Morgoth, on Oct 21 2008, 11:01 AM, said:
Tapper, on Oct 21 2008, 10:59 AM, said:
drinksinbars, on Oct 21 2008, 10:49 AM, said:
funny thing is i dont know why i wasnt killed off night 1, its not something i like talking about, but tbh its been bugging the shit out of me and i leave it to others to mention it and wait and wait and wait. Now if morgo was a killer and knew i was on his tail would he nk me or would he leave me? To nk me implicates morgo badly, not only by how i play and how he was the focus of that play nigth 1 but also by the 'feud' we supposedly have. That I wasnt night killed could easily mean that the killers didnt want that implication made. When i play killer (dk should remember) i choose night kills that deliberately incite confusion and discussion. By taking out jslr there wasnt that much action syurrounding him, so his death was ambigious and didnt really result int he hounding of an inno that the kilelr should look for in night kills.
The only reason i can see that a killer would want this is if they are already under pressure and want the game to cool down.
I also noticed someone doing the "if i die" bit?? who was that?
Lace did some premature 'if I die' during the weekend break at L-4 or so, but funnily enough didn't on L-2 (the worst point he got to). I put it down to inexperience. If there are others, they escaped my notion.
Now, the first paragraph is a nice support for your theory against Morgoth. Your 3x4 votes are bad for the game is perfectly simple reasoning. I'm willing to throw out a vote against Morgoth (and here Dkt jumps up
) to apply pressure early on day 3, might aid your case and give us a couple of PIs if we drive through to a lynch, or might clear Morgoth a bit more if he manages to defend himself adequately. It's yet another chance to see if a derailment train jumps up, but this time not affected by the weekend break.
I don't like that plan. If another train does not appear I die. Not to mention that at this point I'd think the evils would be worried about jumping on my train knowing i'll appear innocent, and I think a lot of people are starting to question the validity of trying to solve the game by lynching me for the third time in a row
Nope. You get to sway people away through defense, but you seem awfully sure it won't be good enough seeing how you mention that you need a second train.
More, the killers not jumping on your train as a block is also information. They'd be in the half-1 part of the players left.
So, more likely, the killers would divide themselves amongst voters/ non-voters. That might stir up the voting pattern and the sides drawn we've seen so far. Lastly, people would have to have a damned good reason for either jumping on or jumping off, a simple: 'what he said' or 'I believe Morgy' or 'I think Dibs has the best part' would be a total failure.
I know it would place your neck on the line, but a) I doubt DiBs will change target and you ended with 4 votes against you now, a lot more than yesterday, that number may raise contrary to what you expect, also because intended derailment/diversion is expected
at this point, with the missed lynch today, we should go for a lynch that leads to a lot of info and a few PIs or a few possible guilty ones as a follow up.
If we slack on until there are 6-8 players left (3-4 nights as the vig must kill within the next 2 days), we're very likely to lynch other inno's anyway and go on hunches. Best to close lines of inquiry with as good a result as possible, in my opinion.
Oh, and I don't mind being a line of inquiry myself, although I'm a bit more in the periphery and seen as a possible symp, so my lynch wouldn't be as telling as a lynch on a possible killer.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad