[Korbas]

Spite, on 08 December 2009 - 09:33 PM, said:

also my post is clearly humourous, you can tell by the canned laughter.

ZOMG, fake symping me now? You bastard!!!




added for Liosan's sake.

edit was to Enter.

This post has been edited by Korbas: 08 December 2009 - 09:35 PM

[Spite]

fake symping my lord?

[Liosan]

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

[Korbas]

Spite, on 08 December 2009 - 09:35 PM, said:

fake symping my lord?

yes, my faithful minion, fake symping.

[Korbas]

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

[Rashan]

Galayn Lord, on 08 December 2009 - 09:19 PM, said:

Actually, strike that.



So he starts by quoting all my posts, saying I'm "padding my posts" because I discuss the rules, where some points were important to me at the time to understand.

Then he says he agrees we should put priority on the Assassin, then quotes a post he finds suspicious by Korbas where Korbas says it's useless to set priorities early in the game, then says he agrees with Eloth that it's useless to set priorities early in the game.

So, basically, a bunch of quotes and conclusions that make no sense put together, besides the fact that it looks interested and "serious" work (or maybe, a need to symp Eloth subtly while forgetting to make that sympage compatible with the rest of his post). And he has the balls to vote me off saying I'll be useless later in the game.

vote Rashan


edit: got "Bride" and "assassin" mixed up

Wow... You mad GL?? Interesting reaction to one Gut vote ( yes I did preface my post saying that its day one and I was going on gut, but whatever)

I think you missed the point, In regards to the Korbas post, All i am pointing out is that he is redirecting the flow of conversation. The substance of the post itself is not my point. I was pointing out that The talk was very bride oriented and he came on and swung talk to the assassin. Thats all. But it was an excellent omgus with conclusions based on a misread post. Based on your reaction I think I am going to leave my vote where it is. It seemed to strike a nerve with you.

Edit : changed buy to but

This post has been edited by Rashan: 08 December 2009 - 09:38 PM

[Kalse]

I actually worry a bit about rash cause his 3 posts are 1 hello 1 goodbye and a giant list of summary. serous bisness huh rash?


edit >> and the one i just xposted with

This post has been edited by Kalse: 08 December 2009 - 09:39 PM

[Korbas]

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:38 PM, said:

I actually worry a bit about rash cause his 3 posts are 1 hello 1 goodbye and a giant list of summary. serous bisness huh rash?


edit >> and the one i just xposted with

well, he does go for maximum efficiency.

[Kalse]

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:37 PM, said:

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

you dont do subtle so you are symping spite? so we should vote for spite then?

[Korbas]

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:41 PM, said:

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:37 PM, said:

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

you dont do subtle so you are symping spite? so we should vote for spite then?

No clue. I would have left a vote somewhere if something stood out, now wouldn't I?

[Kalse]

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:42 PM, said:

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:41 PM, said:

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:37 PM, said:

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

you dont do subtle so you are symping spite? so we should vote for spite then?

No clue. I would have left a vote somewhere if something stood out, now wouldn't I?

i wouldnt know

[Sorrit]

The way Day 1s have been going recently, I fully expect the scum to be keeping their heads down early on. So I'm looking at Alkend and Eloth, who both showed up a little after Spite had his outburst over Korbas. Both of them shied away from commenting on it, which I find strange. Spite's post was very illogical, which should have raised a comment. Seems like both of them were trying to stay under the radar by trying to ignore what could potentially be an explosive issue. Instead, they focus on Fener's case, which was well trodden ground by that point and unlikely to get them in trouble.

Of the two, I find Eloth more suspicious. Here's why:

Eloth, on 08 December 2009 - 03:44 PM, said:

Well back and around for a little bit. Unfortunately busy day and haven't had time to contribute.

Looking at whats out there, perhaps I'm getting slow but I can't see that reveal of Fener's that Olar is talking about.
Shadow quoted Fener as saying, "I am the Assassin", and Fener made some sort of joke about someone else using a phrase that means "I am the Assassin" but I didn't see any reveal so Olar has me confused. Or are you reading Shadows quote Olar as Feners reveal?

If I was going to pick anything from it i'd say its a symp move signalling to The Bride, "I know you can kill I'm your symp". But that strikes me as pretty unlikely.

Translation: This isn't really strong enough for me to voice my support, but let me raise a possibility in the hope that someone else gets things rolling.

Eloth, on 08 December 2009 - 03:56 PM, said:

Crosspost with Alkend there. Whats up with all these people and the priorities? The chances of us finding out who both The Bride and Assassin are on the same day is probably around 0. What 2 seperate Finders are going to reveal at the same time in a cross posting fiasco?

Instead of this priority nonesense, I think we should just try and find scum or since its Day 1, anyone who looks slightly shifty and hope its scum.

Unfortunately at the moment its starting to look we might be heading the classic, speed lynch anyone on Day 1 path.

Also, Mod can we have a list of alts playing and total player numbers? That would be handy.

Reasonable sentiments about the priorities, I suppose. But thinking it's going to go down the speedlynch route when there's 13 hours left is a bit premature. And the use of 'us' and 'we' seems a bit forced here. He's trying too hard to convince people that he's part of the team. It's all about keeping his head down and hoping that the arguments will pass him right by.

Vote Eloth

[Kalse]

Sorrit is also srsbiznis apparently

okay sorrit so eloth is bein a bit weakwilled. thats about what i expect from people on day 1 when they only have 3 posts, so how does this make eloth scummy?

