Help
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 02:33 AM, said:
Right now, I wish we could lynch two players in the same day.
Word.
Mafia 47 - City of Saints and Madmen Festival of the Squid, and other horros
#822
Rashan 
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 06-November 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:38 AM
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 02:33 AM, said:
Right now, I wish we could lynch two players in the same day.
Well let's vote for mockra first then we can debate if it's still a good idea to lynch me tomorrow. I believe that I've improved my game play today enough to at least give me another day. Mockra is just digging himself a deeper and deeper hole by the minute.
#823
Mockra
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:39 AM
Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:35 PM, said:
Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 02:30 AM, said:
Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:24 PM, said:
Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:56 AM, said:
Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:
@Mockra - see my last post.
Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.
Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.
I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected
Just because you think he's not likely to use compel later, that has no bearing on the whether he would use the ability now. Your argument still makes no sense.
So there is a chance he would do it or wouldn't, where did I say I was certain he would? I don't seem to understand your argument
When you said you wanted to sacrifice a lot discussion and information by speed-lynching in an attempt to *catch* the infected. I guess I assumed you were pretty sure they were being compelled if you wanted to take that risk.
Yes I was assuming so, do you have a problem with that? I wasn't expecting that anyone would speed lynch anyway but placing my vote and leaving is all I could do. Its funny how people take things out of proportion when they can't find solid evidence
#824
Galain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:42 AM
Rashan, on Jun 24 2009, 11:38 PM, said:
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 02:33 AM, said:
Right now, I wish we could lynch two players in the same day.
Well let's vote for mockra first then we can debate if it's still a good idea to lynch me tomorrow. I believe that I've improved my game play today enough to at least give me another day. Mockra is just digging himself a deeper and deeper hole by the minute.
Nope, you've made your bed and tonight you're going to sleep in it. We aren't going to play this game again tomorrow. Don't worry about Mockra, I'm sure he'll get lots of attention tomorrow.
#825
Korlat
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 23-November 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:43 AM
We have approximately 1 hour remaining now.
I don't think we can swing to Mockra, like max we can get is 6 votes, but I'm willing to go either way. Still think we need to lynch Rashan to avoid the WIFOMz, improved play or no. *shrug*
I don't think we can swing to Mockra, like max we can get is 6 votes, but I'm willing to go either way. Still think we need to lynch Rashan to avoid the WIFOMz, improved play or no. *shrug*
#826
Liosan
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:44 AM
Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 02:39 AM, said:
Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:35 PM, said:
Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 02:30 AM, said:
Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:24 PM, said:
Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:56 AM, said:
Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:
@Mockra - see my last post.
Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.
Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.
I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected
Just because you think he's not likely to use compel later, that has no bearing on the whether he would use the ability now. Your argument still makes no sense.
So there is a chance he would do it or wouldn't, where did I say I was certain he would? I don't seem to understand your argument
When you said you wanted to sacrifice a lot discussion and information by speed-lynching in an attempt to *catch* the infected. I guess I assumed you were pretty sure they were being compelled if you wanted to take that risk.
Yes I was assuming so, do you have a problem with that? I wasn't expecting that anyone would speed lynch anyway but placing my vote and leaving is all I could do. Its funny how people take things out of proportion when they can't find solid evidence
Yes, I have a problem with that when it results in you trying to speed-lynch somebody on day 2. It means you're either scum or you're too stupid to be playing this game.
#829
Mockra
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:46 AM
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 06:42 PM, said:
Rashan, on Jun 24 2009, 11:38 PM, said:
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 02:33 AM, said:
Right now, I wish we could lynch two players in the same day.
Well let's vote for mockra first then we can debate if it's still a good idea to lynch me tomorrow. I believe that I've improved my game play today enough to at least give me another day. Mockra is just digging himself a deeper and deeper hole by the minute.
Nope, you've made your bed and tonight you're going to sleep in it. We aren't going to play this game again tomorrow. Don't worry about Mockra, I'm sure he'll get lots of attention tomorrow.
Yay
Though Im not sure what I am convicted of, it seems everyone finds me suspicious...
@Liosan, Grow up kay?
#832
Rashan
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 06-November 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:50 AM
Just when I'm finally feeling a little firm footing underneath me I get the rug pulled out from under me. Oh well. So now I'm going to make a prediction before I go. I think we are going to have 3 straight lynches that take out townies.
#833
Galain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:52 AM
Rashan, on Jun 24 2009, 11:50 PM, said:
Just when I'm finally feeling a little firm footing underneath me I get the rug pulled out from under me. Oh well. So now I'm going to make a prediction before I go. I think we are going to have 3 straight lynches that take out townies.
A bold prediction, no doubt.
#834
Rashan
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 06-November 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:53 AM
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 02:47 AM, said:
Rashan, on Jun 24 2009, 11:45 PM, said:
Well then lay the hammer already people. I would like to go to bed.
Hammer yourself if you're town.
isn't it against the rules to hammer yourself? Wait a minute!!!! Why would you ask someone to hammer themselves if they are town? You got all over me for laying the hammer on Tellan yesterday. That is a very scummy remark to make.
#835
Galain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:54 AM
lol, no it is not against the rules to ever vote yourself unless there's like a jester in the game or you have some role about it.
I'm saying that if you're BORED waiting for someone to hammer you, you have all of the power in the world to perform this action yourself.
I'm saying that if you're BORED waiting for someone to hammer you, you have all of the power in the world to perform this action yourself.
#837
Rashan
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 06-November 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:59 AM
Galain, on Jun 25 2009, 02:54 AM, said:
lol, no it is not against the rules to ever vote yourself unless there's like a jester in the game or you have some role about it.
I'm saying that if you're BORED waiting for someone to hammer you, you have all of the power in the world to perform this action yourself.
I'm saying that if you're BORED waiting for someone to hammer you, you have all of the power in the world to perform this action yourself.
It's not that I'm bored. I just expect to be lynched and no amout of talking will change that. It seems that by your will alone it will happen.
#839
Galain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 25 June 2009 - 07:04 AM
Rashan, on Jun 24 2009, 11:57 PM, said:
And you don't acknowledge the scummy remark.
Ignore the mistake and people just might look over it but try and defend yourself and you validate it. Very good. Verry good.
Ignore the mistake and people just might look over it but try and defend yourself and you validate it. Very good. Verry good.
lol, OK he-who-is-about-to-be-lynched, consider this my final act of charity for you.
No, it's not scummy to ask someone to hammer themselves. After you die, if you come up scum or infected, I will believe nothing you have said all game. If you come up innocent, I am going to assume you are a shitty symp or just a player who had a REALLY bad game.
The MOST innocent thing you can do for the town is to suck up the lynch. We can't move it to Mockra at this point, and if we somehow did we'd be wondering for ALL of tomorrow why it is that you didn't die, yet again, for BLATANT anti-town remarks, Voting Night, and just being a major distraction. Voting for yourself now and having an inno CF is a way of going, "Okay he had a bad game but in the end threw himself on the company sword to help the town." Lots of info has come up today with Mockra, Karat, etc so it will not be a wasted lynch if you are actually inno.
