[Karosis]

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Hopw many avatars have been posted on the game so far? Yet out of all the ones I am the one mentioned by Sheltatha? You feel me...

[Karosis]

Since then she (sheltatha is female in the books so i'm going to role with that) has mentioned Meanas' avatar. That looks like she doesn't want to be pegged as "just"mentioning me. So now she spreads out her love. I won't be surprised if there is another "ooh look at **** avatar" later. Just to water it down some more.

[Liosan]

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

He created the first list and Liosan and Korvalian ignored it. Yet called me on it. Now if they are thinking a list is scummy and ignore one but suspect the next then what does that leave?

So wait wait, we're actually playing this seriously? As in, we're taking my accusation of you for your list seriously? Well, okay then. I guess that in that case it behooves me to point out that actually, the first person who ignored Galain's list but called you on yours was actually - YOU. You even put it in italics, presumably so that the rest of us would spot it and then comment on it. And then you highlight the likes of me for pointing out something that you yourself did in the first place, and try and make something super-case-serious out of it?

[Korvalain]

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:19 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 04 March 2013 - 03:12 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 02:16 PM, said:

Who? Who you say? You'll find me in this list....


Dragons!!.PNG

list. scum
Vote Karosis

Is that the extent of your vocabulary?

no

[Sorrit]

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Gods, I'm glad SOMEONE called him on this. There are no symps in this game, just innos and killers. The killers can all talk to each other, so no reason to signal to anyone. Anyone who is trying to make any sort of case based on 'signalling' will have earned my ire for making up bullshit cases, and receive a vote for trying to muddy the waters further, which is totes a scum move!

[Karosis]

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:51 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

He created the first list and Liosan and Korvalian ignored it. Yet called me on it. Now if they are thinking a list is scummy and ignore one but suspect the next then what does that leave?

So wait wait, we're actually playing this seriously? As in, we're taking my accusation of you for your list seriously? Well, okay then. I guess that in that case it behooves me to point out that actually, the first person who ignored Galain's list but called you on yours was actually - YOU. You even put it in italics, presumably so that the rest of us would spot it and then comment on it. And then you highlight the likes of me for pointing out something that you yourself did in the first place, and try and make something super-case-serious out of it?

Ha ha ha, I like you style Liosan I'll say that much. Everything I say, you twist. It looks like you are attacking me when I am attacking others. I'm down with that, seriously. 3 scum players know each other. Fact. You are defending other people by attacking me, although you are more certain than I am of them. You get me? You're focusing on me whilst I am casting my eye on others. I am your sole intent whereas I don't trust one of you. So how can you be so certain? What makes you think Korv didn't ignore Galain on purpose? Just cause you are saying you didn't? Are you saying there is nothing in what I am saying? Should I quiet down whilst you work the game out for me?

[Liosan]

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:51 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

He created the first list and Liosan and Korvalian ignored it. Yet called me on it. Now if they are thinking a list is scummy and ignore one but suspect the next then what does that leave?

So wait wait, we're actually playing this seriously? As in, we're taking my accusation of you for your list seriously? Well, okay then. I guess that in that case it behooves me to point out that actually, the first person who ignored Galain's list but called you on yours was actually - YOU. You even put it in italics, presumably so that the rest of us would spot it and then comment on it. And then you highlight the likes of me for pointing out something that you yourself did in the first place, and try and make something super-case-serious out of it?

Ha ha ha, I like you style Liosan I'll say that much. Everything I say, you twist. It looks like you are attacking me when I am attacking others. I'm down with that, seriously. 3 scum players know each other. Fact. You are defending other people by attacking me, although you are more certain than I am of them. You get me? You're focusing on me whilst I am casting my eye on others. I am your sole intent whereas I don't trust one of you. So how can you be so certain? What makes you think Korv didn't ignore Galain on purpose? Just cause you are saying you didn't? Are you saying there is nothing in what I am saying? Should I quiet down whilst you work the game out for me?

Actually, I think the very opposite of wanting you to quiet down. You're stirring things up, and no matter whether you're town or scum, that is most probably going to be a good thing in the long run, because hopefully it will extract info which can be pieced together later on.

However, I'm also not the sort to ignore things when people only post half-truths, so I am going to call you - or anyone else - on it as I see it, regardless of who the posts are directed at. Just like you, I'm not one for keeping my head down.

As for directing all my posts at you, well, that's a direct result of you being the only one saying interesting things thus far.

