Help
Well, for the Creuss wormhole thingy, empty means no units of any kind, but it can have planets. That’s what I’m minded to go for warfare sec as well.
Twilight Imperium (Game 3) - Chat Thread
#281
Galactic Council 
- God
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 4,983
- Joined: 30-April 13
Posted 01 February 2019 - 06:19 PM
#283
D'rek
- Consort of High House Mafia
-
- Group: Super Moderators
- Posts: 14,609
- Joined: 08-August 07
- Location::
Posted 01 February 2019 - 06:30 PM
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 06:19 PM, said:
Well, for the Creuss wormhole thingy, empty means no units of any kind, but it can have planets. That’s what I’m minded to go for warfare sec as well.
So it's really just "any system that does not contain enemy units" ?
worrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:
I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
#284
Galactic Council
- God
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 4,983
- Joined: 30-April 13
Posted 01 February 2019 - 06:44 PM
D, on 01 February 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 06:19 PM, said:
Well, for the Creuss wormhole thingy, empty means no units of any kind, but it can have planets. That’s what I’m minded to go for warfare sec as well.
So it's really just "any system that does not contain enemy units" ?
I do think we should keep the same definition of ‘empty’ (unless otherwise stated) when it is used in a rule. You still can’t use the Warfare secondary to invade and control a planet, so it’s either blockading (sounds quite Warfary to me) or you use another tactical to then activate that system and invade.
#285
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 01 February 2019 - 06:46 PM
Quote
Construction: none. (Dang you Blend)
What? Why?
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#286
Blend
- Gentleman of High House Mafia
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 4,579
- Joined: 28-March 03
- Location:Ottawa
Posted 01 February 2019 - 06:49 PM
Blend, on 01 February 2019 - 06:46 PM, said:
Quote
Construction: none. (Dang you Blend)
What? Why?
Oh wait, you mean cause I made you pay for the refresh? LoL. Well, can't have you making it too difficult for me to destroy you!
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#287
D'rek
- Consort of High House Mafia
-
- Group: Super Moderators
- Posts: 14,609
- Joined: 08-August 07
- Location::
Posted 01 February 2019 - 07:12 PM
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 06:44 PM, said:
D, on 01 February 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 06:19 PM, said:
Well, for the Creuss wormhole thingy, empty means no units of any kind, but it can have planets. That’s what I’m minded to go for warfare sec as well.
So it's really just "any system that does not contain enemy units" ?
I do think we should keep the same definition of ‘empty’ (unless otherwise stated) when it is used in a rule. You still can’t use the Warfare secondary to invade and control a planet, so it’s either blockading (sounds quite Warfary to me) or you use another tactical to then activate that system and invade.
Yes, you can only ever land units from space onto a planet via the Invasion step of a Tactical Action. Warfare secondary, retreating, and other methods of moving a ship into a system outside of a tactical action would only let you move the ground units carried by that ship to the space area.
We're probably best off to just rewrite the secondary effect so it says "any system that does not contain enemy units" rather than "empty" at all.
worrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:
I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
#288
Galactic Council
- God
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 4,983
- Joined: 30-April 13
Posted 01 February 2019 - 07:13 PM
IH, I have you at 1 tactical and 1 strategic remaining, but you put 1/2?
#289
Gnaw
- Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 5,966
- Joined: 16-June 12
Posted 01 February 2019 - 10:08 PM
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 07:13 PM, said:
IH, I have you at 1 tactical and 1 strategic remaining, but you put 1/2?
Observation: Ancient Solarian author Maya Angelou “when someone shows you the truth of themselves, believe them.” Pirates lie, cheat, steal. That is their truth. One must always be aware and watch for such activity.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
#290
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 01 February 2019 - 10:46 PM
Sorry missed the logistics CT when copy pasting.
But all of the above is true, I have updated.
But all of the above is true, I have updated.
#291
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 01 February 2019 - 10:46 PM
D, on 01 February 2019 - 07:12 PM, said:
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 06:44 PM, said:
D, on 01 February 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:
Galactic Council, on 01 February 2019 - 06:19 PM, said:
Well, for the Creuss wormhole thingy, empty means no units of any kind, but it can have planets. That’s what I’m minded to go for warfare sec as well.
So it's really just "any system that does not contain enemy units" ?
