[Galain]

Korvalain, on 06 September 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

Liosan, on 06 September 2012 - 11:26 AM, said:

And back. Just waking up.

Korv, your whole gripe on me about not posting enough 'content' is bullshit. Is it ok with you if I take a few hours here and there during the game to get some work done or god forbid sleep?

I did however like your case on emur. Without the benefit of coffee yet, Emur and Osseric both are standing out for me for their lack of content, and Sorrit for defending low posters. Someone else pointed out Meanas who has managed to totally stay under the radar. Anyway, I need more caffeine, and want to look at the players again.

What? Near the start of the game you didn't. That spat between you and karosis early on can be seen as distancing cause there wasn't anything substantial in it. The way Galain is behaving points fingers at both you and Karosis for me. That post about one arguing about me symping Mockra was off, then Galain uses it as his reasoning for a Mockra vote AND then he says he didn't read what others had said, "he promises".

Yes Emur, Osseric, and Meanas have scummy play. They do. I am more convinced of you though. I probably won't get the numbers to lynch you because you are a voice of reason, you are one of the higher posters etc.

Cut it out dude. The post made it look very likely that you were symping mockra. Just because you explain something, doesn't make suspicion vanish. I don't really find you that scummy atm, because mockra came up innocent, but this kind of logic is poor imo.

[Olar Ethil]

Galain:

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:

IMO the case on Mockra is nonexistent,but I will vote him if nothing better comes up. Just because I hate low posters.
I don't think Korv was diverting attention, I think he was afraid of being lowposter lynched and so tried to offer an alternative.
And I don't know about D'riss, do you think I should have joined their pissing match?

But Korvalain offered up Osseric (another low poster) instead, while defending Mockra. So he didn't want Mockra dead, it wasn't just about being a low poster.

I feel that Spite is defending Mockra here, this just adds more viability to the lynch train.

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 02:51 PM, said:

I don't like how easy it was to put Mockra at L1 with 12 hours to go. Scum should have a symp and a partner out there somewhere!

He's there because of a supposed symp or partner... lol. One of which voted him when the lynch was clear, then removed. The other (spite, imo) is still not voting him.

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:19 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:

Vote Osseric

We can see what Mockra has to say for himself but I think Osseric' play looked quite scummy. In fact although he did a little burst of posts which included what others were thinking he has not said much since.

case rested. lol

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:21 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:

IMO the case on Mockra is nonexistent,but I will vote him if nothing better comes up. Just because I hate low posters.
I don't think Korv was diverting attention, I think he was afraid of being lowposter lynched and so tried to offer an alternative.
And I don't know about D'riss, do you think I should have joined their pissing match?

But Korvalain offered up Osseric (another low poster) instead, while defending Mockra. So he didn't want Mockra dead, it wasn't just about being a low poster.

I feel that Spite is defending Mockra here, this just adds more viability to the lynch train.

Yeah we are all defending Mockra. That makes sense. Jesus. Your mafia skills are great.

Already resorting to insults? not very nice...

I think there is an obvious case of you defending Mockra, and so far everyone who has voiced an opinion about it has been in agreement excepting spite. I'm drawing logical conclusions.

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:49 PM, said:

Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:

Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 02:51 PM, said:

I don't like how easy it was to put Mockra at L1 with 12 hours to go. Scum should have a symp and a partner out there somewhere!

He's there because of a supposed symp or partner... lol. One of which voted him when the lynch was clear, then removed. The other (spite, imo) is still not voting him.

How am I defending Mockra?
If you care to explain.

Korv is doing a great job of making himslef(and Mockra) look scummy.

Edit: X post with Galain.

You said the case on Mockra is absent. When i clearly it exists. That's my logic.

Only a selection of Galain's posts.

Seems to be a bit of a shit-disturber - was the one who mentioned the coroner-finder issue (which confused me!), joke-votes Fener, then Karosis and Spite (in the same post), and then votes Korvalain for absenteeism. Then, votes Mockra after Korv turns up and appears to be protecting Mockra - in fact Galain is the one that really gets this lynch train going, especially considering he actually intended to vote earlier than he ended up appearing to due to posting from a phone.

Pounces on Emurlahn's 'scrambling' post, which is fair enough - it just seems a pattern of opportunistic behaviour without any real interest, comes off as a bit sinister to me on reread.

The starts scrapping with Spite and Emurlahn, seems certain that both of them are scum.

Then removes the vote on Mockra to avoid an early end to the day,

Comes back on day 2 expressing hesitation to follow-up on a day 1 target despite remaining 'very suspicious' of Emurlahn. Says he will analyze some people he's supicious of. Cool, will await the result of that.

I guess a bit of day 1 randomness is forgiveable so I will wait and see what Galain does from here.

