So prior to the fiasco of the Emurlahn and Liosan lynches, you couldn't be arsed to say or do very much.
Korvalain, on 16 March 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:
This is my only opportunity to post today. I haven't had a chance to look at the thread other than looking at the time stamp and a few of the last couple of posts.and our chioces look to be between Emur and Lio. Personally I don't have much of a read on Emur at the moment but Lio has been annoying me all game. So if for nothing else than to eliminate someone whos posts I find very hard to read
vote Liosan
Happy St Patty's Day everyone.
Korvalain, on 19 March 2012 - 02:41 PM, said:
As I sat out Friday for some March Madness I need to get caught up on Pre last lynch activity. Would like to see how both Emur and Lio got into such hot water. Didn't see either of their lynches coming.
Conveniently oblivious?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And later....
Korvalain, on 20 March 2012 - 09:59 PM, said:
Looks like not a lot has happened today. I know there is something dodgey that went down on the train with Emurlahn and I thought for sure that there was misdirection going on away from Liosan but the fact that he went on and ended up being innocent I'm not sure where exactly to look at from here. The only other interesting bit of going ons was the fact that we got our first night kill. Why Sorrit? He was one of my canidates for being scum as he fell into the middle of the road group that I was keeping an eye on.
D'riss and Tennes are going out of their way to see who is the first to repost everything that Sorrit said. If I had to guess I'm thinking with the fake symping that Rashan accused D'riss of, that D'riss and his recruit Tennes are going out of their way to create WIFOM and direct attention away from each other. And the fact that they went out of their way to double mention Barghast is a bit strange. Was it deliberate? I find it very suspicious in any case.
I think in regards to Mockra I will need to do a reread on him to see where I stand. I always seem to get him and Ruse mixed up. I know I had a bit of a bone with him earlier in the game but he defended himself well enough that I believe his reasonings. Anything after that hasn't really stood out to me.
Right now the two players that are standing out to me are Gamelon and Ruse. Gamelon I get the impression that he is coasting along putting in minimal effort and staying under the radar. It could just be lazy towie play but I get the feeling it's not. Ruse is only on my radar because of two posts recently. His Sigh... and Interesting... posts. Did that sit wrong with anyone else? Seems a bit forced for me.
Korvalain, on 20 March 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Oh one other thing that I forgot to mention earlier. Rashan seems to be absoluted obsessed with stating that Silanah has the killing powers. How can you still think that when a townie was killed and you seem so adamant that there is some sort of finder/kill power that he must have. If that were true then wouldn't a cult member be the one that died last night and not a town player.
I'm begining to wonder if your fascination with this ability stems from the "he who smelt it dealt it" philosophy. But since you seem to be wrong in regards to the results probably not unless you are deliberately trying to defelct who actually has that role.
Korvalain, on 20 March 2012 - 10:07 PM, said:
Gamelon is now one of the high posters? When did that happen and why can't I remember anything he said? Definately need to take a look at him.
Korvalain, on 20 March 2012 - 10:15 PM, said:
Well no wonder I can't remember him. Of his 50 odd posts he has, maybe 4 that give more than a token response. Post padding if I ever saw it. Why don't you come out and give an analysis and help us out here? If you are not going to say anything why go to the trouble of giving the impression that you are actually participating. For all you've said you might as well be a low poster.
I find it interesting and a bit scummy that you now come back to us with the full Monday morning quarterback review. As far as I'm concerned, while I don't fully trust Tennes motivations, he's following the same train of thought that I had as far as the WTF of a low contributer getting killed. I'm reviewing all of the connections he thought he saw as well as Mockra. About the only thing you have said here that I agree with is that Gamelon's posting does look a bit suspicious, I'll have to look closer at the patterns.
Edited to add seperation between posts.
This post has been edited by D'riss: 20 March 2012 - 10:49 PM