Malazan Empire: Shadowthrone is dissapearing (?) - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Shadowthrone is dissapearing (?)

#1 Guest_Mule of Shadow_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 15 April 2006 - 01:06 PM

Just noticed no-ones talking about it yet. Shadowthrone seems to be becoming less ..er.. substantial.

Is this because he has no existence outside of shadow? Anyone have any idea about what's going on there. I haven't read the book for a couple of weeks, perhaps my minds trying to create stories in the absence of a good book.

MoS
0

#2 User is offline   Murrin 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 560
  • Joined: 17-April 04

Posted 15 April 2006 - 02:53 PM

He was - supposedly - spreading himself very thin. While he dealt with everything else, he was also sat firmly on the Throne of Shadow on Drift Avalii, so that he could hide it like he did in the end. By the end of the book he was running around in full form again.
0

#3 User is offline   percival 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: 28-March 06

Posted 15 April 2006 - 03:01 PM

i took it to mean he was somewhere else.. ie the throne he was sitting on, when he was hiding it - therefore his body only seemed like it was in the other places. however i am confused as to the two thrones/drift avalii's... he was sat on one in a place with no other people (drift avalii?) and then there was also the place where the tlan imass and trull were (drift avalii?). or did i read it wrongly?
0

#4 User is offline   Murrin 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 560
  • Joined: 17-April 04

Posted 15 April 2006 - 03:02 PM

The other place - with Trull - was the Imass' First Throne, in a ravine somewhere, location unknown. The Throne Shadowthrone was at was the Shadow Throne on Drift Avalii.
0

#5 User is offline   tjc52 

  • Sergeant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 09-March 06

Posted 15 April 2006 - 05:14 PM

The Frist Throne is supposedly somehwere on Quon Tali, after the T'lan Imass moved it from its original site in Seven Cities when they thought the Nameless Ones were going to find it.
0

#6 User is offline   amirebram 

  • Sergeant
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 83
  • Joined: 20-April 05

Posted 15 April 2006 - 08:55 PM

For those who have read NoK, in the end there was a seen where Dancer appears and talks to the High Mage. It was said that he wasn't there in person, but was projecting himself.

i think that is similar to what Shadowthrone is doing now. Being in one place and projecting himself to be in other places.
0

#7 Guest_Danyah_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 15 April 2006 - 10:41 PM

Dancer shows up wherever he wants, but they are not projections. On drift avalii he could fight quite physical, and he could do some magicking in the imperial warren too.
0

#8 User is offline   tiam 

  • Ascendant
  • Group: Mott Irregulars
  • Posts: 3,953
  • Joined: 26-January 06

Posted 15 April 2006 - 11:12 PM

no hes on about a certain situatio in NOk when to do with when edgewalker first appears i think. as for St being unsubstantial its was because he had spread himslef to thinly. am i irhgt in beleieving the throne in the realm of shadow (with apt and the hounds etc) is actually the throne of meanas the 'gate keepers perch' as its called in HOC i think and the real throne of shadow is on Drift avalii
0

#9 Guest_shadowthrone_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 17 April 2006 - 10:54 PM

my personal theory about shadowthrone (my namesake:D ) has to do with his time in the azath, we no he got pretty close with the nameless ones also that there are many empty thrones like (i think it was cutter said) what was stopping him using the azath to enter as many empty warrens/holds as possible and claiming them for his own, we no he can hold more than one. he then uses the shadow throne as a front (its one of the larger fragments he lays claim to and he holds the true throne) all the gods/ ascendants believe him to be far too ambitious trying to reunite emurlahn (a powerfull elder warren) and seeming to fail at it (reason why he doesn't try and command all the denizens of shadow) so they in a way dissmiss him while in the mean time he consolidates his power on all the other abandoned thrones making him appear a bit insubstantial.

but thats just my little theory.
0

#10 User is offline   Dolorous Menhir 

  • God
  • Group: Wiki Contributor
  • Posts: 4,550
  • Joined: 31-January 06

Posted 17 April 2006 - 11:03 PM

I like that idea...how does it agree with Shadowthrone as agent/ally of the Azath?