[Olar Ethil]

Right, I am quickly running out of time for the day and chances are that I won't have much if any time this evening. I'll check in as soon as I can.

[Liosan]

Thanks for taking the time to do all this player summarizing OE. I'm not going to have the time I had yesterday, but looking at these players, one thing that stuck out to me yesterday was Emur's defense at just having one vote dropped on him. Mockra was getting lots of discussion at the time, and he really shouldn't have been feeling any heat for that type of response. That makes him seem a lot more guilty to me.

[Spite]

I'm here for 10 minutes or so, but I see thread is halfway dead . Right know Sorrit really stands out to me. He is Low posting and getting away with it.

[Spite]

Sorrit, on 06 September 2012 - 12:37 AM, said:

Why would you vote Korv, when the whole point was that Korv was symping Mockra? Killing a symp gets us nowhere, unless the voting block made by the killers and the symp is becoming an issue. At this stage of the game it isn't.

When I said that , it was just gut.
now, I think It may be possible that Korv picked a low poster and tried to lynch him by fake-symping him. Clearing himself when he came up inno.

This post has been edited by Spite: 06 September 2012 - 02:37 PM

[Spite]

two others that I would like the lynch are Ossy and Meanas. Both of them are low posting so I don't have any idea about them.

Oh and btw, Dead Thread Is Dead.

[Korvalain]

Vote Liosan

I'll see what he has to say for himself. I don't buy what Galain's selling. Back much later.

[Liosan]

Spite said:

1346942224[/url]' post='993005']
two others that I would like the lynch are Ossy and Meanas. Both of them are low posting so I don't have any idea about them.

Oh and btw, Dead Thread Is Dead.

Busy Thursday at work. Osseric, sorrit and Meanas are the bottom 3, with D'riss not far behind. Of those 3, osseric's primary content was purely post padding when I called him out for only having one post. I'd be more inclined to vote him out of the low posters.

[Liosan]

Korvalain said:

1346942611[/url]' post='993007']
Vote Liosan

I'll see what he has to say for himself. I don't buy what Galain's selling. Back much later.

About? What is your case? That I targeted a low poster, whom YOU made look more guilty?

[Korvalain]

Liosan, on 06 September 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 06 September 2012 - 02:43 PM, said:

Vote Liosan

I'll see what he has to say for himself. I don't buy what Galain's selling. Back much later.

About? What is your case? That I targeted a low poster, whom YOU made look more guilty?

No you said earlier that you'd take time to read through my recent posts and accusations. So i'd like to here more about it. What are your thoughts on Galain and Karosis?

[Liosan]

Korvalain said:

1346942945[/url]' post='993010']

Liosan said:

1346942764[/url]' post='993009']

Korvalain said:

1346942611[/url]' post='993007']
Vote Liosan

I'll see what he has to say for himself. I don't buy what Galain's selling. Back much later.

About? What is your case? That I targeted a low poster, whom YOU made look more guilty?

No you said earlier that you'd take time to read through my recent posts and accusations. So i'd like to here more about it. What are your thoughts on Galain and Karosis?

I happen to have good information that I'm nether a killer or a symp, so your theory regarding the three of us is flawed. You also confused me with OE. He was the one that got into a spat with Karosis.

[Korvalain]

Liosan, on 06 September 2012 - 02:58 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 06 September 2012 - 02:49 PM, said:

Liosan, on 06 September 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:

Korvalain, on 06 September 2012 - 02:43 PM, said:

Vote Liosan

I'll see what he has to say for himself. I don't buy what Galain's selling. Back much later.

About? What is your case? That I targeted a low poster, whom YOU made look more guilty?

No you said earlier that you'd take time to read through my recent posts and accusations. So i'd like to here more about it. What are your thoughts on Galain and Karosis?

I happen to have good information that I'm nether a killer or a symp, so your theory regarding the three of us is flawed. You also confused me with OE. He was the one that got into a spat with Karosis.

No I quoted the relevant posts. Just cause your too lazy to look.

[Galain]

Path-Shaper, on 06 September 2012 - 01:38 AM, said:

14 Players still alive: D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Galain, Karosis, Korbas, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Sorrit, Spite

8 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.

1 vote for D'riss: Meanas
8 votes for Mockra: Liosan, Fener, Emurlahn, Korvalain, Spite, Olar Ethil, Karosis, D'riss


Players not voted: Galain, Korbas, Mockra, Osseric, Sorrit

Kristen knew everything about the Plastics. Her favourite fact was that they liked Varsity Blues. But one day she made the mistake of wearing her hair in a ponytail.... for the second time in a week! No Plastic would ever do that!

Mockra is lynched. She was Kristen Hadley and Gwyn Ap Nubb.

It is now night.