[Korbas]

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:43 PM, said:

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:42 PM, said:

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:41 PM, said:

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:37 PM, said:

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

you dont do subtle so you are symping spite? so we should vote for spite then?

No clue. I would have left a vote somewhere if something stood out, now wouldn't I?

i wouldnt know

what do you know?All I was trying to say with that comment, was that it wasn't some deflection attempt.Everyone is trying to put me down as insinuating and subtle and whatnot, when all I try to do is write down what I consider sensible. I could fucking coast and have let Spite drive by, I didn't want to, and from there, I rolled into this. If you weren't all eager to find a scapegoat, you'd have been perfectly able to trace everything within the fucking context.

[Spite]

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:37 PM, said:

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

does anyone on this board

[Tellan]

Spite, on 08 December 2009 - 07:53 PM, said:

Tellan, on 08 December 2009 - 06:44 PM, said:

Why would you pursue an argument at all? You say it serves no purpose-then why vote him in the first place if it is so irrelevant.

Trying too hard to appear innocent does not strike me as innocent, as usually it is the scum who have that pre-occupation.

my point, genius is that the pursuit of a PISSING CONTEST on day 1 is a good way to get lynched and stop other people talking as they just sit back and say nothing. No one was follwoing my vote, and the constant arguing served no purpose. If you think i am scum tellan, vote. Cause your poor logic and weak strawmanning is boring me.

Spite, on 08 December 2009 - 07:58 PM, said:

Tellan, on 08 December 2009 - 07:27 PM, said:

You then remove from the person you think is the bride, because you are worreid about being lycnhed. So, you're worried about getting into an argument against someone you think is the bride?
Now, and correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't it the innos job to try and get the people they think are scum lynched?
Removing vote on someone you think is the bride just because you are worried about getting lynched yourself strikes me as scummy. And if scum use your mistakes to lynch you? Well, why do you think we look at the trains post-CF?

You couldnt get a lynch on me with this piss poor attemtp at an argument. Its day 1, tellan. I aint got proof of my suspicions so when i throw about accusations they are to guage reactions. as for train cf's, the point i am making which you are too stupid it seems to get is that continuing a pointless pissing contest on day 1 is the mistake they will use, and no looking at a cf after the fact will change the point that getting into a pissing contest and continuing it for no reason is a valid lynch reason. You are digging rather hard for a good reason to vote, when i think its pretty fucking obvious that theres nothing in what i said and so you are trying very hard to construe it as something scum would say.

vote tellan

because your obviously a symp and are trying to keep me in the spotlight with a foolish attempt at strawmanning a player who can shout longer and louder than you can.

So, you're not willing to enter a pissing contest with Korbas, but perfectly happy to be shouting longer and louder than me?

You're defence is that you are doing it for reactions, which is a weak defence, and can justify just about anything.

You said you didn't want to get in an argument because it would get you lynched.

And then saying that I am strawmanning?

I am pointing out what I see to be scummy behaviour. That you are unwilling to get involved in an argument, with someone you said you think is the bride no less, because of a fear of being lynched.

You say that the argument between you and Korbas would be pointless. And yet you think he's the bride? So, you're just going to let it drop like that? Hardly seems like inno play. And you claim that you "don't have proof of your suspicions", because it's day one. So, does that mean later you will?

The things you are saying do not make sense from an innocent POV. Why would an innocent remove vote so easily from someone he thinks is the bride-you never said you changed your mind, only that you didn't want to enter a pissing contest that could get you lynched. And that reason is just not something an inno would do-backtrack from someone they think is scum for fear of being lynched.

[Kalse]

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:58 PM, said:

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:43 PM, said:

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:42 PM, said:

Kalse, on 08 December 2009 - 09:41 PM, said:

Korbas, on 08 December 2009 - 09:37 PM, said:

Liosan, on 08 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:

I didn't think your post was completely serious, Spite. Just thought there was no need for Korbas's added comment. It seemed a subtle way to try and put attention onto Tellan.

I don't do subtle.

you dont do subtle so you are symping spite? so we should vote for spite then?

No clue. I would have left a vote somewhere if something stood out, now wouldn't I?

i wouldnt know

what do you know?All I was trying to say with that comment, was that it wasn't some deflection attempt.Everyone is trying to put me down as insinuating and subtle and whatnot, when all I try to do is write down what I consider sensible. I could fucking coast and have let Spite drive by, I didn't want to, and from there, I rolled into this. If you weren't all eager to find a scapegoat, you'd have been perfectly able to trace everything within the fucking context.

whoa whoa, I wasnt implicating you or nothin, i was trying to craftily say that im an awful fake symper (or real symper for that matter, though when i do it i try to be subtle)

[Sorrit]

With regards to the rest of what has been going on, it looks like Spite was fishing for a reaction with his vote on Korbas, didn't get one, so proceeded to kiss and make up with Spite. Tellan's criticism has some merit - going from absolute certainty of guilt to all pally and friendly like Spite did does look a bit crazy. And Spite has certainly reacted pretty violently to the accusations, which strikes me as odd. But the initial reaction fishing makes me doubt that this is anything other than a false positive.

EDIT: X-post with many

This post has been edited by Sorrit: 08 December 2009 - 10:01 PM

[Spite]

well considering the winning conditions i think we will need a lot more to go on than anything in thread already to get a lynch with some substance and merit. We dont want to do scums job for them. unless we are going to intentionally make an example of a low poster for once i cant see a case working on someone with only 3 votes.

[Spite]

just checking the post count, wow its been quiet today.

36 hour days, PS, 36 hour days!!!