The foundation of Kellanved's power was his access to the Deadhouse, and the Azath must have had a motive to grant this to him. Now, over a hundred years later, Kellanved is claiming thrones and realms all over the shop. Since he is probably still working with the assent or permission of the Azath, his actions must work towards some Azath plan. Is it related to Cutter's idea in HoC that you mention, that Shadowthrone intends to claim all that power and then with it, do...nothing? I imagine such an event would make things a lot quieter for the Azath, though I'm struggling to think of a better motive for it/them.

Do we know how the Azath stand relative to the CG? Opposed, neutral, allied, indifferent, unknowing?
0

#11 Guest_shadowthrone_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 17 April 2006 - 11:23 PM

my theory on the azath is that they like peace and quiet, so ammanas somehow gains their trust while on his travels maybe becomes a nameless one for a time he realises wat a state the pantheon is in with all the empty thrones and knows that the CG is stirring, if he or his minions find a way to begin claiming thrones theres gonna be a whole lot of trouble (its seems that thats wat hes trying to do at the mo) but ammanass and the nameless ones know they cant begin entrusting people with godhood and one person cant begin claiming them all openly cause the other gods would make fish bait out of him/her so they form this ruse to claim them covertly and maybe reunite emurlahn in the process this would give the remaining azath houses a power base to draw from unrivalled by anything. also shadow appears to have a lot of trapped souls that the azath would probably love to claim. however ammanass then begins to distance himself from the azath (by design or convenience?) and starts claiming thrones, we know that the nameless ones are becoming alarmed by him but we also no how arrogant and idiotic they can be, so maybe they are giving him leeway now in the hope they can take him down in the future and use all he has made, it would certainly fit with the nice little collection of assassins the azath are amounting all adept at killing in different ways and styles. however thru all this ammanass has second guessed them, the rope patron of assassins also good friends with a few others and an empire on the verge of collapse in need of a saviour/patron god.

while most of this is speculation it just seems to fit (to me at least) there are other points but its far too late for me too continue to rant:D
0

#12 User is offline   Abyss 

  • abyssus abyssum invocat
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 22,915
  • Joined: 22-May 03
  • Location:The call is coming from inside the house!!!!
  • Interests:Interesting.

Posted 18 April 2006 - 08:55 PM

I took his filminess to be because he was multi-tasking. As noted, he does solidify at the end, altho' that may have something to do with Kalam's otataral blade.

I don't actually think he sat on the First Throne or the Elder Shadow Throne, but he IS looking to keep anyone else away from them.

Note Cotillion's comment that the demons in Meanas raid each other and go about their lives, but that ST can compel them, but doesn't know the limits of their obediance. He did have azalans and aptorians defending (and dying at) the Shadow Throne on Avalii.


His 'collection' is interesting - for all we know, he may have grabbed Rel and Vorcan at the end of GotM - we don't see what happens to them between then and their appareance as coat racks in MoI. Maybe he grabbed Topper too, but if this means he has Rel, Vorcan and Kalam at his disposal, look OUT, like, everyone. Of course, one wonders why ST, who has Cotillion, the Patron of Assassins as an ally, is collecting extremely talented assassins for his own purposes. Perhaps a split is imminent?

