Creation Vs Evolution
#441
Posted 20 February 2007 - 10:40 PM
mm..
I love the human race.. You know they feared that turning on the cern thingy could create a tiny black hole..
Much like how Heisenberg pointed out that it was a possible that the first test of a nuklear weapon could ignite the atmosphere and kill all life
I love the human race.. You know they feared that turning on the cern thingy could create a tiny black hole..
Much like how Heisenberg pointed out that it was a possible that the first test of a nuklear weapon could ignite the atmosphere and kill all life
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#442
Posted 20 February 2007 - 10:54 PM
maybe its just a really slow process. Might explain global warming
#446
Posted 22 February 2007 - 02:25 PM
There was a point?
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell
#447
Posted 22 February 2007 - 03:26 PM
Morgoth;161072 said:
mm..
I love the human race.. You know they feared that turning on the cern thingy could create a tiny black hole..
I love the human race.. You know they feared that turning on the cern thingy could create a tiny black hole..
I've been to CERN on a physics trip and somebody asked whether that would happen when they tried to find the Higgs Boson in the new accelerator. What a dunce. It's a huge thing though, and the amount of construction going on was unbelievable. The woman scientist taking us round did comment though that they were a little worried about not finding it, because theyd have to question their entire theory. Be interesting to see what happens.
#448
Posted 23 February 2007 - 11:17 AM
Well, how can they be certain this experiment should show it? Perhaps we're not nearly advanced enough to detect it. Or perhaps the theory is somehow a bit off. Not finding it does not invalidate the theory, IMO. But they might come up with a different theory that also confirms the experiments, we did in the past.
#449
Posted 04 March 2008 - 01:51 PM
"To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree."
(Charles Darwin 1872)
Enough Said
(Charles Darwin 1872)
Enough Said
#450
Posted 04 March 2008 - 04:58 PM
Thelomen Toblerone;161605 said:
I've been to CERN on a physics trip and somebody asked whether that would happen when they tried to find the Higgs Boson in the new accelerator. What a dunce. It's a huge thing though, and the amount of construction going on was unbelievable. The woman scientist taking us round did comment though that they were a little worried about not finding it, because theyd have to question their entire theory. Be interesting to see what happens.
I missed this the first time round, and it's kinda off topic. But you know they did find the Higgs Boson, right? Not at Cern though.
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde; keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi.
#451
Posted 04 March 2008 - 05:10 PM
Since when? The latest National Geographic has talked about it and so has Scientific american and they haven't mentionned any discovery of the Higgs Bosson. That's why LHC is so important. They've discovered other bossons, but not Higgs.
The Pub is Always Open
Proud supporter of the Wolves of Winter. Glory be to her Majesty, The Lady Snow.
Cursed Summer returns. The Lady Now Sleeps.
The Sexy Thatch Burning Physicist
Τον Πρωτος Αληθη Δεσποτην της Οικιας Αυτος
Proud supporter of the Wolves of Winter. Glory be to her Majesty, The Lady Snow.
Cursed Summer returns. The Lady Now Sleeps.
The Sexy Thatch Burning Physicist
Τον Πρωτος Αληθη Δεσποτην της Οικιας Αυτος
RodeoRanch said:
You're a rock.
A non-touching itself rock.
A non-touching itself rock.
#452
Posted 04 March 2008 - 05:15 PM
Huh. I was sure they'd found it at Fermilab. I read it... somewhere:o
I'll leave now...
I'll leave now...
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde; keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi.
#453
Posted 04 March 2008 - 06:24 PM
? this debate was long before my time, but...
I went to a catholic hight school
They taught evolution.
Nothing in the Bible directly defies evolution.
you can be both a creationist and an evolutionist
I went to a catholic hight school
They taught evolution.
Nothing in the Bible directly defies evolution.
you can be both a creationist and an evolutionist
#454
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:25 PM
Tsaritsa;268610 said:
"To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree."
(Charles Darwin 1872)
Enough Said
(Charles Darwin 1872)
Enough Said
Misquoting someone is a dishonest tactic. The above passage is followed by a long and clear explanation of how natural selection could have produced the eye. Note also the use of "seems". Darwin couched his conclusions in cautious language - he had to, given the times he lived in and the orthodoxies he was overturning.
