Neocount Cicero, on 02 May 2011 - 07:00 PM, said:
Tapper, on 02 May 2011 - 06:49 PM, said:
Jaime was a bit too one-dimensional to my liking, a bit too selfish and a bit too intent on a turf war,=
Idunno, Tapper, I have to beg to differ. I actually thought that with this episode, the series did a better job at pulling on some of the more sympathetic strands of Jaime's character earlier on than the books. We are really only introduced to the idea that Jaime killed Aerys Tararyen for anything resembling a good reason in ASoS, and it doesn't come to fruition until FFC when we learn that he did it (among other reasons) chiefly to stop him from burning everyone in King's Landing to a crisp with wildfire. And yet they alluded to that here in episode three of the first season.
I agree that there are times when he comes off as selfish, brutish and trigger happy in the show, but that's, to my mind, pretty faithful to what we see of him in the books pre-ASoS when he gets a POV. I tend to think they're doing a much better job of hinting at some of his more humane qualities here than Martin managed to do before he introduced him as a POV. To the fact that he still mostly comes off as a cock, well, Jaime
is kind of a cock until being defeated by Robb, losing his hand to the Mummers, running with Brienne, and falling out with Cersei and Tywin.
Maybe - I know they do the same with Cersei. My point is, with her, it works marvellously for me - not in the least thanks to the actor, she adds depth to a character I detested. Wih Jaime, not so much - but that might be because I generally tend to like arrogant, cocky devils who believe in the prowess of their own right hand and little else - Sergio Leone style I mean, the guy shags his own twin sister, wouldn't that weigh on your mind? It doesnt on the early book Jaime Lannister. My point is more that this Jaime is not posturing, lacks 50% of the arrogance he had in the books, and yet tries to bring his lines across in a Bond-esque fashion, and somehow that doesn't mesh entirely. Tyrion has the venom and arrogance I expected of Jaime.
The Throne room scene between Ned and Jaime was good, but the flavor of it was disdainful aristocrat meets reserved farmer, instead of cocky traitor who lived by his sword, name and reputation since he became Kingslayer meets seasoned warrior, warden of the North, friend of the king, who stood against fucking Arthur Dayne Ned. The
history between them, a history which weaves through the entire first book, was not at all apparent in what made it such a great confrontation - and I can only congratulate the actors on still making it look great, but the lines and lack of reflection by the script writers gave them less than 100% sound material. I'd much rather have given up a bit of Jon time to see that scene perfected.
And yes, to those of us who know about the fire, this was a new line that revealed things. To new people, it was an illustration of Aerys' madness, in a bit of a parallel to Denethor's demise in Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, but not the planning of an atrocity.
EDIT: I might seem to contradict myself. The Jaime I like in the books is an arrogant cock but he has earned it and he revels in his reputation. The Jaime of the series is coasting and seems more snobbish, looking down his nose and wondering what all the little mouth breathers are doing there, than confident. There is as of yet no sense of Jaime being one of the martial prodigies of the realm, which he is. Instead, he seems more of a fad, a courtier.
This post has been edited by Tapper: 02 May 2011 - 07:30 PM
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad