Help
Sucks we didnt hit scum in Mockra.
As i said before im leaning towards Emurlahn most because of the really wishy washy posts, especially his main defense post which really rubbed me the wrong way.
Mafia 91.5 - Mean Girls
#262
Korvalain 
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 06 September 2012 - 07:38 AM
D, on 06 September 2012 - 03:10 AM, said:
I will likely be chasing korvalian, emurlain or karosis today.
Reasons for that when I get to my laptop
Reasons for that when I get to my laptop
That's very open minded of you. I think over the next few hours I'll look at the whole fiasco about me being a symp. Scum had to be involved somewhere.
I hate the way people who are town regurgutate what other people say without actually thinking for themselves. If you are innocent it shouldn't be about self preservation, avoiding putting yourself out there and going against the grain, it's only scum that wants to try and fit in and not make any waves.
Liosan rubs me up the wrong way. A lot. The rest of you need to actually read through the thread and see what transpired. Back in an hour or two
#263
Karosis
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 07:44 AM
Emurlahn, on 05 September 2012 - 01:24 PM, said:
Guys, I can understand where you're coming from by looking at me, but we still have plenty of time, and I just haven't see a great deal to latch onto, yet. I'm here, I'm willing to discuss, but you're looking in the wrong area if you think that you'll find a killer in me. It's day 1, and we still have plenty of time. Most people tend to grow more aggressive as the hours until time out get lower. I was hoping for more content before trying to make some flimsy case just yet. We have time. We may end up having to Lynch someone who is either low posting or seems to be middle of the road, but I can assure you that neither of those descriptions fit me. In summary, if my post content continues to stay as it was, then yes, maybe a case could be made for me not being helpful, but that would the only viable case. Voting for me for not getting deep into the discussions as of yet, with still plenty of time left in the day is not viable, in my opinion. Like I said, I'm here, and plan to be here, and WILL be an active, helpful force in finding these killers. Don't count me out without further scrutiny.
This post is the one that really stood out to me, as it just seems so panicky and seems to basically amount to "please dont lynch me even though im not doing anything useful! pretty please!"
for now
remove vote
vote Emurlahn
to see where people stand on this
#266
Korbas
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:15 AM
Fener, on 06 September 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
Oops
ZOMBIE!
lol
So mockra was inno, not a huge surprise, but as he wasnt posting anything its not a great loss either. If we hadnt taken him out we would of spent another day wondering about him.
#268
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:29 AM
I'm going to try and look at some people individually, starting with Sorrit, our new lowest poster. I've chosen his last few posts, omitting one which was just announcing he was back and rereading.
I still like the low poster route. This is a tried and true method for finding scum, and when we have strayed from it, we have often let scum win. One may argue that you might be symping dear Ossy or Mockra in your defense against low posters in general, and offerring me a (mid-high poster) as an alternative.
That's kind of the point though, isn't it? We've found enough scum lurking in the low posters that it almost makes sense for them to start posting higher, just to allay suspicion. I think Emur, smack bang in the middle of the posters but with practically no content to speak of, is probably a good bet.
I still like the low poster route. This is a tried and true method for finding scum, and when we have strayed from it, we have often let scum win. One may argue that you might be symping dear Ossy or Mockra in your defense against low posters in general, and offerring me a (mid-high poster) as an alternative.
That's kind of the point though, isn't it? We've found enough scum lurking in the low posters that it almost makes sense for them to start posting higher, just to allay suspicion. I think Emur, smack bang in the middle of the posters but with practically no content to speak of, is probably a good bet.
And now you've already broken out the wifom! You are trying way too hard to defend low posters when you're already posting yourself out of that distinction.
Vote Mockra
Sure it's wifom. Doesn't mean it's not also a valid argument.
I'm not defending anything. I said before all of the low poster arguments that Emur was suspicious. I think he's a good pick for scum. My point was that I think Emur is a better bet than Mockra, not that I didn't think Mockra was scum. And I'm the second lowest poster, so I'm not sure what you mean by that last bit.
I'll vote Mockra if that's where the voting goes. I just get bored by low poster hunts.
Sorrit is all about leaving low-posters alone : low-poster hunts are 'boring', it makes more sense for the killers to avoid low-posting becuase so many killers have been low-posters lately - really? wtf? meta-gaming should be inadmissable in the first place imo, but this line of thought just doesn't make sense to me in any context.
Fener was not having this either and was committed to pursuing low posters, as am I. Please enlighten me on how it can possibly be a good idea to let people get away with not talking in this game?
Anyway, before the lynch, Sorrit says he is suspicious of Korvalain and by extension Mockra, though he doesn't like the case on Mockra on its own merits, which is fair enough but then, how can you have a case on Mockra when he only posted twice, one of which was to ask what he had said in his other post to rile everybody up and tell us he was bedridden (paraphrased).
He is unceratin about Spite but takes issue with Spite's wanting to vote for Korvalain since the argument was that Korv was symping Mockra. Also is not happy with Korbas' lazy voting.
Sorrit did not vote and has not posted since before the lynch.
Fener was vehemently anti-low poster and was the most vocal poster, so a low-posting killer would have good reason to kill him. Sorrit is on my radar for sure.
Sorrit, on 05 September 2012 - 12:29 PM, said:
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 12:13 PM, said:
What are we going to look for in our killers this game? A low poster day one seems unlikely in my opinion as that would garner attention. Lots of posts day one then drift away throughout the game. Likely. Middle of the road, posting content but not too much more than likely, partner either also being middle of the road or one high and one low?
For me Liosan is in a good position as scum. Not one of the highest posters but just above middle. He has also pointed towards the low poster route as a good idea when we are only midway through day one.
Another one is Emurlahn, he doesn't say much that we could pounce on but he says enough to not look dodgy. I mean look at his posts so far...
For me Liosan is in a good position as scum. Not one of the highest posters but just above middle. He has also pointed towards the low poster route as a good idea when we are only midway through day one.
Another one is Emurlahn, he doesn't say much that we could pounce on but he says enough to not look dodgy. I mean look at his posts so far...
I still like the low poster route. This is a tried and true method for finding scum, and when we have strayed from it, we have often let scum win. One may argue that you might be symping dear Ossy or Mockra in your defense against low posters in general, and offerring me a (mid-high poster) as an alternative.
That's kind of the point though, isn't it? We've found enough scum lurking in the low posters that it almost makes sense for them to start posting higher, just to allay suspicion. I think Emur, smack bang in the middle of the posters but with practically no content to speak of, is probably a good bet.
Sorrit, on 05 September 2012 - 01:03 PM, said:
Fener, on 05 September 2012 - 12:31 PM, said:
Sorrit, on 05 September 2012 - 12:29 PM, said:
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 12:13 PM, said:
What are we going to look for in our killers this game? A low poster day one seems unlikely in my opinion as that would garner attention. Lots of posts day one then drift away throughout the game. Likely. Middle of the road, posting content but not too much more than likely, partner either also being middle of the road or one high and one low?
