HoosierDaddy, on Mar 23 2009, 04:18 PM, said:
Anomander, on Mar 23 2009, 03:10 PM, said:
Raymond Luxury Yacht, on Mar 23 2009, 03:44 PM, said:
My issue is not with saying that some movie are geared towards Americans. Of course they are. My problem is with the idea that a movie must be geared towards Americans because it is stupid and unsubtle. How am I not supposed to take offense when someone calls me stupid and unsubtle?
Here's another thing. We live in a global market. A big part of the profits from a movie comes from overseas sales. So, if a movie is dumbed down, is it not probable that it is dumbed down to appeal to unsophisticated people everywhere?
Mk, I'm going to respond to a bit of this.
Wry had a point in saying that television/film is geared towards the "lowest common denominator". Unfortunately for you guys it tends to come across as absolutely stupid to foreigners. This is obviously not the case 100% of the time or anywhere near that however. But I mean really, the most popular shows are reality crap, the "popular" music is inane for the most part, and a trend for a blockbuster usually includes either cheesy comedy/romance/explosions. These things aren't subtle and some might term them stupid. So yes, because they pop up often in American culture when we see them in movies you wind up thinking "oh, it's geared towards Americans". Saying this though doesn't mean you guys are idiots. I was disolved of that notion once I started up on the internet and actually met some Americans and I daresay you'd find the same is true for most members on this site.
Your point on the "global market" has a flaw. If a Hollywood movie doesn't do as well nationally it doesn't matter as much to the film industry even if it turns a good profit globally. Point in case is the Golden Compass movie. The film did not do as well in the States as expected, so while it had a respectable income overseas it's unknown if a sequel will now happen despite that being the initial plan. And this is coming from New Line, so clearly they're more concerned with appealing to Americans and not the global public.
1. Most popular television shows are "reality crap." This is nonsense. American Idol (designed by a Brit) yes, is popular. But not outside the 8-16 shrieking pre-teen/teenage girl faction. Lost... not complex? Battlestar Galactica... not complex?
2. Popular music: What does "popular" mean? Pop? Rap? If you think Rap is the most popular music in America you are sorely mistaken.
3. Blockbusters: See, the thing with blockbusters is that they have to appeal to large masses of people by their very definition. A film that is directed towards one demographic cannot become a blockbuster. It has to, by nature, be fairly bland enough that most people take some enjoyment out of it.
@Wry: Not defensive. I merely disagree, and am willing to state why I think you are wrong. Are you being, "offensive" (in the attack sort of way, not insulting)? No, you are stating an opinion as well. So...
1. Hmm, guess I hit off base here. I'm going off the American stations I see here. There are plenty of gems, but by comparison the amount of crap (of which reality based programming takes a good chunk) I see is staggering.
2. You say "pop" and "rap" aren't the most popular music in America? Tune into MTV, check the Billboard charts, hell check out all those radio stations claiming "today's best music!" The trend is changing and rock/metal/alternative/etc is becoming more common, but it doesn't begin to approach how much money is made off of "pop" and "rap".
3. Nothing to add here.