Malazan Empire: Mafia 27: The Escape of the Benses (Game Thread) - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 59 Pages +
  • « First
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Mafia 27: The Escape of the Benses (Game Thread)

#301 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 11:42 AM

Telas;374770 said:

For the record, I still don't see why Ruse, if he were UB, would knowingly risk it all like this. I don't buy for one second that it was a sacrifice reveal of another player's pairing. My suspects remain Galain and to an extent, Fener. Can someone remind me please, what is the suspicion of Shadow? Is this that whole strawwhatsit thing?


How is ruse "knowingly risking it all" ?

Hes a symp, nothing more. He can make one person STFU for a day.

If he can out a pair of lover to his master the earlyer the better, since he doesnt know if we are finders or not. So he had to get the message out.
If i was UB i would have have told the world about what ive found aswell.

ONLY if i was scum

If i was inno, i would NOT have told anybody. As its very likely that we were lovers. Scum coding is just daft.
0

#302 Guest_Fener_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 11:43 AM

Telas;374767 said:

I second the plea to Fener to elaborate more on Kaschan's accusation of him. The drop-in vote looked dodgy in light of that.


okay, what thte hell can I "Elaborate" on that

Kaschan says that my post where I say

Fener;374176 said:

Still, it would seem out UB dislike the Kaschan alt.


is similar to the PS' PM to Kaschan about his silencing. Now, I don't know what's in that PM, so how the hell am I supposed to defend against that is beyond me. It was a half joking observation, based, As I already mentioned on the fact that in my Mafiaexperience Kaschan has been a rarely used alt, and if one was to try to figure out how UB chose someone to silence on day 1, it may be as simple as "I dislike that rarely used alt. let's get him"
It's possible that JA just thought the same thing, but decided to jazz up his PM to Kaschan a bit

@ Omtose + Mockra
shit, I guess I kinda missed the confirmation. all right, so you guys can communicate. Ruse is still being kinda shady with outing codes like this. Hopefully this was a genuine scum slip-up rather than just innos being at each other's throats while the scum laugh fromt he sidelines...

I have to head off to work (will prolly be already late).. back in 13-14 hours, as usual.
0

#303 Guest_Path-Shaper_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 11:43 AM

It is day 1, 3 hours and 15 minutes left

15 players alive, 8 to lynch and to go to night

2 votes Shadow (Omtose, Tennes)
2 votes Omtose (Shadow, Ruse)
2 votes Fener (Gamelon, Kaschan)
5 votes Ruse (Mockra, Barghast, D'riss, Hoods Path, Fener)

4 have not voted (Galain, Liosan, Serc, Telas)
0

#304 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 11:56 AM

Fener;374781 said:

is similar to the PS' PM to Kaschan about his silencing. Now, I don't know what's in that PM, so how the hell am I supposed to defend against that is beyond me. It was a half joking observation, based, As I already mentioned on the fact that in my Mafiaexperience Kaschan has been a rarely used alt, and if one was to try to figure out how UB chose someone to silence on day 1, it may be as simple as "I dislike that rarely used alt. let's get him"
It's possible that JA just thought the same thing, but decided to jazz up his PM to Kaschan a bit


Well i just find it be a slightly odd statement, since kaschan wasnt in the last benses game.
In other words, why would JA say that in his pm to Kaschan?
Kaschans alt isnt as rare you would like to believe you know.

And then you pipe up with the same statement?

Its almost too much to write off...

But ,I do agree that ruse is in all likelihood our best bet for a day one lynch.
0

#305 Guest_Omtose_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 11:59 AM

Fener;374760 said:

yawn
good morning, all
I have actually fallen asleep last night in close proximity to a keyboard, wow

Seems Ruse went slightly overboard, esp with the whole codes thing. As some people already pointed out, at thispoint of the game, only scum would look for codes.

vote Ruse

however, if he comes up inno, we may have to take a closer look at Omtose again..


Trying to discredit the the CIs? Nothing at all scummy in that. Nothing at all...


...in the BIZARRO WORLD!
0

#306 Guest_Omtose_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:10 PM

Telas;374770 said:

For the record, I still don't see why Ruse, if he were UB, would knowingly risk it all like this. I don't buy for one second that it was a sacrifice reveal of another player's pairing. My suspects remain Galain and to an extent, Fener. Can someone remind me please, what is the suspicion of Shadow? Is this that whole strawwhatsit thing?