For me Liosan is in a good position as scum. Not one of the highest posters but just above middle. He has also pointed towards the low poster route as a good idea when we are only midway through day one.
Another one is Emurlahn, he doesn't say much that we could pounce on but he says enough to not look dodgy. I mean look at his posts so far...
For me Liosan is in a good position as scum. Not one of the highest posters but just above middle. He has also pointed towards the low poster route as a good idea when we are only midway through day one.
Another one is Emurlahn, he doesn't say much that we could pounce on but he says enough to not look dodgy. I mean look at his posts so far...
I still like the low poster route. This is a tried and true method for finding scum, and when we have strayed from it, we have often let scum win. One may argue that you might be symping dear Ossy or Mockra in your defense against low posters in general, and offerring me a (mid-high poster) as an alternative.
That's kind of the point though, isn't it? We've found enough scum lurking in the low posters that it almost makes sense for them to start posting higher, just to allay suspicion. I think Emur, smack bang in the middle of the posters but with practically no content to speak of, is probably a good bet.
And now you've already broken out the wifom! You are trying way too hard to defend low posters when you're already posting yourself out of that distinction.
Vote Mockra
Sure it's wifom. Doesn't mean it's not also a valid argument.
I'm not defending anything. I said before all of the low poster arguments that Emur was suspicious. I think he's a good pick for scum. My point was that I think Emur is a better bet than Mockra, not that I didn't think Mockra was scum. And I'm the second lowest poster, so I'm not sure what you mean by that last bit.
I'll vote Mockra if that's where the voting goes. I just get bored by low poster hunts.
Sorrit, on 06 September 2012 - 12:37 AM, said:
First off, in terms of the Mockra case, it is a low poster hunt, backed up by Korv's reactions. For this stage in the game that's fine, but I do wish we could stop relying on a low poster hunt to kick off a game. In the last 3-4 games I've played we have started off with a low poster hunt, and it gets boring. Whoever is using the Dresden game as justification needs to remember that that was a faction game.
So, to the suspicions against Mockra, and those associated with him. Low poster-case. I don't think much of the 'slip' someone brought up, because it was in the context of discussing CF's (and lack thereof). The argument that people tend to talk about their own roles is really only relevant if something new is presented, because otherwise it could smply be put down to people speculating about roles and joining in the discussion. The argument that people talk about the roles that they have would be better applied to Olar, who brought up the role speculation in the first place. The one thing that seems pretty damning is Korvalain's reaction. It seems that he is getting pretty antsy, considering it isn't his head on the chopping block. I found it very telling that he voted for Mockra and then almost immediately removed his vote.
I'm not completely sold on the suspicions on Spite. His first 'defence' of Mockra could be genuine disagreement with the case. Having been in that position many times, I hate that anyone disagreeing with a case is supposedly defending the person the case was about, when that is simply not true. I could almost also believe that the contradiction below was simply him changing his mind on the case.
He's there because of a supposed symp or partner... lol. One of which voted him when the lynch was clear, then removed. The other (spite, imo) is still not voting him.
How am I defending Mockra?
If you care to explain.
Korv is doing a great job of making himslef(and Mockra) look scummy.
Edit: X post with Galain.
You are contradicting yourself here. Is Korv distracting or making himself and Mockra look scummy? You have said you don't see a case here, but you aren't dropping your vote anywhere. Do you think there is a better candidate for Day1?
When I came on, I didn't like the case on Mockra.
now after some discussion, I'm getting the feeling that Korv is scummy. I still don't know about Mockra. but the fact that he defended him ...( you get the wifom in my mind.)
I'm waiting for him to come, I will vote him in 1 hour 45 minutes. ( I set a timer,that much I will wait, no more.
Edit: by he defended him I mean Korv defended Mockra.
The initial 'case' was picking a low poster out of the 3, and latching onto what MAY be a slip from Mockra. Korv's reaction is what made it interesting.
It is this comment that has me wondering though:
Why would you vote Korv, when the whole point was that Korv was symping Mockra? Killing a symp gets us nowhere, unless the voting block made by the killers and the symp is becoming an issue. At this stage of the game it isn't.
For those of you connecting me with Mockra, I'd like you to go back and actually read what I wrote. Particularly Fener, because this post pisses me off:
Korv and Sorrit both seemed pretty flustered after mockra got one vote. Particularly Korv, and then Sorrit suggested that scum would become high posters because scum have low posted the last few games that just seemed extremely suspicious to me.
I wrote one post, pointing out that I thought AT THE TIME that I thought Emurlahn was scummier than Mockra, because he had a fairly high post count, was encouraging others to participate in the debate while offering none of his own thoughts, and generally having no content to speak of, even though there was a fair amount of discussion going on. This was before Korvalain's involvement in the case, and after I had already made a post with suspicions of Emur. In the context of my suspicions of Emur, it is not crazy to suggest that scum is equally likely to be a middle poster as a low. In addition, when I made that post there was a single vote on Mockra. I would be the worst symp ever if that got me flustered.
Somewhat related but mostly me just having a grump is this post:
This is seriously lazy voting. If Mockra had been around at the time to defend himself, but wasn't, that would be suspicious. But saying it is suspicious that he hasn't been on at all to defend himself is rather unfair when he hasn't been on to see that he needs to defend himself. In addition, how is he supposed to defend himself from low-posting, except to post more?
TL;DR: Korvalain is suspicious. Mockra is suspicious by association. Jury is still out on Spite.
So, to the suspicions against Mockra, and those associated with him. Low poster-case. I don't think much of the 'slip' someone brought up, because it was in the context of discussing CF's (and lack thereof). The argument that people tend to talk about their own roles is really only relevant if something new is presented, because otherwise it could smply be put down to people speculating about roles and joining in the discussion. The argument that people talk about the roles that they have would be better applied to Olar, who brought up the role speculation in the first place. The one thing that seems pretty damning is Korvalain's reaction. It seems that he is getting pretty antsy, considering it isn't his head on the chopping block. I found it very telling that he voted for Mockra and then almost immediately removed his vote.
I'm not completely sold on the suspicions on Spite. His first 'defence' of Mockra could be genuine disagreement with the case. Having been in that position many times, I hate that anyone disagreeing with a case is supposedly defending the person the case was about, when that is simply not true. I could almost also believe that the contradiction below was simply him changing his mind on the case.
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 04:48 PM, said:
Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 04:45 PM, said:
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 04:31 PM, said:
Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:
IMO the case on Mockra is nonexistent,but I will vote him if nothing better comes up. Just because I hate low posters.
I don't think Korv was diverting attention, I think he was afraid of being lowposter lynched and so tried to offer an alternative.
And I don't know about D'riss, do you think I should have joined their pissing match?
