Thyrllan, on Nov 26 2008, 12:35 PM, said:
Ok I wont be able to post much more for a while, as Ive got taekwondo for a few hours then a load of homework to do, so I'l just make a comment to kaschan, you said that I came on you say that was like the 3rd or 4th time i mentioned you, what you missed out was the fact that I came on and said I couldnt remember much about the low posters so went through yours, Korlats and Feners posts so obviously I mention you in my review of your posts.
I do agree with you about the fact that as soon as I made 1 or 2 posts everyone jumped on me like I was a messiah, this has been freaking me out, because nothing I found was foolproof and I dont see why its made some people (mainly Rashan) suddenly look at me like Im less guilty, It is making me think that I may have gone for the wrong people, but at the moment I cant really go back as Il just end up coming back to this again if i dont get some answers.
points out for the first time the extra attention he received after posting. Clearly overreacting here. The reason he was suspicious,was becasue he did not post. with that reason removed by posting, obviously people would find him less likely to be scum.
Thyrllan, on Nov 26 2008, 12:40 PM, said:
God dont bring him into this
Thyrllan, on Nov 27 2008, 09:29 AM, said:
Well now we know Rashan was innocent, so now we can now move on from that. I don't think much can be read into the Tennes Nk as he was probably the least likely to get targetted for a lynch.
Now reading through Silanahs and Gams points I can see merit in both of them, I said earlier I was suspicious of Kaschan, but he did get involved and put a bit more substance but I keep getting stumped by the fact his vote on me does seem very random and OMGUS.
Now D'riss is definitely getting me a bit worried after reading through the quotes provided by Gam so I will look back in a bit when I have time and see for myself if he's missed anything or if hes putting a bit of a spin on them.
For now il leave off on putting a vote down until im sure.
ok, here he's once again following someone's lead. Day 2 it was Rashan, today it appears to be Gamelon
Thyrllan, on Nov 27 2008, 11:29 AM, said:
Gah I come back after a walk and finish my read up of D'riss's stuff to discover you 2 have done it already and come to the same conclusions anyway looking at his posts there I couldnt really see much that tied him really to anyone or anything overtly scummy, although that post that gamelon found is a good catch. The only thing I did notice that stood out strongly was the fact that he hasnt actually attacked anyone or strongly opposed much , he seems to be being very friendly and almost going with the flow, I dont like this at all it appears as though he is trying to make everyone like him and think of him as an ally.
considering that the only person that took his previous attacks seriously was Rashan, who was supporting him, since Thyr basically restated what Rash said, I don't think he should judge. he's blaming me for "not being tied to anyone"--I'm sorry, I'm pretty sure the only people "tied" to each other in the game are scum.
Thyrllan, on Nov 27 2008, 12:54 PM, said:
Ok how exactly are we linked? I know you mentioned something about me, Rashan and D'riss yesterday. All I can see is the fact that they both suddenly went all puppyeyed over me when I started making a post, and while that did seem slightly odd, and has me worried I may be being set up, I dont know what else is causing us to be linked.
puppyeyed??? I'm sorry, since when is "he's now posting more. I like that. since I found him suspicious due to lack of contribution, I now find you less suspicious" puppyeyed? Once again, he keeps trying to stress the "Radical shift" in my behaviour towards him, where there was none. i had suspicions, he alleviated them, I don't think he's suspicious. that's how the game's played, it's nothing exceptional. I was ceptical enough about his day 2 theory to now be able to say that I did NOT see him as a "messiah"
I really don't see the point of stressing this. at all.
Thyrllan, on Nov 27 2008, 01:57 PM, said:
Ok well im off out now, will be back on way before day is over probably so Il leave my vote off for now.
Thyrllan, on Nov 27 2008, 08:49 PM, said:
Silanah, on Nov 27 2008, 09:10 PM, said:
are you going to comment on it? or better yet place a vote so when others come on they can discuss it.
What do you think of the way driss defended thyr a few times, obviously thyrllan doesn tthink they are linked or wont admit on thread nayway. can you see anything there? if driss came back inno who would you suspect? which of driss or kaschan would you prefer to lynch today? if driss came back guilty who would you think is his partner / symp?
any answer to any of these questions would be useful from you korlat, or anyone else for that matter.
ok ibviously I dont think were linked as I'm an inno who doesnt have a link but I Would like to hear your evidence (seriously) I'm Really drunk now so I wont be making a case.
Thyrllan, on Nov 28 2008, 07:38 AM, said:
Ok have just read through D'riss' defence and it doesnt do anything to alleviate my fears, he seems to be skirting most of the issues by making it appear he's answering them but really just working round them. If anything its just made me more suspicious of him. So now
Vote D'riss
okay, now this is just plain weird. I give you a defence. you don't like it, challenge it, tell me what's wrong with it. you do NOT just say "oh, yeah, you're not answering" and vote and then leave. that's easily the scummiest thing he's done. ffs, it took me an hour to go through the case on me and answer it. The least you could do is tell me what you don't like about it.
so in summary:
Day 1-zero content
Night 1- jumps in with "Well, Ano was roled that's why he died, see?"
Day 2- takes a cue from Rashan, restates his cases, votes for one of the most unlikely lynch candidates and leaves.
Day 3 - once again takes cue on who to look for, this time from Gamelon and sticks to it. This time he doesn't even restate the case, and what's more he sidesteps the defence by saying "yeah, you're not answering".
so, for this behaviour that I find scummy, at least untill he explains what he found wrong with my defence
vote Thyrhlan
ok, this took me two hours to write.
I gotta go get ready to go out.
I'll check back sometime tomorrow.
good night, all
oh, and all emoticons were removed to accomodate the board