Cause, on 17 December 2013 - 10:32 AM, said:
amphibian, on 16 December 2013 - 06:02 PM, said:
I found the dwarf/dragon chase scene to be quite good - why?
Because it showed us not only the inventiveness of the dwarves, the fate of the prior inhabitants and sone fun stuff, it also showed us why the dwarves went to that much trouble to assemble that much gold and treasure. It was religious. the statue of a dwarf god was but the start of probably a whole hall full of such statues.
The motivation for Thorin isn't just to reclaim his family home, it's to fulfill a dwarf religious need. That makes the fights more meaningful and better tells us why they're willing to fight a dragon over it.
Its not religious its vanity, It was the gallery of kings. I cant see a resemblance but I think its supposed to be Thorins Grandfather. The dwarven god is one of the valar, I forget which one, who i think looks nothing like the dwarves, possibly looks like an elf (I think all valar do).
The desire to reclaim a homeland I think can be very powerful even in the absence of a religious motivation. A place to belong, to be safe from persecution etc etc. I think Tolkien himself once said the dwarves were based on the Jews.
http://en.wikipedia....f_(Middle-earth). Nevertheless the coming kingship and riches are definitly supposed to be having a corrupting influence on Thorin much like they had on his grandfather. That's why its so powerful that the dragon threatens to destroy laketown for his hubris, after being warned, and he cant stop it. Whcih makes the fact that he tries and fails in the absolutely the most ridiculous way strike me as silly. Much better if the dragon jsut flew off and Bilbo and the dwarves are just overcome with guilt and shame.
Whcih returns me to my dissapointment with the movie. Everyone so far has a built to a crescendo! The mines of moria, the batle of helms deep, the siege of Minas Tirith and the goblin caves and battle with azog. I feel this movie lacked the same and to end on a cliffhanger is poor form. A tv series that picks up again next week fine. But a movie to cut mid scene when we have to wait a year is a terrible thing in my eyes. This is not a cliffhanger in the sense Oh my God is Gandalf dead or not. This was a cliffhanger smack dab in the middle of a scene that will pick right up in a year.
Also the Dragon is not a dumb beast. He is one of the greatest powers of middle earth and why the tale of the Hobbit is so important. If not for this prequel quest before lotr the world is fucked! Imagine the Siege of Minas Tirith only Sauron brings a dragon! Also establishing the dwarven homeland in erebor again makes it a bulwark against Sauron in the north. To see the dragon be tricked by dwarves calling out its name is painful.
Was it a bad movie, no! Was it the weakest of the series! Yes, to my eyes.
This.
I enjoyed it, but Smaug is literally the biggest, most powerful bad guy threat left on the face of Middle Earth other than Sauron. And Sauron is a fucking demi-god. Smaug is arrogant, sure, but he's not an idiot. He's not just an animal.
If they'd planned on
distracting him with gold - that, I would get. He's a dragon. He fucking loves gold. But to pour molten gold on him is like dropping ice into a sea deity's watery body. It's HOT. As Smaug delightfully monologues not moments later - "I AM FIRE!". If they had THEN applied cold water to make things explode? Fine. If it had been particularly quick-setting gold? Can kind of see it. But as it stood, the entire plan was put together on too short a notice (OK, movie-time, but still) for it to be a convincing "genius last-minute plan", AND it was predicated on the most stupid of assumptions.
Smaug has demonstrably,
casually, broken a structural, dwarven stone pillar. An action which rocked the entire mountain. He has broken through a massive dwarven gate with little difficulty (though more difficulty than his previously demonstrated strength would warrant - see previous sentence. Even if the gate was stronger, the wall it was embedded in would not have held). HOW THE FUCKING FUCK WOULD GOLD HAVE THE STRUCTURAL STRENGTH TO WORRY HIM?!?!
And that's assuming that DWARVES, the mastercrafters of the Middle Earth world (Elven smiths notwithstanding), would somehow NOT know that it would take way too long for that gold to harden, even assuming they WAY underestimated (for no reason, given recent demonstrations) it's ability to contain Smaug once hard.
Were the scenes pointless? No. They were fun, movie moments. Were they contrived? Ill-conceived? Illogical? Immersion-breaking? Certainly.
Did they collectively reduce the threat of Smaug? Certainly.
He somehow wiped out the entirety of Erebor, and fucked over Dale, but can't even touch one of the ten or so people running around for thirty minutes? So far I have seen nothing to suggest Smaug is a threat to anything that is mobile. Or able to defend itself.
If Jackson wanted to fuck with canon, why not have someone become dragon chow?
I know the next movie is going to open with Laketown being nuked from orbit. But that's not going to have much punch, I think. Because Smaug is incapable of killing anything now, apparently. He's just a "mindless beast". XD Never mind that he's going to get killed pretty easily anyway.
It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure that his rampage in the books is more like "OH SHIT DRAGON!!!!!!!!!!!! WE'RE DOOMED! OH GOD EVERYONE IS DYING EVERYTHING IS BURNING HOLY FUCKING SHI-no, wait, lucky shot on the weak spot, we're saved!".
Whereas in this one, it's going to be "OH GOD DRAGO-no, wait, lucky shot, we're saved! No-one died! Woohoo!" because Smaug is so fucking incompetent at killing things.
>.>
*insert obligatory complaint that he's not really even a dragon now* - oh, wait, is that why he's also useless? >.<
Anyway, that aside, I mostly enjoyed the film. Sauron was fucking awesome. Barrel scene was a bit overdone and 'meh', but still worked. Benedict Cumberbatch is even more ludicrously legendary now.