I don't think Korv was diverting attention, I think he was afraid of being lowposter lynched and so tried to offer an alternative.
And I don't know about D'riss, do you think I should have joined their pissing match?
Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 03:18 PM, said:
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 02:51 PM, said:
I don't like how easy it was to put Mockra at L1 with 12 hours to go. Scum should have a symp and a partner out there somewhere!
He's there because of a supposed symp or partner... lol. One of which voted him when the lynch was clear, then removed. The other (spite, imo) is still not voting him.
How am I defending Mockra?
If you care to explain.
Korv is doing a great job of making himslef(and Mockra) look scummy.
Edit: X post with Galain.
You are contradicting yourself here. Is Korv distracting or making himself and Mockra look scummy? You have said you don't see a case here, but you aren't dropping your vote anywhere. Do you think there is a better candidate for Day1?
When I came on, I didn't like the case on Mockra.
now after some discussion, I'm getting the feeling that Korv is scummy. I still don't know about Mockra. but the fact that he defended him ...( you get the wifom in my mind.)
I'm waiting for him to come, I will vote him in 1 hour 45 minutes. ( I set a timer,that much I will wait, no more.
Edit: by he defended him I mean Korv defended Mockra.
The initial 'case' was picking a low poster out of the 3, and latching onto what MAY be a slip from Mockra. Korv's reaction is what made it interesting.
It is this comment that has me wondering though:
Spite, on 05 September 2012 - 05:54 PM, said:
I'm more into voting Korv. but I will vote Mockra if he doesn't defend himself.
Why would you vote Korv, when the whole point was that Korv was symping Mockra? Killing a symp gets us nowhere, unless the voting block made by the killers and the symp is becoming an issue. At this stage of the game it isn't.
For those of you connecting me with Mockra, I'd like you to go back and actually read what I wrote. Particularly Fener, because this post pisses me off:
Fener, on 05 September 2012 - 09:57 PM, said:
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 09:48 PM, said:
I'm going to be available for the next 2 hours off and on, so I can vote if need be
so I see Lio talking about the case on Mockra as one that consists of Mockra talking about killer CFs and the suspicion that Korvalain was symping him...is that what everyone is voting for?
so I see Lio talking about the case on Mockra as one that consists of Mockra talking about killer CFs and the suspicion that Korvalain was symping him...is that what everyone is voting for?
Korv and Sorrit both seemed pretty flustered after mockra got one vote. Particularly Korv, and then Sorrit suggested that scum would become high posters because scum have low posted the last few games that just seemed extremely suspicious to me.
I wrote one post, pointing out that I thought AT THE TIME that I thought Emurlahn was scummier than Mockra, because he had a fairly high post count, was encouraging others to participate in the debate while offering none of his own thoughts, and generally having no content to speak of, even though there was a fair amount of discussion going on. This was before Korvalain's involvement in the case, and after I had already made a post with suspicions of Emur. In the context of my suspicions of Emur, it is not crazy to suggest that scum is equally likely to be a middle poster as a low. In addition, when I made that post there was a single vote on Mockra. I would be the worst symp ever if that got me flustered.
Somewhat related but mostly me just having a grump is this post:
Korbas, on 05 September 2012 - 02:41 PM, said:
you would smell too if you were made or otataral....
Because its probably the best case out there and he isnt defending himself
Vote Mockra
Because its probably the best case out there and he isnt defending himself
Vote Mockra
This is seriously lazy voting. If Mockra had been around at the time to defend himself, but wasn't, that would be suspicious. But saying it is suspicious that he hasn't been on at all to defend himself is rather unfair when he hasn't been on to see that he needs to defend himself. In addition, how is he supposed to defend himself from low-posting, except to post more?
TL;DR: Korvalain is suspicious. Mockra is suspicious by association. Jury is still out on Spite.
Sorrit is all about leaving low-posters alone : low-poster hunts are 'boring', it makes more sense for the killers to avoid low-posting becuase so many killers have been low-posters lately - really? wtf? meta-gaming should be inadmissable in the first place imo, but this line of thought just doesn't make sense to me in any context.
Fener was not having this either and was committed to pursuing low posters, as am I. Please enlighten me on how it can possibly be a good idea to let people get away with not talking in this game?
Anyway, before the lynch, Sorrit says he is suspicious of Korvalain and by extension Mockra, though he doesn't like the case on Mockra on its own merits, which is fair enough but then, how can you have a case on Mockra when he only posted twice, one of which was to ask what he had said in his other post to rile everybody up and tell us he was bedridden (paraphrased).
He is unceratin about Spite but takes issue with Spite's wanting to vote for Korvalain since the argument was that Korv was symping Mockra. Also is not happy with Korbas' lazy voting.
Sorrit did not vote and has not posted since before the lynch.
Fener was vehemently anti-low poster and was the most vocal poster, so a low-posting killer would have good reason to kill him. Sorrit is on my radar for sure.
#269
Karosis
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:36 AM
That's a good catch on Sorrit's defending of low posters. The reason low poster hunts happen is that you will often find people who use low posting as a way of lying low and not riling anyone up. So saying its a bad idea just because its been done before is weird.
Also is anyone seeing one of Sorrit's posts in multicolours and finding it really tricky to read?
Also is anyone seeing one of Sorrit's posts in multicolours and finding it really tricky to read?
#270
Korbas
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:41 AM
Im not a fan of all the different colours....
emur has been called on his lack of content in his posts, he has responded with a pretty hectic defence which fails to have any content in it....
maybe he is just lazy unhelpfull town or maybe not
emur has been called on his lack of content in his posts, he has responded with a pretty hectic defence which fails to have any content in it....
maybe he is just lazy unhelpfull town or maybe not
#271
Karosis
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:46 AM
Korbas, on 06 September 2012 - 09:41 AM, said:
Im not a fan of all the different colours....
emur has been called on his lack of content in his posts, he has responded with a pretty hectic defence which fails to have any content in it....
maybe he is just lazy unhelpfull town or maybe not
emur has been called on his lack of content in his posts, he has responded with a pretty hectic defence which fails to have any content in it....
maybe he is just lazy unhelpfull town or maybe not
The problem is that the skin i use has a dark background so the black writing is actually really hard to read. Im not sure whether it was deliberate or not though as i remember weird things like this happening a while back.
#272
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:50 AM
Karosis, on 06 September 2012 - 09:46 AM, said:
Korbas, on 06 September 2012 - 09:41 AM, said:
Im not a fan of all the different colours....
emur has been called on his lack of content in his posts, he has responded with a pretty hectic defence which fails to have any content in it....
maybe he is just lazy unhelpfull town or maybe not
emur has been called on his lack of content in his posts, he has responded with a pretty hectic defence which fails to have any content in it....
maybe he is just lazy unhelpfull town or maybe not
The problem is that the skin i use has a dark background so the black writing is actually really hard to read. Im not sure whether it was deliberate or not though as i remember weird things like this happening a while back.
