Liosan, on Nov 26 2008, 02:48 PM, said:
D'riss if you see earlier, I refused to consider low posters.
1. They dont deserve to win by doing that. They can fucking play like everyone else, or I dont know why they play at all.
2. It is hit and miss. There just isnt enough to go on, properly.
As for why I find you and Tennes suspicious:
Both of you:
Pushed a lynch onto me(not scummy in itself).
You then went on to hint that going for Rashan, if I come up innocent, is good.
Its basically like setting up the rest of the game, and trying to make certain of who gets lynched. Its suspicious, as you're planning ahead.
Youre saying go for one, if hes inno(and if you're killers, you'll know I am) then go for the other. SInce you'd know I'd come up inno, you could then push a Rashan lynch, having already planted the seeds that its a good idea.
Keep calling me a symp.
Now, this basically gives you a way out, if pulled up on voting, to say "look, he was probably a symp anyhow", which also makes people consider a better scenario.
one fundamental problem with your argument
i am NOT pushing a lynch onto you
if I did, I'd have voted already. that's how I express who I want to see lynched. Period.
the reason i'm not putting a vote on you is BECAUSE I think you're a likely symp. if I was scum, and you were my symp, I'd try to follow your lead on Rashan, as there are plenty of people here willing to vote that way. but i'm not.
instead, im trying to figure out who you may be symping if you are a symp.
so yeah, once again. I'm not pushing a lynch on you. or on Rashan, for that matter.
I am not against it, as a last resort. But i hav doubts about both of you.