[Karosis]

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 03:54 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Gods, I'm glad SOMEONE called him on this. There are no symps in this game, just innos and killers. The killers can all talk to each other, so no reason to signal to anyone. Anyone who is trying to make any sort of case based on 'signalling' will have earned my ire for making up bullshit cases, and receive a vote for trying to muddy the waters further, which is totes a scum move!

and you further buddy up to Liosan. He says your avatar is nice, you congratulate him on calling me out. Pat each others backs why don't you. We are not buddies. You do not know if he is your freind or enemy so why the niceties? When you see my CF will you come back and look at what I say? No? Yes?



it's day one, don't give anyone a free ride. Just cause we have nothing to go on. You have to create interactions based off nothing, then go after the responses.

[Karosis]

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 04:01 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:51 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:39 PM, said:

He created the first list and Liosan and Korvalian ignored it. Yet called me on it. Now if they are thinking a list is scummy and ignore one but suspect the next then what does that leave?

So wait wait, we're actually playing this seriously? As in, we're taking my accusation of you for your list seriously? Well, okay then. I guess that in that case it behooves me to point out that actually, the first person who ignored Galain's list but called you on yours was actually - YOU. You even put it in italics, presumably so that the rest of us would spot it and then comment on it. And then you highlight the likes of me for pointing out something that you yourself did in the first place, and try and make something super-case-serious out of it?

Ha ha ha, I like you style Liosan I'll say that much. Everything I say, you twist. It looks like you are attacking me when I am attacking others. I'm down with that, seriously. 3 scum players know each other. Fact. You are defending other people by attacking me, although you are more certain than I am of them. You get me? You're focusing on me whilst I am casting my eye on others. I am your sole intent whereas I don't trust one of you. So how can you be so certain? What makes you think Korv didn't ignore Galain on purpose? Just cause you are saying you didn't? Are you saying there is nothing in what I am saying? Should I quiet down whilst you work the game out for me?

Actually, I think the very opposite of wanting you to quiet down. You're stirring things up, and no matter whether you're town or scum, that is most probably going to be a good thing in the long run, because hopefully it will extract info which can be pieced together later on.

However, I'm also not the sort to ignore things when people only post half-truths, so I am going to call you - or anyone else - on it as I see it, regardless of who the posts are directed at. Just like you, I'm not one for keeping my head down.

As for directing all my posts at you, well, that's a direct result of you being the only one saying interesting things thus far.

Cross post. You echo what I say but in a better way. I'm still suspicious.

[Liosan]

To answer your questions:

No, I'm neither attacking you nor defending others. I'm pointing out what appear to me to be fallacies.

You appear to be my sole intent because you keep dragging my name into it, so actually, if I'm defending anybody, it's myself.

I don't know if Korv did ignore Galain on purpose, and I never said otherwise. For all I know, that is exactly what happened. I also know, however, that I didn't on purpose, and yet my name ends up in the same breath as Korv's. You get me?

There might be something in what you are saying, but at the moment it seems less than paper-thin. Which, to be fair, it being day 1, is hardly suprising.



Edit: Removed an unnecessary 'I'.

This post has been edited by Liosan: 04 March 2013 - 04:07 PM

[Sorrit]

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 03:54 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Gods, I'm glad SOMEONE called him on this. There are no symps in this game, just innos and killers. The killers can all talk to each other, so no reason to signal to anyone. Anyone who is trying to make any sort of case based on 'signalling' will have earned my ire for making up bullshit cases, and receive a vote for trying to muddy the waters further, which is totes a scum move!

and you further buddy up to Liosan. He says your avatar is nice, you congratulate him on calling me out. Pat each others backs why don't you. We are not buddies. You do not know if he is your freind or enemy so why the niceties? When you see my CF will you come back and look at what I say? No? Yes?



it's day one, don't give anyone a free ride. Just cause we have nothing to go on. You have to create interactions based off nothing, then go after the responses.

Uhm, I don't see anything in my post that even implies that I'm going to give him a 'free ride'. I was just commenting on how I was happy that he called you out on your bullshit about 'symps' and 'signalling' when it's very clear that no such thing could happen in this game. Agreeing with someone's opinion does not equate a 'free ride.' Stop putting words into my mouth, it's a cheesy tactic that only serves to confuse those who don't read thoroughly enough.

[Tennes]

Hang on, I can't find anything about this game having a CF... I would assume it does, but H&M, can you confirm/clarify?

And yeah, this exchange between Karosis and Liosan is kind of tiring, but so far it's the only thing of content. We're just some 4 (?) hours in, so a lot of people haven't showed up, but Korvalain has, and is really trying to not do anything...

Vote Korvalain

[Karosis]

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 03:54 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Gods, I'm glad SOMEONE called him on this. There are no symps in this game, just innos and killers. The killers can all talk to each other, so no reason to signal to anyone. Anyone who is trying to make any sort of case based on 'signalling' will have earned my ire for making up bullshit cases, and receive a vote for trying to muddy the waters further, which is totes a scum move!

and you further buddy up to Liosan. He says your avatar is nice, you congratulate him on calling me out. Pat each others backs why don't you. We are not buddies. You do not know if he is your freind or enemy so why the niceties? When you see my CF will you come back and look at what I say? No? Yes?



it's day one, don't give anyone a free ride. Just cause we have nothing to go on. You have to create interactions based off nothing, then go after the responses.

