ok found a few minutes to read up.
Dejim Nebrahl, on 12 December 2013 - 08:42 AM, said:
For someone commenting on PS having more posts about all players you'd think they'd take more of an active interest and you know up their game.
<snip>
Now this looks like a defense of Tholen, WHO since yesterday has yet to provide us anything of substance and is not around to help us vote. We have already moved off of Tholen and onto others. Scum protecting his partner?
Remove Vote
Vote Ryllandaras
i at least agree with the logic here, because tholen has disappeared, hasn't posted since yesterday (3 posts total), and because we missed the lynch on him on day 1, it seems unlikely from the way things are progressing that we will revisit him as a probable target. this is disappointing because it wasted our day 1 lynch but basically gives tholen a free pass since he was already under suspicion and escaped. he doesn't even have to post and no one is looking at him. this is partly why i'm still convinced that denesmet's vote was a successful derailing of the tholen train, regardless of the numbers we had at the end of the day. his vote makes no sense and here is his defense...
Denesmet, on 11 December 2013 - 11:51 PM, said:
Eloth, on 11 December 2013 - 09:04 PM, said:
Denesmet, on 11 December 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:
Dejim Nebrahl, on 11 December 2013 - 03:43 PM, said:
Denesmet, on 11 December 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:
So what is the deal with the high number of modkills lately? Is RL just getting too crazy?
On a more of a serious note, can you tell me why you voted elsewhere ie so that we wouldn't get a lynch?
I don't think my vote would have gotten you the lynch, that would have just put Tholen at L1. The Tholen train was completely random, so I voted where there was some quasi reasoning. Without interaction we didn't have even a shitty day one case, it was the poops poop.
reading back this is is a total bullshit explanation. we were 4 hours from the end of a 36 hour day with half the votes needed to lynch, and you somehow magically knew that your vote wouldn't get tholen lynched? you could not possibly have known that, so that doesn't stand up at all. the tholen train was not completely random - he offered to be lynched, actually (THE OPPOSITE OF RANDOM) - and you did not vote where there was any reasoning, quasi or otherwise. you say there wasn't even a shitty day one case, but rather than lynch someone who ASKED to be lynched you decided your vote was better placed where there was NO case at all? help me understand this madness.
No we were 4 hours away from a lynch that didn't have much momentum, nor much of a case, so I supplied an alternative.
ok, let's get the facts straight. we're 32 hours into a 36 hour day with low day 1 participation. we need 6 votes to lynch. we have a train with 3 votes already on one target; no one else has any votes. no momentum? tholen was the only lynch that had ANY momentum. THERE WERENT EVEN ANY OTHER VOTES OUT. and as for no case, again, he offered to be lynched. in lieu of no case, that + already having 3/6 votes and very little time on the clock is a VERY good reason to vote tholen on day 1. alternative? are you fucking joking? you are seriously saying that you thought it was possible in the next 3.5 hours for everyone to magically logon after no posting all day and switch all their votes over to nimander based on your "dragon comment" case? that is not an alternative. it's a terrible vote with no backing that looks like a derail. i honestly don't know how you are getting away with not explaining your actions at all. and now this:
Denesmet, on 12 December 2013 - 06:10 PM, said:
Desra, on 12 December 2013 - 06:08 PM, said:
Damn, I forgot to remove didn't I
Remove vote
Vote Ryllandaras
I'm willing to
vote Kalse
sorry, what? what the fuck does desra's post have to do with kalse? why does desra's post make you "willing to vote kalse"? earlier you did say "I think I'd be good with a Kalse or Desra vote." how does that make sense in light of the post above? you again provide no basis for your vote, i can't see that you provided any reasoning at all other than discussing kalse earlier in the day. this is why i'm keeping my vote here for now, denesmet's play so far leaves a really bad taste in my mouth and it has potentially lost us any info about tholen, who has 3 posts and is not around, and his voting patterns are erratic and generally unhelpful.
please try to explain your way out of this again.