- Abyss, thinks frozen assassins would make great lawn gnomes.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
0

#13 Guest_shadowthrone_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:18 PM

Abyss said:

I don't actually think he sat on the First Throne



he did sit on the first throne thats how he commanded the t'lan imass in the first place and the reason there was the confusion with lasseen and whether she would be able to controll them. it has been one of the major themes thru all but one of the books (MT)
0

#14

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:21 PM

He sat on the first throne as a mortal non-ascendant....thats how he could command the T'lan Imass.....but that's quite a different thing from what he has become.. and can no longer do so.
0

#15 Guest_shadowthrone_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:25 PM

i thought the whole reason for him not commanding the t'lan imass was him hiding his identity in the first few books also the reason he allowed his assassination because the gods would not stand for a god commanding a mortal empire. and now that the second gathering has occured silver fox is the living heir and by extension commander of the TI. could have sworn this was stated in BH. and the rest of this was covered in previous books
0

#16 User is offline   Dolorous Menhir 

  • God
  • Group: Wiki Contributor
  • Posts: 4,550
  • Joined: 31-January 06

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:32 PM

Is it not said that as a mortal Kellanved controlled the Imass by sitting the First Throne, but then his ascension left things unclear. He no longer properly occupies the Throne, but at the same time, because he did not die, the Throne was not vacated for someone else to take his place.

That was how I understood it, that the First Throne is kind of in a limbo with Shadowthrone "blocking" it without actually being able to use it to exert his will on the Imass.
0

#17 Guest_shadowthrone_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:40 PM

i suppose it could be seen either way. the only thing that was never clear was why would ascending to godhood (essentially just becoming more powerful and harder to kill) negate his ability to command them, i always assumed the "limbo" was just created by him up and dissapearing from the mortal realm without letting them know and then not asserting his dominance over the first throne. they have said he showed remarkable restraint while in command of them, wouldn't it be natural for them to assume that most beings attaining godhood would then fully claim the TI as there own and try to take over either the mortal realm or the pantheon. and seeing as he didn't they were unsure whether he truly ascended or was just killed, thus creating a "limbo"
0

#18

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:42 PM

@ Dolorous Menhir .....I'm afraid it does say just that in the Bonehunters.

Onrack : "Once long ago, by mortal standards, now, your companion found the First Throne. He occupied it and so gained command over the T'lan Imass......."

Then : "When Shadowthrone last sat upon the First Throne he was mortal, bound to no other aspect. He had not ascended. But now he is impure, and this impurity ever weakens his command..... as your companion loses substance, so too does he lose ..... veracity"
0

#19 Guest_shadowthrone_*

  • Group: Unregistered / Not Logged In

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:53 PM

Hetan said:

Then : "When Shadowthrone last sat upon the First Throne he was mortal, bound to no other aspect. He had not ascended. But now he is impure, and this impurity ever weakens his command..... as your companion loses substance, so too does he lose ..... veracity"


now i can accept if i'm wrong here but as it says wen he last sat on the throne he was mortal this clearly says he has not tried to command them since, although it then says his impurity has weakened his command it does not state he cant command just that he hasn't tried and i would assume his command could be contested by silverfox maybe his ascenscion has weakened his claim but i doubt it would completely eradicate it thus still leaving him in command but with untested capabilities of command.

maybe this is building to a confrontation or pact between silverfox and shadowthrone?
0

#20 User is offline   Dolorous Menhir 

  • God
  • Group: Wiki Contributor
  • Posts: 4,550
  • Joined: 31-January 06

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:54 PM

Thanks Hetan. It seems that ascendants have a hard time sitting the First Throne...not sure why, as this is a restriction that doesn't apply to any other Throne that we know of. Perhaps the issue is that he claimed it as a mortal and THEN ascended. Maybe if he'd claimed it post-ascenscion then there would have been no problems, and it's the act of ascending that has muddied the issue.

edit: that would be an interesting confrontation, especially when you consider that three of Silverfox's constituent souls (Tattersail, Bellurdan, Nightchill) have long histories with Kellanved, and all submitted to his rule and served loyally under him. I think on a personal level Kellanved would totally wipe the floor with Silverfox (because, frankly, she's a useless brat), but I would say her claim to control over the Imass is far far stronger than his.

further edit: thanks again Hetan, for the post below, don't want to clog this up with any more posts. That does neatly explain why no T'lan Imass - before Silverfox - could just assume the First Throne and avert the danger of someone else seizing it. I had wondered why they didn't just do that.
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users