[D'rek]

Galactic Council, on 15 October 2013 - 10:36 PM, said:

205 Khell vs cubes
neutron bombs
Khell takes hex

I have Neutron Absorber. He has to roll for it.


1

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 16 October 2013 - 04:38 AM

[D'rek]

Galactic Council, on 15 October 2013 - 11:30 PM, said:

102 CF vs D'rek

• CF 1 Int
• D'rek: 1 Cr

Firing order: CF Int, D'rek cruiser

Engagement one

CF
R9 102B1 E1 CF 1 x Int 1d6O
1d6: 1 [1d6=1]
http://orokos.com/roll/143255#
+3 and 0 shields == 1 hit

2 pts damage to D'rek's cruiser. 3/5 health.

D'rek
R9 102B1 E1 D'rek 1 x Cr 1d6O
1d6: 2 [1d6=2]
http://orokos.com/roll/143254#
+2 and -1 shield == 1 miss

Engagement two

CF
R9 102B1 E2 CF 1 x Int 1d6O
1d6: 3 [1d6=3]
http://orokos.com/roll/143257#
+3 and 0 shields == 1 hit

2 pts damage to D'rek's cruiser. 1/5 health.

D'rek
R9 102B1 E2 D'rek 1 x Cr 1d6O
1d6: 4 [1d6=4]
http://orokos.com/roll/143262#
+2 and -1 shield == 1 miss

Engagement three

CF
R9 102B1 E3 CF 1 x Int 1d6O
1d6: 6 [1d6=6]
http://orokos.com/roll/143265#
1 hit

D'rek cruiser destroyed

CF's interceptor fires side thrusters to orient towards the Squids.

The comm system blares a raccous "Aaaaaaarrrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhh!"

There is no reply. In space no one can hear you squirt yourself

Re the part in red - my cruisers have Gluon Computers, which are +3. Roll of 4 +3 -1 = 6 = hit = CF interceptor destroyed.

2,3

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 16 October 2013 - 04:40 AM

[D'rek]

Khellendros, on 15 October 2013 - 10:12 PM, said:

Also, D'rek, I can't believe you gave me my first neg-rep ever, and for an innocuous comment too! I made it as un-spoilery as possible, your comment was just feeding wrong information!

I stand by it. There's absolutely no reason to "spoiler bait" earlier book forums with unasked for spoilers or allusions to future books. The OP of that thread was just making a fun little comment about what (s)he may or may not have perceived to be just a regular bit of the Malazan world and you put up a giant flashing neon sign saying "I won't tell you what, but there's more to this than has been revealed so far so your current interpretation is incomplete" when no one in that thread asked for any sort of future spoiling. Because you posted that, it is quite possible that when the OP reaches the point in the future books that more information on that topic is revealed, the surprise they would have otherwise experienced no longer occurs because you hinted at it for no reason back in the HoC forum.

[twelve]

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 03:30 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 02:08 AM, said:

twelve, on 15 October 2013 - 09:43 PM, said:

Galactic Council, on 15 October 2013 - 09:34 PM, said:

281 Twelve vs cubes
neutron bombs
Twelve takes hex

Influence hex
deploy 2 colony ships both from the money track

(yes, yes, I know this is a bit premature but I want to get this out there as soon as possible.)

Done

Influence Epsilon Eridani and colonize money?

281 is delta corvi and that has a money planet and an orbital. Colonize both as money. Colonize my home world with money.

[Galactic Council]

D, on 16 October 2013 - 04:07 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 15 October 2013 - 10:36 PM, said:

205 Khell vs cubes
neutron bombs
Khell takes hex

I have Neutron Absorber. He has to roll for it.


1

205 Khell vs cubes

R9 205 Khell vs cubes 1d6R
1d6: 2 [1d6=2]
http://orokos.com/roll/143344#

D'rek retains hex


(You should have left that one alone D'rek. You were better off with him taking it.)

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 16 October 2013 - 05:54 AM

[twelve]

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 03:15 AM, said:

Engagement one

Twelve

• 1 x Dread 1d6R
• 4 x SB 4 x 1d6R

R9 001 E1 Twelve 1 x Dread 1d6R 4xSB 4x(1d6R)
5d6: 20 [5d6=6, 4, 1, 3, 6]
http://orokos.com/roll/143326#

2 natural 6s == 2 hits
1 natural 1 == 1 miss

[4, 3] +5 to hit

Waiting for assignment

I'm assuming that the first six is from my dread. If that is the case then assign both sixes to both dreads. Actually it doesn't matter assign both to the dreads.

