[Mockra]

A vote on Karatallid? Seems a little off when we are at the end of day and it is clear that its either me or you...
Seems like infected voting how they need to but I cannot be too sure..

[Korlat]

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

[Galain]

Ampelas, on Jun 24 2009, 10:21 PM, said:

So Galain, are you scum who voted first because that's not a suspicious place to be on the train, and is now pissed to be moved at a suspicious spot? All your plans and efforts WASTED!

I'm annoyed at the amount of misinterpretation people have made in this game and noticed a possible future issue.

[Mockra]

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected

[Rashan]

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:50 AM, said:

A vote on Karatallid? Seems a little off when we are at the end of day and it is clear that its either me or you...
Seems like infected voting how they need to but I cannot be too sure..

I'm just trying to get people to take a closer look at him before I'm lynched and they realized they made a mistake lynching me. But like you said it's either you or me so

Remove Vote

Vote Mockra

Good luck Mockra though I believe that I'm the one that will need it.

[Galain]

Mockra, on Jun 24 2009, 10:50 PM, said:

A vote on Karatallid? Seems a little off when we are at the end of day and it is clear that its either me or you...
Seems like infected voting how they need to but I cannot be too sure..

He had a vote on Karat earlier.

D'riss says infected and didn't vote anywhere.

Seriously, you and Rashan have combined for some of the most suspicious crap in all of Mafia history.

[Korlat]

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 09:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected

So...you're saying D'riss is lying about being infected?

[Mockra]

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:59 PM, said:

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 09:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected

So...you're saying D'riss is lying about being infected?

Im saying its possible as scum could easily say that to be disinfected instead of an inno who needs it

[Mockra]

Amp you are visible

[Liosan]

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:41 AM, said:

Well based on how the voting was going I suspected that there wouldn't be another viable lynch target for the day so I wanted to lynch before infected players could place a vote on their forced target. I know nobody else would have pushed the lynch but that is what I was hoping for as it would have gotten rid of 2 infected who would do the DG's bidding. Now the infected are either the 2 voting for me currently or are on the Rashan train and based on Kaschan not voting for anyone, it seems he might not be infected. I didn't really want to mention lynching when I placed my vote as I didn't want the infected to get their votes down in a flurry.
@Liosan, You think getting rid of 2 infected is only good for scum? I disagree but you can think what you like
Now Rashan is at L-1 so I suspect someone will hammer shortly and we will see if any infected have not placed their needed votes if the effect is in place. Right now the 2 people who I suspect are infected are the 2 voting for me and Sil as the DG.

Repeating your silly argument doesn't make it any less silly. In fact, it might make it more silly. You do realize the DG doesn't have to compel, right? The chances of your plan working were so stupidly small, I don't even know why we're talking about it.

[Mockra]

Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:09 PM, said:

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:41 AM, said:

Well based on how the voting was going I suspected that there wouldn't be another viable lynch target for the day so I wanted to lynch before infected players could place a vote on their forced target. I know nobody else would have pushed the lynch but that is what I was hoping for as it would have gotten rid of 2 infected who would do the DG's bidding. Now the infected are either the 2 voting for me currently or are on the Rashan train and based on Kaschan not voting for anyone, it seems he might not be infected. I didn't really want to mention lynching when I placed my vote as I didn't want the infected to get their votes down in a flurry.
@Liosan, You think getting rid of 2 infected is only good for scum? I disagree but you can think what you like
Now Rashan is at L-1 so I suspect someone will hammer shortly and we will see if any infected have not placed their needed votes if the effect is in place. Right now the 2 people who I suspect are infected are the 2 voting for me and Sil as the DG.

Repeating your silly argument doesn't make it any less silly. In fact, it might make it more silly. You do realize the DG doesn't have to compel, right? The chances of your plan working were so stupidly small, I don't even know why we're talking about it.

