MAFIA 99 Back to Back to Basics, but not back to Back to Back to Basics... huh?
#41
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:19 PM
I don't know what the hell it's supposed to be, but Korvalain's has now gone to the top of the badass avatar list.
#42
#43
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

#44
#45
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:21 PM
You too, Hugin & Munin? Another list? Is nothing sacred anymore? 
And woah, my avatar!

And woah, my avatar!
#46
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:23 PM
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

no, by being silent and observing, to swoop in with flawless logic when scum least expect it
#47
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:24 PM
typing from phone is way too slow, so you all enjoy your avatar-squabbling and list-making, I'll be back later.
#48
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:24 PM
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

Well why would you defend an unknown? I am at a loss for the reason you would do this. If Sheltatha comes up scum you will be linked to him through that post. I'm not going to buddy up to someone and defend them, i'll let them answer their own accusations. So because you have now answered for him he can go and crawl under a rock until next time someone comes along and says something to him.
I already had pointed a post your way and would interact with you through those channels. Now we are discussing that one post when I actually wanted Sheltatha to answer for himself.
You know that is the only way we are going to catch scum right? By interacting with EVERYONE on thread.
#49
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:25 PM
Telas, on 04 March 2013 - 03:21 PM, said:
What did you order? Why do you need it? Confidence man!! It's all about the motion in the ocean not the size of the boat!
#50
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:26 PM
Telas, on 04 March 2013 - 03:23 PM, said:
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

no, by being silent and observing, to swoop in with flawless logic when scum least expect it
And how do you get scum to ever say anything incriminating if you don't interact with anyone or query on thread anything at all?
#51
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:29 PM
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:24 PM, said:
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

Well why would you defend an unknown? I am at a loss for the reason you would do this. If Sheltatha comes up scum you will be linked to him through that post. I'm not going to buddy up to someone and defend them, i'll let them answer their own accusations. So because you have now answered for him he can go and crawl under a rock until next time someone comes along and says something to him.
I already had pointed a post your way and would interact with you through those channels. Now we are discussing that one post when I actually wanted Sheltatha to answer for himself.
You know that is the only way we are going to catch scum right? By interacting with EVERYONE on thread.
Defending? Defending?! That's some nice shitty strawmanning already! Kudos! Anyone can go look back and see my post (a joke at the time, but hell, let's roll with this) had nothing to do with defending Sheltatha and all about pointing out that you were talking about symping in a game with no symps. That is, attacking you for your silly-ass comment, not defending anyone.
As for the interacting with people comment, well, see my own post on that matter above. At least we're on the same wavelength there

#52
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:29 PM
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:26 PM, said:
Telas, on 04 March 2013 - 03:23 PM, said:
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

no, by being silent and observing, to swoop in with flawless logic when scum least expect it
And how do you get scum to ever say anything incriminating if you don't interact with anyone or query on thread anything at all?
Exactly my point, you have realised Sheltatha has said nothing since? Whereas you and I have had a few back and forths
#53
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:32 PM
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:25 PM, said:
Telas, on 04 March 2013 - 03:21 PM, said:
What did you order? Why do you need it? Confidence man!! It's all about the motion in the ocean not the size of the boat!
it's about loading dock equipment for a warehouse, that's why it's funny
#54
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:26 PM, said:
Telas, on 04 March 2013 - 03:23 PM, said:
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

no, by being silent and observing, to swoop in with flawless logic when scum least expect it
And how do you get scum to ever say anything incriminating if you don't interact with anyone or query on thread anything at all?
alligator clips to the nipples
#55
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:24 PM, said:
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:10 PM, said:
Of course you are but why would you? I know shit, so are you saying you know more?
So wait, I'm allowed to comment, but I'm not supposed to? Why not? Isn't that how we try and establish things? By commenting and questioning? I can go into serious mode too see

Well why would you defend an unknown? I am at a loss for the reason you would do this. If Sheltatha comes up scum you will be linked to him through that post. I'm not going to buddy up to someone and defend them, i'll let them answer their own accusations. So because you have now answered for him he can go and crawl under a rock until next time someone comes along and says something to him.
I already had pointed a post your way and would interact with you through those channels. Now we are discussing that one post when I actually wanted Sheltatha to answer for himself.
You know that is the only way we are going to catch scum right? By interacting with EVERYONE on thread.
Defending? Defending?! That's some nice shitty strawmanning already! Kudos! Anyone can go look back and see my post (a joke at the time, but hell, let's roll with this) had nothing to do with defending Sheltatha and all about pointing out that you were talking about symping in a game with no symps. That is, attacking you for your silly-ass comment, not defending anyone.
As for the interacting with people comment, well, see my own post on that matter above. At least we're on the same wavelength there

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.
Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.
#56
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:35 PM
#57
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:39 PM
Sheltatha Lore, on 04 March 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:
Oh well then.
Remove Vote
[sarcasm] I'm completely wrong. [/sarcasm]
Vote Galain
He created the first list and Liosan and Korvalian ignored it. Yet called me on it. Now if they are thinking a list is scummy and ignore one but suspect the next then what does that leave?
#58
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:
Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.
Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.
Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.
#59
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:41 PM
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:
Sheltatha Lore, on 04 March 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:
Oh well then.
Remove Vote
[sarcasm] I'm completely wrong. [/sarcasm]
Vote Galain
He created the first list and Liosan and Korvalian ignored it. Yet called me on it. Now if they are thinking a list is scummy and ignore one but suspect the next then what does that leave?
You are wrong? You are wrong? Such a noob.
#60
Posted 04 March 2013 - 03:44 PM
Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:
Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.
Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.
Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.
Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.
Dude, he didn't know what to say and made up something. I don't think he put that much thought behind it.