[Galactic Council]

102 CF vs D'rek vs Khell

• 102B1 CF vs D'rek vs Khell
  • CF 1 Int
  • D'rek: 1 Cr

Firing order: CF int, D'rek cruiser

Engagement one

CF
R9 102 Re-Roll CF int 1x 1d6O
1d6: 1 [1d6=1]
miss

D'rek
R9 102B1 Re-Roll E1 D'rek 1 x Cr 1d6O
1d6: 3 [1d6=3]
http://orokos.com/roll/143347
+3 -1 shield == miss

Engagement two

CFR9 102B1 Re-Roll E2 CF int 1x 1d6O

1d6: 5 [1d6=5]

http://orokos.com/roll/143348

+3 and 0 shields == hit

2 pts damage to cruiser. 3/5 health
D'rek
R9 102B1 Re-Roll E2 D'rek 1 x Cr 1d6O
1d6: 4 [1d6=4]
http://orokos.com/roll/143349#
+3 and -1 == hit

CF interceptor destroyed.
D'rek moves on to the finals

• 102B2 Winner vs Khell
  • D'rek 1 x cruiser 3/5 health
  • Khell: 1 x Int

Firing order: D'rek cruiser, Khell interceptor

Engagement one

D'rek

R9 102B2 Re-Roll E1 D'rek 1 x Cr 1d6

1d6: 4 [1d6=4]

http://orokos.com/roll/143351#

+3 and 0 shields == hit

2pts damage to Khell's interceptor. 1/3 health

Khell

R9 102B2 Re-Roll E1 Khell 1xInt 1d6R

1d6: 6 [1d6=6]

http://orokos.com/roll/143352#

hit

cruiser destroyed

Khell takes hex

• Reputation draw:
  • CF 1
  • D'rek 2
  • Khell 3
  • ten 1s and three 2s in pile [1-10 == 1s, 11-13 == 2s]
    • CF does not draw
    • D'rek does not draw
    • Khell
      • <draw>
      • link
      • keep/discard

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 16 October 2013 - 05:09 AM

[Galactic Council]

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 03:15 AM, said:

Engagement one

Twelve

• 1 x Dread 1d6R
• 4 x SB 4 x 1d6R

R9 001 E1 Twelve 1 x Dread 1d6R 4xSB 4x(1d6R)
5d6: 20 [5d6=6, 4, 1, 3, 6]
http://orokos.com/roll/143326#

2 natural 6s == 2 hits
1 natural 1 == 1 miss

[4, 3] +5 to hit

Waiting for assignment

I'm assuming that the first six is from my dread. If that is the case then assign both sixes to both dreads. Actually it doesn't matter assign both to the dreads.

Quote

Ships still alive and in battle at end of missile engagement

• Tatts.
  • 2 x dread 4/6 and 6/6
  • 2 x Cr 5/5 and 5/5
  • 2 x int 1/1 and 1/1
• Twelve
  • 4 x SB all 7/7
  • 1 x dread 5/5
  
  

1 natural 6 assigned to DreadOne. DreadOne destroyed.
1 natural 6 assigned to DreadTwo. 2/6 health.

1 [4] modified +3 to 7. -2 shields, -2 shields, -4 shields. miss.
1 [3] modified +3 to 6. -2 shields, -2 shields, -4 shields. miss.


Engagement one

Tattersail
All ships are 1d6R Firing order: 1 x dread, 2 x Int, 2 x Cr == 5d6R

R9 001 E1 Tatts 1xDread, 2xInt, 2xCr. 5d6R


5d6: 22 [5d6=5, 3, 3, 6, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143353#
Dread +2 / 0 shields == hit
Ints 0 / 0 == miss, miss
Cruiser 0 / 0 == 1 hit on natural 6 and 1 miss
2 hits at 4 pts damage each awaiting assignment



Ships surviving Engagement one

• Tatts.
  • 1 x dread 2/6
  • 2 x Cr 5/5 and 5/5
  • 2 x int 1/1 and 1/1
• Twelve
  • 4 x SB all 7/7
  • 1 x dread 5/5
  
  
  
  
  

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 16 October 2013 - 05:33 AM

[Galactic Council]

Engagement two

Twelve
4 x SB +3 to hit.
1 x Dread +5 to hit.


I was going to roll 4d6, but the difference in computers make that unfeasible. Tatts knowing what your next hits were would affect his decision on targeting.

[twelve]

Retreat my interceptors to zeta Hurculis.

[Tattersail_]

destroy his dread

[Galactic Council]

R9 001 E2 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
4d6: 19 [4d6=3, 6, 5, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143354#

[twelve]

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 06:21 AM, said:

R9 001 E2 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
4d6: 19 [4d6=3, 6, 5, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143354#

Take out the dread and both interceptors.

[Gnaw]

twelve, on 16 October 2013 - 06:28 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 06:21 AM, said:

R9 001 E2 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
4d6: 19 [4d6=3, 6, 5, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143354#

Take out the dread and both interceptors.