Because I have already stated why I believe that infected would be compelled early

[Rashan]

Mockra, on Jun 24 2009, 10:24 PM, said:

Damn forum downs...
Wow I wasn't expecting all this talk about me from my one post while I was checking in...
I didn't vote under pressure... I voted as I found him to be the best candidate earlier and others didn't seem to hesitate. Why should putting him at l-3 be a bad thing from my position.. its not like i am hammering him with 20 hours left. The reason I placed my vote is that I was hoping for a speed lynch on the inevitable target so the 2 infected players in play would die from not having their vote on a specific alt if that power is currently in effect. The fact that 2 people jumped on my is beginning to make me think that there is the DG forcing them to do so which gives me much more suspicions of Sil. It seems not many of you realized that I made a post with a vote that I said I would place earlier and you all begin talking about me over reacting...
Im going to leave my vote where it is and we still have 7 hours with Rash at L-2.
Copy pasta

Whoa if I have learned anything you don't want to vote night the first day and speed lynch in a M&P game on day two is almost as bad for most of the same reasons. Plus why would you want to kill the infected? Just because they are infected doesn't mean they are automatically the enemy. They can still try to help the team that they were placed on with the hopes of becoming disinfected. Look what D'riss did. He was willing to risk there not being a healer to help his "former team" against the possibility of losing. I think this puts another strike against you instead of helping yourslef dig out of the hole you placed yourself.

[Liosan]

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected

Just because you think he's not likely to use compel later, that has no bearing on the whether he would use the ability now. Your argument still makes no sense.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 1 hour and 31 minutes remaining

19 Players still alive: Ampelas, Barghast, D'riss, Eloth, Emurlahn, Galain, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Karatallid, Kaschan, Korlat, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Omtose, Rashan, Silanah, Thyrllan

10 votes to lynch, 10 votes to go to night

2 votes for Mockra: ( Karatallid, Rashan )
9 votes for Rashan: ( Kaschan, Omtose, Barghast, Mockra, Thyrllan, Galain, Emurlahn, Hood's Path, Ampelas )

Players not voted: D'riss, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Korlat, Liosan, Meanas, Silanah

-Mal

[Mockra]

Rashan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:14 PM, said:

Mockra, on Jun 24 2009, 10:24 PM, said:

Damn forum downs...
Wow I wasn't expecting all this talk about me from my one post while I was checking in...
I didn't vote under pressure... I voted as I found him to be the best candidate earlier and others didn't seem to hesitate. Why should putting him at l-3 be a bad thing from my position.. its not like i am hammering him with 20 hours left. The reason I placed my vote is that I was hoping for a speed lynch on the inevitable target so the 2 infected players in play would die from not having their vote on a specific alt if that power is currently in effect. The fact that 2 people jumped on my is beginning to make me think that there is the DG forcing them to do so which gives me much more suspicions of Sil. It seems not many of you realized that I made a post with a vote that I said I would place earlier and you all begin talking about me over reacting...
Im going to leave my vote where it is and we still have 7 hours with Rash at L-2.
Copy pasta

Whoa if I have learned anything you don't want to vote night the first day and speed lynch in a M&P game on day two is almost as bad for most of the same reasons. Plus why would you want to kill the infected? Just because they are infected doesn't mean they are automatically the enemy. They can still try to help the team that they were placed on with the hopes of becoming disinfected. Look what D'riss did. He was willing to risk there not being a healer to help his "former team" against the possibility of losing. I think this puts another strike against you instead of helping yourslef dig out of the hole you placed yourself.

Yes well D'riss didnt realize that chances are that the DG will kill him before he is disinfected as that is the order of actions. Infected play for whatever side they wish but we cannot know if they are scum or not so are potentially a risk either way. D'riss is a goner, no way around that now..

[Silanah]

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 07:41 AM, said:

Well based on how the voting was going I suspected that there wouldn't be another viable lynch target for the day so I wanted to lynch before infected players could place a vote on their forced target. I know nobody else would have pushed the lynch but that is what I was hoping for as it would have gotten rid of 2 infected who would do the DG's bidding. Now the infected are either the 2 voting for me currently or are on the Rashan train and based on Kaschan not voting for anyone, it seems he might not be infected. I didn't really want to mention lynching when I placed my vote as I didn't want the infected to get their votes down in a flurry.
@Liosan, You think getting rid of 2 infected is only good for scum? I disagree but you can think what you like
Now Rashan is at L-1 so I suspect someone will hammer shortly and we will see if any infected have not placed their needed votes if the effect is in place. Right now the 2 people who I suspect are infected are the 2 voting for me and Sil as the DG.

