[Sixty]

Well, let's put it this way--
No matter what, if you get a find there's a 50/50 shot it's true.

[Sixty]

If I get a guilty find:
I can either be normal, paranoid, or insane (not naive since it's guilty).
33% chance I'm right and they're scum
33% chance I'm insane and they're inno
If I'm paranoid, there's a 50/50 (or is it 20%? I suck at probability) chance they're scum.

Vice versa with an inno find.

[bwgan]

Sooo, who wants to go first?

[Gem Windcaster]

I was thinking, how exactly does an insane finder works? Does an insane finder have a 50/50 chance to get it right?

[Sixty]

If we try a reveal-fest, it's critical that we remember that
one of us the killer and will lie their ass off.

That should be the #1 thing to keep in mind.

[Sixty]

Gem Windcaster, on Jul 21 2009, 05:38 PM, said:

I was thinking, how exactly does an insane finder works? Does an insane finder have a 50/50 chance to get it right?

They return the opposite of the actual. If they're scum it returns inno etc etc.

[Gem Windcaster]

Either way, we should all do finds on the same target, or this won't work.

[bwgan]

Insane gets a reverse find don't they? Paranoid always gets guilty, niave always inno?

Edit: Attack of the slow typist strikes again...please type more slowly...remember my poor old and probably arthritic hands.

This post has been edited by bwgan: 21 July 2009 - 09:41 PM

[Sixty]

The trouble is, though, that it if they're inno all it does is CI them and give the killer a free night. But first, shall we reveal?

I investigated Peanutbutta and was told he is scum.

[bwgan]

Wierdly I also investigated PB (what has he done to deserve such suspicion? ) and was told he is inno.

[Gem Windcaster]

Sixty, on Jul 21 2009, 09:39 PM, said:

Gem Windcaster, on Jul 21 2009, 05:38 PM, said:

I was thinking, how exactly does an insane finder works? Does an insane finder have a 50/50 chance to get it right?

They return the opposite of the actual. If they're scum it returns inno etc etc.

Right, so if we all do a find on the same player, we should get 2 correct finds, and 2 incorrect finds. Problem is, we don't know what is what. But after the first night, we will only be 3 finders. Okay this is getting nowhere...

[Gem Windcaster]

Sixty, on Jul 21 2009, 09:40 PM, said:

The trouble is, though, that it if they're inno all it does is CI them and give the killer a free night. But first, shall we reveal?

I investigated Peanutbutta and was told he is scum.

Ah, I got an inno find on Peanut.


Edit: no way! 3 on Peanut!

This post has been edited by Gem Windcaster: 21 July 2009 - 09:45 PM

[Sixty]

Meta hate, I guess. Heh. Gem?

edit: x-post.

Assuming none of us are lying, I am an insane/paranoid finder and the two of you are naive and normal.

edit #2: Either that or I am a normal finder and the two of your are naive and insane.

This post has been edited by Sixty: 21 July 2009 - 09:47 PM

[bwgan]

OMG - if you two are being honest that is hilarious...(btw I swear I am telling the truth...and you all know what that means! 'tis my secret weapon against teh scum.)

[Gem Windcaster]

Sixty, on Jul 21 2009, 09:46 PM, said:

Meta hate, I guess. Heh. Gem?

edit: x-post.

Assuming none of us are lying, I am an insane/paranoid finder and the two of you are naive and normal.

Yes, statistically one of us is right.

Edit: but it could be you that is right too.

This post has been edited by Gem Windcaster: 21 July 2009 - 09:47 PM

[Gem Windcaster]

Anyone else thinks the anonymous player is teh scum?

[Sixty]

Hmmmm. I'd like to see what PB and Venge have as their results. If Venge also did a find on PB (ha!) I think it'd be almost certain whether he's inno or scum.

[bwgan]

Wouldn't it be...(what's the opposite of ironic?) if I was the niave one?

[Sixty]

@Gem: Aren't you the anon? I don't see you in the nekkid list but you're still posting.

[Gem Windcaster]

Sixty, on Jul 21 2009, 09:49 PM, said:

Hmmmm. I'd like to see what PB and Venge have as their results. If Venge also did a find on PB (ha!) I think it'd be almost certain whether he's inno or scum.

Well, we'd still have to assume one of us is lying, no?