Mafia 33 - Heroes: Experiments
#381
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:38 PM
Ah, now you've gone and given yourself away.
Maybe.
Or not.
Damn...
Maybe.
Or not.
Damn...
#382 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:39 PM
I too shall challenge you to alt-guess me, Shadow. 
And Liosan is obviously Baudin
And Liosan is obviously Baudin
#383
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:39 PM
You suck, Lish.
Edit: Added the comma, cause without it was kinda ewww.
Edit: Added the comma, cause without it was kinda ewww.
This post has been edited by Liosan: 28 October 2008 - 08:40 PM
#384
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:40 PM
bah, i'm not on any lists that are important... I don't think.. so meh
I always end up giving myself away, half the time through posting nekkid. no big deal
I always end up giving myself away, half the time through posting nekkid. no big deal
#385
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:42 PM
Emurlahn, on Oct 28 2008, 07:29 PM, said:
Anyways. It's good that you are here, Fener, for I've been playing with the thought of arguing that we should lynch you or Mockra, if we decide to lynch anyone. Since you're here we can discuss it.
Basically, my argument is that the way you jumped up defending Mockra makes you a likely candidate to be his partner, or his friend as discussed earlier regarding likely roles knowing of each other.
Sylar would not have a friend to defend him like that. And Peter as we've argued in all probability does not know who Claire is, even if she could know him. That should mean that you'd be a safe lynch in regards to one day victories.
I basically think it'd be good for us to narrow the playing field a little, and any new information now is good information.
The question in essence is why you were so quick to jump up in defence of Mockra when there really was no reason to. Mockra clearly overreacted badly to a mistake he himself made, yet you defended him very one sidedly. Why?
Basically, my argument is that the way you jumped up defending Mockra makes you a likely candidate to be his partner, or his friend as discussed earlier regarding likely roles knowing of each other.
Sylar would not have a friend to defend him like that. And Peter as we've argued in all probability does not know who Claire is, even if she could know him. That should mean that you'd be a safe lynch in regards to one day victories.
I basically think it'd be good for us to narrow the playing field a little, and any new information now is good information.
The question in essence is why you were so quick to jump up in defence of Mockra when there really was no reason to. Mockra clearly overreacted badly to a mistake he himself made, yet you defended him very one sidedly. Why?
I like the way you posted this, almost like we had been having a conversation and that I was around. I was not around and we were not having a conversation. This is the post you refer to:
Fener, on Oct 28 2008, 01:27 PM, said:
Seemed to be a genuine mistake to me. You seem very aggressive Serc and ringing a very loud bell on day 1. I dunno I dont want to Alt guess but I am now.
Not really much of a defence. Serc was accusing Mockra of cheating, which I guess it could be argued he was. I was just saying I thought it was a genuine mistake as opposed to him doing it on purpose. The second part was just a joke and maybe could have done with a smiley.
#386
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:42 PM
Im too obvious to avoid it, cause im obvious through when I can play, and the reasons I must leave etc.
Still, doesnt really matter much.
Also, meta is such a stupid argument.
Still, doesnt really matter much.
Also, meta is such a stupid argument.
#387 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:42 PM
Argggh my mind
The comma was too late. Too late.
(But honestly, Lisheo?)
(But honestly, Lisheo?)
#388
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:42 PM
#389
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:43 PM
Allright, caught up. Started at 16 pages and was at 20 by the time I got done. Damn People. Looks like we have a ton of time left so I too am of the opinion that we should really think this through.
As to the game itself...wow. I am guessing a lot of you have really complicated roles cause you seem to have a much better grasp on this so far than I. I am going to go back and read the rules again. Really glad Gem extended the time as it will give us a chance to better get a handle on what we are dealing with.
As to the game itself...wow. I am guessing a lot of you have really complicated roles cause you seem to have a much better grasp on this so far than I. I am going to go back and read the rules again. Really glad Gem extended the time as it will give us a chance to better get a handle on what we are dealing with.
#390
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:44 PM
meh, alting is fun sometimes, but only when you don't really try... when you do, it gets irritating
and besides, we all know that q21 will die on night 1 anyways...
and besides, we all know that q21 will die on night 1 anyways...
#391
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:45 PM
PS. If you want to alt guess Lisheo you can really narrow the field.. just look at the top 3 posters
#392
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:46 PM
Galain, on Oct 28 2008, 04:43 PM, said:
Allright, caught up. Started at 16 pages and was at 20 by the time I got done. Damn People. Looks like we have a ton of time left so I too am of the opinion that we should really think this through.
As to the game itself...wow. I am guessing a lot of you have really complicated roles cause you seem to have a much better grasp on this so far than I. I am going to go back and read the rules again. Really glad Gem extended the time as it will give us a chance to better get a handle on what we are dealing with.
As to the game itself...wow. I am guessing a lot of you have really complicated roles cause you seem to have a much better grasp on this so far than I. I am going to go back and read the rules again. Really glad Gem extended the time as it will give us a chance to better get a handle on what we are dealing with.
edited for punctuation.
This post has been edited by Shadow: 28 October 2008 - 08:47 PM
#393
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:47 PM
True, although he has other players that werent in the last to contend with, I think.
So, on a serious note, what do we think would be a good plan of actions.
Not naming names, just which roles etc we should go for.
So, on a serious note, what do we think would be a good plan of actions.
Not naming names, just which roles etc we should go for.
#394
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:47 PM
Right, I haven't read a thing yet so here's a little disclaimer before I do. This game started at a bad time for me so I won't be able to participate properly until tomorrow (wednesday) night. With 380 + posts to read don't expect any in depth analysis, I'm going to be playing this game mostly on gut and impressions I get from reading lots of posts at once. At least until I get properly caught up and have had a chance to get involved.
If that offends people, so be it. I'm probably not going to be around to defend myself over the next RL day if the need should arise. Again, so be it. Normal participation will start as soon as I can, I've been looking forward to this game.
Now, I have a crap load to read and unless I finish you won't here from me again tonight.
If that offends people, so be it. I'm probably not going to be around to defend myself over the next RL day if the need should arise. Again, so be it. Normal participation will start as soon as I can, I've been looking forward to this game.
Now, I have a crap load to read and unless I finish you won't here from me again tonight.
#395 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:47 PM
#396
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:48 PM
Am I reading the rules wrong, or ... its possible that some people will start with certain win conditions but those may change as they get recruited. Some people can be recriuted, but that won't change their win conditions. We have 3 known win conditions but others are possible. Is this right? Damn Gem....
#397
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:48 PM
#398
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:48 PM
Does anyone else think telas and liosan should switch avs.
I just think they suit the others better.
I just think they suit the others better.
#399
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:49 PM
Telas, on Oct 28 2008, 04:47 PM, said:
Right, I haven't read a thing yet so here's a little disclaimer before I do. This game started at a bad time for me so I won't be able to participate properly until tomorrow (wednesday) night. With 380 + posts to read don't expect any in depth analysis, I'm going to be playing this game mostly on gut and impressions I get from reading lots of posts at once. At least until I get properly caught up and have had a chance to get involved.
If that offends people, so be it. I'm probably not going to be around to defend myself over the next RL day if the need should arise. Again, so be it. Normal participation will start as soon as I can, I've been looking forward to this game.
Now, I have a crap load to read and unless I finish you won't here from me again tonight.
If that offends people, so be it. I'm probably not going to be around to defend myself over the next RL day if the need should arise. Again, so be it. Normal participation will start as soon as I can, I've been looking forward to this game.
Now, I have a crap load to read and unless I finish you won't here from me again tonight.
you have till Thursday. you can relax, lol

Help














