Malazan Empire: Finally-the missing 2nd seguleh reviled ! - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Finally-the missing 2nd seguleh reviled !

#1 User is offline   frank 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 150
  • Joined: 06-May 03

  Posted 01 July 2009 - 08:44 AM

I'm not sure if someone already figured it out and wrote a post about it, but decided to post it NOW and not waste time finding out in case SE decides to tell us in DoD.

I just finished rereading TtH to be prepared for DoD and on page 883 of the large paperback just before the 2nd leaves Dragnipur he reasons that "The other seguleh were doomed anyway, and though in this last battle they had each redeemed something of their shame in dying to a forigner, that was no reason to fall at their sides"

This means that he didn't. And he is really pissed at skinner. So skinner, originally a seguleh, killed him and then went rouge rather than claiming his place. Hence skinner must be the missing 2nd.

Unless of course Esselmont reveals something else in tRotCG.

Now I'll take a bow (and hope I doesn't overbalance) :Oops:
0

#2 User is offline   Lisheo 

  • Difference Engineer
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 2,306
  • Joined: 04-June 07
  • Location:Slowly returning, piece by piece.
  • Interests:All of the things.

Posted 01 July 2009 - 08:50 AM

RotCG Spoilers.
Spoiler

The quote about dying to a foreigner refers to Anomander, who it was revealed in MoI, went on a little trip to the Segulah Island. The Segulah Second doesn't want to die at their sides because, I think, he's been apart from Segulah society so long he's no longer a true Segulah, in mentality, anyway.
“People have wanted to narrate since first we banged rocks together & wondered about fire. There’ll be tellings as long as there are any of us here, until the stars disappear one by one like turned-out lights.”
- China Mieville
0

#3 User is offline   frank 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 150
  • Joined: 06-May 03

Posted 01 July 2009 - 09:21 AM

The 2nd doesn't care that it was Rake. He was a FORIGNER! And he belives that they are less than full seguleh for it.
0

#4 User is offline   Nep Furrow 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 30-June 07

Posted 01 July 2009 - 01:27 PM

I think you are reading that passage wrong. All the Seguleh in Dargnipur died to a foreigner, Rake. This is why they are in Dragnipur in the first place. The foreigner they all lost to was Rake. If they had lost to Skinner they would not be in Dragnipur.
0

#5 User is offline   beru 

  • shy guy
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 780
  • Joined: 14-December 08
  • Location:norway
  • Interests:gaming (strategy/tactic first persons)<br />reading<br />swiming

Posted 01 July 2009 - 02:03 PM

and seg second is way older than skinner (he do rememberr that the segule lived in daru estimated 1000 years ago)
i want to see this world where T'lan imass kneels
0

#6 User is offline   Wampyry 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 426
  • Joined: 26-July 07
  • Location:Queens, NYC

Posted 01 July 2009 - 03:16 PM

View PostNep Furrow, on Jul 1 2009, 09:27 AM, said:

I think you are reading that passage wrong. All the Seguleh in Dargnipur died to a foreigner, Rake. This is why they are in Dragnipur in the first place. The foreigner they all lost to was Rake. If they had lost to Skinner they would not be in Dragnipur.


Nep Furrow, nice explanation!
0

#7 User is offline   frank 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 150
  • Joined: 06-May 03

Posted 02 July 2009 - 10:11 AM

I'm not sure where you mean this disagrees with my theory... Because this is my point exactly. They are there because they lost to Rake who is a forigner and in the 2 nd's opinion that is not good enough. My point was that skinner is a seguleh and thus NOT a forigner. The 2 nd is there with hood, not because he lost to Rake and feels contempt for the other seguleh

HOWEVER I must bow to the observation that the 2 nd is way to old for skinner to have killed him. Unless someone has some theory/explenation for that
0

#8 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,408
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 02 July 2009 - 02:21 PM

The 2nd didn't lose to Rake. If he did, all the MoI refs would have been to Rake as Second, not Seventh.

The 2nd is there because Hood recruited him. The others are there because Rake Dragnipur'd them on his visit ref's in MoI.

We don't know for certain whether the 2nd was killed and then recruited, like Baudin, or still lived when he was recruited by Hood, like Dassem.

Either way, something Skinner did REALLY pissed him off. And we also don't know if the 2nd was already Soldier/Knight when that conflict with Skinner happened.... and assuming it only happened once.

- Abyss, wants that story.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#9 User is offline   Sheve 

  • Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 217
  • Joined: 08-October 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 06:04 PM

We dont know enough to say what happend between the 2 and skinner.
There is no real reason to believe that the 2 is even dead, just because you look dead dont mean you have to be dead(Tlan imass).
And he certainly thinks of himself as the seguleh second, as does Hood.
They may cut your dick in half
And serve it to a pig
And though it hurts, you'll laugh
And dance a dickless jig
0

#10 User is offline   WhiskeyJackDaniels 

  • Emperor
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 19-February 09
  • Location:Syracuse

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:07 PM

Well the T'lan Imass are basically animated dead, I know they never technically died, but the ritual basically just bound their bodies to continue living long after they should have died of old age. They say once that the reason the T'lan Imass can turn to dust is because that is returning their bodies to the form they would be in if the ritual had never taken place.
So, you're the historian who survived the Chain of Dogs.
Actually, I didn't.

It seems you stand alone.
It was ever thus.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users