I can only hope that you were not aware of the context of this quote, and simply repeated it as it had been misrepresented to you.
#455
Posted 04 March 2008 - 10:15 PM
DM: fixing the broken one at a time
have rep though
have rep though
#456
Posted 04 March 2008 - 10:17 PM
I was involved in a debate in college concerning this subject, and just grew weary of the "Creationist" I was facing and their tactics.
This whole debate is pointless to me because to believe any holy book's story of creation is to blatantly ignore anything scientific.
@DM, nice work there sir, nice work.
@Kud, I respectfully disagree.
This whole debate is pointless to me because to believe any holy book's story of creation is to blatantly ignore anything scientific.
@DM, nice work there sir, nice work.
@Kud, I respectfully disagree.
#457
Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:14 AM
I was merely adding fuel to the fire with that quote.
That having been said however, I am a firm believer in both evolution and creation respectively.
No one can deny the existence of evolution. It is a fact. Life forms do evolve, either to a better state..or as humans have shown to a worse state
However to suggest that life on earth was formed via the theories of evolution and I repeat “theories” is all together absurd.
The absolute delicate balance in which every life form exists is not a balance which can be stuck randomly..you can throw never ending scientific technical lingo at me all you like
Bottom line is …and this bottom line which is mostly ignored is that the evolution theory is just that..a theory
The ardent pursuit of this theory by some scientists who are almost too eager to prove its validity is most alarming, as it does take on a rather fanatical tone. Is not science a study based on fact removed from emotion?
Science however at this point in time of our collective evolution cannot prove that life on Earth was initiated via a series of random occurrences
I choose to believe a force..be it god..be it santa or whomever you choose, gave us that initial nudge ..set things in motion and then from that initial creation …the evolution of the species started to take place …
Just my fiddy cents
That having been said however, I am a firm believer in both evolution and creation respectively.
No one can deny the existence of evolution. It is a fact. Life forms do evolve, either to a better state..or as humans have shown to a worse state
However to suggest that life on earth was formed via the theories of evolution and I repeat “theories” is all together absurd.
The absolute delicate balance in which every life form exists is not a balance which can be stuck randomly..you can throw never ending scientific technical lingo at me all you like
Bottom line is …and this bottom line which is mostly ignored is that the evolution theory is just that..a theory
The ardent pursuit of this theory by some scientists who are almost too eager to prove its validity is most alarming, as it does take on a rather fanatical tone. Is not science a study based on fact removed from emotion?
Science however at this point in time of our collective evolution cannot prove that life on Earth was initiated via a series of random occurrences
I choose to believe a force..be it god..be it santa or whomever you choose, gave us that initial nudge ..set things in motion and then from that initial creation …the evolution of the species started to take place …
Just my fiddy cents
#458
Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:22 AM
Everything you have said can be applied to gravity. Besides, you troll poorly.
Hello, soldiers, look at your mage, now back to me, now back at your mage, now back to me. Sadly, he isn’t me, but if he stopped being an unascended mortal and switched to Sole Spice, he could smell like he’s me. Look down, back up, where are you? You’re in a warren with the High Mage your cadre mage could smell like. What’s in your hand, back at me. I have it, it’s an acorn with two gates to that realm you love. Look again, the acorn is now otataral. Anything is possible when your mage smells like Sole Spice and not a Bole brother. I’m on a quorl.
#459
Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:23 AM
Wait, I'm confused...
Are you not just completely contradicting yourself there?:confused:
Quote
No one can deny the existence of evolution. It is a fact.
Quote
Bottom line is …and this bottom line which is mostly ignored is that the evolution theory is just that..a theory
Are you not just completely contradicting yourself there?:confused:
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde; keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi.
#460
Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:26 AM
Xander;269069 said:
I was involved in a debate in college concerning this subject, and just grew weary of the "Creationist" I was facing and their tactics.
This whole debate is pointless to me because to believe any holy book's story of creation is to blatantly ignore anything scientific.
@DM, nice work there sir, nice work.
@Kud, I respectfully disagree.
This whole debate is pointless to me because to believe any holy book's story of creation is to blatantly ignore anything scientific.
@DM, nice work there sir, nice work.
@Kud, I respectfully disagree.
Have you read "Inherit the wind?"
lol, that sums up the relationship b/w interpretation of the bible + Evlution quite nicely, imho...