[Hood's Path]

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 04:11 PM, said:

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 02:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on Jun 1 2009, 05:05 PM, said:

Besides that, this.

Path-Shaper, on May 24 2009, 01:30 PM, said:

Any of the following roles may in the game: Healer, Guard, Killer, Symp, Finder, BP, Vig, Silencer. Roles not in this list may be present. Listed roles may work slightly differently than normal. More than one instance of any role may exist and may or may not be paired. There is no Jester, Cult or Faceless Man.

Crosspost.

Yeah. that doesn't prove shit, just that you are good at reading the rules.

So does that make you good at not reading them? Seriously, why are you and Shadow trying so hard to get us to believe we're playing a TMDI 2 game here?

no, i'm just saying it doesn't prove kesso is telling the truth, simply that. stop strawmanning please.

Of course it doesn't. I'm sitting here trying to ask intelligent questions about his reveal to gather an informed opinion on whether he is telling the truth, and you pop in with a "this is ridiculous-anything I've never experienced before can't possibly exist-the mod could never have been at all creative when designing this game" attitude, and it is seriously getting us nowhere. I mean, are you even trying to play the game?

[Kessobahn]

@Shadow: Because HP is who I put my provisional on for tonight. I already know the result, I just picked him and sent it in to save me time.

[Ampelas]

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 05:20 PM, said:

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 04:11 PM, said:

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 02:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on Jun 1 2009, 05:05 PM, said:

Besides that, this.

Path-Shaper, on May 24 2009, 01:30 PM, said:

Any of the following roles may in the game: Healer, Guard, Killer, Symp, Finder, BP, Vig, Silencer. Roles not in this list may be present. Listed roles may work slightly differently than normal. More than one instance of any role may exist and may or may not be paired. There is no Jester, Cult or Faceless Man.

Crosspost.

Yeah. that doesn't prove shit, just that you are good at reading the rules.

So does that make you good at not reading them? Seriously, why are you and Shadow trying so hard to get us to believe we're playing a TMDI 2 game here?

no, i'm just saying it doesn't prove kesso is telling the truth, simply that. stop strawmanning please.

Of course it doesn't. I'm sitting here trying to ask intelligent questions about his reveal to gather an informed opinion on whether he is telling the truth, and you pop in with a "this is ridiculous-anything I've never experienced before can't possibly exist-the mod could never have been at all creative when designing this game" attitude, and it is seriously getting us nowhere. I mean, are you even trying to play the game?

I don't spot any intelligent questions so far, but please try again. to reiterate--->

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 05:17 PM, said:

anyway, I'm open for suggestions, nobody of you have even tried making a case yet, so I'm hoping you got anything besides whining.

[Ampelas]

Kessobahn, on Jun 1 2009, 05:22 PM, said:

@Shadow: Because HP is who I put my provisional on for tonight. I already know the result, I just picked him and sent it in to save me time.

Looks to me like saving time would be to not send in anything at all - since you already know the result.

[Hood's Path]

Here's a question then: Do you expect anyone to follow you in your vote on Kesso when your accusations against him are so poorly thought out? Or are you just hoping that the day will get close to timing out and people will be afraid that their only options are to lynch the guy with 2 votes on him or lynch no-one? Because I don't intend to have that happen again.

edit: syntax

This post has been edited by Hood's Path: 01 June 2009 - 09:34 PM

[Ampelas]

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 04:33 PM, said:

Here's a question then: Do you expect anyone to follow you in your vote on Kesso when your accusations against him are so poorly thought out? Or are you just hoping that the day will get close to timing out and people will be afraid that their only options are to lynch the guy with 2 votes on him or lynch no-one? Because I don't intend on that happening again.

to reiterate--->

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 05:17 PM, said:

anyway, I'm open for suggestions, nobody of you have even tried making a case yet, so I'm hoping you got anything besides whining.

[Shadow]

Don't get cantankerous, there, Amp, HP is just being cautious because we're at or near the ol' D-Day. We just have to keep upping the persuasion, he'll come around eventually!

[Ampelas]

I know we're all getting jumpy, but I'm tired of my posts getting ignored.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 5. 27 hours and 30 minutes remaining

8 Players still alive: Ampelas, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Liosan, Mockra, Ruse, Shadow, Tellan

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night

1 vote for Shadow: ( Kessobahn )
2 votes for Kessobahn: ( Ampelas, Shadow )

Players not voted: Hood's Path, Liosan, Mockra, Ruse, Tellan


Ok I am going to class....If there is a lynch or what not hopefully someone will get on to take care of it. If not then you will just have to wait...Sorry guys


Vengeance

[Liosan]

gah
the fact that you're not dead suggests you may be teling the truth, shadow.

although a complete silencer role sounds just as useless as a paranoid finder.

[Hood's Path]

Liosan, do you have any other theories about the lack of a modkill?

[Kessobahn]

Okay, just read Ruse and found nothing remarkably strange. Until today when he was all groggy on flu meds. Gonna read the missing people now. Tellan and Mockra.

[Kessobahn]

Hmmmm...Mockra has indeed been an interesting fellow. Honestly, everyone he has come out with suspicions on has been killed that day or night. Last night it was Korvalain. I had passed it off as WIFOM since it was pointed out before the weekend, but now...I don't really know. Still I think I'll

remove vote
vote Mockra

[Liosan]

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 06:54 PM, said:

Liosan, do you have any other theories about the lack of a modkill?

no, not really.
unless Shadow simply asked the mods for a modkill extension and then decided to make up the silencer thing.

which is unlikely.

so, I suppose, I must believe that he's not lying.

the question then becomes, why was the first instance of silencing on day 3?

