Nicodimas, on 27 June 2018 - 09:01 PM, said:
HoosierDaddy, on 27 June 2018 - 08:49 PM, said:
I'm not even going to read your idiocy, Nic. The celebration says everything I need to judge.
I hope all those poor white assholes who hate people who aren't taking their jobs, and still are losing them despite fuckface's promises, enjoy their just fruits.
Lots of civil liberties now under threat.
? The guy was 81. Are you suprised he retired or something geez.
Term limits HD.. always been pro, even on judges!
Like the above judges expertise sounds solid:
Civil Procedure
Constitutional Law
Evidence
Federal Courts
Federal Courts & Federal Litigation
Statutory Interpretation
Those are all core law school classes other than federal court litigation.
That isn't rocket science. For fucks sake that is 1L and 2L beginning information.
Civ Pro is hardly problematic for a Supreme Court Justice. They only hear cases they want.
Constitutional Law is........... Supreme Court case law. That's it.
Statutory Interpretation is called "Legislation" in law school. It's grammar rules with lots of nuances. Not hard.
Evidence is very nuanced. I'll give you that it is difficult to determine outcomes, but only because the rules are ever changing.
Fed and Fed Lit are specialties that I'll admit I'm not as familiar with other than general Fed Law.
The Congress has a job to make sure a qualified candidate is selected, and I seriously doubt assfuckmcghee is going to do a thorough selection process.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....