[Sorrit]

Serc, on Jul 28 2009, 02:19 PM, said:

the worst thing ive seen is karats middle of the roading....and thats not much either.

The worst thing you've seen so far is Karat's middle of the roading...... so you're determined to be middle of the road yourself?

[Emurlahn]

errr you are GL
EDIT :at GL obviously

This post has been edited by Emurlahn: 28 July 2009 - 01:23 PM

[Sorrit]

Galayn Lord, on Jul 28 2009, 02:21 PM, said:

There's enough time for further discussion and even for different cases. I am not about to be harangued into a vote because you say so Sorrit.

The great thing about votes is that they can be changed at any point.

[Hood's Path]

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:20 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 02:14 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:03 PM, said:

fair enough, thinking on it more it probably would promote discussion because of its weirdness but i still dont think voting for one person because theyve already got votes is ever a good reason unless were in maybe the last 2 hours and definitely want a lynch

so you would prefer that nothing happened and then i voted you when there was no chance that anyone would even discuss it? Thats a very odd viewpoint. It seems people want us to do nothing until we reach the point where we can only do one thing and one thing only.

Wait how is that what i said at all? Youve actually said that you voted me over other people because i already had votes, what youve just said is not in any way related to my comment so stop putting words in my mouth please

you complained i voted for you and said it would be all right if there was only two hours left. So i didnt put words n your mouth, i just remarked upon it. why dont you quit getting your knickers in a twist.

[Galayn Lord]

No I'm not I'm me...


Edit: At Emurlahn...or me...or someone.

This post has been edited by Galayn Lord: 28 July 2009 - 01:27 PM

[Karatallid]

Sorrit, on Jul 28 2009, 02:14 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:03 PM, said:

fair enough, thinking on it more it probably would promote discussion because of its weirdness but i still dont think voting for one person because theyve already got votes is ever a good reason unless were in maybe the last 2 hours and definitely want a lynch

Yes, Emur is right. The only reason HP's vote helped discussion was because I took issue with his poor reasoning. If he'd justified the vote better it would not have been helpful.


Emurlahn, Galayn Lord and Karatallid have all been around and posting since discussion got going, but have not voted. Waiting until the end to vote is bad for the innocents, because we just end up lynching whoever's top at the time, instead of discussing it properly. If you suspect someone, vote for them. If you don't suspect anyone, you're too non-committal to be left alive (Karat, i'm looking at you).

This is stupid, both in underlying reasoning and because it's interpreting me incorrectly. I am neither undecided nor non-committal. I have decided (and posted as much) that I consider neither you nor HP worthy of a vote at the moment. And I'm not just going to say "well, it looks like Emur is the way to go" because I want to see what else this brings out of the woodwork.

If you must know the top suspect in my mind, it's Serc. Why? Because his 2nd vote is based on a tired old scum finding excuse. And he tags on the discussion with HP to make sure he's on record as backing up his vote on something that appears to be forming. After that, once it actually starts to get interesting, he disappears. Now he comes back and takes credit for starting this discussion?
But is that speculation worth a vote? Maybe. But I would bet a pint or two that HP would start humping my leg* with a "LOOK, A DERAILMENT" since that's his play style. I would happily prove I'm not trying to toe any indecisive line by voting Serc right now, but I'm not going to dick around and step within these lines in the sand that you and HP have drawn. Call me middle of the road all you want, I'll vote when I'm good and ready and NOT TO ANYONE ELSE'S TUNE.



*

[Emurlahn]

Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 02:25 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:20 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 02:14 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:03 PM, said:

fair enough, thinking on it more it probably would promote discussion because of its weirdness but i still dont think voting for one person because theyve already got votes is ever a good reason unless were in maybe the last 2 hours and definitely want a lynch

so you would prefer that nothing happened and then i voted you when there was no chance that anyone would even discuss it? Thats a very odd viewpoint. It seems people want us to do nothing until we reach the point where we can only do one thing and one thing only.

Wait how is that what i said at all? Youve actually said that you voted me over other people because i already had votes, what youve just said is not in any way related to my comment so stop putting words in my mouth please

you complained i voted for you and said it would be all right if there was only two hours left. So i didnt put words n your mouth, i just remarked upon it. why dont you quit getting your knickers in a twist.

