Malazan Empire: The Three Chained Dragons.... - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Three Chained Dragons....

#1 User is offline   Rat Mentor 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 173
  • Joined: 22-January 06

Posted 10 August 2006 - 09:30 PM

The Bonehunters for me had one major eyes open wide moment, that of the Three Chained Dragons.

Cotillion in conversation with them and Edgewalker awakend to the knowledge of the fact that some Soletaken Eleint are linked to the races.

The Tiste Andii for Anomandaris.
Tiste Liosan for Osserc.
T'lan Imass for Olar Ethil.

Draconus....?

At this point the chained three shrieked at this and claimed how reviled Draconus is, to which the discussion takes another turn..

So what is Draconus crime, in the eyes of the true Eleint?
Could this be one reason to why Rake fought Draconus and so imprison him in Dragonpur?
Could it be that Draconus is linked to another race, say humans?
I wonder if Draconus used the Eleint to bring about the warrens for access to humans. This would make the humans become a player between the races. In the same way that the Imass used the ritual and Silanah to gain power against the Jaghut?

Also...

Cotillion finds out that " a sundered realm is the weakest realm of all! Why do you think the Crippled God is working through it?"

So the Crippled God is working through the warren of Kurald Emurlahn and the Tiste Edur. To negate the CG Kurald Emurlahn would need to be healed. How would that be done?

Also.....

The three chained Dragons have been chained because they were planing to gain the Throne of Shadow. Rake didn't want this (vengeance against the Edur) Destroyed the realm and imprisioned the three to stop them healing Shadow. So is he not responsible for the CG being able to work through Kurald Emurlahn? Scadandari started the sundering by spilling Draconean Blood in the heart of KE, but Rake is impeached by his subsiquent rengeance.

Welcome members thoughts...
0

#2 User is offline   Dark Mac 

  • Emperor
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 804
  • Joined: 05-April 06

Posted 10 August 2006 - 10:07 PM

Perhaps it was Draconus and not Rake who killed the dragons now residing in Dragnipur.
0

#3 User is offline   Sir Thursday 

  • House Knight
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,819
  • Joined: 14-July 05
  • Location:Enfield, UK

Posted 10 August 2006 - 10:21 PM

Are the dragons that Cotillion sees actually imprisoned in the Shadow Realm? Or are they merely reflections of the true beings actually imprisoned somewhere else?

I am assuming that saying that they are imprisoned in Dragnipur is pure conjecture...

Sir Thursday
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.
0

#4 User is offline   Folken 

  • Never throw your life away so easily
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 2,908
  • Joined: 11-September 04
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Posted 10 August 2006 - 10:35 PM

The 3 Dragons are imprisoned in KE and not Dragnipur. Rake never killed them, read the conversation again.

You can't lay blame at Rake's feet for the CG using KE. The warren was shattered ages before the Fall and subsiquent chaining of the Crippled God. Rake had no way of knowing such an event would take place. He did what he thought was just I suppose.

Humans did not exist during the time the three dragons where bound in KE. Thus, to answer your question, no. It was something else that have the dragons hating on Draconus so much.
<div align='center'>You must always strive to be the best, but you must never believe that you are - Juan Manuel Fangio</div>
0

#5 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,405
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 10 August 2006 - 10:35 PM

@SirThurs - Not exactly...

Draconus told Paran that there are dragons amongst those present in the sword's warren while the dead Hounds of Shadow are throwing a fit.

The three bound dragons in Meanas are different dragons.

And we don't know how many were around before Krul had them forge the warrens and then return to SD, or how many weren't involved in the making.

Their anger at Draconus isn't explained - speculation on my part: maybe it has something to do with what he did to put the gate to Mommy D into the sword in the first place.

- Abyss, thinks they mostly just dislike his name.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#6

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 10 August 2006 - 10:37 PM

Rat Mentor said:

The Bonehunters for me had one major eyes open wide moment, that of the Three Chained Dragons.

