[Blend]

Tattersail, on 16 January 2013 - 05:01 PM, said:

So you don't want to answer the questions? You accuse someone of something with you own words you should at least answer my questions in return. Your removal of vote and avoidance of questions makes you look scummy.

I always think you two are connected though. So maybe i'm right this time around..

Patience grasshopper, I needed some time to review the thread before I responded. I removed the vote for exactly the reason I stated. I'd like to see what others are thinking before forming the beginnings of an actual train.

[Khellendros]

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

[Gnaw]

oh dear gawd. reading up is so much less informative when you're hungover.

I'm slower than usual, but how do we know we're on the right or wrong track if we don't get feedback of any sort?

@Khell of course you're always right. I use weasel words to let me wriggle out when my crazy theories turn out to be shit. perhaps, seems, could be, etc. you're a Texas sharpshooter; you holler out 59 theories and at the concusion of the game circle the 4 that were right and crow how good your aim is.

now will you all please stop posting so loudly.

[Blend]

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

I think Tatts just really wants people to believe that you and I to be the most obvious scum partners that ever existed. I mean, anyone who has played or even read the last 3-4 games would know that you and I are usually at odds with each other, so he's trying to make it seem like the fact that we agree is really suspicious. It's like he's a dog with a big ass bone, and we're the big ass bone. He thinks that if he comes at us different ways, he'll eventually destroy us.

[Khellendros]

Gnaw, on 16 January 2013 - 05:17 PM, said:

oh dear gawd. reading up is so much less informative when you're hungover.

I'm slower than usual, but how do we know we're on the right or wrong track if we don't get feedback of any sort?

@Khell of course you're always right. I use weasel words to let me wriggle out when my crazy theories turn out to be shit. perhaps, seems, could be, etc. you're a Texas sharpshooter; you holler out 59 theories and at the concusion of the game circle the 4 that were right and crow how good your aim is.

now will you all please stop posting so loudly.

What's with all the Khell-hating on here all of a sudden?

I guess you must all be jealous.

[Blend]

Gnaw, on 16 January 2013 - 05:17 PM, said:

oh dear gawd. reading up is so much less informative when you're hungover.

I'm slower than usual, but how do we know we're on the right or wrong track if we don't get feedback of any sort?

@Khell of course you're always right. I use weasel words to let me wriggle out when my crazy theories turn out to be shit. perhaps, seems, could be, etc. you're a Texas sharpshooter; you holler out 59 theories and at the concusion of the game circle the 4 that were right and crow how good your aim is.

now will you all please stop posting so loudly.

*runs around screaming incoherently and waving arms wildly above his head*

Better?

[The Dude]

Here and caught up. Usual day 1 banter, but I have to say the scummiest thing I have seen is Tattersail's defensiveness based upon 2 votes. Me no likey.

Also, bonecaster just kind of vanished after people started talking about him.

At this point I will be willing to vote either of them. It is day one after all.

[Khellendros]

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:19 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

I think Tatts just really wants people to believe that you and I to be the most obvious scum partners that ever existed. I mean, anyone who has played or even read the last 3-4 games would know that you and I are usually at odds with each other, so he's trying to make it seem like the fact that we agree is really suspicious. It's like he's a dog with a big ass bone, and we're the big ass bone. He thinks that if he comes at us different ways, he'll eventually destroy us.

I didn't even realise that we were agreeing till you and Tats pointed it out. Now you got me paranoid that you're trying to fake-symp me.

[The Dude]

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:19 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

I think Tatts just really wants people to believe that you and I to be the most obvious scum partners that ever existed. I mean, anyone who has played or even read the last 3-4 games would know that you and I are usually at odds with each other, so he's trying to make it seem like the fact that we agree is really suspicious. It's like he's a dog with a big ass bone, and we're the big ass bone. He thinks that if he comes at us different ways, he'll eventually destroy us.

I didn't even realise that we were agreeing till you and Tats pointed it out. Now you got me paranoid that you're trying to fake-symp me.

This post is stinky, like a master telling a symp to cool it off.

[Blend]

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:

I didn't even realise that we were agreeing till you and Tats pointed it out. Now you got me paranoid that you're trying to fake-symp me.

Hey, how do you think I feel? I hate having to agree with you. It makes me feel unclean, no matter how many times I shower. But when I think you're right, I can't just disagree cause YOU are making the accusations, no matter how much I want to.

I can, however, wait to see what others are thinking, just in case you're wrong, which would mean that at least then I wouldn't be the only one to blame for agreeing with you!

[Khellendros]

The Dude, on 16 January 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:19 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

I think Tatts just really wants people to believe that you and I to be the most obvious scum partners that ever existed. I mean, anyone who has played or even read the last 3-4 games would know that you and I are usually at odds with each other, so he's trying to make it seem like the fact that we agree is really suspicious. It's like he's a dog with a big ass bone, and we're the big ass bone. He thinks that if he comes at us different ways, he'll eventually destroy us.

I didn't even realise that we were agreeing till you and Tats pointed it out. Now you got me paranoid that you're trying to fake-symp me.

This post is stinky, like a master telling a symp to cool it off.

Oh brother, reaching much?

