Mafia 33 - Heroes: Experiments
#321
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:22 PM
As for the pictures thingy, can anyone tell me if I understood right?
Here goes:
Serc as the name of a Heroes character that can read the future.
Gem tells him what he's allowed to tell us
He's telling it to us in pictures , UB-style.
Is that what he claims? Does that make sense TV show-wise? What the hell is "the future", provisionals? When does he get the info, as soon as Gem receives the provisional from a night-action player?
Here goes:
Serc as the name of a Heroes character that can read the future.
Gem tells him what he's allowed to tell us
He's telling it to us in pictures , UB-style.
Is that what he claims? Does that make sense TV show-wise? What the hell is "the future", provisionals? When does he get the info, as soon as Gem receives the provisional from a night-action player?
#322
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:23 PM
so, seems we're missing gamelon and Telas
what are the chances one of them was silenced by the Haitian already?
what are the chances one of them was silenced by the Haitian already?
#323
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:25 PM
Meanas, on Oct 28 2008, 03:22 PM, said:
As for the pictures thingy, can anyone tell me if I understood right?
Here goes:
Serc as the name of a Heroes character that can read the future.
Gem tells him what he's allowed to tell us
He's telling it to us in pictures , UB-style.
Is that what he claims? Does that make sense TV show-wise? What the hell is "the future", provisionals? When does he get the info, as soon as Gem receives the provisional from a night-action player?
Here goes:
Serc as the name of a Heroes character that can read the future.
Gem tells him what he's allowed to tell us
He's telling it to us in pictures , UB-style.
Is that what he claims? Does that make sense TV show-wise? What the hell is "the future", provisionals? When does he get the info, as soon as Gem receives the provisional from a night-action player?
apparently in the show he (Isaac) is a slightly mental bloke who paints prophetic paintings
translating into gam mechanics, he gets "visions" from Gem and has to express them. I'm assuming these "visions" come from provisionals, although they could be some scripted events..
#324
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:28 PM
Well, hopefully none of the "Shadow" mentions refer to me.
#325
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:29 PM
Anyways. It's good that you are here, Fener, for I've been playing with the thought of arguing that we should lynch you or Mockra, if we decide to lynch anyone. Since you're here we can discuss it.
Basically, my argument is that the way you jumped up defending Mockra makes you a likely candidate to be his partner, or his friend as discussed earlier regarding likely roles knowing of each other.
Sylar would not have a friend to defend him like that. And Peter as we've argued in all probability does not know who Claire is, even if she could know him. That should mean that you'd be a safe lynch in regards to one day victories.
I basically think it'd be good for us to narrow the playing field a little, and any new information now is good information.
The question in essence is why you were so quick to jump up in defence of Mockra when there really was no reason to. Mockra clearly overreacted badly to a mistake he himself made, yet you defended him very one sidedly. Why?
Basically, my argument is that the way you jumped up defending Mockra makes you a likely candidate to be his partner, or his friend as discussed earlier regarding likely roles knowing of each other.
Sylar would not have a friend to defend him like that. And Peter as we've argued in all probability does not know who Claire is, even if she could know him. That should mean that you'd be a safe lynch in regards to one day victories.
I basically think it'd be good for us to narrow the playing field a little, and any new information now is good information.
The question in essence is why you were so quick to jump up in defence of Mockra when there really was no reason to. Mockra clearly overreacted badly to a mistake he himself made, yet you defended him very one sidedly. Why?
#326
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:30 PM
#329
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:35 PM
#330
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:36 PM
#331
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:39 PM
lol, well with 300+ posts it's not surprising... not like he posted in a block, just one post here and there...
#332
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:40 PM
Shadow, on Oct 28 2008, 12:35 PM, said:
hey, how come Liosan's a regular and not an alt? shock.gif
Cause im
Sorry, just the way it is.
Sorry, ive not been too active, but really busy atm.
Ill be on and off, doing some stuff, for the next while.
This post has been edited by Liosan: 28 October 2008 - 07:40 PM
#335
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:46 PM
If I can. I'll ask any questions directed at me, but im trying to do a chemistry paper atm.
#336
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:50 PM
#337
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:51 PM
Great, Bargy!
any revelations you'd like to share?
any revelations you'd like to share?
#338
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:52 PM
Well that serc thing is interesting. looks like it is Gem sending the pictures, whether its provisional or just a way to mess with us without them really meaning much is hard to tell at this point so i think i'l let it slide for now and see if anything comes of them.
To be honest i can't quite see how you would integrate a person whose power is to paint the future into a mafia game.
Noone else seems to have done much other than general day one randomness, apart from a weird argument appearing between mockra and serc.
Feners comment about winning conditions doesn't strike me as that odd as it does seem pretty convoluted with all the different factions and sub factions around.
To be honest i can't quite see how you would integrate a person whose power is to paint the future into a mafia game.
Noone else seems to have done much other than general day one randomness, apart from a weird argument appearing between mockra and serc.
Feners comment about winning conditions doesn't strike me as that odd as it does seem pretty convoluted with all the different factions and sub factions around.
#339
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:52 PM
#340
Posted 28 October 2008 - 07:52 PM
OMG! Lover pair! They must be evil! Get 'em!
~Yellow

Eidt: Cross post, i'll look over your arguments.
Edit 2: Lol, this post was directed at emurlahn saying he missed bargy.
~Yellow
Eidt: Cross post, i'll look over your arguments.
Edit 2: Lol, this post was directed at emurlahn saying he missed bargy.
This post has been edited by Liosan: 28 October 2008 - 07:55 PM

Help














