Mafia 70.5: The Stalwart Ma Teng A Tale of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms
#761
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:27 PM
Ah, but you see, what i find weird right now is that his attention is on two people. They're different cases, too. And that I find odd.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#762
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:28 PM
I said it was a weak case. And I do not think it is worth a vote.
I don't blame him on that, I have my own problems with that.
The only reason I have brought it up again is, that there was no reaction whatsoever from him. That surprised me.
Edit: fixed the quote
Tapper, on 23 February 2011 - 10:16 PM, said:
as being relatively new, not at ease with the nostalgic banter to step in. Joke votes are easier after all if you have a history 
I don't blame him on that, I have my own problems with that.
The only reason I have brought it up again is, that there was no reaction whatsoever from him. That surprised me.
Edit: fixed the quote
This post has been edited by Lizra: 23 February 2011 - 10:33 PM
#763
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:32 PM
Mentalist, on 23 February 2011 - 10:26 PM, said:
so I can vote and put pressure wherever the hell I please, b/c I'm always here to remove it, if I see somehting better.
Oooh, is the big bad swimming guawd thweatening to switch to whoever he not likies the most?
Anyway, I'm off to bed.
Also a funny observation: those of you who voted late yesterday for Silencer are completely off that track right now, when one could add to the 'case' that existed back then that today, he's doing his utmost best to drop off the radar.
All he did was speculate on rules, so far. Of course, he'll be online soonish, so that may change.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#764
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:32 PM
Tapper, on 23 February 2011 - 10:27 PM, said:
Ah, but you see, what i find weird right now is that his attention is on two people. They're different cases, too. And that I find odd.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
I suppose i'll have to re-read it. The way I saw it, he sees two people vote Tat, one of them makes a case day 2, while ruffling his feathers and dissapearing w/o response (shin), while the other comes on and follows the vote (DiBs). in my mind, DiBs is an appendage to the Shin case, as a possible partner scum.
But the thrust appears to be on Shin. which is why I voted him, seeing the reaction a single vote garnered.
and, as far as impressions and gut goes, you seem to be more erratic that usual in pushing trains, and that first post/case at the Dude came out of nowhere, which is partially the reason I looked at it. didn't want to bring this up, since it's all gut and meta, but, yeah.
#765
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:34 PM
Lizra, on 23 February 2011 - 10:28 PM, said:
I said it was a weak case. And I do not think it is worth a vote.
I don't blame him on that, I have my own problems with that.
The only reason I have brought it up again is, that there was no reaction whatsoever from him. That surprised me.
Quote
as being relatively new, not at ease with the nostalgic banter to step in. Joke votes are easier after all if you have a history 
I don't blame him on that, I have my own problems with that.
The only reason I have brought it up again is, that there was no reaction whatsoever from him. That surprised me.
Hehehe, may be he read the dibs guide on how to treat cases against oneself: ignore the first few prods and votes, then laugh it off, then defend when it seems serious to avoid being seen as jumping.
Tattersails lynch from yesterday may have encouraged him in that respect
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#766
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:34 PM
xpost.
good night, taps.
I'm somehow doubting the aussies will be back on before timeout, which is at 10-11sh my time. so it may be a moot issue.
good night, taps.
I'm somehow doubting the aussies will be back on before timeout, which is at 10-11sh my time. so it may be a moot issue.
#767
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:37 PM
Tapper, on 23 February 2011 - 10:34 PM, said:
Lizra, on 23 February 2011 - 10:28 PM, said:
I said it was a weak case. And I do not think it is worth a vote.
I don't blame him on that, I have my own problems with that.
The only reason I have brought it up again is, that there was no reaction whatsoever from him. That surprised me.
Quote
as being relatively new, not at ease with the nostalgic banter to step in. Joke votes are easier after all if you have a history 
I don't blame him on that, I have my own problems with that.
The only reason I have brought it up again is, that there was no reaction whatsoever from him. That surprised me.
Hehehe, may be he read the dibs guide on how to treat cases against oneself: ignore the first few prods and votes, then laugh it off, then defend when it seems serious to avoid being seen as jumping.
Tattersails lynch from yesterday may have encouraged him in that respect
Yeah, maybe.
Anyway, good night to you, Tapper.
#768
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:39 PM
Night tapper.