I said the only time its really ok to vote for someone just becuase they already have votes is if its neairng the end and your trying to get a lynch. I didnt in anyway say that id prefer if nothing happened until the end, thats you making stuff up

[Sorrit]

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 02:30 PM, said:

This is stupid, both in underlying reasoning and because it's interpreting me incorrectly. I am neither undecided nor non-committal. I have decided (and posted as much) that I consider neither you nor HP worthy of a vote at the moment. And I'm not just going to say "well, it looks like Emur is the way to go" because I want to see what else this brings out of the woodwork.

You are neither undecided nor non-committal, you just refuse to decide or commit to anything?

[Serc]

aaah

lets remove vote
vote karatalid

Ill remove my vote if you can come up with somthing of your own...
Statements like

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 03:48 AM, said:

Ok, I'm interested in seeing more from HP, Sorrit, Serc and it would be nice for Emur to show up too.

I have some speculations, but they are just a sort of circular reasoning based on the back and forth that has already happened. Moar plz.

dont cut it for me...you want others to do all the work?



edit - major xpostage...

This post has been edited by Serc: 28 July 2009 - 01:39 PM

[Thyrllan]

Double Double Toil and Trouble!

Catching up.

[Hood's Path]

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:32 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 02:25 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:20 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 02:14 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:03 PM, said:

fair enough, thinking on it more it probably would promote discussion because of its weirdness but i still dont think voting for one person because theyve already got votes is ever a good reason unless were in maybe the last 2 hours and definitely want a lynch

so you would prefer that nothing happened and then i voted you when there was no chance that anyone would even discuss it? Thats a very odd viewpoint. It seems people want us to do nothing until we reach the point where we can only do one thing and one thing only.

Wait how is that what i said at all? Youve actually said that you voted me over other people because i already had votes, what youve just said is not in any way related to my comment so stop putting words in my mouth please

you complained i voted for you and said it would be all right if there was only two hours left. So i didnt put words n your mouth, i just remarked upon it. why dont you quit getting your knickers in a twist.

I said the only time its really ok to vote for someone just becuase they already have votes is if its neairng the end and your trying to get a lynch. I didnt in anyway say that id prefer if nothing happened until the end, thats you making stuff up

thats called commenting on what is said. You say something, i say something and it goes back and forward. I didnt make stuff up, i said "it seems" which implies that it is my opinion on what is happening. had i said "emurlahn says" and then wrote something i would be making something up if it was incorrect.

Now i aint supposed to have an opinion, i am just supposed to sheeple about and make bleating noises. Well there was enough of that for anyone earlier, if you are looking to stop the votes and maybe survive day 1 you should maybe look at making a case instead of discussing semantics and trying to twist what i say to suit yourself.

[Karatallid]

Sorrit, are you dense?

I decided that you are not worth a vote at the moment. I decided that HP isn't worth a vote at the moment. I have decided that I'm not going to dance to your tune just because you think I"m middle of the road.

Furthermore, not having voted does not equal non-committal. Your willingness to make this shit up and push it along is making me reconsider my first decision.

[Serc]

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 05:30 AM, said:

Sorrit, on Jul 28 2009, 02:14 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on Jul 28 2009, 02:03 PM, said:

fair enough, thinking on it more it probably would promote discussion because of its weirdness but i still dont think voting for one person because theyve already got votes is ever a good reason unless were in maybe the last 2 hours and definitely want a lynch

Yes, Emur is right. The only reason HP's vote helped discussion was because I took issue with his poor reasoning. If he'd justified the vote better it would not have been helpful.


Emurlahn, Galayn Lord and Karatallid have all been around and posting since discussion got going, but have not voted. Waiting until the end to vote is bad for the innocents, because we just end up lynching whoever's top at the time, instead of discussing it properly. If you suspect someone, vote for them. If you don't suspect anyone, you're too non-committal to be left alive (Karat, i'm looking at you).

