[Tattersail_]

ToasTer86, on 19 October 2019 - 01:29 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 19 October 2019 - 11:28 AM, said:

Probably going to play logistics next turn.

You mean next turn as first time your up ?
Or the turn after this one

This turn coming.

[ToasTer86]

Tattersail_, on 19 October 2019 - 02:21 PM, said:

ToasTer86, on 19 October 2019 - 01:29 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 19 October 2019 - 11:28 AM, said:

Probably going to play logistics next turn.

You mean next turn as first time your up ?
Or the turn after this one

This turn coming.

Ok cool thanks for the heads up

[Morgoth]

ToasTer86, on 19 October 2019 - 01:30 PM, said:

Morgoth, on 19 October 2019 - 12:35 PM, said:

Thanks Khell!

Anyone up for a 2 for 2 swap? I’ll do my turn when I have a chance to sit down.

I will wash your commodities if you play leadership

That’s a deal.

[ToasTer86]

Morgoth, on 19 October 2019 - 02:43 PM, said:

ToasTer86, on 19 October 2019 - 01:30 PM, said:

Morgoth, on 19 October 2019 - 12:35 PM, said:

Thanks Khell!

Anyone up for a 2 for 2 swap? I’ll do my turn when I have a chance to sit down.

I will wash your commodities if you play leadership

That’s a deal.

Great and let's do that support swap.

[Imperial Historian]

Thanks for the commodity twelve, trade 1 more commodity?

[Khellendros]

That’s twice in two rounds you’ve played your strategy card before I wanted you to, Morghy

Switching to Glorious Plan B.

[D'rek]

Khellendros, on 19 October 2019 - 04:02 PM, said:

That’s twice in two rounds you’ve played your strategy card before I wanted you to, Morghy

Switching to Glorious Plan B.

I'm guessing 'cause he didn't want to let Twelve get the Rex->Diplomacy->Leadership combo. Looks like I'm going to plan B, too!

[Morgoth]

Khellendros, on 19 October 2019 - 04:02 PM, said:

That’s twice in two rounds you’ve played your strategy card before I wanted you to, Morghy

Switching to Glorious Plan B.

You should have told me when you wanted it played 😉

[Morgoth]

D, on 19 October 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 19 October 2019 - 04:02 PM, said:

That’s twice in two rounds you’ve played your strategy card before I wanted you to, Morghy

Switching to Glorious Plan B.

I'm guessing 'cause he didn't want to let Twelve get the Rex->Diplomacy->Leadership combo. Looks like I'm going to plan B, too!

It seemed a bit too much of an advantage for an Arborec entrenched on MR round 2.

[Jazzarm]

Khellendros, on 19 October 2019 - 10:49 AM, said:

Jazzarm, on 19 October 2019 - 07:47 AM, said:

I'm gonna be playing my second ever irl ti4 game today and I'm quite excited about that! That does mean my turn will have to wait until tonight, sorry guys.

Let us know how it goes!

It was great, thanks for asking! I got to play L1Z1X in a competitive build galaxy against Hacan, Mentak, Barony, Nekro, and Jol-Nar. I got to pull off a sneaky win after everyone was convinced another person would win and were almost ready to call it. Don't underestimate action phase secrets!

[twelve]

Imperial Historian, on 19 October 2019 - 03:49 PM, said:

Thanks for the commodity twelve, trade 1 more commodity?

Any chance you would be willing to go 1 comm, 2 tgs for my 3 commodities? If not then yes I'll still do a 1 for 1.

[twelve]

D, on 19 October 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 19 October 2019 - 04:02 PM, said:

That’s twice in two rounds you’ve played your strategy card before I wanted you to, Morghy

Switching to Glorious Plan B.

I'm guessing 'cause he didn't want to let Twelve get the Rex->Diplomacy->Leadership combo. Looks like I'm going to plan B, too!

Didnt even cross my mind this was an option. Man I suck at this game.

[Imperial Historian]

twelve, on 19 October 2019 - 08:33 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 19 October 2019 - 03:49 PM, said:

Thanks for the commodity twelve, trade 1 more commodity?

Any chance you would be willing to go 1 comm, 2 tgs for my 3 commodities? If not then yes I'll still do a 1 for 1.

That seems like a pretty big benefit for you as likely point leader entrenched on rex. I'd do 1 tg and 1 commodity for 3 commodities if that is of interest.

[twelve]

Imperial Historian, on 19 October 2019 - 09:47 PM, said:

twelve, on 19 October 2019 - 08:33 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 19 October 2019 - 03:49 PM, said:

Thanks for the commodity twelve, trade 1 more commodity?

Any chance you would be willing to go 1 comm, 2 tgs for my 3 commodities? If not then yes I'll still do a 1 for 1.

That seems like a pretty big benefit for you as likely point leader entrenched on rex. I'd do 1 tg and 1 commodity for 3 commodities if that is of interest.

I was hoping to do the leadership secondary. I'd pay with votes as you were looking to garner some if I recall correctly if you are still interested?

[Imperial Historian]

Okay, how many votes and on what terms? I'll definitely consider it if you are paying in votes.

As you probably recall I like to get a political PN as security for promised votes after someone welched on a deal in a previous game. To be traded back to you on providing of the votes. Willing to be flexible though.

[D'rek]

Twelve, FYI we'll probably be connected later this round and I'll be willing to do an equal c/tg trade instead, if IH and you don't work out a favourable deal.

[twelve]

D, on 20 October 2019 - 02:37 PM, said:

Twelve, FYI we'll probably be connected later this round and I'll be willing to do an equal c/tg trade instead, if IH and you don't work out a favourable deal.

Will we be neighbors before my next move though? If not I'll need to continue my negotiations with IH.

[D'rek]

twelve, on 20 October 2019 - 03:55 PM, said:

D, on 20 October 2019 - 02:37 PM, said:

Twelve, FYI we'll probably be connected later this round and I'll be willing to do an equal c/tg trade instead, if IH and you don't work out a favourable deal.

Will we be neighbors before my next move though? If not I'll need to continue my negotiations with IH.

Probably two more turns, alas.

[twelve]

Imperial Historian, on 20 October 2019 - 02:00 PM, said:

Okay, how many votes and on what terms? I'll definitely consider it if you are paying in votes.

As you probably recall I like to get a political PN as security for promised votes after someone welched on a deal in a previous game. To be traded back to you on providing of the votes. Willing to be flexible though.

Full disclosure, I'm hoping to work things out with the virus first but if that doesnt work this is my initial offer. I'll give 3 votes if you insist on my political secrets pn, 6 without it. You have to call in the votes before the first stage II public objectives are revealed and the agenda results cannot directly harm me unless I receive an agreed upon immediate compensation to allow it. Thoughts?

[twelve]

D, on 20 October 2019 - 04:00 PM, said:

twelve, on 20 October 2019 - 03:55 PM, said:

D, on 20 October 2019 - 02:37 PM, said:

Twelve, FYI we'll probably be connected later this round and I'll be willing to do an equal c/tg trade instead, if IH and you don't work out a favourable deal.

Will we be neighbors before my next move though? If not I'll need to continue my negotiations with IH.

Probably two more turns, alas.

If IH's price too high I'll still trade with you. I probably should bank to TGs for the objective anyway.