Okay, so the internet is out. I'll do my best here, but gonna struggle doing multiple quotes. So I'll just pick this one. It doesn't do anything to make Emurlahn less suspicious, really. He was third (fourth, I think, since I removed) on the train. But along with him at the beginniner are Liosan, Fener, and myself. Liosan is under attack from Korvalain. I don't agree with Korvalain at all, -but- I need to go back and reread his posts just to make sure I'm not missing anything, or going omgus because he accused me. Fener is dead. I am under attack from Korvalain. So of the train starters, he is attacking the two not dead. But he also omits himself, who comes in at 5th on an 8 person train (again, leaving my vote in there). 5th is the tipping point, where the train passes half way. I see some merit in the accusation that Korvalain got Mockra lynched on purpose.

We really have to choose here, Korvalain and Emurlahn are both suspicious, but on polar opposite sides. And they aren't the only two choices, just the two more suspicious in my mind. Korv's insistence that we lynch Emurlahn earlier is actually my primary reason for not voting him. Hm.

Anyway, hopefully the internet will be fixed after work. Will be reading from phone when I can.

[Olar Ethil]

Korv, you're not doing yourself any favours here mate

Your mega-post with all the fucked up quotes is basically unreadable for me. Can you please restate in brief what you're thinking at the moment?

[Olar Ethil]

Sorrit, on 06 September 2012 - 11:37 AM, said:

I'm back and caught up.

First up, sorry for the wonky colours in my last post, I had done that to differentiate the quotes to make it easier to sort them all out as I was typing, and then forgot to change them back.

I have tried to point out several times that I'm not defending low posters. If I'm not explaining myself properly I'm sorry. But I do think we are using low posting as a crutch at the moment to get the game started, and while it does sometimes give us some useful information, more often we see the low poster return and start to post more, at which point it's too late and we end up lynching an inno, or whoever is being lynched is lynched, like Mockra, having said two things, and we are not much further ahead than we were at the beginning of the game. I know I personally tend to be at the lower end of posting, although I try to make sure all my posts have a lot of content to them, and so I tend to be much more suspicious of people who post a lot, but have nothing of substance to say.

I was at work when the lynch went down. I popped in to see if my vote was needed, and when it wasn't I left again. I haven't had much opportunity to post from work today, but I have tomorrow off, so I should be around more then.

I'm currently most suspicious of Emurlahn. That post of his, defending his lack of participation, smelt of scrambling. I'd like to see if his content does increase in the next few days.

I'd also like to see D'riss elaborate on his suspicions, particularly about Korvalain. It seemed to me that the main issue with Korvalain was his defence of Mockra.

So if our current low posters do not show up and start to post more as we near the end of day two, will you change your opinion on the matter? How far are you willing to go with your tolerance of low posters?

My point is that not contributing, either by not posting much and/or posting without real contribution is essentially helping the killers, no matter what role the offender has. This should never be tolerated, imo.

I don't understand how we're even debating this - our current three lowest posters have added almost nothing to the conversation. Unacceptable.

I may have to go at any moment, btw

I have missed three people in my summaries - Korv, Liosan and Karosis - I was going from lowest poster to highest y'see. I won't have time to get round to them until tomorrow.

[Liosan]

Korvalain said:

1346943825[/url]' post='993015']

Liosan said:

1346943508[/url]' post='993014']

Korvalain said:

1346942945[/url]' post='993010']

Liosan said:

1346942764[/url]' post='993009']

Korvalain said:

1346942611[/url]' post='993007']
Vote Liosan

I'll see what he has to say for himself. I don't buy what Galain's selling. Back much later.

About? What is your case? That I targeted a low poster, whom YOU made look more guilty?

No you said earlier that you'd take time to read through my recent posts and accusations. So i'd like to here more about it. What are your thoughts on Galain and Karosis?

I happen to have good information that I'm nether a killer or a symp, so your theory regarding the three of us is flawed. You also confused me with OE. He was the one that got into a spat with Karosis.

No I quoted the relevant posts. Just cause your too lazy to look.

Lazy? I've been pretty busy at work today, and dont have the time i had yesterday. I mentioned that earlier.
Your spat that you have been making so much of a fuss about, was Karosis saying I wasn't around and my response. I hardly think that constitutes a spat.
And using the term "one" when referring to oneself is hardly signalling. So many others, including Fener, found your defense of Mockra so odd that it became the primary case against him.

[Spite]

I'm back.
I'm gonna vote Sorrit on grounds of low posting/move your lazy ass and give us some opinions .

Vote Sorrit.

I chose Sorrit because he was the most suspicious one. low posting big posts and pretending to post content.

[Osseric]

I'm doing a bit of review, but I'm not getting much insight here

[Karosis]

Ok im back from work now. will start my reread while waiting for food.