This is stupid, both in underlying reasoning and because it's interpreting me incorrectly. I am neither undecided nor non-committal. I have decided (and posted as much) that I consider neither you nor HP worthy of a vote at the moment. And I'm not just going to say "well, it looks like Emur is the way to go" because I want to see what else this brings out of the woodwork.

If you must know the top suspect in my mind, it's Serc. Why? Because his 2nd vote is based on a tired old scum finding excuse. And he tags on the discussion with HP to make sure he's on record as backing up his vote on something that appears to be forming. After that, once it actually starts to get interesting, he disappears. Now he comes back and takes credit for starting this discussion?
But is that speculation worth a vote? Maybe. But I would bet a pint or two that HP would start humping my leg* with a "LOOK, A DERAILMENT" since that's his play style. I would happily prove I'm not trying to toe any indecisive line by voting Serc right now, but I'm not going to dick around and step within these lines in the sand that you and HP have drawn. Call me middle of the road all you want, I'll vote when I'm good and ready and NOT TO ANYONE ELSE'S TUNE.



*

"tired old scum finding excuse"
Excuse?

Its a honest to god scum thing to do....is it not?
Are we not allowed to use conventional methods anymore?
on day one?
when we have NOTHING to go on?

[Karatallid]

Serc, on Jul 28 2009, 02:35 PM, said:

aaah

lets remove vote
vote karatalid

Ill remove my vote if you can come up with somthing of your own...
Statements like

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 03:48 AM, said:

Ok, I'm interested in seeing more from HP, Sorrit, Serc and it would be nice for Emur to show up too.

I have some speculations, but they are just a sort of circular reasoning based on the back and forth that has already happened. Moar plz.

dont cut it for me...you want others to do all the work?

Yay! Add to my case an OMGUS on me for saying you're my #1 suspicion. You must also think my coming under scrutiny so putting a vote on me is strategic.

Honey - I'm ready to commit. :Rose:

Vote Serc


edit: I'm to my since it was grammar fail

This post has been edited by Karatallid: 28 July 2009 - 01:40 PM

[Hood's Path]

@serc - neither are we allowed opinions or to put more than two votes on until the end

[Sorrit]

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 02:36 PM, said:

Sorrit, are you dense?

I decided that you are not worth a vote at the moment. I decided that HP isn't worth a vote at the moment. I have decided that I'm not going to dance to your tune just because you think I"m middle of the road.

Furthermore, not having voted does not equal non-committal. Your willingness to make this shit up and push it along is making me reconsider my first decision.

You think i've made up that you're non-committal?

I'm not the only person to think so, you know. I think everyone does. I guess you have committed quite firmly to being non-committal, but I don't think that counts.

Edit: Crosspost

This post has been edited by Sorrit: 28 July 2009 - 01:42 PM

[Serc]

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 05:39 AM, said:

Serc, on Jul 28 2009, 02:35 PM, said:

aaah

lets remove vote
vote karatalid

Ill remove my vote if you can come up with somthing of your own...
Statements like

Karatallid, on Jul 28 2009, 03:48 AM, said:

Ok, I'm interested in seeing more from HP, Sorrit, Serc and it would be nice for Emur to show up too.

I have some speculations, but they are just a sort of circular reasoning based on the back and forth that has already happened. Moar plz.

dont cut it for me...you want others to do all the work?

Yay! Add to my case an OMGUS on me for saying you're my #1 suspicion. You must also think my coming under scrutiny so putting a vote on me is strategic.

Honey - I'm ready to commit. :Rose:

Vote Serc


edit: I'm to my since it was grammar fail

i was actually typing that message out looooong before you said anything about me being your suspect.
My boss walked in the office

believe what you want i suppose...you still have done fuck all but wait for others to contribute and then sit on bothe sides and pick at everyone

[Thyrllan]

As I noted, I voted for him because he claimed to have put on an invisability cloak, and so must be a warlock.

That is what we in the business call a 'joke vote'.

I skimmed through, noone seems to want to talk to me but I need to actually read it all to figure out why you people are being so ... interesting.

[Sorrit]

Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 02:39 PM, said:

@serc - neither are we allowed opinions or to put more than two votes on until the end

Sure you are, if your reasoning is sensible.

[Hood's Path]

some one get marshmallows, things are finally heating up