Mental spills the beans to Vengey.
Merrid, on 14 April 2011 - 02:40 AM, said:
ansible is playing it very well with D'rek. He knows he's on the outs, and he just has to make himself seem like a good alternative when the next vote happens.
Kalse, on 14 April 2011 - 02:38 AM, said:
So sure, put in a good word for me and I'll do my best to stay valuable. Until then, like you said, we're in this together.
With any luck, we won't end up at Tribal Council at all.
I love how D'rek's still pretending to not be a Leader. It helps that she's not directly allied with Alkend and they voted off Tiamatha!
Serc, on 14 April 2011 - 02:51 AM, said:
Yes well, that would be ideal. Any plans for what you'll do with your 2 EXP? I'm thinking of branching to Leader - no one's claimed that one and it seems like it could be the type to benefit the tribe well.
Kalse, on 14 April 2011 - 03:25 AM, said:
Serc, on 14 April 2011 - 06:15 AM, said:
Tapper seems OK with allying up with the core group in Pensador.
Eloth, on 14 April 2011 - 06:22 AM, said:
Tapper discusses it more with Roldom.
Eloth, on 14 April 2011 - 06:20 AM, said:
Ruse proposed the exact same thing in nearly the exact same wording, so unless you and he are partners, more people have this idea
have to run now, more tonight my time!
And Roldom is *very* open with Tapper about Shadow/Shinrei. This is going to be *very* interesting to see how Shadow's lies catch up to him. Picking Survivalist probably wasn't the best choice after he saw he had a +INT bonus!
Karatallid, on 14 April 2011 - 06:42 AM, said:
we have 5 players ( you, me, ruse, liosan and shadow) which we are making into a allied core, with 5 loyal players we can cruise to the jury stage, when we are there its up to the jury to decide not us 5, so we gain nothing by being sneaky lol We have tried to get five players with different abilities.
so far we have four out of the five in agreement, your the only player we need confimation from.
how ever there is a slight development that is causing us trouble.
Sadly we have reason the believe one of the four confirmed players, Shadow has been lying. the other three of us are currantly discussing what are best options are. Shadow has been pretending to be a genius. according to ruse, shadow is a survivalist like me, most likely he lied to make it look like he was more valuable.
It is good that you are talking to TS as he is likely the person we going to invite into our cadre should we decide it is in our best interests to inform the tribe at large about this liars behaviour and vote them out, as he has risked the entire tribes chances, not just our groups. In this latest challenge he was originaly put forward as the person to attempt the intelligence part of the challenge.
luckily TS got here on time to change it.
off course there is the possibility that ruse is the one lying, and that shadow really is a genius, but personaly i believe ruse.
so far we havent mentioned to shadow that we have caught him on his lie, but if you have time could you please talk to TS and see if we could get him into our cadre? me lio and ruse are all linked with each other and shadow, if one of us breaks allience with shadow, it might alert him that something is up.
Sorry for the essay lol
Karatallid, on 14 April 2011 - 07:07 AM, said:
Ive tole shadow we are going to vote for fener, but personally i think we should get rid of shadow and bring the real genius TS into the group
looking at the thread, the way TS seemed to know more about being a genius, and the fact that shadow didnt say what he was untill after a few of us survivalists had already spoken...
he lied, not that it mattered, we still lost the challenge. But we cant have a player pretendind to be something else, it risks all our chances, so i suggest we publicly go for fener, but the rest of the allience goes for shadow so we can bring in TS
What do you think?
as the only one of us with a link to TS could you inform him? and try to get him to vote with us? sorry to throw all this at you at once