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#769
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:40 PM
Lizra, what are your thoughts on the current debacle?
Me and tapper are so mired in meta and preconceptoins, it'd be good to hear an unbiased opinion,
Me and tapper are so mired in meta and preconceptoins, it'd be good to hear an unbiased opinion,
#770
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:40 PM
Mentalist, on 23 February 2011 - 10:32 PM, said:
Tapper, on 23 February 2011 - 10:27 PM, said:
Ah, but you see, what i find weird right now is that his attention is on two people. They're different cases, too. And that I find odd.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
I suppose i'll have to re-read it. The way I saw it, he sees two people vote Tat, one of them makes a case day 2, while ruffling his feathers and dissapearing w/o response (shin), while the other comes on and follows the vote (DiBs). in my mind, DiBs is an appendage to the Shin case, as a possible partner scum.
But the thrust appears to be on Shin. which is why I voted him, seeing the reaction a single vote garnered.
and, as far as impressions and gut goes, you seem to be more erratic that usual in pushing trains, and that first post/case at the Dude came out of nowhere, which is partially the reason I looked at it. didn't want to bring this up, since it's all gut and meta, but, yeah.
Well, dibs voted Tattersail for a very specific reason, whereas Shin followed my initial reasoning. And the Dude himself stated earlier that he didn't expect scum early on the train, yet now makes a case against 2 of the early voters, one part based purely on reasoning about dibs' playstyle because he is not all over the place.
Now, we all know dibs, and we all know that he is all over the place when roled in a certain way, but there are several possibilities still. Drawing attention to that feels scummy.
As far as me being erratic - well, I had some time on my hands yesterday and saw an opening to push the game to serious business territory. Normally I wait for either a dose of Day 2 Syndrome or until I see a real pattern emerging, this time, I was a tad bit irritated with the amount of spam and saw someone jump far higher than warranted.
The fact that tattersail and I are in adjacent timezones also meant we could back-and-forth pretty fast, which may have helped me pushing it, too.
/shrug.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#771
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:41 PM
now really off. Sweet dreams (or enjoy work/school/leisure time), people!
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#772
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:42 PM
I'm reading that again right now. Give me some minutes.
#773
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:48 PM
no worries, I'm here most of the night.
incidentally, in response to Silencer's comment about the abrupt lack of Silencer attention.
the case on him was that he was a symp. if he is, he hasn't given his master away. and voting off a suspected symp is a last resort effort. and we're nowhere near that point yet.
incidentally, in response to Silencer's comment about the abrupt lack of Silencer attention.
the case on him was that he was a symp. if he is, he hasn't given his master away. and voting off a suspected symp is a last resort effort. and we're nowhere near that point yet.
#774
Posted 23 February 2011 - 10:56 PM
The Dude, on 23 February 2011 - 05:46 PM, said:
Shinrei, on 23 February 2011 - 10:48 AM, said:
What I said has nothing to do about posting times, or even speculating that The Dude was lurking. My point is, he voted with 30 minutes left, for someone who wasn't the main candidate to be lynched, and seemed unwilling/unprepared to change his vote to get a lynch.
(Underlined is mine)
I play from work. I had a meeting. I can't prove or disprove this. It's just the way it is.
.
As to the underlined part...This is a blatant lie. or you are just shooting from the hip. Tapper points out that that When I voted I brought Silencer to 5 votes tattersail only had 4. and ment had some votes as well. To me, this has the look of someone subtly trying to push a lynch. After Tapper calls Shin out on his *Cough* lie *Cough* mistake Shin doesn't even acknowledge... he just brushes it under the rug. Here are his next 2 posts.
Shinrei, on 23 February 2011 - 11:11 AM, said:
Donuts in the shape of boobs?
Shinrei, on 23 February 2011 - 11:24 AM, said:
Don't worry Silencer, I'll still play miniature golf with you on weekends. 
He pushed with tapper on a misguided lynch of an RI and he then tries to direct votes onto me using fabricated facts. This seems more than a little scummy.
vote Shin
As to the underlined - you're right, "voted 30 minutes from the end" isn't technically correct. You voted a bit before that, but your last post was 30 minutes before day ended. The inconvenient truth is my point still stands regardless of the actual time of your vote - you voted for the secondary candidate, who was at best suspected a symp so would provide no information, and didn't bother to make sure that town got a lynch.
