Malazan Empire: TI4 Game 4B - Chat Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 38 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

TI4 Game 4B - Chat Thread

#1 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 27 June 2019 - 08:51 PM

All the regular chat thread reference material is in the Reference Thread.

Chat away!
0

#2 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 27 June 2019 - 08:51 PM

Alright, so just waiting for everyone to select their starting SOs then we can get this game going! Will add the updated map to the OP of the Game Thread in a minute!
0

#3 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 04:04 AM

View PostGalactic Council, on 27 June 2019 - 08:51 PM, said:

Alright, so just waiting for everyone to select their starting SOs then we can get this game going! Will add the updated map to the OP of the Game Thread in a minute!

I assume you are waiting for the secret objective selections before revealing the first 2 public objectives. Right?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#4 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 28 June 2019 - 12:46 PM

Alright, first two public objectives are revealed and game is officially started! I've posted IH's strategy choice. Please go ahead and post your strategy phase choices in the game thread, I'll edit your posts to add the player banner and (if you don't do it yourself) the first detailed post for yall!

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 28 June 2019 - 12:46 PM

0

#5 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 02:08 PM

Old faithful public objectives, think we have started with these ones before!
0

#6 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 28 June 2019 - 02:24 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 02:08 PM, said:

Old faithful public objectives, think we have started with these ones before!


Realistically there arent a whole lot of POs, so we will likely always see repeats. Pretty sure at this point every 1 point PO has been in at least one game, and only loke 1 or 2 of the 2 pointers have never come up.
0

#7 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 02:24 PM

Thanks Blend, looking forward to this one. Going to be interesting trying one of the 'fighty' races!
0

#8 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 02:38 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 28 June 2019 - 02:24 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 02:08 PM, said:

Old faithful public objectives, think we have started with these ones before!


Realistically there arent a whole lot of POs, so we will likely always see repeats. Pretty sure at this point every 1 point PO has been in at least one game, and only loke 1 or 2 of the 2 pointers have never come up.


It'll be interesting to see if anyone manages to score either of those in round 1.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#9 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 02:38 PM

Also to start the preliminary negotiations, Gnaw/Morgoth my neighbours of old, either of you interested in a trade relationship? Not sure if we will be able to trade this turn, but I'd be interested in an exchange of goods if it became a possibility.

Morgoth, where do we stand on Quann? I consider it more in my sphere of influence than yours, I'd like to park some forces there to discourage Twelve's Saar ball deciding to come visit through the wormhole, which I think is beneficial to you as well. I'd be willing to agree to a deal, perhaps involving sftt around establishing a border at Quann.
0

#10 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 02:51 PM

Why am I the only sucker with just one carrier?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#11 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 03:15 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 02:51 PM, said:

Why am I the only sucker with just one carrier?

Try playing as the Winnu they really start with shit.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#12 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 28 June 2019 - 03:33 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 02:51 PM, said:

Why am I the only sucker with just one carrier?


Naalu are not one of the vaunted 2c4i races :)

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#13 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 03:46 PM

The Saar didn't pick warfare?!

I'm shocked.
0

#14 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 03:49 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 03:46 PM, said:

The Saar didn't pick warfare?!

I'm shocked.

It was a tough choice and I'm probably going to regret not taking it but we will see.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#15 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 03:53 PM

View Posttwelve, on 28 June 2019 - 03:49 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 03:46 PM, said:

The Saar didn't pick warfare?!

I'm shocked.

It was a tough choice and I'm probably going to regret not taking it but we will see.


I was 100% convinced that you would take Warfare.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#16 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 03:59 PM

My species disposition is 'seductive.'
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#17 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 28 June 2019 - 04:07 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 03:53 PM, said:

View Posttwelve, on 28 June 2019 - 03:49 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 03:46 PM, said:

The Saar didn't pick warfare?!

I'm shocked.

It was a tough choice and I'm probably going to regret not taking it but we will see.


I was 100% convinced that you would take Warfare.

I wanted to score lead from the front so I grabbed the strategy card that allows me to do that and get it out of the way as soon as possible.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#18 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 28 June 2019 - 04:47 PM

View Posttwelve, on 28 June 2019 - 04:07 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 28 June 2019 - 03:53 PM, said:

View Posttwelve, on 28 June 2019 - 03:49 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 28 June 2019 - 03:46 PM, said:

The Saar didn't pick warfare?!

I'm shocked.

It was a tough choice and I'm probably going to regret not taking it but we will see.


I was 100% convinced that you would take Warfare.

I wanted to score lead from the front so I grabbed the strategy card that allows me to do that and get it out of the way as soon as possible.


Yeah, I figured after seeing your selection, seems sensible.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#19 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,611
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 28 June 2019 - 04:55 PM

Khell, I propose we designate the two empty hexes and asteroid field as a complete DMZ b/w us, which neither of us ever send anything into or through. We might link up Tier 1 and be able to trade this round, though. Sound good?

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#20 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,882
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 28 June 2019 - 05:38 PM

What's the price for a free refresh D'rek?

The only thing I can think of that you might want from me is an early play of Technology? That worth a refresh?
0

Share this topic:


  • 38 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users