Are you blind??? Kaschan's vote is currently on Rashan

Path-Shaper, on Jun 25 2009, 08:25 AM, said:

It is Day 2. 1 hour and 31 minutes remaining

19 Players still alive: Ampelas, Barghast, D'riss, Eloth, Emurlahn, Galain, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Karatallid, Kaschan, Korlat, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Omtose, Rashan, Silanah, Thyrllan

10 votes to lynch, 10 votes to go to night

2 votes for Mockra: ( Karatallid, Rashan )
9 votes for Rashan: ( Kaschan, Omtose, Barghast, Mockra, Thyrllan, Galain, Emurlahn, Hood's Path, Ampelas )

Players not voted: D'riss, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Korlat, Liosan, Meanas, Silanah

-Mal

[Mockra]

Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:24 PM, said:

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected

Just because you think he's not likely to use compel later, that has no bearing on the whether he would use the ability now. Your argument still makes no sense.

So there is a chance he would do it or wouldn't, where did I say I was certain he would? I don't seem to understand your argument

[Mockra]

Silanah, on Jun 25 2009, 06:29 PM, said:

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 07:41 AM, said:

Well based on how the voting was going I suspected that there wouldn't be another viable lynch target for the day so I wanted to lynch before infected players could place a vote on their forced target. I know nobody else would have pushed the lynch but that is what I was hoping for as it would have gotten rid of 2 infected who would do the DG's bidding. Now the infected are either the 2 voting for me currently or are on the Rashan train and based on Kaschan not voting for anyone, it seems he might not be infected. I didn't really want to mention lynching when I placed my vote as I didn't want the infected to get their votes down in a flurry.
@Liosan, You think getting rid of 2 infected is only good for scum? I disagree but you can think what you like
Now Rashan is at L-1 so I suspect someone will hammer shortly and we will see if any infected have not placed their needed votes if the effect is in place. Right now the 2 people who I suspect are infected are the 2 voting for me and Sil as the DG.

Are you blind??? Kaschan's vote is currently on Rashan

Path-Shaper, on Jun 25 2009, 08:25 AM, said:

It is Day 2. 1 hour and 31 minutes remaining

19 Players still alive: Ampelas, Barghast, D'riss, Eloth, Emurlahn, Galain, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Karatallid, Kaschan, Korlat, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Omtose, Rashan, Silanah, Thyrllan

10 votes to lynch, 10 votes to go to night

2 votes for Mockra: ( Karatallid, Rashan )
9 votes for Rashan: ( Kaschan, Omtose, Barghast, Mockra, Thyrllan, Galain, Emurlahn, Hood's Path, Ampelas )

Players not voted: D'riss, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Gamelon, Korlat, Liosan, Meanas, Silanah

-Mal

Got the name mixed up with Korlat sorry, I suspected him to be a possible infected before

[Galain]

Right now, I wish we could lynch two players in the same day.

[Liosan]

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 02:30 AM, said:

Liosan, on Jun 25 2009, 06:24 PM, said:

Mockra, on Jun 25 2009, 01:56 AM, said:

Korlat, on Jun 25 2009, 05:53 PM, said:

@Mockra - see my last post.

Admittedly, it assumes D'riss is infected as he claims, and that the infected have been compelled, which, as Rashan pointed out, is actually unlikely this early in the game.

I believe that being compelled to vote is very likely this early and not later as there could be a large number of people voting one way, the rest voting the other and it would be apparent who is infected

Just because you think he's not likely to use compel later, that has no bearing on the whether he would use the ability now. Your argument still makes no sense.

So there is a chance he would do it or wouldn't, where did I say I was certain he would? I don't seem to understand your argument

When you said you wanted to sacrifice a lot discussion and information by speed-lynching in an attempt to *catch* the infected. I guess I assumed you were pretty sure they were being compelled if you wanted to take that risk.