Emurlahn, on 25 July 2012 - 08:54 PM, said:
Vote Rashan
D'rek/Emurlahn makes a good point here. For all those that took their time to change their avatar and get into the spirit of the game and then have low content is bad. I could vote Rashan for this same as Kaschan.
Kaschan, on 26 July 2012 - 01:58 AM, said:
Telas, on 26 July 2012 - 01:37 AM, said:
Liosan, it may have been a weak case, but that's all we can expect from day 1: make weak cases and see how people react.
@Kaschan: When else are we going to hunt for low posters? The game has been running for 24 hours, and everyone was checked in about 12 hours in. Most people were present to at least talk a bit, to put themselves out there. Rashan got voted because, like Liosan explained, he was present at a time of high post volume but didn't contribute much himself beyond checking in. That kind of tactic is good for scum since they can appear to be involved without drawing suspicion (unless we choose to hunt low posters). People who are the forefront of conversations are putting themselves out there; they are explaining their thoughts, so if they are scum it is more probable they will slip. If we let town get away with low-posting, it is easy for scum to hide among them.
As a result, I don't mind lynching low-posters if we need a lynch and have nothing controversial. Lynching low-posters might be a better strategy later in the game, but by that point we also have cases with genuine evidence to consider.
I think the usual time is Day 2 or 3 when trends have begun to develop as to who is not participating and when there are no strong cases to be utilized. It seems like the game just started to me because of time zones, I guess. I won't argue w tih you about the need to post.
At least Kaschan knows he hasn't been very helpful.
Right the reason I pegged Sorrit and Atrahal more likely to be town is because of the Emurlahn lynch fiasco.
D, on 26 July 2012 - 04:23 AM, said:
Tellan is raising my hackles and I don't like Kasch, Sorrit, Rash, and Lio all jumping onto Emur so quickly when there are votes on other people and still many hours to go. I think of those 4, Lio makes me the most nervous, putting Emur at L-1 so carelessly, and dropping her case against you Rash so casually for an even worse case against Emur.
But if someone would like to hammer, by all means, I don't think there's much more to be accomplished here. I will take no part in it however.
I wholeheartedly agree with D'riss' post. It is something I would have posted myself at the time. Looking at this all four are suspect and yet Tellan was the one I focused upon but this post is followed by these two.
Atrahal, on 26 July 2012 - 04:29 AM, said:
I'll be around to hammer if needed, but I am not happy with this lynch.
I like this post by Atrahal. It shows he is against the lynch of Emurlahn but he will vote if needed.
Sorrit, on 26 July 2012 - 04:36 AM, said:
Not necessarily that you're defending Emurlahn, but more like you seem to be trying to appear a bit TOO tough on a possible town lynch.
If you read the thread, you'd see that really the MAIN reason for choosing Emurlahn looks like it was just the simple fact he had 3 votes, and Rashan only had 1, I believe. We're really just taking a huge shot in the dark with anyone right now. There's no solid case on anyone. You're not suggesting a no lynch, are you? Same question for Atrahal.
If either of you have a better option, let's hear it.
remove vote
Here's time.
Sorrit I liked this post. It makes them both add their thoughts and it gives Emurlahn time to defend themselves.
Atrahal, on 26 July 2012 - 04:56 AM, said:
With voting this close we now have no other viable lynches, and there is not going to be much more information put on thread because this lynch is assured.
Plus people voting simply to get a lynch does not provide town with a lot of information in the long run.
Another post i'm agreeable with.
So maybe I have town like thoughts towards you Sorrit and Atrahal because early in the game I was agreeable with your posts.
Yet..
Sorrit, on 31 July 2012 - 01:52 AM, said:
Come on people. It's Day 3. Time to participate.
I and everyone else has seen what Eloth has posted and now he's probably going to be night killed. I am 50 50 here, if you are the finder Eloth then let us know what you've got so far because I don't see you making it another day. If not then the real finder should stay hidden unless they've found at least one scum. If the finder has found one scum then we can lynch him, pushing back D day and forge connections.
I don't like the way Sorrit has been acting over the last few posts, I applaud the amount of posts but he is all over the place.