I'll copy this again, since very few people seemed to have ever read it. This is the middle section of my post 160, it outlines the things Shadow has accused me of which I have never done. This is not the only such example, he has been building arguments against me based on things I haven't said in quite a few posts. I just don't have the time to type the all up - and it is the clearest example.

Omtose Post 160 said:

...

As to strawmanning, a prime example from Shadow.

Shadow;374312 said:

No, I stated that it was interesting that my vote on Omtose for bullying was considered weak, while his case on Ruse(the question of Kaschan silencing himself) is considered strong.



I am acusing Omtose of being reckless/ruthless, and suggesting thats how Big Ben would play. And to clarify, I am saying that Omtoses reasoning (pushing weak cases for the sake of lynching) is scummy, instead of trying to catch slips or looking for scummy play. Even on day 1 it is counter productive to start a train in the hopes that we can lynch just for the sake of getting a lynch, I would rather that we look at the gameplay of others and present cases based on that, as opposed to bullying and hoping that a train forms "for more information on day 2", regardless of the case, which is what Omtose would like to see.


First underlined bit: I haven't pushed any case on Ruse. I voted and gave a reason. Never have I called for others to vote Ruse and I haven't been hounding everything he says as I would be doing if I was trying to push his lynch.

Second underlined bit: Instead of looking for scummy play? My vote for Ruse was based on scummy play. Weakly scummy, I know (I have never said otherwise), but scummy non-the-less.

Third underlined bit: Lynching for the sake of getting a lynch is something I have never suggested or advocated at any point. Ever.

Fourth underlined bit: I never said for more information on day 2. I said for information (and maybe that was misinterpreted), but I meant now, in the form of discussion, reactions and responses - as mentioned above.

All of these are instances of strawmanning (as stated the last may be simple misinterpretation), presenting as fact (see the bolded bit at the end) things which I have never said or done.

...

0

#307 Guest_Shadow_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:16 PM

OK, caught up, Omtose looks like I owe you an apology, here goes -

Sorry I called you a lying scummy bastard, and for saying that your mom smelled like old shoes, but JA might have snuck in an evil pair, and as he hasn't answered my PM asking about that, I assume no answer is forth-coming. So for now, I have to play along. The simple fact that you have a bone that you wont drop pisses me off a little, but I'll deal with that, Ruse looks like the lynch and time is way short, so I guess I will remove Vote vote Ruse

By the way Omtose, if I get time today, I will respond to your underlined parts. Hee hee, that sounds dirty.
0

#308 Guest_Path-Shaper_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:21 PM

It is day 1, 2 hours and 40 minutes left

15 players alive, 8 to lynch and to go to night

2 votes Shadow (Omtose, Tennes)
1 vote Omtose (Ruse)
2 votes Fener (Gamelon, Kaschan)
6 votes Ruse (Mockra, Barghast, D'riss, Hoods Path, Fener, Shadow)

4 have not voted (Galain, Liosan, Serc, Telas)
0

#309 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:22 PM

Shadow;374794 said:

but JA might have snuck in an evil pair, and as he hasn't answered my PM asking about that, I assume no answer is forth-coming. So for now, I have to play along.


Your kidding right?
0

#310 Guest_Tennes_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:23 PM

I dotn believe ruse is our best bet to find scum. if i vote for him, it will be to minimise the risk of our finders/guards/vigs wasting their time on a RI who made a mistake. The fact is as the game progresses if we have a player with such heavy suspicion on them in day 1, it is determental to the team.

BB, or UB will foist suspicion at every oppurtunity toward ruse and its in our interests to ensure the day 1, if it doesnt hit an evil, at least protects us for later in the game.
0

#311 Guest_Omtose_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:28 PM

Shadow;374794 said:

OK, caught up, Omtose looks like I owe you an apology, here goes -

Sorry I called you a lying scummy bastard, and for saying that your mom smelled like old shoes, but JA might have snuck in an evil pair, and as he hasn't answered my PM asking about that, I assume no answer is forth-coming. So for now, I have to play along. The simple fact that you have a bone that you wont drop pisses me off a little, but I'll deal with that, Ruse looks like the lynch and time is way short, so I guess I will remove Vote vote Ruse

By the way Omtose, if I get time today, I will respond to your underlined parts. Hee hee, that sounds dirty.


