Help
Interesting idea.
I'd say lynches are good for information.
Basically, you want to lynch them because you dont think that they're Peter or Sylar?
Well, yeah, thats one possibility, and it seems like it could be a safe lynch.
Mafia 33 - Heroes: Experiments
#344
Shadow 
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:01 PM
lol, i'd rather he got NK-ed by someone other than Sylar.
oh, btw, this is interesting: if Sylar and another person both target someone for the NK, how do we determine who killed them? and does hteir winning condition stil switch to that of Sylar?
oh, btw, this is interesting: if Sylar and another person both target someone for the NK, how do we determine who killed them? and does hteir winning condition stil switch to that of Sylar?
#345 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:01 PM
Ok, now I'm definatly back. Why are you so lynch happy, Emurlahn? I'm very suspicious of that. It's day one, we don't understand how things will develop(anyone see the revealing of night actions coming? Makes things VERY interesting for the Heroes with powers), so why press for a lynch? I for one would prefer to vote Night, and welcome our new super-powered overlords, but I suppose if we have the possibility of voting someone off that we're sure is safe...
#347
Meanas
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:03 PM
I'm off for the night, but now that I think of it I'm serious about the idea to lynch Serc
- We move the game forward
- We for sure don't end the game by lynching someone we shouldn't, specially on day 1 where there's little info to make a wise decision
- We eliminate the picture-thingy posts, which are disruptive at best and misleading at worst
Not bad, let's think of it if we're in a bind
- We move the game forward
- We for sure don't end the game by lynching someone we shouldn't, specially on day 1 where there's little info to make a wise decision
- We eliminate the picture-thingy posts, which are disruptive at best and misleading at worst
Not bad, let's think of it if we're in a bind
#348
Liosan
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:06 PM
Look at the list.
We know peter and sylar have winning conditions, but since they havent killed/protected anyone else yet, its only those 2 that have their winning conditions.
The company has 4, with their winning conditions, so thats 6 altogether.
Id say those without winning conditions are the majority atm.
Though tommorow, say sylar kills one, company capture one, peter protects, then its 8/15 that have them, assuming they dont hit each other.
Got to consider who killing of Isaac would help though, meanas.
We know peter and sylar have winning conditions, but since they havent killed/protected anyone else yet, its only those 2 that have their winning conditions.
The company has 4, with their winning conditions, so thats 6 altogether.
Id say those without winning conditions are the majority atm.
Though tommorow, say sylar kills one, company capture one, peter protects, then its 8/15 that have them, assuming they dont hit each other.
Got to consider who killing of Isaac would help though, meanas.
This post has been edited by Liosan: 28 October 2008 - 08:07 PM
#349
Shadow
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:06 PM
Meanas, the game's frozen for something like another 30 hours, with the clock being at 24 hours left,
we're REALLY not in any hurry here.
i'm sure that thevigs will see the danger that Serc posesses and kill him at night
unless peter saves him
in which case, we can lynch him the next day,
we're REALLY not in any hurry here.
i'm sure that thevigs will see the danger that Serc posesses and kill him at night
unless peter saves him
in which case, we can lynch him the next day,
#351 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:09 PM
The picture posts are actually quite useful. For example Shadow is being guarded. Why? It suggests someone either knows or suspects he has a role with a night action that shouldn't be used. Tell's us we got a guard somewhere too. Are they linked? We just don't know yet. Now, that's all hypothetical, but it could be applied to almost everyone. We simply don't know the relationships yet and we can trust that Gem made them balanced, so a foolish move will have consquences.
And let's not vote people off for supporting others JUST yet. We have n00bs playing, gentlemen. If we're confused, imagine how they feel!
And let's not vote people off for supporting others JUST yet. We have n00bs playing, gentlemen. If we're confused, imagine how they feel!
#353
Shadow
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:11 PM
Liosan, on Oct 28 2008, 04:08 PM, said:
In other words:
We go tonight, let the vigs kill, and if he survives, lynch him tommorow.
Its quite possible he'd survive, so it doesnt actually achieve much going to night.
We go tonight, let the vigs kill, and if he survives, lynch him tommorow.
Its quite possible he'd survive, so it doesnt actually achieve much going to night.
lol, Liosan, if we lynch someone who has no faction yet, by just random vote, that person loses. like, totally loses.
I don't think that's fair--everyone should get a chance to be recruited. THEN we can go for each other's throats,
that's just me though...
#354 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:12 PM
There's no JA this time though. I hope.
#355
Shadow
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:13 PM
Liosan, on Oct 28 2008, 04:10 PM, said:
Good idea, lets let them play the noob card again...
lol, in this case everyone who hasn't played the LOST game (and that's an overwhelming majority) is a noob to this kind of set up.
no reason to get all huffy just yet, Liosan...
#356
Korvalain
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:14 PM
Shadow, on Oct 28 2008, 07:59 PM, said:
hmm
run by me again, WHY is it bad to lynch Peter?
I get Sylar, sure then Peter wins
But if we lynch Peter, Sylar still needs to get Claire, no?
run by me again, WHY is it bad to lynch Peter?
I get Sylar, sure then Peter wins
But if we lynch Peter, Sylar still needs to get Claire, no?
Well yes it wouldn't mean that we lose straight away, but I don't think killing one of the people sylar needs to kill to win is a good idea really as it just puts him that much closer to victory.
#358
Shadow
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:15 PM
Korvalain, on Oct 28 2008, 04:14 PM, said:
Shadow, on Oct 28 2008, 07:59 PM, said:
hmm
run by me again, WHY is it bad to lynch Peter?
I get Sylar, sure then Peter wins
But if we lynch Peter, Sylar still needs to get Claire, no?
run by me again, WHY is it bad to lynch Peter?
I get Sylar, sure then Peter wins
But if we lynch Peter, Sylar still needs to get Claire, no?
Well yes it wouldn't mean that we lose straight away, but I don't think killing one of the people sylar needs to kill to win is a good idea really as it just puts him that much closer to victory.
and lynching Claire wouldn't?
I mean, if we're gonna do things like that, we should say "we don't want to lynch Sylar, Peter or Claire. Everyone else is fair game"
#359 Guest_Barghast_*
Posted 28 October 2008 - 08:16 PM
Shadow, on Oct 28 2008, 08:13 PM, said:
Liosan, on Oct 28 2008, 04:10 PM, said:
Good idea, lets let them play the noob card again...
lol, in this case everyone who hasn't played the LOST game (and that's an overwhelming majority) is a noob to this kind of set up.
no reason to get all huffy just yet, Liosan...
Not necessarily, actually. It's a cult game, with much more roles, and slightly more specific victory conditions. Anyone who's played a cult game before will probably settle into it in a day or two.