Yeah I had the same problem, had to switch to a light skin.
Regarding Emurlahn, yes, I'm a fan of the case on him for posting a fair amount but saying almost nothing. Hopefully I'll have time to get to him as well.
#274
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:28 AM
And now Osseric. Here are all of his posts:
seems like a lot of roles for 12 players, imo
I would love to have a confirmation from PS which one is correct, might save some useless speculations
Korv and Sorrit both seemed pretty flustered after mockra got one vote. Particularly Korv, and then Sorrit suggested that scum would become high posters because scum have low posted the last few games that just seemed extremely suspicious to me.
Why would anybody care about one vote? That;s no big deal.
I'm leaving in about 20 minutes, shall I leave the hammering to whoever said they would stick around until the last? I'm not very convinced about Mockra, but I won't be apart of a no lynch day. The train seemed to build quickly on him earlier today - does anyone find any significance in that?
alright, Galain, I leave you to it
Nothing of substance here. States that he prefers to 'start the serious business early' but then doesn't offer anything. Wonders if there is anything significant about Mockra's lynch train building quickly. Also does not vote and has not posted since the lynch.
I suppose Sorrit would say leave Ossy alone as you can't really make a case on him apart from being a low-poster and seeming to lay low. He says he'll be around for a couple of hours at one point, but only if a vote is needed, doesn't offer anything of his own thoughts. Why not?
What do you have to say for yourself Ossy?
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 01:16 AM, said:
quick check in, game hadn't started last I looked but there's all kinds of time left for today
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:29 AM, said:
ok, back for today, I've seen some references to a pissing match, so I'm going to read up then be back to comment
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:30 AM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 04 September 2012 - 04:36 PM, said:
Checking in. Never seen the movie, so I'm not really interested in the RP in this one...
No coroner finder - hmm, I hope the mods made the effort to balance this correctly...could be cool, haven't seen paired finders for a very long time but I dunno how it could work without them.
So I reckon 2 killers & a symp vs. 2 finders and a healer. Anybody have any other ideas?
No coroner finder - hmm, I hope the mods made the effort to balance this correctly...could be cool, haven't seen paired finders for a very long time but I dunno how it could work without them.
So I reckon 2 killers & a symp vs. 2 finders and a healer. Anybody have any other ideas?
seems like a lot of roles for 12 players, imo
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:33 AM, said:
Galain, on 04 September 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
RI don't need to know what roles are on their team. Scum would like to know, though. That's why I don't find your speculation useful. Fair enough to the coroner thing
M&P means meat & potatoes. loosely used term. A real M&P game would be killers vs RI only, according to the scale. This is most likely a bit higher on the tmdi.
M&P means meat & potatoes. loosely used term. A real M&P game would be killers vs RI only, according to the scale. This is most likely a bit higher on the tmdi.
I would love to have a confirmation from PS which one is correct, might save some useless speculations
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:50 AM, said:
thanks, Lio, reading fail, I was still operating on the sign up thread
My take on the exchanges between OE and Karo is that is seems to be mostly playing style clashes. I can agree with starting the serious business early, I'm not into spam anyway.
now I must be productive for a time, will look in later
My take on the exchanges between OE and Karo is that is seems to be mostly playing style clashes. I can agree with starting the serious business early, I'm not into spam anyway.
now I must be productive for a time, will look in later
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 09:48 PM, said:
I'm going to be available for the next 2 hours off and on, so I can vote if need be
so I see Lio talking about the case on Mockra as one that consists of Mockra talking about killer CFs and the suspicion that Korvalain was symping him...is that what everyone is voting for?
so I see Lio talking about the case on Mockra as one that consists of Mockra talking about killer CFs and the suspicion that Korvalain was symping him...is that what everyone is voting for?
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:36 PM, said:
Fener, on 05 September 2012 - 09:57 PM, said:
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 09:48 PM, said:
I'm going to be available for the next 2 hours off and on, so I can vote if need be
so I see Lio talking about the case on Mockra as one that consists of Mockra talking about killer CFs and the suspicion that Korvalain was symping him...is that what everyone is voting for?
so I see Lio talking about the case on Mockra as one that consists of Mockra talking about killer CFs and the suspicion that Korvalain was symping him...is that what everyone is voting for?
Korv and Sorrit both seemed pretty flustered after mockra got one vote. Particularly Korv, and then Sorrit suggested that scum would become high posters because scum have low posted the last few games that just seemed extremely suspicious to me.
Why would anybody care about one vote? That;s no big deal.
I'm leaving in about 20 minutes, shall I leave the hammering to whoever said they would stick around until the last? I'm not very convinced about Mockra, but I won't be apart of a no lynch day. The train seemed to build quickly on him earlier today - does anyone find any significance in that?
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:57 PM, said:
Galain, on 05 September 2012 - 11:46 PM, said:
I'll be here until the end, or at least close.
alright, Galain, I leave you to it
Nothing of substance here. States that he prefers to 'start the serious business early' but then doesn't offer anything. Wonders if there is anything significant about Mockra's lynch train building quickly. Also does not vote and has not posted since the lynch.
I suppose Sorrit would say leave Ossy alone as you can't really make a case on him apart from being a low-poster and seeming to lay low. He says he'll be around for a couple of hours at one point, but only if a vote is needed, doesn't offer anything of his own thoughts. Why not?
What do you have to say for yourself Ossy?
#275
Korvalain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:37 AM
First of all apologies for this fucked up post. I posted out of alt and then had to copy and paste and try and put the fricking quote brackets in the right place.
Right. Looking back and reading up I could vote a number of people for a number of reasons. I'll comment as I go. The first little bit is about Karosis and Liosan. Then some others thrown in. I've got more to add after this but this is what happened just before anyone started a train rolling.
So here Karosis names Liosan as a particular suspect. I'd like to know why Karosis named him out of all the ones that had posted before this.
Not long later Lio comes on and replies to karosis
Lio wants spam, he also gets a little uppity about karosis calling him out.
This is the type of post Emurlahn has been getting away with it leaves us nothing. If he does have connections then we won't be able to find them. He hasn't really made a fuss about anything or said anything different to anybody else.
Then Lio decides to push his post count higher with a bit of spam. I mention this because he was one of the first votes on Mockra and one of the ones pushing the low poster lynch but until Karosis called him out he was down there himself.
Another person that has said little but has a higher post count is Meanas. These are his typical posts. Role Play. Easy for scum to hide behind.
Next comes Galain. This could be a signal to Karosis. I don't see the point in someone voting one player and then another like this in the same post. I don't like the way he votes Karosis and swaps to Spite. This could be a signal by a symp to his master.
Remove Vote
That's on d day.
Also, the new Fener is Karosis, if I remember correctly. He's been scum every time more than fener, recently.