[Gnaw]

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:50 PM, said:

The Dude, on 16 January 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:19 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

I think Tatts just really wants people to believe that you and I to be the most obvious scum partners that ever existed. I mean, anyone who has played or even read the last 3-4 games would know that you and I are usually at odds with each other, so he's trying to make it seem like the fact that we agree is really suspicious. It's like he's a dog with a big ass bone, and we're the big ass bone. He thinks that if he comes at us different ways, he'll eventually destroy us.

I didn't even realise that we were agreeing till you and Tats pointed it out. Now you got me paranoid that you're trying to fake-symp me.

This post is stinky, like a master telling a symp to cool it off.

Oh brother, reaching much?

The Dude may be reaching, but that reach gets a bit shorter when you take into account the cross post from Blend.

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:31 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:

I didn't even realise that we were agreeing till you and Tats pointed it out. Now you got me paranoid that you're trying to fake-symp me.

Hey, how do you think I feel? I hate having to agree with you. It makes me feel unclean, no matter how many times I shower. But when I think you're right, I can't just disagree cause YOU are making the accusations, no matter how much I want to.

I can, however, wait to see what others are thinking, just in case you're wrong, which would mean that at least then I wouldn't be the only one to blame for agreeing with you!

[Hinter]

The Dude, on 16 January 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:

Here and caught up. Usual day 1 banter, but I have to say the scummiest thing I have seen is Tattersail's defensiveness based upon 2 votes. Me no likey.

Also, bonecaster just kind of vanished after people started talking about him.

At this point I will be willing to vote either of them. It is day one after all.

BC is a noob and he did say he would be gone for a while so I'm not to concerned about him yet.

Tatts' problem is that he posts so much it's kind of easy for scum to point the finger at him. I should know because that's exactly what I did in the last game I played

For me, Blend and Khell are tickling my scumdar the most. Seems to be a bit of symping one way or the other.

Very litle to go on, but as I am going out for a while I am going to

vote Blend


and see what happens.

Hopefully I should be back before days end and will ammend my vote if a more likely candidate exists.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 12 hours and 14 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Blend, Bliss, Bonecaster, Brujah, Dude, Gnaw, Hinter, Khell, Silencer, Sixty, Tapper, Tattersail

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Blend ( Hinter )
1 Vote for Tattersail ( Khell )
1 Vote for Khell ( Tattersail )

Players not voted: Blend, Bliss, Bonecaster, Brujah, Dude, Gnaw, Silencer, Sixty, Tapper

[Sixty]

Back y'all. Catching up

[Sixty]

Not a whole lot going on so far. Can't say that I'm particularly surprised though.

Tatts and Khell are clearly the most prominent right now on-thread, but that's about what I'd expect so it doesn't say a whole lot.

I am surprised Brujah still hasn't shown up yet, though.

[Bonecaster]

Quick pop-in. My work site during snow days is close enough for me to do this. And now I'm off. Hopefully a boss won't call before I get back. Maybe my coworkers will tell them I'm on the toilet.

[Tattersail_]

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:03 PM, said:

Tattersail, on 16 January 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Two pronged scum attack? wow.

fair enough

control the thread how? Do you know what that means? How am I doing that? No one has followed any of my votes. I was trying to manipulate the newbie into voting night, that's right, i'm not denying it. How does that make me scum?

Okay, after careful inspection of the thread, I may have been mistaken on the 'controlling the thread' thing. But as you say above, you tried to get the filthy newbie to vote night, and that right there is a scum move. It's a 'let's give up the right to use town's only power, the lynch, to allow the killers to use their powers' thing. How does that NOT make you scum?

And don't think that I didn't see your partner, Tapper, try to get him to do the same thing. Shame on you both for trying to confuse the poor filthy newbie.

I hope we can count on Bonecaster's vote in the future of this game but it is not like he is going to come on and find scum straight away is it? Having a joke early on is okay, he's not really going to vote night now is he, and if he did I am sure a lot of you would show him the error of his ways. The game wasn't serious early doors and instead of lying low and being cagey as what some people like to do I thought I'd create a bit of banter on thread, a few jokes here and there and a few votes here and there. What I didn't like was the way you and khell seemed to buddy up to each other throughout the day. Then he follows your vote. Now he is either following you or setting you up in my mind. So I think that is the best place to look for at least one of our scum.

[Tattersail_]

Blend, on 16 January 2013 - 05:19 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 16 January 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

You are funny, Tats.


Voting for you is scummy, unvoting for you is scummy...is that paranoia or panic which is making you sweat?

I think Tatts just really wants people to believe that you and I to be the most obvious scum partners that ever existed. I mean, anyone who has played or even read the last 3-4 games would know that you and I are usually at odds with each other, so he's trying to make it seem like the fact that we agree is really suspicious. It's like he's a dog with a big ass bone, and we're the big ass bone. He thinks that if he comes at us different ways, he'll eventually destroy us.

Khell is one to shoot himself in the foot as always. If you are partnered why would you not interact that way on thread? Why would you? You are trying to paint what I see as WIFOM and I don't like it. You could easily use that as a tactic to hide the fact that you are partnered. Don't try to tell me that isn't how scum play. You'll have a strategy and you're both pissed I'm on to you. I don't know who is innocent, or who is not, but you seem to be very agreeable with Khell, and he seems to like voting after you. He could very well be setting you up and that is the reason i'm voting Khell.

[Sixty]

I'm not particularly convinced by either side of this argument. I kinda see where you're coming from Tatts, but your reaction is unusually strong to just two votes that aren't even all that serious.