Cotillion in conversation with them and Edgewalker awakend to the knowledge of the fact that some Soletaken Eleint are linked to the races.

The Tiste Andii for Anomandaris.
Tiste Liosan for Osserc.
T'lan Imass for Olar Ethil.

Draconus....?

At this point the chained three shrieked at this and claimed how reviled Draconus is, to which the discussion takes another turn..

So what is Draconus crime, in the eyes of the true Eleint?
Could this be one reason to why Rake fought Draconus and so imprison him in Dragonpur?
Could it be that Draconus is linked to another race, say humans?
I wonder if Draconus used the Eleint to bring about the warrens for access to humans. This would make the humans become a player between the races. In the same way that the Imass used the ritual and Silanah to gain power against the Jaghut?


Rake fought Draconus to gain Dragnipur.

Draconus' crime was making the sword Dragnipur and all that implies... it upset the balance.

It was K'rul that persuaded the Dragons to give their power for him to create the warrens... and so they became available to humans.

Quote

Also...

Cotillion finds out that " a sundered realm is the weakest realm of all! Why do you think the Crippled God is working through it?"

So the Crippled God is working through the warren of Kurald Emurlahn and the Tiste Edur. To negate the CG Kurald Emurlahn would need to be healed. How would that be done?


it's implied in BH that NEW throne of shadow commanding a healed realm is required.

Quote

Also.....

The three chained Dragons have been chained because they were planing to gain the Throne of Shadow. Rake didn't want this (vengeance against the Edur) Destroyed the realm and imprisioned the three to stop them healing Shadow. So is he not responsible for the CG being able to work through Kurald Emurlahn? Scadandari started the sundering by spilling Draconean Blood in the heart of KE, but Rake is impeached by his subsiquent rengeance.


An Eleint holding the throne would not be a good thing.. too much untethered power was the impression I got.
Rake cannot be impeached because he has never tried or wanted, from what I can gather to sit on the Shadow throne. He's the one that put it on Drift Avalii, therefore one would assume he could have taken it any time he liked. His forebearance is pretty impressive and very calculated.. imo.
0

#7 User is offline   Onos 

  • Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 23-May 06
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Posted 10 August 2006 - 11:27 PM

Eleint holding a thone seems way too powerful. And Rake NOT sitting on the thrown says something for sure about him.

Creating the sword would make most people upset since it can imprision creatures for 'all time' til the die. Not sure how Draconnus used the sword... Rake seems to be pretty reasonable about what he puts in there... if it crosses his path it goes in, but he isnt hunting things down... where Draconnus may have been hunting down Eleint to help with the pulling....

Wish i knew more about the Draconnus Rake argument... that may be a book in itself.

BTW Which bloody dragons are in Dragnipur? I know.. we have no real idea...

P.S have we heard of Eleint having pure eleint children?? Not recently... they dont seem very prolific.
0

#8

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 11 August 2006 - 07:39 AM

Onos said:

P.S have we heard of Eleint having pure eleint children?? Not recently... they dont seem very prolific.


Tiam is the mother of alldragons - perhaps figuratively as well as literally! :)
therefore they are all her children.. Not recently - nope.. she's supposed to be dead and unable to resurrect
0

#9 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,405
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:02 PM

Is Tiam i.d.'d as the mother of ALL dragons?
Iirc, she is 'mother of dragons', ie, Sukul, Menandore, Sheltie that we know of, plus technically everyone who drank her blood, but not 'all'...i don't think she's taken responsibility for Sorrit, Kalse, et al?

And i'm still wondering at just how the wyval, spawn of dragons that they are, are explained.

- Abyss, not admitting to being the Father of Anything until the test results come in.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#10

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:14 PM

Olar Ethil : ‘When I veer, I am as an undead twin to Tiam, who spawned all dragons.’ (MoI UKTpb, p.597)

the wyval are the runts... :)
0

#11 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,405
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:31 PM

Good use of quote. :)
Unless Olar has it wrong. I guess i'm just suspicious because the dragons seem (emphasis on 'seem') to predate the Elder Gds, and all the EGs we've seen were human aspected.