Vote Karosis
just do spelling fixes only, and make sure to note what you edit.
Spite, on 04 September 2012 - 09:45 PM, said:
I'm here. And I see we have had an argument this early in the first day. interesting.
And Spite! I'm glad you're posting. You better not turn into AnsibleSpite scum like a few games ago and low post your way to victory.
Spite, on 04 September 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:
I noticed the ETA btw. And I completely agree that what he said was foolish but it does not mean OMGUS comment this early in the game. (I would have jumped and made one such comment too, but really. it does not mean you should do it as well.)
That vote for Fener. It made me cry. useless voting in... worst way possible.
Remove Vote
Vote Spite
Meanas, on 05 September 2012 - 02:48 AM, said:
Liosan, on 04 September 2012 - 10:49 PM, said:
I forgot to comment on my day!
So I knew it was going to be a Bad Day when my hair just wouldn't behave! It curled but it wouldn't bounce you know? I think I need to see my stylist and get more products. They were out of the vegan breakfast sausage at the cafeteria, so I had to settle for just tofutti on my bagel *sobs*, and I got a speeding ticket because my car got stuck on kilometers and DUH I'm an AMERICAN. I can't READ kilometers.
Finally someone is playing this game correctly...
So anyways, like, this fat bitch totally gave me some sort of freaky nerd loser look in the cafeteria, so I, like, went over to her table and cussed her out. She absolutely ran her fat ass out of there, crying like some sort of little bitch!
Also, I found the cutest top today at Hollister.
P.s. vote D'riss
Apostrophes are soooo last season.
Just another one of Meanas' posts.
So this is before all hell brakes lose.
Right. Looking back and reading up I could vote a number of people for a number of reasons. I'll comment as I go. The first little bit is about Karosis and Liosan. Then some others thrown in. I've got more to add after this but this is what happened just before anyone started a train rolling.
Quote
Karosis, on 04 September 2012 - 09:26 PM, said:
Ok as noone seems to be around il talk to myself .
Looking back the thread so far. Not a lot stands out (obviously since we've even had a page yet), but i find myself suspicious of Liosan and Fener.Liosan's only posts were saying he was here and then calling olar a killer for discussing roles. This just a bit like shooting at an easy target that people might decide to jump on while staying low so people wont notice you. Fener made mention of the thread being dead , and called on people to arrive and start discussion then disappeared as soon as people did, this just seems a bit weird.
At the moment im more suspicious of Liosan but obviously its pretty hard to judge someone whose only made 2 posts so i will wait to see what else he does.
Ok as noone seems to be around il talk to myself .
Looking back the thread so far. Not a lot stands out (obviously since we've even had a page yet), but i find myself suspicious of Liosan and Fener.Liosan's only posts were saying he was here and then calling olar a killer for discussing roles. This just a bit like shooting at an easy target that people might decide to jump on while staying low so people wont notice you. Fener made mention of the thread being dead , and called on people to arrive and start discussion then disappeared as soon as people did, this just seems a bit weird.
At the moment im more suspicious of Liosan but obviously its pretty hard to judge someone whose only made 2 posts so i will wait to see what else he does.
So here Karosis names Liosan as a particular suspect. I'd like to know why Karosis named him out of all the ones that had posted before this.
Quote
Liosan, on 04 September 2012 - 10:24 PM, said:
OK. I'm back.
OK. I'm back.
Not long later Lio comes on and replies to karosis
Quote
Liosan, on 04 September 2012 - 10:30 PM, said:
Ssooooo I'm suspicious for posting, then getting busy and having to be away for awhile? Well fuck me.
Now, as far as OE goes, I just thought it was a little odd that he came in speculating without secks or spam first! WTF?! What have we become if we cannot warm up a game with some lewd comments and joke votes first?
Quote
Karosis, on 04 September 2012 - 09:26 PM, said:
Ok as noone seems to be around il talk to myself .
Looking back the thread so far. Not a lot stands out (obviously since we've even had a page yet), but i find myself suspicious of Liosan and Fener.Liosan's only posts were saying he was here and then calling olar a killer for discussing roles. This just a bit like shooting at an easy target that people might decide to jump on while staying low so people wont notice you. Fener made mention of the thread being dead , and called on people to arrive and start discussion then disappeared as soon as people did, this just seems a bit weird.
At the moment im more suspicious of Liosan but obviously its pretty hard to judge someone whose only made 2 posts so i will wait to see what else he does.
Ok as noone seems to be around il talk to myself .
Looking back the thread so far. Not a lot stands out (obviously since we've even had a page yet), but i find myself suspicious of Liosan and Fener.Liosan's only posts were saying he was here and then calling olar a killer for discussing roles. This just a bit like shooting at an easy target that people might decide to jump on while staying low so people wont notice you. Fener made mention of the thread being dead , and called on people to arrive and start discussion then disappeared as soon as people did, this just seems a bit weird.
At the moment im more suspicious of Liosan but obviously its pretty hard to judge someone whose only made 2 posts so i will wait to see what else he does.
Ssooooo I'm suspicious for posting, then getting busy and having to be away for awhile? Well fuck me.
Now, as far as OE goes, I just thought it was a little odd that he came in speculating without secks or spam first! WTF?! What have we become if we cannot warm up a game with some lewd comments and joke votes first?
Lio wants spam, he also gets a little uppity about karosis calling him out.
Quote
Emurlahn, on 04 September 2012 - 10:37 PM, said:
Good evening, everyone. I just got home from work, and I had to sit in traffic forever. Anyway, it looks like you guys have dived right in, and the game is running along at full speed. This looks like it might turn out to be a very entertaining game.
Good evening, everyone. I just got home from work, and I had to sit in traffic forever. Anyway, it looks like you guys have dived right in, and the game is running along at full speed. This looks like it might turn out to be a very entertaining game.
This is the type of post Emurlahn has been getting away with it leaves us nothing. If he does have connections then we won't be able to find them. He hasn't really made a fuss about anything or said anything different to anybody else.
Quote
Liosan, on 04 September 2012 - 10:49 PM, said:
I forgot to comment on my day!
So I knew it was going to be a Bad Day when my hair just wouldn't behave! It curled but it wouldn't bounce you know? I think I need to see my stylist and get more products. They were out of the vegan breakfast sausage at the cafeteria, so I had to settle for just tofutti on my bagel *sobs*, and I got a speeding ticket because my car got stuck on kilometers and DUH I'm an AMERICAN. I can't READ kilometers.
I forgot to comment on my day!
So I knew it was going to be a Bad Day when my hair just wouldn't behave! It curled but it wouldn't bounce you know? I think I need to see my stylist and get more products. They were out of the vegan breakfast sausage at the cafeteria, so I had to settle for just tofutti on my bagel *sobs*, and I got a speeding ticket because my car got stuck on kilometers and DUH I'm an AMERICAN. I can't READ kilometers.