[Kessobahn]

As for Tellan he hasn't posted since Saturday, conveniently missed 2 lynches, and had several of the same suspicions as Mockra. Of course, several of use suspected Korlat, so not sure how far that one goes, but the advertisement of his missing 2 lynches threw up flags in my mind. Still think Mockra's more suspicious though.

[Hood's Path]

Liosan, on Jun 1 2009, 04:35 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 06:54 PM, said:

Liosan, do you have any other theories about the lack of a modkill?

no, not really.
unless Shadow simply asked the mods for a modkill extension and then decided to make up the silencer thing.

which is unlikely.

so, I suppose, I must believe that he's not lying.

the question then becomes, why was the first instance of silencing on day 3?

...
Shadow says he was silenced day 2.

And, Amp, could you find it in your heart to either confirm or deny that you were silenced yesterday? I know that you most likely would have said something by now if you were, but it would just make me feel better if I could get a definitive statement.

[Hood's Path]

Oh, I just remembered another question I wanted to ask:
Liosan, whatever happened to your suspicion of Amp from, like, day 2 and 3? You had a giant hard-on for him, and it seems like it has just disappeared since you've returned.

[Kessobahn]

Hood's Path, on Jun 1 2009, 08:35 PM, said:

Oh, I just remembered another question I wanted to ask:
Liosan, whatever happened to your suspicion of Amp from, like, day 2 and 3? You had a giant hard-on for him, and it seems like it has just disappeared since you've returned.

I noticed that reading through Amp, I thought they'd resolved it though.

[Mockra]

Kessobahn, on Jun 2 2009, 11:33 AM, said:

Hmmmm...Mockra has indeed been an interesting fellow. Honestly, everyone he has come out with suspicions on has been killed that day or night. Last night it was Korvalain. I had passed it off as WIFOM since it was pointed out before the weekend, but now...I don't really know. Still I think I'll

remove vote
vote Mockra

So im being lynched for participation?
With there being 2 nk's I assume that the symps might have had the roles passed down to them and the provisional from Fener on D'riss was followed through. Korv's death was probably a vig kill though if there were 2 symps that have the roles passed down to them, we might still have 2 killers alive...
Currently I don't believe Kess's reveal, to me he looks like a symp that wants to be ridden off as CI and basically RI for the rest of the game. Then when he is not nk'd he will say that he is potentially useless as a paranoid finder. Im going to read his posts and see if he attempted to lynch the first person he claims to have found.

Edit: Fener to Kess :S

This post has been edited by Mockra: 02 June 2009 - 01:17 AM

[Mockra]

Kessobahn, on May 29 2009, 04:24 AM, said:

Alright, so after reviewing I suppose Mockra's been a little bit annoying but its nothing to put a vote on, imo. I was never a fan of Shadow, right from that first comment about les auto (that's French dontcha know) and after he seemed to make you think I was his symp, I think its worth looking at him a little closer. Its possible he is scum trying to attach himself to an inno and get me lynched...hmm, I'm gonna go re-read him and see what I find.

Kessobahn, on May 29 2009, 04:52 AM, said:

Well, not as much on Shadow as I'd hoped. He's mostly middle of the road, with a padded post count do to his activity during the spam phase. nothing overtly scummy, imho, but maybe I'm just missing something. I've still got a lot to learn about case construction.

Meanas, on May 29 2009, 05:12 AM, said:

Kessobahn, on May 28 2009, 01:01 PM, said:

Meanas, on May 28 2009, 12:57 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on May 28 2009, 12:52 PM, said:

Well, not as much on Shadow as I'd hoped. He's mostly middle of the road, with a padded post count do to his activity during the spam phase. nothing overtly scummy, imho, but maybe I'm just missing something. I've still got a lot to learn about case construction.

Busy at work right now, but Kess, (sarcasm) that post doesn't make you look like a symp on Shadow, nope, not even a little bit (/sarcasm)

I'll be sporadic for the rest of the day, but with the thread moving at a snails pace, shouldn't have any trouble keeping up.

Well, no more than you look like Sil's symp. I mean, come on, you look at virtually everyone on the train yesterday and conveniently forget to mention the most suspicious one? I suppose if you're an experienced player forced to symp a newb you can only work with what you've got, but you should've at least mentioned it!

HA! Now I'm the symp? thats hilarious, I explained why I left Sil's name off that list. I was asking questions based on that train, Sil had pre-emptivley responded, I also left Mockra's name off for starting the train, you failed to mention that. Want to know why? Its because he was the first vote, the train grew AROUND him not BECAUSE of him. Does any of this mean I am CIing anyone? Of course not, keep trying Kess, but you need to do more than that to save you're master.

In fact

Vote Shadow

Kessobahn, on May 29 2009, 05:16 AM, said:

vote Shadow

I got nothing to hide. I am looking forward to uncovering your plot with Sil though.

These are the first few posts of relevance from Kess after night ended. The fact that he brought up suspicions on Shadow shows true to his word but the fact that he votes Shadow directly after his master puts it in a bad light.. He either is a smart symp with a back up plan or a naive inno with no insight into anything with his useless ability.