Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium VII: Revelations - Chatty Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 146 Pages +
  • « First
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium VII: Revelations - Chatty Thread

#681 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,262
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 21 January 2021 - 01:57 PM

Are we waiting for IH?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#682 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 02:26 PM

I was waiting to see if any further discussion on agendas/deals occured before I played my votes, and to sit down and work out how many votes are in play.

My initial inclination is to vote Against for the first agenda and for the second one.



0

#683 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,262
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 21 January 2021 - 02:48 PM

I like For on the first and against on the second myself.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#684 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 21 January 2021 - 02:53 PM

I haven't placed my votes yet, I'm waiting for Drek to actually start the agenda phase and reveal the next PO before I do so.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#685 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,262
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 21 January 2021 - 03:06 PM

IH has to vote first Blend I think.

I mean before we vote.

This post has been edited by Tattersail_: 21 January 2021 - 03:06 PM

Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#686 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 03:14 PM

The PO has to be revealed I think before I vote.
0

#687 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 21 January 2021 - 03:49 PM

Oh yeah, I forgot about that.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#688 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,262
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:07 PM

What type of PO is that. Jesus. These are hard.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#689 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:34 PM

Thanks Khell
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#690 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:37 PM

@Blend and @Morgoth - Please include the ability you gain from your exchanged alliance PNs in your status block's play area section, see Tatts' post for a good formatting example.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#691 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:41 PM

The new PNs certainly make things interesting and make tech less of a necessity.
0

#692 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:47 PM

Votes:
Khell: 15
Morgoth:14, but 0 due to relic
Blend :13 (+specials)
Twelve: 11
IH:8 (+specials)
Tatts:5
0

#693 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:50 PM

D'rek if the first agenda resolves for, how does the second agenda work?
0

#694 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:51 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 January 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

D'rek if the first agenda resolves for, how does the second agenda work?


If a player submitted any number of votes towards a particular outcome, they will vote for that outcome with 1 vote instead.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#695 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:55 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 21 January 2021 - 02:48 PM, said:

I like For on the first and against on the second myself.


For on the first completely screws over my race :( As a good alliance partner I'd appreciate your votes on FOR for the first agenda, 5 votes from you FOR on the first and I'll put 7 votes towards against on the second.
0

#696 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 January 2021 - 05:55 PM

View PostD, on 21 January 2021 - 05:51 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 January 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

D'rek if the first agenda resolves for, how does the second agenda work?


If a player submitted any number of votes towards a particular outcome, they will vote for that outcome with 1 vote instead.

And if they didn't? No vote?
0

#697 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 21 January 2021 - 06:01 PM

Tatts, please don't forget to give me a TG for your refresh.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#698 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 21 January 2021 - 06:02 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 January 2021 - 05:55 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 21 January 2021 - 02:48 PM, said:

I like For on the first and against on the second myself.


For on the first completely screws over my race :( As a good alliance partner I'd appreciate your votes on FOR for the first agenda, 5 votes from you FOR on the first and I'll put 7 votes towards against on the second.


Don't you mean you want him to vote AGAINST on the first agenda?
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#699 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 21 January 2021 - 06:03 PM

IH, if you and I just put all our votes on AGAINST on the first agenda, they can only outvote us if Khell, Twelve and Tatts put all their votes on FOR (they have 31 combined, we have 29 combined if we vote the same way)
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#700 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 21 January 2021 - 06:04 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 January 2021 - 05:55 PM, said:

View PostD, on 21 January 2021 - 05:51 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 January 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

D'rek if the first agenda resolves for, how does the second agenda work?


If a player submitted any number of votes towards a particular outcome, they will vote for that outcome with 1 vote instead.

And if they didn't? No vote?


Right. If they abstained from agenda 2, they still abstain on agenda 2 regardless of the outcome of agenda 1.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

Share this topic:


  • 146 Pages +
  • « First
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users