Uhm, I don't see anything in my post that even implies that I'm going to give him a 'free ride'. I was just commenting on how I was happy that he called you out on your bullshit about 'symps' and 'signalling' when it's very clear that no such thing could happen in this game. Agreeing with someone's opinion does not equate a 'free ride.' Stop putting words into my mouth, it's a cheesy tactic that only serves to confuse those who don't read thoroughly enough.

So 3 scum who know each other and can talk off thread. That is powerful yes? Now what I am saying is that say for example Sheltatha is one of those three and she says karosis' avatar is nice. Day 4 we lynch her for example and you go back and read that sentence, what do you think?




edit. she comes up scum in the above scenario...

This post has been edited by Karosis: 04 March 2013 - 04:11 PM

[Sorrit]

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 04:10 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 03:54 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Gods, I'm glad SOMEONE called him on this. There are no symps in this game, just innos and killers. The killers can all talk to each other, so no reason to signal to anyone. Anyone who is trying to make any sort of case based on 'signalling' will have earned my ire for making up bullshit cases, and receive a vote for trying to muddy the waters further, which is totes a scum move!

and you further buddy up to Liosan. He says your avatar is nice, you congratulate him on calling me out. Pat each others backs why don't you. We are not buddies. You do not know if he is your freind or enemy so why the niceties? When you see my CF will you come back and look at what I say? No? Yes?



it's day one, don't give anyone a free ride. Just cause we have nothing to go on. You have to create interactions based off nothing, then go after the responses.

Uhm, I don't see anything in my post that even implies that I'm going to give him a 'free ride'. I was just commenting on how I was happy that he called you out on your bullshit about 'symps' and 'signalling' when it's very clear that no such thing could happen in this game. Agreeing with someone's opinion does not equate a 'free ride.' Stop putting words into my mouth, it's a cheesy tactic that only serves to confuse those who don't read thoroughly enough.

So 3 scum who know each other and can talk off thread. That is powerful yes? Now what I am saying is that say for example Sheltatha is one of those three and she says karosis' avatar is nice. Day 4 we lynch her for example and you go back and read that sentence, what do you think?




edit. she comes up scum in the above scenario...

I think that, in the above scenario, and given that we know the game has 3 killers and 13 innocents, therefore there is no reason for the killers to be signalling, she was commenting on how Karosis's new avatar was really nice.

Are you really this dense? There's no reason to signal. Not at this point in the game, nor at the end of the game, nor would there be any reason to go and try to dig up signalling when we get closer to D-Day. It's not signalling that's going to connect us to people this game, as NO ONE NEEDS TO DO IT. All the killers know each other, and innos have no reason to signal to anyone.

[Sorrit]

Tennes, on 04 March 2013 - 04:09 PM, said:

Hang on, I can't find anything about this game having a CF... I would assume it does, but H&M, can you confirm/clarify?

And yeah, this exchange between Karosis and Liosan is kind of tiring, but so far it's the only thing of content. We're just some 4 (?) hours in, so a lot of people haven't showed up, but Korvalain has, and is really trying to not do anything...

Vote Korvalain

From the OP (really, is it that hard to read the first fucking sentence in the thread?):

Hugin & Munin, on 03 March 2013 - 05:26 PM, said:

This is a pure TMDI:0/1 game. There are 13 RIs and 3 killers. The killers can talk off-thread and kill one player each night.

The town/innocents win when all killers are eliminated.
The killers win when they have a parity or majority of surviving players.

Day is 32 hours long. Night is 8 hours long (if necessary).

Modkill timer is 36 hours, but you should inform the mods if you won't be able to post in a 24-hour or longer period.


Innocents role PM:

Quote

You are innocent.

Killers role PM:

Quote

You are a killer. Your fellow killers are _____ and _____.

Each night, you and your partners can conspire to kill one other player.

[Telas]

no signalling, no symps, boy, the day 1 lynch is going to be based on avatar eye color or some similar foolishness

[Sorrit]

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 04:22 PM, said:

Tennes, on 04 March 2013 - 04:09 PM, said:

Hang on, I can't find anything about this game having a CF... I would assume it does, but H&M, can you confirm/clarify?

And yeah, this exchange between Karosis and Liosan is kind of tiring, but so far it's the only thing of content. We're just some 4 (?) hours in, so a lot of people haven't showed up, but Korvalain has, and is really trying to not do anything...

Vote Korvalain

From the OP (really, is it that hard to read the first fucking sentence in the thread?):

Hugin & Munin, on 03 March 2013 - 05:26 PM, said:

This is a pure TMDI:0/1 game. There are 13 RIs and 3 killers. The killers can talk off-thread and kill one player each night.

