that time with another book that I might enjoy.
You can't really judge a series by one book. You can judge the one book of a series.
Say you're in a retaurant having a 3 course meal:
The appetizers come out and it's something you like (epic fantasy books), say shrimp for example. Maybe they're seasoned/prepared oddly or some way experimental, that you just don't care for. Can you judge how the whole meal is going to turn out? You can make an assumption based on your experience with the appetizer. The main course could come out and it's the best steak you've ever had in your life, along with an awesome piece of pie for dessert.
Heh, I've dropped a series after thinking the first book was shit before, there's nothing wrong with it. You give the author a shot and it's not your cup of tea.
I also liked GotM and was pretty much hooked at that point. For me it was pretty much my first taste of real reading though, so I didn't know it was an atypical type of read. Before GotM I had really only read Star Wars books. Sometimes I have a hard time giving other authors a fair chance as I find them to be too easy/simple. I try to stay open minded and a lot of times I end up happy that I got past the early predictability of the story/writing and enjoy the story overall.
Again, I enjoyed GotM, and like everyone else is saying, the next 2 books take things to a whole new level.
Now they will know why they are are afraid of the dark. Now they will learn why they fear the night. -Thulsa Doom
You're such an inspiration for the ways that I would never, ever choose to be. -MJK
You're such an inspiration for the ways that I would never, ever choose to be. -MJK
#79
Posted 06 February 2014 - 09:37 PM
..... another one tried, and another one left.... in a huff and a puff.
but are they worth preserving?
'that judgement does not belong to you.'
'that judgement does not belong to you.'
#80
Posted 07 February 2014 - 05:14 PM
I understand why the OP didn´t like at first sight GotM, and there is no problem. If you can´t buy magic at such a big size, a lot of demi-god characters and a lack of physical descriptions, these books are not for you. I understand why the OP has posted here, because when I do not like a book I´ve expected to like I want to hear another people who already have enjoy it and see what they think. What I don´t understand is why the OP wants to continue a series whose first book has been a torture for him. 
And I wonder who the God Mod Dark Elf The King of Mary Sues could be. This die-hard fan of Rake has no idea.

And I wonder who the God Mod Dark Elf The King of Mary Sues could be. This die-hard fan of Rake has no idea.
When the arrow is on the bow, it has to go