Nice apology... You'll play along because all options which may make me scum has been exhausted - except the one where maybe the mod went and did the opposite of what he said in the Mechanics Post at the beginning of the game. And because of that (im)possibility you won't discount me as scum.

And you're pissed that I won't let something drop? You sir, are scum.

If you can provide quotes to verify those underlined pieces (just a hint - you can't) then all you will do is prove that I can't keep track of what I post (I can) and that maybe you aren't scum. But I doubt that. I look forward to those replies.

Just to clarify.

Path-Shaper;373586 said:

The Benses (evil team)[/B]

One of each of the following roles WILL be present:

Big Ben (killer) – Although your mastering of Meanas allows you to remain undetected, you are also able to draw from various other warrens, allowing you one lethal attack per night, when the others are sleeping.

You are a soul-shifter, when you die, you are able to transfer your soul into the player of your choice. Upon death, the player chooses another alt to carry over his role. The player playing this alt now becomes Big Ben and gains his role (on top of anything he already had), and changes his winning conditions accordingly.

This shifting happens ONCE, so if the second Big Ben dies the evil team loses.

Uncle Ben (symp) – You don’t really agree with Big’s mentality of killing your fellow man, even if they are Mezla. However, your mastery of Meanas allows you to silence one player per day. You do this by sending the mods the name of the player you want to silence.

Once silenced, a player can no longer speak, but he can still post and contribute. The posts can only contain: votes, quotes, emoticons, player's alts and images (uploaded or linked from the web).

This power can be used every day and as many times as wanted, although it can’t target the same player two days in a row. It can be used on himself, or on Big Ben if wanted. The silencing is in effect from the end-of-night to the end-of-day post from the mod. This silencing apply to PMs between pairs, so please don’t cheat ;)

Note: upon investigation/CF, Uncle Ben will come up as “Innocent”

Note 2: The two Benses can NOT communicate off-thread, although they will know of each other. When the first Big Ben shift, Uncle Ben will be made aware of the identity of his new master, and vice-versa.

******


Learn to read Shadow.
0

#312 Guest_Shadow_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:29 PM

OK, just got confirmation, no evil paired people, that sucks, I knew Omtose was evil, oh well, just goes to show, first impessions arent always right. So Omtose, are you and Tennes gonna get the lynch, or are you gonna let time expire, while you continue to push for m lynch, there is plenty of time for that tomorrow, you know.
0

#313 Guest_Omtose_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:32 PM

I have said in the past that I am willing to change to Ruse, but I am going to vote for you and push others to do so for as long as I can.
0

#314 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:35 PM

Shadow;374801 said:

OK, just got confirmation, no evil paired people, that sucks, I knew Omtose was evil, oh well, just goes to show, first impessions arent always right. So Omtose, are you and Tennes gonna get the lynch, or are you gonna let time expire, while you continue to push for m lynch, there is plenty of time for that tomorrow, you know.


what you need confirmation for?

it says so in the rules...
0

#315 Guest_Shadow_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:36 PM

Alright, Omtose, be careful what you say, you might really piss me off and now isn't the best time to do so, ok. this is a game and if you think I am scum, fine, but curb your attitude.
0

#316 Guest_Shadow_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:38 PM

Mockra;374804 said:

what you need confirmation for?

it says so in the rules...


No where in the rules does it say

these are the only roles, or the roles are the only ones etc. It just says that some of the roles might be paired, do you really put it past JA to throw in evil gaurds or some crap?
0

#317 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:39 PM

Shadow;374805 said:

Alright, Omtose, be careful what you say, you might really piss me off and now isn't the best time to do so, ok. this is a game and if you think I am scum, fine, but curb your attitude.


you are right this is a game.

Posted Image


Why so serious?
0

#318 Guest_Omtose_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:39 PM

@ Shadow's 315: Already did before your rant. And I do appologise - I can get worked up at times.
0

#319 Guest_Mockra_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:40 PM

Shadow;374807 said:

No where in the rules does it say

these are the only roles, or the roles are the only ones etc. It just says that some of the roles might be paired, do you really put it past JA to throw in evil gaurds or some crap?


Path-Shaper;373586 said:

One of each of the following roles WILL be present:


No role not described here will be used.


I think these two should have sufficed...
0

#320 Guest_Shadow_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 26 August 2008 - 12:42 PM

I just wanted confirmaion, I got it, end of story.
0

Share this topic:


  • 59 Pages +
  • « First
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users