Tatts
R9 001 E2 Tatts 2 x Cr 2d6R
2d6: 6 [2d6=1, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143369#

1 hit

[Tattersail_]

Gnaw, on 16 October 2013 - 07:26 AM, said:

twelve, on 16 October 2013 - 06:28 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 16 October 2013 - 06:21 AM, said:

R9 001 E2 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
4d6: 19 [4d6=3, 6, 5, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143354#

Take out the dread and both interceptors.

Tatts
R9 001 E2 Tatts 2 x Cr 2d6R
2d6: 6 [2d6=1, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143369#

1 hit

no hits, my cruisers need to roll a 6 don't they. ufck Twelve and his rolling of 6's and no ones.

[Gnaw]

Engagement three

R9 001 E3 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
3d6: 13 [3d6=6, 4, 3]
http://orokos.com/roll/143370#


R9 001 E3 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
1d6: 3 [1d6=3]
http://orokos.com/roll/143371#


Tatts

R9 001 E3 Tatts 1 Cr 1d6R
1d6: 4 [1d6=4]
http://orokos.com/roll/143372#



Engagement four


R9 001 E4 Twelve 4x SB 4d6R
4d6: 10 [4d6=2, 1, 4, 3]
http://orokos.com/roll/143373#


R9 001 E4 Tatts 1 Cr 1d64
1d6: 5 [1d6=5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143374#


screw this.


R9 001 Twelve 4d6r next 10 salvoes
40d6: 146 [40d6=3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 6, 3, 2, 6, 5, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 5, 4, 5, 3, 3, 3, 6, 5, 2, 1, 2, 2, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, 5, 1]
http://orokos.com/roll/143375#


R9 001 Tatts 1 cr 1d6r next 10 salvoes
10d6: 30 [10d6=2, 1, 2, 6, 6, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2]
http://orokos.com/roll/143376#



good night.

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 16 October 2013 - 08:07 AM

[Morgoth]

Galactic Council, on 15 October 2013 - 11:38 PM, said:

Galactic Council, on 15 October 2013 - 11:05 PM, said:

103 Morgoth vs cubes

I have no fucking clue.


(And I'm dead serious. My board says Morgoth has neutron bombs.)



And D'rek has absorber.

103 Morgoth vs cubes




R9 103 Cube engagment Morgoth 2d6O
2d6: 7 [2d6=2, 5]
http://orokos.com/roll/143280#
+4 == 2 hits

Morgoth takes hex.

Yay!!

[Tattersail_]

Below is a rant, I advise you not to take it to heart but it is influenced by being on the receiving end of all those 6's.

Spoiler

So all of Twelve's rolls so far, Against Khell, 2, 3, 3, 2, Then it was re rolled. 6, 6, re roll, 6 next battle, 5, 4, 5, 2, 4, 3 Then versus me, 4, 3, 2, 6, 5, 6, 2, 5, 6, 4, 1, 3, 6, 3, 6, 5, 5, 6, 4, 3, 3


So in 31 rolls he has hit 9 6's and only one 1. That would never happen in real life. Total bullshit.


I'm just pissed off. I can say I am not a fan of Okoros.


How many fucking games have you played in real life and how many times has something like the above happened? Ever played monopoly? You throw two dice and 6's are still hard to come by. Fucking dick shit computerized programs. It's like playing Poker online when you have 3 of a kind and the guy has 4 of a kind, or you have a full house and he has a better full house. Fucking bull shit. Total twat bullshit fucking dice.

[Morgoth]

Random is random. It feels unfair because our ideas of what random is do not match the reality of a random draw

[Khellendros]

D, on 16 October 2013 - 04:18 AM, said:

Khellendros, on 15 October 2013 - 10:12 PM, said:

Also, D'rek, I can't believe you gave me my first neg-rep ever, and for an innocuous comment too! I made it as un-spoilery as possible, your comment was just feeding wrong information!

I stand by it. There's absolutely no reason to "spoiler bait" earlier book forums with unasked for spoilers or allusions to future books. The OP of that thread was just making a fun little comment about what (s)he may or may not have perceived to be just a regular bit of the Malazan world and you put up a giant flashing neon sign saying "I won't tell you what, but there's more to this than has been revealed so far so your current interpretation is incomplete" when no one in that thread asked for any sort of future spoiling. Because you posted that, it is quite possible that when the OP reaches the point in the future books that more information on that topic is revealed, the surprise they would have otherwise experienced no longer occurs because you hinted at it for no reason back in the HoC forum.

Hardly! It's not as if they themselves hadn't brought up the possibility earlier and I suddenly came out of nowhere with it. Nor that I even confirmed whether it was that particular idea or some other one which was correct, only that there was more to it, just like the OP thought. I would argue that only makes things more intriguing, as they know they have to wait to find out more. Calling it spoiler bait is extreme, I certainly do not go around the book forums looking to ruin people's reading experiences.

Anyway, I'm not looking to start an argument over this, I was just confused by it.