I do think we should keep the same definition of ‘empty’ (unless otherwise stated) when it is used in a rule. You still can’t use the Warfare secondary to invade and control a planet, so it’s either blockading (sounds quite Warfary to me) or you use another tactical to then activate that system and invade.
Yes, you can only ever land units from space onto a planet via the Invasion step of a Tactical Action. Warfare secondary, retreating, and other methods of moving a ship into a system outside of a tactical action would only let you move the ground units carried by that ship to the space area.
We're probably best off to just rewrite the secondary effect so it says "any system that does not contain enemy units" rather than "empty" at all.
I like this
#293
Morgoth
- executor emeritus
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 11,448
- Joined: 24-January 03
- Location:the void
Posted 01 February 2019 - 11:44 PM
twelve, on 01 February 2019 - 11:25 PM, said:
Morgoth I thought you were saving those resources for the public objective. Dan the barony is scary.
Yeah, but I felt too exposed.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#294
Galactic Council
- God
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 4,983
- Joined: 30-April 13
Posted 01 February 2019 - 11:45 PM
Morgoth, I've placed all you GFs on Arc Prime as that's where they were produced by the dock - I don't believe that they can automatically be placed on a different planet:
59.3: 'When a player produced ground forces, he must place those units on planets that contain a unit that used its Production ability'.
59.3: 'When a player produced ground forces, he must place those units on planets that contain a unit that used its Production ability'.
#295
Galactic Council
- God
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 4,983
- Joined: 30-April 13
Posted 02 February 2019 - 12:00 AM
twelve, on 01 February 2019 - 11:25 PM, said:
Morgoth I thought you were saving those resources for the public objective. Dan the barony is scary.
Twelve, could you make sure to make your post all nice-like when you get the chance, please (and anyone else who may need to do it)? Cheers!
#296
Galactic Council
- God
-
- Group: Game Mod
- Posts: 4,983
- Joined: 30-April 13
Posted 02 February 2019 - 12:00 AM
Map has been updated to end of Morgoth's turn.
#297
twelve
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 9,163
- Joined: 27-March 09
- Location:Pacific Northwest
Posted 02 February 2019 - 12:34 AM
Galactic Council, on 02 February 2019 - 12:00 AM, said:
twelve, on 01 February 2019 - 11:25 PM, said:
Morgoth I thought you were saving those resources for the public objective. Dan the barony is scary.
Twelve, could you make sure to make your post all nice-like when you get the chance, please (and anyone else who may need to do it)? Cheers!
When I get to proper computer tonight I'll tidy it up for you.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#298
twelve
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 9,163
- Joined: 27-March 09
- Location:Pacific Northwest
Posted 02 February 2019 - 03:22 AM
Welp for some reason I can't log into my laptop. That is a serious pain. So post cleanup is going to be seriously delayed.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#299
Imperial Historian
- Master of the Deck
-
- Group: Administrators
- Posts: 7,882
- Joined: 08-February 04
Posted 02 February 2019 - 08:43 AM
During the exchange of promises for research agreements in exchange for the mentaks protection, there was an unfortunate incident where a rogue crew made off with... Well all the valuables of the jol nar negotiating committee. The mentak leadership send there profuse apologies for this regrettable incident and beg the jol nar to take efforts to communicate more clearly there protected status.
Mentak traders are also seeking interested parties for the trade of a commodity for tg, traders have been dispatched to Hacan, letnev and jol nar with assurances, the mentak are just peaceful traders. The mentak leadership dismiss all rumours that the goods on sale are of jol narian providence, pointing to the strong mentak jol nar research agreements as evidence of there continuing friendship.
Mentak traders are also seeking interested parties for the trade of a commodity for tg, traders have been dispatched to Hacan, letnev and jol nar with assurances, the mentak are just peaceful traders. The mentak leadership dismiss all rumours that the goods on sale are of jol narian providence, pointing to the strong mentak jol nar research agreements as evidence of there continuing friendship.
#300
Gnaw
- Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
-
- Group: High House Mafia
- Posts: 5,966
- Joined: 16-June 12
Posted 02 February 2019 - 08:49 AM
Question: How do you tell a Mentak is lying?
Correct answer: Their lips are moving.
Correcter answer: They’re alive.
Correct answer: Their lips are moving.
Correcter answer: They’re alive.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
