Abyss;280472 said:
Now this is tricky. And i grant, it may be whole crap - you're engaged in a protracted conflict against a god who has subverted entire empires. He's doing crazy shit and may or may not have the destruction of the planet as his agenda. It's all well and good to have brilliant military commanders fighting wars, but sometimes you need someone on the front line, seeing what's what with the grunts. All of the BBs were great SOLDIERS, but nothing we saw ever suggested any of them were great leaders or strategists.
Whiskeyjack was a big picture kind of guy, so his perspective was valuable. It just happened that he was MORE valuiable resuming command of the Host in MoI.
WELL- this is an interesting proposition, and gets back to the rationale at the core of this explanation / excuse. Is it indeed more useful to have the best and the brightest down on the micromanagement level in the armies, getting shit done, or should they be orchestrating campaigns, and laying down the big-picture.
I think that Laseen isn't retarded (alright, not totally retarded, and this might not even be her idea, but I digress...) and in light of an impending conflict with CG forces, with a rather considerable 7C problema on the horizon, it seems to me, that in retrospect putting the good guys on the ground level was an excellent move. For 3 main reasons.
1) Look at the Malazan unofficial command structure, even beyond rank, the higher-ups looked to, consulted with, and frequently involved the "old guard" and the vets that were on hand. Even if WJ's rank wasn't Fist, or High Mage or Gigantic Baller, he was still on hand to share his experience.
2) In a conflict involving the CG, the worldly forces of the Malazans were set into many forced paths. the CoD was a only-option kind of endeavor. The Host really had no choice but to throw it's hat in with Brood's dudes to fight the Pannion. In light of the conflict, the big picture is pretty set- and the most effective way of optimizing the odds in favor of the Malazans is to optimize ground-level performance.
3) The CG's modus operandi seems to be to subvert, pervert, and convert (sounds like Abyss, Apt, and Brood...) whenever possible. By keeping the bamfs on the ground, it puts them in a position to check the authority of any coopted leadership. Being the middle-men in the command structure (even on the lower end) makes keeping command under control become more realistic (countermanding orders even if it means killing the superior officers if need be.)
Now that last point is a tad weak. So let's not speak of it. Not that I support the move to knock down the old guard, but it makes a bit o' sense.
This point has been extensively discussed elsewhere.
<!--quoteo(post=462161:date=Nov 1 2008, 06:13 PM:name=Aptorian)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Aptorian @ Nov 1 2008, 06:13 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=462161"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->God damn. Mighty drunk. Must ... what is the english movement movement movement for drunk... with out you seemimg drunk?
bla bla bla
Peopleare harrasing me... grrrrrh.
Also people with big noses aren't jews, they're just french
EDIT: We has editted so mucj that5 we're not quite sure... also, leave britney alone.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->