[Path-Shaper]

Kesso

Quote

Didn't I have a provisional on D'riss on like, day 3 or something? That would have been nice. @Silencer, you almost had them man. I wish I'd been on though, we could have revealed as a finder/vig pair. That probably would have worked had D'riss been dead. Sigh. But then I'd have no chance at all. This game went to pieces when Bent was vigged.

I believe that you might have....


Vengeance

This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 01 June 2009 - 07:16 PM

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on Jun 1 2009, 07:15 PM, said:

Lol, noone has picked up on it yet. As you said, someone likely will. Some fast talking may let Kesso survive today, but he's more than likely going to get guarded to death tonight.

Insane finders get the opposite results from what they normally should. So scum CF inno and inno CF scum. It's still a fairly useful role, if the player doesnt out himself on day two thinking he has found scum. Paranoid finders on the other hand will only ever receive scum CFs, no matter who they do a find on, as opposed to naive finders who will always get back inno.

That probably would have been a better choice. That would explain why he didn't reveal when he found his first scum....As it is he reveal has a lot of holes...

[Path-Shaper]

Kesso...

Quote

Quote

Quote

Didn't I have a provisional on D'riss on like, day 3 or something? That would have been nice. @Silencer, you almost had them man. I wish I'd been on though, we could have revealed as a finder/vig pair. That probably would have worked had D'riss been dead. Sigh. But then I'd have no chance at all. This game went to pieces when Bent was vigged.

I believe that you might have....


Vengeance

Well then fuck me up the ass.

While I'm thinking of it, provisional on HP.

Ok but I don't use any lube...

[Path-Shaper]

Hi Silencer - what you think of the game?

[Fener]

Dearest D'rek, aka Shadow. You are going to eat your words SO BADLY when you get to spoiler heaven, and find that everything I said about my role was true. XD

Oh, and I'm going to find and lynch Peanutbutta next game. No matter what.

This post has been edited by Fener: 01 June 2009 - 07:21 PM

[Peanutbutta]

Yep he changed the prov on me to someone else.

Also, LOL at the innos right now. I cannot BELIEVE that they are feeding into his shit. When she gets back, Gem is way too good at this game to let that slip IMO and yes, even if she does miss the numerical shit, I believe she'll keep her guard on him.

Seriously though, Breadmaster is working on a PHD in Physics. How he could miss something as easy as that I have no idea and I'm going to give him shit for it for a lonnnnnnng time. ROFL.

[Fener]

Game was good fun. ^^

If D'riss/peanut hadn't of been on when he was, then I would have escaped the noose with my reveal. Wild last role of the dice, yes - but a good enough reveal that it should have confused the hell out of all.
Sadly, my prediction at the beginning of the game came true - both the substitute killers died before the killer did. XD

Anyway, off to school.

[Peanutbutta]

LOL silencer, you said it yourself in an early post to SH. That alt is shit. I hate that alt so much and will always gun for it.

[HoosierDaddy]

Sigh. Always trust the gut, and nobody else. That is what spoiler-heaven has taught me.

[Peanutbutta]

HoosierDaddy, on Jun 1 2009, 12:24 PM, said:

Sigh. Always trust the gut, and nobody else. That is what spoiler-heaven has taught me.

HD you were awesome lol. I had you as inno for a long time.

[Path-Shaper]

More from M45

Kesso said:

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Didn't I have a provisional on D'riss on like, day 3 or something? That would have been nice. @Silencer, you almost had them man. I wish I'd been on though, we could have revealed as a finder/vig pair. That probably would have worked had D'riss been dead. Sigh. But then I'd have no chance at all. This game went to pieces when Bent was vigged.

I believe that you might have....


Vengeance

Well then fuck me up the ass.

While I'm thinking of it, provisional on HP.

Ok but I don't use any lube... tongue.gif

Well then forget that.

Awh - I'm gonna need that video camera back then. It's behind the book on the lefthand shelf.

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on Jun 1 2009, 07:29 PM, said:

More from M45

Kesso said:

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Didn't I have a provisional on D'riss on like, day 3 or something? That would have been nice. @Silencer, you almost had them man. I wish I'd been on though, we could have revealed as a finder/vig pair. That probably would have worked had D'riss been dead. Sigh. But then I'd have no chance at all. This game went to pieces when Bent was vigged.

I believe that you might have....


Vengeance

Well then fuck me up the ass.

While I'm thinking of it, provisional on HP.

Ok but I don't use any lube... tongue.gif

Well then forget that.

Awh - I'm gonna need that video camera back then. It's behind the book on the lefthand shelf.

Naaa... I think that I will keep it for a little while he might change his mind later on....

[Path-Shaper]

Fener, on Jun 1 2009, 07:20 PM, said:

Dearest D'rek, aka Shadow. You are going to eat your words SO BADLY when you get to spoiler heaven, and find that everything I said about my role was true. XD

Oh, and I'm going to find and lynch Peanutbutta next game. No matter what.

Not everything - you said the targetter dies, when it is in fact the target. But yeah, it was close enough to your actual role. Shame, the scum were very unlucky this game. If Gem had died early they might just have won it, her vig on Meanas really turned the game on it's head.

[Path-Shaper]

Hmm, I think Kesso is likely to ask for formal clarification about Shadow's lack of modkill. I dont want to outright confirm that he was silenced, as that would affect the game. Any ideas on how to respond if he does?

[Path-Shaper]

Were we suppose to modkill Shadow???? I don't remember any talk about that...


Vengeance

[Path-Shaper]

Path-Shaper, on Jun 1 2009, 08:03 PM, said:

Were we suppose to modkill Shadow???? I don't remember any talk about that...


Vengeance

No we weren't. He was silenced and had his modkill timer frozen for the duration. But if we state that on thread it officially backs up his story, not doing so makes it look like he's lying. Either way it has an effect on the game. Anyway, I'm off to work now, check in a bit later.

[Peanutbutta]

IMO you need to just state that modkills are being appropriately handled.

Silence is such a bad mechanic. You need to make sure it's explicitly discussed in the rules if you include so it there isn't this rules-guessing later.

[Peanutbutta]

Man if they keep chatting away, Kesso's mistake is going to get buried in posts by anyone who isn't paying attention to the numbers. Hope someone that catches up can see it.

[Peanutbutta]

Gem shows up suspicious of Kesso, but even with the list hasn't put it together. Why am I the only person who is immediately on the alert about reveals for fishy info?

Ampelas, on Jun 1 2009, 01:45 PM, said:

i'm not sure I believe Kesso's reveal, why would the game have an insane finder? it doesn't make sense. I'm more inclined to believe Kesso is fake revealing, and that he uses his 'find' list as decoy and to make it harder to find scum. it's possible that makes him a symp more than a killer, but I guess a desperate killer could spout this insanity aswell. but I'm nor sure what to think tbh.

[Path-Shaper]

Peanutbutta, on Jun 1 2009, 08:18 PM, said:

IMO you need to just state that modkills are being appropriately handled.

Silence is such a bad mechanic. You need to make sure it's explicitly discussed in the rules if you include so it there isn't this rules-guessing later.

Appropriately handled is a good term, thanks. A lot of whatwas in this game was supposed to suprise the players, it's very difficult to clearly define rules in that case, since it gives players a better idea of what to expect. Or can lead to even worse mechanic speculation.