Malazan Empire: TI4 Game 4B - Chat Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 38 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

TI4 Game 4B - Chat Thread

#21 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 05:46 PM

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 04:55 PM, said:

Khell, I propose we designate the two empty hexes and asteroid field as a complete DMZ b/w us, which neither of us ever send anything into or through. We might link up Tier 1 and be able to trade this round, though. Sound good?


I’ll be upfront with you, I have the Nether Regions SO so will definitely be bringing ships into those hexes at some point - at least for one round anyway.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#22 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 05:47 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 05:46 PM, said:

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 04:55 PM, said:

Khell, I propose we designate the two empty hexes and asteroid field as a complete DMZ b/w us, which neither of us ever send anything into or through. We might link up Tier 1 and be able to trade this round, though. Sound good?


I’ll be upfront with you, I have the Nether Regions SO so will definitely be bringing ships into those hexes at some point - at least for one round anyway.


Tier 1 Trade might be possible this round, yep.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#23 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 28 June 2019 - 05:51 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 05:46 PM, said:

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 04:55 PM, said:

Khell, I propose we designate the two empty hexes and asteroid field as a complete DMZ b/w us, which neither of us ever send anything into or through. We might link up Tier 1 and be able to trade this round, though. Sound good?


I’ll be upfront with you, I have the Nether Regions SO so will definitely be bringing ships into those hexes at some point - at least for one round anyway.


Well that's fine, as long as we communicate about it beforehand and use the minimum number of ships.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#24 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 28 June 2019 - 05:54 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 05:38 PM, said:

What's the price for a free refresh D'rek?

The only thing I can think of that you might want from me is an early play of Technology? That worth a refresh?


The default price of a free refresh (for anyone/everyone) will be 1 trade good.

In your case, I suspect you want to play Tech pretty early anyways, but reassurance is good to have, too :) I'll give you a free refresh if you play Tech as your first turn.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#25 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 06:10 PM

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 05:54 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 05:38 PM, said:

What's the price for a free refresh D'rek?

The only thing I can think of that you might want from me is an early play of Technology? That worth a refresh?


The default price of a free refresh (for anyone/everyone) will be 1 trade good.

In your case, I suspect you want to play Tech pretty early anyways, but reassurance is good to have, too :) I'll give you a free refresh if you play Tech as your first turn.


Done
0

#26 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 28 June 2019 - 06:16 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 02:38 PM, said:

Also to start the preliminary negotiations, Gnaw/Morgoth my neighbours of old, either of you interested in a trade relationship? Not sure if we will be able to trade this turn, but I'd be interested in an exchange of goods if it became a possibility.

Morgoth, where do we stand on Quann? I consider it more in my sphere of influence than yours, I'd like to park some forces there to discourage Twelve's Saar ball deciding to come visit through the wormhole, which I think is beneficial to you as well. I'd be willing to agree to a deal, perhaps involving sftt around establishing a border at Quann.


I am confident we two can come to an understanding. I have no particular desires towards Quann, and would be pleased to have you act as a buffer. We’ll have to work out an agreeable compromise regarding the size of your fleet though. It is too close to my hearthlands for a sizeable fleet. I doubt twelve would like to put his furball too close to the Van Hague anyways.

An exchange of sftt seems a reasonable guarantee.

I am also very positive to a trade deal when it comes around to that.

This post has been edited by Morgoth: 28 June 2019 - 06:17 PM

Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#27 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 07:05 PM

Yeah with the Yin in the game our roaming ways aren't likely to want and cross the clones if at all possible.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#28 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 28 June 2019 - 07:33 PM

Game map in OP has been updated.
0

#29 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 07:41 PM

Pretty sure I’m first :)
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#30 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 07:45 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 07:41 PM, said:

Pretty sure I’m first :)

Crap. Forgot about the zero token.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#31 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 07:46 PM

Deleted.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#32 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 28 June 2019 - 07:46 PM

Oh shit, I did too, hold on, lemme fix that.
0

#33 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 08:44 PM

Khell, you forgot to remove a tactical token for your action. Fyi
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#34 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 28 June 2019 - 08:53 PM

Naalu with Warfare first round is such a good pick... and a pain in the butt :)

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#35 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 09:49 PM

View Posttwelve, on 28 June 2019 - 08:44 PM, said:

Khell, you forgot to remove a tactical token for your action. Fyi


Good catch, thanks.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#36 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 09:50 PM

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 08:53 PM, said:

Naalu with Warfare first round is such a good pick... and a pain in the butt :)


From what I’ve been researching, the Naalu are essentially designed to be space butt pains :p
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#37 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 10:23 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 08:53 PM, said:

Naalu with Warfare first round is such a good pick... and a pain in the butt :)


From what I’ve been researching, the Naalu are essentially designed to be space butt pains :)


I'm sure you will be excellent at playing them :p
1

#38 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 28 June 2019 - 10:34 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

View PostD, on 28 June 2019 - 08:53 PM, said:

Naalu with Warfare first round is such a good pick... and a pain in the butt :)


From what I’ve been researching, the Naalu are essentially designed to be space butt pains :p


Wellllll... yeah, you're right

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#39 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 10:39 PM

I'm about to get on a flight home, and starting a new job on Monday so who knows what my availability will be like but ive stuck in a bunch of provisionals.
0

#40 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 10:44 PM

View PostMorgoth, on 28 June 2019 - 06:16 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 02:38 PM, said:

Also to start the preliminary negotiations, Gnaw/Morgoth my neighbours of old, either of you interested in a trade relationship? Not sure if we will be able to trade this turn, but I'd be interested in an exchange of goods if it became a possibility.

Morgoth, where do we stand on Quann? I consider it more in my sphere of influence than yours, I'd like to park some forces there to discourage Twelve's Saar ball deciding to come visit through the wormhole, which I think is beneficial to you as well. I'd be willing to agree to a deal, perhaps involving sftt around establishing a border at Quann.


I am confident we two can come to an understanding. I have no particular desires towards Quann, and would be pleased to have you act as a buffer. We’ll have to work out an agreeable compromise regarding the size of your fleet though. It is too close to my hearthlands for a sizeable fleet. I doubt twelve would like to put his furball too close to the Van Hague anyways.

An exchange of sftt seems a reasonable guarantee.

I am also very positive to a trade deal when it comes around to that.


Hmmm, what limitations were you thinking? I wasn't going to put a lot there, but i would like to keep a dread or two there to discourage an exploratory offshoot.

If you want me to limit the troops there maybe throw in your racial on top of the sftt, I won't trade it or use it unless you attack me .
0

Share this topic:


  • 38 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users