[Morgoth]

Yellow, on Oct 17 2008, 07:14 PM, said:

Morgoth, on Oct 17 2008, 06:08 PM, said:

If you're refering to the naming him a hunk, I just don't know how to respond.

Hand job?

well, I'm sure we could work something out. A vote on the other hand, is hardly a right move

Edit: you have to buy me flowers first

[Gem Windcaster]

We're not gonna get anything relevant today, all we can do is build on what we have for the next day.

[Yellow]

Lisheo, on Oct 17 2008, 06:17 PM, said:

If we are gonna lynch everyone who stands out as being dodgy, Id have quite the list of people to vote for, with you and Alt topping the list, for tryin to get someone lynched for no real reason. True, he's Morgy lmao, but I cant see anything in his posts that suggests he could be a killer. And it'll only help the scum if he was to get lynched with no evidence, and turn out to be innocent.

Sorry, I'm well in the camp that says in a normal game, you should lynch every day, because it gives you so much more information than no lynch (yeah, my camp needs to work on its motto a little).

If we don't lynch today (which looks likely) then come day two, we will still be arguing about the same shit and we will have no extra information to work on, except a dead inno. At least with a day one lynch, you will likely have settled an argument, even though it is likely at the expense of another inno.

[mocker]

hey hey hey

work was a bitch and im exhausted, but couldnt keep away lol hmm

[Gem Windcaster]

With a day 1 lynch based on nothing we'll have two dead innos tomorrow, and still nothing to go on.

[Path-Shaper]

1 hour left.

[Tapper]

Gem Windcaster, on Oct 17 2008, 07:27 PM, said:

With a day 1 lynch based on nothing we'll have two dead innos tomorrow, and still nothing to go on.

We have a train, which becomes more and more valuable while the game progresses.
I'm in the Yellow camp when it comes to lynching (usually). As for a slogan: "No lynch --> no train --> no info!"

[Morgoth]

Yellow, on Oct 17 2008, 07:25 PM, said:

Lisheo, on Oct 17 2008, 06:17 PM, said:

If we are gonna lynch everyone who stands out as being dodgy, Id have quite the list of people to vote for, with you and Alt topping the list, for tryin to get someone lynched for no real reason. True, he's Morgy lmao, but I cant see anything in his posts that suggests he could be a killer. And it'll only help the scum if he was to get lynched with no evidence, and turn out to be innocent.

Sorry, I'm well in the camp that says in a normal game, you should lynch every day, because it gives you so much more information than no lynch (yeah, my camp needs to work on its motto a little).

If we don't lynch today (which looks likely) then come day two, we will still be arguing about the same shit and we will have no extra information to work on, except a dead inno. At least with a day one lynch, you will likely have settled an argument, even though it is likely at the expense of another inno.

I believe my views on this is well known, and not at all biased in this case... .. We should always work to get someone lynched, but if by the end of the day there's no good candidate, we should not push through a lynch for the sake of lynching. People on the trains where there whether someone were lynched or not.

[Jump Around]

Sorry, I was kicked out of the computer without warning. (Actually, there was warning, but caught in the game I didn't really pay attention. The open picture of Photoshop with Lisheo and the Bee-Gees kinda destroyed the illusion that I was doing something important )

Now I'm only passing by since the arguments of "mafia day time out" can only get you so far.

This is a CF game, and lynching is good. Of the two I prefer

remove vote
vote alt146

I agree with dktorode he played it smooth and non-conspicuous for the whole day, until, I guess, he was called up by dktorode.

[Lisheo]

@yellow
With one dead person, you get more evidence, as well as one less person to vote for. If we vote another inno on day one we're down two, and the killers are one kill up.
We've only got two groups, killers and innocents, and we decided earlier on that there are more than likely only two killers, thats a one in eighteen chance of getting any information whatsoever other than dead inno. On day one, when you have no chance of getting info, thats just foolish and lynch-happy. If you have real evidence of someone being dodgy, put it up and Ill vote with you, no qualms, but so far the most suspicious person I can see being scum is you or Alt for being so seriously lynch happy.

[mocker]

lynch happy muthafucka's make this muthafucka suspicious. bo!

(thats a possible candidate for my Dance Speak)

[Gem Windcaster]

alt146 is indeed lynch happy, so if it comes down to a real train with a possible lynch, then I'll put my vote on him.

[The Dude]

Yellow, on Oct 17 2008, 10:25 AM, said:

Lisheo, on Oct 17 2008, 06:17 PM, said:

If we are gonna lynch everyone who stands out as being dodgy, Id have quite the list of people to vote for, with you and Alt topping the list, for tryin to get someone lynched for no real reason. True, he's Morgy lmao, but I cant see anything in his posts that suggests he could be a killer. And it'll only help the scum if he was to get lynched with no evidence, and turn out to be innocent.

Sorry, I'm well in the camp that says in a normal game, you should lynch every day, because it gives you so much more information than no lynch (yeah, my camp needs to work on its motto a little).

If we don't lynch today (which looks likely) then come day two, we will still be arguing about the same shit and we will have no extra information to work on, except a dead inno. At least with a day one lynch, you will likely have settled an argument, even though it is likely at the expense of another inno.

It just seems like, yeah an argument will have been settled, but like you said Likely it will be inno. If we wait for night we can make cases based upon who got NK'd based on previous play. I don't know, seems like the one think RI's have going for them is numbers. Cutting them down just for the sake of removing arguments doesn't seem right. especially if it results in inno death.

Gem Windcaster, on Oct 17 2008, 10:27 AM, said:

With a day 1 lynch based on nothing we'll have two dead innos tomorrow, and still nothing to go on.

exactly. I wish I could be concise.

[Tapper]

@ Mocker: bo selecta?

This post has been edited by Tapper: 17 October 2008 - 05:38 PM

[Lisheo]

Well, if someone else votes for him, thats five, half way there.

[Tapper]

It's not going to happen I think.
I could switch, and Gem has announced she will if he's the one and only true option and there is a lynch guarantee, but the number of users in this topic has dropped to 5 right now.

[Lisheo]

9 Now you never know.

[mocker]

Tapper, on Oct 17 2008, 06:37 PM, said:

@ Mocker: bo selecta?

lol yeah sorta! havnt seen it in years but was ace at the time

so ace its Dance worthy? i hope so lol

[Lacedaemonian]

Might as well Lynch Morg for pretending to be a bloke. The Dude also begs questions.

[Vengeance]

Morgoth, on Oct 17 2008, 12:20 PM, said:

Yellow, on Oct 17 2008, 07:14 PM, said:

Morgoth, on Oct 17 2008, 06:08 PM, said:

If you're refering to the naming him a hunk, I just don't know how to respond.

Hand job?

well, I'm sure we could work something out. A vote on the other hand, is hardly a right move

Edit: you have to buy me flowers first

Don't believe him all it takes is booze.....He's easy...