Then Lio decides to push his post count higher with a bit of spam. I mention this because he was one of the first votes on Mockra and one of the ones pushing the low poster lynch but until Karosis called him out he was down there himself.
Quote
Meanas, on 04 September 2012 - 11:25 PM, said:
The bright pink sports car rolled into the parking lot of Northview High School. The driver: a hot-pink colored dragon with a bit too much make-up on. In the passenger seat was a black colored dragon, wearing a letterman's jacket and sporting a "cool" hairstyle. In the backseat were two bright pink dragons (also wearing too much beauty roduct).
The driver pulled over to the curb and slowed to a stop next to a not-bad-looking but otherwise normal dragon, with scales the color of a ginger's locks.
"Get in the car, loser."
The bright pink sports car rolled into the parking lot of Northview High School. The driver: a hot-pink colored dragon with a bit too much make-up on. In the passenger seat was a black colored dragon, wearing a letterman's jacket and sporting a "cool" hairstyle. In the backseat were two bright pink dragons (also wearing too much beauty roduct).
The driver pulled over to the curb and slowed to a stop next to a not-bad-looking but otherwise normal dragon, with scales the color of a ginger's locks.
"Get in the car, loser."
Another person that has said little but has a higher post count is Meanas. These are his typical posts. Role Play. Easy for scum to hide behind.
Quote
Meanas, on 04 September 2012 - 11:27 PM, said:
And I also don't fucking believe that there have been no quotes or references, and an appalling lack of spam. There has been OMGUSing, but it's just not the same...
Seriously, you may not have seen the movie, but at least learn a few quotes.
"...I don't go here. I just have a lot of emotions."
And I also don't fucking believe that there have been no quotes or references, and an appalling lack of spam. There has been OMGUSing, but it's just not the same...
Seriously, you may not have seen the movie, but at least learn a few quotes.
"...I don't go here. I just have a lot of emotions."
Next comes Galain. This could be a signal to Karosis. I don't see the point in someone voting one player and then another like this in the same post. I don't like the way he votes Karosis and swaps to Spite. This could be a signal by a symp to his master.
Quote
Galain, on 04 September 2012 - 11:40 PM, said:
It's Fener. There is observable behavior. He's always the baddest of scum.
Quote
Olar Ethil, on 04 September 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
Alright - that makes no sense to me. Ages ago, I managed to lynch a fellow innocent on day one in a serious game (not sure you lot know what that means, tbph) due to a random, fun vote on day one operating on the principle that it didn't matter anyway, might as well be a complete ass. Never again. There has to be a reason. There are compelling math reasons to lynch every day so I'm down with that but I don't start off with stupidity, I'd prefer to have a proper adult reason based on observable behaviour. There's no reason, especially with 36 hour days, that we can't have a real conversation that is related to the situation at hand. I'm off to bed soon, so please don't lynch me before I have a chance to respond
Alright - that makes no sense to me. Ages ago, I managed to lynch a fellow innocent on day one in a serious game (not sure you lot know what that means, tbph) due to a random, fun vote on day one operating on the principle that it didn't matter anyway, might as well be a complete ass. Never again. There has to be a reason. There are compelling math reasons to lynch every day so I'm down with that but I don't start off with stupidity, I'd prefer to have a proper adult reason based on observable behaviour. There's no reason, especially with 36 hour days, that we can't have a real conversation that is related to the situation at hand. I'm off to bed soon, so please don't lynch me before I have a chance to respond
It's Fener. There is observable behavior. He's always the baddest of scum.
Remove Vote
Quote
Karosis, on 04 September 2012 - 08:46 PM, said:
Read much?
Quote
Olar Ethil, on 04 September 2012 - 08:42 PM, said:
Alright - that makes no sense to me. Ages ago, I managed to lynch a fellow innocent on day one in a serious game (not sure you lot know what that means, tbph) due to a random, fun vote on day one operating on the principle that it didn't matter anyway, might as well be a complete ass. Never again. There has to be a reason. There are compelling math reasons to lynch every day so I'm down with that but I don't start off with stupidity, I'd prefer to have a proper adult reason based on observable behaviour. There's no reason, especially with 36 hour days, that we can't have a real conversation that is related to the situation at hand. I'm off to bed soon, so please don't lynch me before I have a chance to respond
The problem with this idea is that if you don't lynch day one then you go into day 2 with very little extra information to work with and one less innocent to get the lynch
Alright - that makes no sense to me. Ages ago, I managed to lynch a fellow innocent on day one in a serious game (not sure you lot know what that means, tbph) due to a random, fun vote on day one operating on the principle that it didn't matter anyway, might as well be a complete ass. Never again. There has to be a reason. There are compelling math reasons to lynch every day so I'm down with that but I don't start off with stupidity, I'd prefer to have a proper adult reason based on observable behaviour. There's no reason, especially with 36 hour days, that we can't have a real conversation that is related to the situation at hand. I'm off to bed soon, so please don't lynch me before I have a chance to respond
The problem with this idea is that if you don't lynch day one then you go into day 2 with very little extra information to work with and one less innocent to get the lynch
Read much?
Quote
Karosis, on 04 September 2012 - 08:59 PM, said:
I vaguely remember seeing somewhere that depending on whether you have an odd or even number of players left that its sometimes better to go to night and wait for the next day. I cant remember which way round it was though as this was a while back
I vaguely remember seeing somewhere that depending on whether you have an odd or even number of players left that its sometimes better to go to night and wait for the next day. I cant remember which way round it was though as this was a while back
That's on d day.
Also, the new Fener is Karosis, if I remember correctly. He's been scum every time more than fener, recently.
Vote Karosis
Quote
Olar Ethil, on 04 September 2012 - 09:23 PM, said:
Oh, FFS, you are clever while seeming like the opposite aren't you?
slight bits? As in the enitirety of my post? Read it again - you missed everything, not just the bit about math reasons. What part of it were you responding to, ffs?
You're Brujah aren't you? NO, don't answer.
if editing posts is illegal in 'new malazan mafia' than kill me now because that is not on.
Oh, FFS, you are clever while seeming like the opposite aren't you?
slight bits? As in the enitirety of my post? Read it again - you missed everything, not just the bit about math reasons. What part of it were you responding to, ffs?
You're Brujah aren't you? NO, don't answer.
if editing posts is illegal in 'new malazan mafia' than kill me now because that is not on.
just do spelling fixes only, and make sure to note what you edit.
Spite, on 04 September 2012 - 09:45 PM, said:I'm here. And I see we have had an argument this early in the first day. interesting.
And Spite! I'm glad you're posting. You better not turn into AnsibleSpite scum like a few games ago and low post your way to victory.
Spite, on 04 September 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:I noticed the ETA btw. And I completely agree that what he said was foolish but it does not mean OMGUS comment this early in the game. (I would have jumped and made one such comment too, but really. it does not mean you should do it as well.)