So it's a series of assumptions on my part, but one assumes Tiam was humanoid in some fashion or Scabby and Ossi would have had a hell of a logistical challenge getting it on with the dirty ho.


- Abyss, doesn't need diagrams or fanfic explanations, thanks :D
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#12

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:55 PM

It's rather confirmed by the Shetland Pony sister too..."dies and gives birth to us all".

Incidentally.. I knew I'd seen it somewhere... the wyval are the spawn of the dragons...rather than her royal skankiness... :D

As for Osserc and Scabs and whether she was humanoid... it's possible they drank her blood first... and became soletaken second.... and then did the thing when she resurrected.

EDIT : Just made a wiki page : https://starvalddeme...pbwiki.com/Tiam :)
0

#13 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,948
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:06 PM

Do you actually still stick to the thought that to have kids with tiam they must bump uglies? i think as Abyss puts it the 'logistical challenge' makes it impossible for actually mating. I thought it would be more a binding of blood than anything else and not merely a traditionaly breeding pattern.
0

#14 User is offline   Ivan the terrible 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 336
  • Joined: 05-March 06
  • Location:Dublin/Paris

Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:21 PM

The most interesting point brought up in this thread was Rake refusing to heal KE BY CLAIMING THE THRONE. Unless he has a reason such as avoiding convergence he is equally responsible for upsetting the balance... although while i say this it occurs to me placing the son of darkness on the throne of shadow might really screw things up.
0

#15

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 11 August 2006 - 04:44 PM

tiam said:

Do you actually still stick to the thought that to have kids with tiam they must bump uglies? i think as Abyss puts it the 'logistical challenge' makes it impossible for actually mating. I thought it would be more a binding of blood than anything else and not merely a traditionaly breeding pattern.


Well Rake and Silannah seem to get it on.... wasn't it euphemistically termed "comforting" or summat? :) so I see no reason why not
0

#16 User is offline   Rat Mentor 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 173
  • Joined: 22-January 06

Posted 11 August 2006 - 04:56 PM

Ivan - I guess that Rake just dosn't want to have any responsibility for the Edur.
0

#17 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,948
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 11 August 2006 - 04:58 PM

yeh he longs for Silnahs comfort in GOTM. And rake and Silanah only get it on after the drinking of tiams blood. So they were both dragons at this time. Anyway Rake would definitely not heal KE because of either

a) Not wanting a convergence

b)Not wanting it to heal out of spite for the betrayal

c) not willing to give the edur a healed realm at which to recover their ppl from
0

#18 User is offline   Jorram 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 383
  • Joined: 07-June 04

Posted 14 August 2006 - 02:00 PM

Rat Mentor said:

So the Crippled God is working through the warren of Kurald Emurlahn and the Tiste Edur. To negate the CG Kurald Emurlahn would need to be healed. How would that be done?


I thought it said in Bottle's visions that the child of the Eres'al and Trull (was that the soul in the body of Kettle or am I way out there?) would become the means to heal the shattered warren.
0

#19

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 14 August 2006 - 02:05 PM

Onos;104991 said:

P.S have we heard of Eleint having pure eleint children?? Not recently... they dont seem very prolific.


We don't really know what the Eleint are doing.
They were forced to return to Starvald Demelain, and the gate was closed iirc?
Which begs the question.. if SD is the warren of chaos.. a theory that has been put forward, and K'rul was hoping to return there with Raest as of GotM.. does that mean it's now open again?
0

#20 User is offline   Dinivan 

  • Captain
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 179
  • Joined: 28-February 06

Posted 14 August 2006 - 02:18 PM

What do you mean by 'open' ?

If you mean only accessable...I think Silanah used SD in the fight against Raest, so i don't think it was ever that isolated. and whats with the dragons chained in Shadow? Either they weren't forced to fly into SD or they returned.

But i dislike the notion of a warren of chaos entirely. That would mean an ordered form of chaos, which is a contradiction in itself, imo.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users