We have to accept that you had a meeting. That's fine with me. It would have been nice if you'd said something like "Well, that looks like a lynch - I can't stick around. C-ya!"
And I agree with Ment on his vote for me in that - Tapper? Wow, that seemed like some heavy-handed sympage.
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#775
Posted 23 February 2011 - 11:01 PM
actually, when he voted Silencer, he put him at l-2
with Tattersail needing 5 more votes.
it was a bit later that it became 7 for Silencer and 6 for Tattersail, and then I switched to Tattersail, looking at the old vote count
this particular bit of misinterpretation has been bugging me most of yesterday.
unless there was a second vote I didn't see or smth....
with Tattersail needing 5 more votes.
it was a bit later that it became 7 for Silencer and 6 for Tattersail, and then I switched to Tattersail, looking at the old vote count
this particular bit of misinterpretation has been bugging me most of yesterday.
unless there was a second vote I didn't see or smth....
#776
Posted 23 February 2011 - 11:04 PM
Tapper, on 23 February 2011 - 10:27 PM, said:
Ah, but you see, what i find weird right now is that his attention is on two people. They're different cases, too. And that I find odd.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
As for gut not being enough: there are 15 people in the game, on how many do you have a real read? I'd say I'm limited to about 6, and a few of those are mostly because I am online and posting at the same time as they do. I have an opinion on a few others, but it'd require some reading back or someone else making a case before I'd call it a read.
Again Tapper. You are putting words into my mouth. My case is on Shin. I said dibs looked suspicious but that isn't who my case is on or who I am implicating. Dibs has given me nothing suspicious other than his place on a train and my Gut. Notice how I am not voting him based just on gut. Thats a quick way to a scum victory. You seem to feel this is ok. I don't. So to all those who say I have a case against dibs. Stop. It's against shin.
Mafia 100 Champion. There can only be one!!!
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
#777
Posted 23 February 2011 - 11:05 PM
bah gotta catch the train. I'll be back before the day times out
Mafia 100 Champion. There can only be one!!!
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
Yossarian was sorry to hear that they had a mutual friend. It seemed there was a basis to their conversation after all.
#778
Posted 23 February 2011 - 11:07 PM
Mentalist, on 23 February 2011 - 10:48 PM, said:
no worries, I'm here most of the night.
incidentally, in response to Silencer's comment about the abrupt lack of Silencer attention.
the case on him was that he was a symp. if he is, he hasn't given his master away. and voting off a suspected symp is a last resort effort. and we're nowhere near that point yet.
incidentally, in response to Silencer's comment about the abrupt lack of Silencer attention.
the case on him was that he was a symp. if he is, he hasn't given his master away. and voting off a suspected symp is a last resort effort. and we're nowhere near that point yet.
Ah, so you didn't find anyone I was symping, then? Big surprise...
I'm back, catching up, but have things to do today, so I won't be posting as much as did on day one, unfortunately (content or otherwise).
***
Shinrei said:
<Vote Silencer> For not garnering any heat or any love for that matter. And I'm being serious here, it's like a mental block that is there, and you just keep forgetting it.
#779
Posted 23 February 2011 - 11:10 PM
But The Dude was there for the flurry of Tattersail votes - he was posting after what should have been the hammer (not knowing Roldom was dead).
It looked dodgy to me, which is why I brought it up. However, now The Dude said he had to go to a meeting, and I think it's fair to believe him. As of now I'm not planning on voting for him, despite his OMGUS case on me.
Now, like The Dude, I have to catch a bus to get to work. Laters.
Edit: added "however, now"
It looked dodgy to me, which is why I brought it up. However, now The Dude said he had to go to a meeting, and I think it's fair to believe him. As of now I'm not planning on voting for him, despite his OMGUS case on me.
Now, like The Dude, I have to catch a bus to get to work. Laters.
Edit: added "however, now"
This post has been edited by Shinrei: 23 February 2011 - 11:11 PM
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#780
Posted 23 February 2011 - 11:11 PM
Ok, Tapper's main point seems to be gut-feeling and in the post he votes, he dismisses most of his own points right away. That seems like symping and the one most likely symped is Shin. Also Tapper yesterday got on the Tattersailtrain after Shin.

Help

