That vote for Fener. It made me cry. useless voting in... worst way possible.
Remove Vote
Vote Spite
Meanas, on 05 September 2012 - 02:48 AM, said:Liosan, on 04 September 2012 - 10:49 PM, said:I forgot to comment on my day!
So I knew it was going to be a Bad Day when my hair just wouldn't behave! It curled but it wouldn't bounce you know? I think I need to see my stylist and get more products. They were out of the vegan breakfast sausage at the cafeteria, so I had to settle for just tofutti on my bagel *sobs*, and I got a speeding ticket because my car got stuck on kilometers and DUH I'm an AMERICAN. I can't READ kilometers.
Finally someone is playing this game correctly...
So anyways, like, this fat bitch totally gave me some sort of freaky nerd loser look in the cafeteria, so I, like, went over to her table and cussed her out. She absolutely ran her fat ass out of there, crying like some sort of little bitch!
Also, I found the cutest top today at Hollister.
P.s. vote D'riss
Apostrophes are soooo last season.
Just another one of Meanas' posts.
So this is before all hell brakes lose.
#276
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:40 AM
And now Meanas:
Who was this aimed at?
I've got to say, Galain's play has me scratching my head. First a vote for Fener, then a low poster hunt?
Sorry that was re: your comment about emurlahn. I don't think we should be expecting much in the way of content right now. Besides, like, talking about clothes is so much more fun!
Like, I know, right?
And Sorrit, you need to, like, get off your period.
Meanas, period jokes are, like, soooo 2003.
Oh. May. God. I happen to be, like, subscribed to, um, Teenglamm magazine, and, like, period jokes are totally hawt right now! Like, totally. Real talk.
I know, she is such a bitch!
Wait...
Really? That or football huh?
Anyone watching the Dem. convention?
Really? That or football huh?
Anyone watching the Dem. convention?
Pshaw who would ever do that.
Eh, I'm switching between that and football.
I couldn't include all of meanas' posts, so I ommitted the first few. Wow, nothing but spam. Kill it with fire.
Meanas, on 05 September 2012 - 03:59 AM, said:
Sorrit, on 05 September 2012 - 03:54 AM, said:
Meanas, on 05 September 2012 - 03:05 AM, said:
Fener, on 05 September 2012 - 02:58 AM, said:
Sorrit, on 05 September 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
Fener, on 05 September 2012 - 01:33 AM, said:
Dude you're two pages deep, that's vaguely serious already. Much more than usual.
I'm around for a bit if anyone wants to talk. Everything between Karosis and Olar Ethil seems like just a pissing contest. "Well, that sure escalated quickly." - Michael Scott
I'm around for a bit if anyone wants to talk. Everything between Karosis and Olar Ethil seems like just a pissing contest. "Well, that sure escalated quickly." - Michael Scott
Who was this aimed at?
I've got to say, Galain's play has me scratching my head. First a vote for Fener, then a low poster hunt?
Sorry that was re: your comment about emurlahn. I don't think we should be expecting much in the way of content right now. Besides, like, talking about clothes is so much more fun!
Like, I know, right?
And Sorrit, you need to, like, get off your period.
Meanas, period jokes are, like, soooo 2003.
Oh. May. God. I happen to be, like, subscribed to, um, Teenglamm magazine, and, like, period jokes are totally hawt right now! Like, totally. Real talk.
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 01:43 AM, said:
What, still no real defense from Mockra? I was looking forward to reading his thoughts on the perfect case that has been built against him...
At least we got a lynch in, too bad I couldn't contribute much. And before I forget:
Remove vote
Apostrophes are neither in or out. they are simply punctuation.
At least we got a lynch in, too bad I couldn't contribute much. And before I forget:
Remove vote
Apostrophes are neither in or out. they are simply punctuation.
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 02:04 AM, said:
Fener, on 06 September 2012 - 01:46 AM, said:
Scumbag Meanas:
Is never around, complains about weak cases
Is never around, complains about weak cases
I know, she is such a bitch!
Wait...
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 02:11 AM, said:
Liosan, on 06 September 2012 - 02:06 AM, said:
Fener, on 06 September 2012 - 02:03 AM, said:
Hard to say for sure. I'm watching the movie right now so I can tell haha
Really? That or football huh?
Anyone watching the Dem. convention?
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 02:35 AM, said:
Fener, on 06 September 2012 - 02:27 AM, said:
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 02:11 AM, said:
Liosan, on 06 September 2012 - 02:06 AM, said:
Fener, on 06 September 2012 - 02:03 AM, said:
Hard to say for sure. I'm watching the movie right now so I can tell haha
Really? That or football huh?
Anyone watching the Dem. convention?
Pshaw who would ever do that.
Eh, I'm switching between that and football.
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:
That was a fast resolve. Good job on the provisionals, guys. Or girls.
Apparently, we have both.
And isn't sixty a bit old for a high school student? (bu dum tish)
Apparently, we have both.
And isn't sixty a bit old for a high school student? (bu dum tish)
Meanas, on 06 September 2012 - 02:52 AM, said:
Lol nice x post, fener.
I couldn't include all of meanas' posts, so I ommitted the first few. Wow, nothing but spam. Kill it with fire.
#277
Korvalain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:41 AM
Again apologies. None of the above are votes from me they are quotes from galain and Meanas.
So in conclusion for the above post. Lio looks suspect for being a low poster, increasing his posts and going after low posters. Emur and Meanas look suspect for providing no content. Galain looks suspect for flash voting Karosis and movi9ng onto Spite.
Still getting caught up.
So in conclusion for the above post. Lio looks suspect for being a low poster, increasing his posts and going after low posters. Emur and Meanas look suspect for providing no content. Galain looks suspect for flash voting Karosis and movi9ng onto Spite.
Still getting caught up.
#278
Korvalain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 06 September 2012 - 10:58 AM
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 10:29 AM, said:
I was around yesterday for the most part but the game thread was locked.
Not that many pages to read up on so I will go and do that now.
Not that many pages to read up on so I will go and do that now.
So this is my first post. I said i'd be around to comment and I was. The next post is by Liosan. Low poster hunt. This is a few posts after Karosis called him out on low posting but by this stage he has a higher post count.
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 11:12 AM, said:
I'm back again.
I think that unless we see some slip ups that indicate someone is talking about a role they have *hint hint* or sympage, then the low poster route is the best way to go at this juncture, and we'll see how everyone reacts.
I think that unless we see some slip ups that indicate someone is talking about a role they have *hint hint* or sympage, then the low poster route is the best way to go at this juncture, and we'll see how everyone reacts.
He knows Karosis will be agreeable to this as he was earlier.
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 11:20 AM, said:
Mockra, on 04 September 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:
Here for a moment.
I hope it becomes fairly obvious once we lynch a killer.
I hope it becomes fairly obvious once we lynch a killer.
