Cause, on 16 October 2021 - 08:41 PM, said:
Mezla PigDog, on 16 October 2021 - 06:56 AM, said:
Cause, on 15 October 2021 - 08:34 PM, said:
Does it have to be either / or? Can you ask them to hold the Boston offer so you can start living in Philly and take up the Boston offer a later if you so choose? Work with lots of travel gets very tiring for many people after a while but others love it.
A life sciences career has way more options in Boston than Philly long term but it doesn't mean Philly is a bust. A big shot life sciences consultant and business development chap advised me to quit the UK and move to Boston or California if I wanted to make it. I didn't and I'm doing fine but there are undoubtedly more jobs in those areas.
The New England Biolabs campus is an idyllic place to work, for example. I visited a few times and it's lab mecca.
I think it’s partly just bad timing. I just signed a lease and moved i to my new apartment this Friday! The thought of moving cities, packing again, finding a new place and starting a new job in a nee city all in a month also just seems too much right now.
In 6 months, if the job feels more stable I’d be open to discussing it again and at that point I’m sure if I said I’d move I could ask for the extra money etc than.
It might be worth breaking it down to which factors you think are important in the short and long term.
Mostly I'd see career moves as a long-term question. Having to break your lease and relocate is clearly a hassle in the short term, but in the long term you'll almost certainly forget about it. Whereas if you strongly prefer life in Philly compared to Boston then that's a long-term issue.
It doesn't sound like either choice is bad which is a good place to be. And as you say it isn't necessarily a permanent choice.