The town/innocents win when all killers are eliminated.
The killers win when they have a parity or majority of surviving players.

Day is 32 hours long. Night is 8 hours long (if necessary).

Modkill timer is 36 hours, but you should inform the mods if you won't be able to post in a 24-hour or longer period.


Innocents role PM:

Quote

You are innocent.

Killers role PM:

Quote

You are a killer. Your fellow killers are _____ and _____.

Each night, you and your partners can conspire to kill one other player.

Wow - I saw CF and read TMDI. I apologize Korv, I thought you were asking something else. That being said, would be interesting to see H&M's response to this question. CF or no CF would make for two completely different games.

[Tennes]

I was just about to give a snide reply...

[Karosis]

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 04:17 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 04:10 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 04 March 2013 - 03:54 PM, said:

Liosan, on 04 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

Karosis, on 04 March 2013 - 03:33 PM, said:

Just because there is no symps in the game does not mean that scum might not use it to their advantage. I don't mean to say Sheltatha is a symp or you are a symp but moreover the post "karosis has a nice avatar" looks like signalling which from my point of view can only be fake. Same with you and Sorriit.


Later down the line when we look back on things you have planted a link between two avatars.

Oh-kay. I'm curious to know what the point of signalling would be in this game? Who? To whom? To what end? I mean, if you had said, "Player 1 could be trying to cosy up to Player 2 because Player 1 is scum and by complimenting Player 2's avatar they hope to get on their good side early on; or Player 1 is fake being nice to Player 2 in order to have that random dude linked with them so that if they do get lynched then the next person along who could be linked to them is that Player 2 inno....or something along those lines, then that's something I could see happening. But you're talking about signalling? I don't really understand that.

Gods, I'm glad SOMEONE called him on this. There are no symps in this game, just innos and killers. The killers can all talk to each other, so no reason to signal to anyone. Anyone who is trying to make any sort of case based on 'signalling' will have earned my ire for making up bullshit cases, and receive a vote for trying to muddy the waters further, which is totes a scum move!

and you further buddy up to Liosan. He says your avatar is nice, you congratulate him on calling me out. Pat each others backs why don't you. We are not buddies. You do not know if he is your freind or enemy so why the niceties? When you see my CF will you come back and look at what I say? No? Yes?



it's day one, don't give anyone a free ride. Just cause we have nothing to go on. You have to create interactions based off nothing, then go after the responses.

Uhm, I don't see anything in my post that even implies that I'm going to give him a 'free ride'. I was just commenting on how I was happy that he called you out on your bullshit about 'symps' and 'signalling' when it's very clear that no such thing could happen in this game. Agreeing with someone's opinion does not equate a 'free ride.' Stop putting words into my mouth, it's a cheesy tactic that only serves to confuse those who don't read thoroughly enough.

So 3 scum who know each other and can talk off thread. That is powerful yes? Now what I am saying is that say for example Sheltatha is one of those three and she says karosis' avatar is nice. Day 4 we lynch her for example and you go back and read that sentence, what do you think?




edit. she comes up scum in the above scenario...

I think that, in the above scenario, and given that we know the game has 3 killers and 13 innocents, therefore there is no reason for the killers to be signalling, she was commenting on how Karosis's new avatar was really nice.

Are you really this dense? There's no reason to signal. Not at this point in the game, nor at the end of the game, nor would there be any reason to go and try to dig up signalling when we get closer to D-Day. It's not signalling that's going to connect us to people this game, as NO ONE NEEDS TO DO IT. All the killers know each other, and innos have no reason to signal to anyone.

But creating connections and misdirection is one thing they are going to need to do to try and win this. Are you that dense? Or are you being so against what i am saying because you are linked to Liosan for something similar? If we caught scum in Sheltatha then she would want people to look away from her partners at someone else. If we totally discount this, then that is great for the killers because they can keep doing it. No one needs to do it but that doesn't mean they won't and I am not talking about real signalling/symping I am talking about faking it to either create wifom, or to implicate someone later down the road.

[Hugin & Munin]

It is Day 1. 28 hours and 56 minutes remaining
16 Players still alive: Ampelas, Anomandaris, Galain, Karosis, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Ruse, Sheltatha Lore, Sorrit, Spite, Telas, Tennes, Tulas Shorn

9 votes to lynch, 8 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Galain ( Karosis )
1 Vote for Anomandaris ( Anomandaris )
1 Vote for Karosis ( Korvalain )
1 Vote for Korvalain ( Tennes )

Players not voted: Ampelas, Galain, Liosan, Meanas, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Ruse, Sheltatha Lore, Sorrit, Spite, Telas, Tulas Shorn