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 01:16 AM, said:
quick check in, game hadn't started last I looked but there's all kinds of time left for today
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 10:29 AM, said:
I was around yesterday for the most part but the game thread was locked.
Not that many pages to read up on so I will go and do that now.
Not that many pages to read up on so I will go and do that now.
Of the three one-hit posters, I think Mockra's sticks out the most.
vote Mockra
So he quotes our three posts.
Now I agree to Mockra being a suspected low poster as they posted over 12 hours previously to this post and then did not post since. That is classic to avoid a modkill and try and slip under the radar. I disagree with me being a low poster as I had just come online for the first time and said i'd catch up. Osseric to me then looks suspect. This looked like panicking from him.
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:29 AM, said:
ok, back for today, I've seen some references to a pissing match, so I'm going to read up then be back to comment
This reads to me that he doesn't like Lio's accusation so he'll post a couple of posts.
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:30 AM, said:
Olar Ethil, on 04 September 2012 - 04:36 PM, said:
Checking in. Never seen the movie, so I'm not really interested in the RP in this one...
No coroner finder - hmm, I hope the mods made the effort to balance this correctly...could be cool, haven't seen paired finders for a very long time but I dunno how it could work without them.
So I reckon 2 killers & a symp vs. 2 finders and a healer. Anybody have any other ideas?
No coroner finder - hmm, I hope the mods made the effort to balance this correctly...could be cool, haven't seen paired finders for a very long time but I dunno how it could work without them.
So I reckon 2 killers & a symp vs. 2 finders and a healer. Anybody have any other ideas?
seems like a lot of roles for 12 players, imo
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:33 AM, said:
Galain, on 04 September 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
RI don't need to know what roles are on their team. Scum would like to know, though. That's why I don't find your speculation useful. Fair enough to the coroner thing
M&P means meat & potatoes. loosely used term. A real M&P game would be killers vs RI only, according to the scale. This is most likely a bit higher on the tmdi.
M&P means meat & potatoes. loosely used term. A real M&P game would be killers vs RI only, according to the scale. This is most likely a bit higher on the tmdi.
I would love to have a confirmation from PS which one is correct, might save some useless speculations
Korbas, on 05 September 2012 - 11:38 AM, said:
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:33 AM, said:
Galain, on 04 September 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
RI don't need to know what roles are on their team. Scum would like to know, though. That's why I don't find your speculation useful. Fair enough to the coroner thing
M&P means meat & potatoes. loosely used term. A real M&P game would be killers vs RI only, according to the scale. This is most likely a bit higher on the tmdi.
M&P means meat & potatoes. loosely used term. A real M&P game would be killers vs RI only, according to the scale. This is most likely a bit higher on the tmdi.
I would love to have a confirmation from PS which one is correct, might save some useless speculations
Useless speculation is what mafia is all about!
Im still waiting for korv, he said he was catching up over an hour ago now and still n othing from him other than his I'm here post.
Something must of caught his eye to post about...
This is a post by Korbas saying that he is waiting to see what I have to say. yet I was away from the thread at the time.
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 11:50 AM, said:
thanks, Lio, reading fail, I was still operating on the sign up thread
My take on the exchanges between OE and Karo is that is seems to be mostly playing style clashes. I can agree with starting the serious business early, I'm not into spam anyway.
now I must be productive for a time, will look in later
My take on the exchanges between OE and Karo is that is seems to be mostly playing style clashes. I can agree with starting the serious business early, I'm not into spam anyway.
now I must be productive for a time, will look in later
You do not have to spam to provide content. He leaves after these few posts. Which basically shows us he did it to get away from being accused as a low poster.
#279
Korvalain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 06 September 2012 - 11:01 AM
The first part of this post is aimed at Korbas' post I have just quoted. The part were he said he is waiting for me.
Of the three one-hit posters, I think Mockra's sticks out the most.
vote Mockra
Jesus! Lunch break you know. I am not going to be glued to my computer all day long. My read ups take quite a while as I try and get a feel for the thread at the time of posting. Like that one from Mockra you quoted, that was day one, about four or five posts in or something. Then nothing since. Then you got Osseric posting like 4 posts in a row to just become a higher poster. How is that helpful to town? In my opinion Osseric looks more suspicious for doing just that.
You got Olar who is bat shit crazy but makes some good points then gets defensive then flies off the wall. Why is he so jumpy and nervous?
Now this posted reply, I admit, is lazy. I did not elaborate which is why some people may have thought this was a defence of Mockra but it genuinly wasn't. I was agreeable to both Osseric and Mockra here, yet not myself.
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 12:04 PM, said:
Liosan, on 05 September 2012 - 11:20 AM, said:
Mockra, on 04 September 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:
Here for a moment.
I hope it becomes fairly obvious once we lynch a killer.
I hope it becomes fairly obvious once we lynch a killer.
Osseric, on 05 September 2012 - 01:16 AM, said:
quick check in, game hadn't started last I looked but there's all kinds of time left for today
Korvalain, on 05 September 2012 - 10:29 AM, said:
I was around yesterday for the most part but the game thread was locked.
Not that many pages to read up on so I will go and do that now.
Not that many pages to read up on so I will go and do that now.
Of the three one-hit posters, I think Mockra's sticks out the most.
vote Mockra
Jesus! Lunch break you know. I am not going to be glued to my computer all day long. My read ups take quite a while as I try and get a feel for the thread at the time of posting. Like that one from Mockra you quoted, that was day one, about four or five posts in or something. Then nothing since. Then you got Osseric posting like 4 posts in a row to just become a higher poster. How is that helpful to town? In my opinion Osseric looks more suspicious for doing just that.
You got Olar who is bat shit crazy but makes some good points then gets defensive then flies off the wall. Why is he so jumpy and nervous?
Now this posted reply, I admit, is lazy. I did not elaborate which is why some people may have thought this was a defence of Mockra but it genuinly wasn't. I was agreeable to both Osseric and Mockra here, yet not myself.
#280
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 06 September 2012 - 11:02 AM
forgot to add re: Meanas - voted D'riss early in the day, didn't remove it until after the lynch.
@Korv: you pick out some early posts from Lio, who is now our highest living poster - it's my general impression that most of his posts have been potentially useful in that they are dealing with the problem at hand. If he had artificially inflated his post count with useless posts I might agree with you. This is not to say that I believe Liosan is innocent, but I think suspicion for the reason you've given is unwarranted.
Obviously I agree about about Emur and Meanas and will have a look at Galain too.
@Korv: you pick out some early posts from Lio, who is now our highest living poster - it's my general impression that most of his posts have been potentially useful in that they are dealing with the problem at hand. If he had artificially inflated his post count with useless posts I might agree with you. This is not to say that I believe Liosan is innocent, but I think suspicion for the reason you've given is unwarranted.
Obviously I agree about about Emur and Meanas and will have a look at Galain too.
