Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread

#801 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 21 July 2018 - 09:51 PM

Yeah I definitely don't feel like doing that so cheaply
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#802 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 21 July 2018 - 09:55 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too


I can move the Carrier from Centauri-Gral turn 1 yes. And I can play Logistics turn 2. In return for playing Logistics turn 2 and trading 2:2, I would like to take 2GFs from centauri-Gral and transfer them to Corneeq-Reculon. I'd like to keep those and the Centauri-Grabplanets for the rest of the round but come next round you can do whatever you want with them (as each planet will only have 1GF they won't be hard to take). If you want to contact Morgoth this round you can also move in and destroy the Carrier in Corneeq but I would ask you not to invade the planets. And this is instead of the earlier Silvano request. So how about it?


I liked the Silvano thing much better tbh


You sure? It means you'd have to spend a token retaking it next round if you wanted it again? But if you're really against my proposal we can do it (Silvano instead). I just need a bit of time to rethink through my moves (sorry!).

And the battle station?

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 21 July 2018 - 09:56 PM

"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#803 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:01 PM

And a CT to move them away this round, yeah I'm aware, hmmm

A ship can pick up infantry from different hex than it started in on its' way to a activated hex, does the same apply to fighters?
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#804 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:12 PM

Yes. But the inf/fighter can only be picked up from unactivated systems.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#805 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:13 PM

View PostD, on 21 July 2018 - 10:12 PM, said:

Yes. But the inf/fighter can only be picked up from unactivated systems.


^^^^^
0

#806 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:28 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too



What do you want for the battlestation?


Guess I'll be saving a CT to cancel that particular card...unless of course you factor in the payoff to me to let you use it.

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 21 July 2018 - 10:29 PM

"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#807 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:55 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too


I can move the Carrier from Centauri-Gral turn 1 yes. And I can play Logistics turn 2. In return for playing Logistics turn 2 and trading 2:2, I would like to take 2GFs from centauri-Gral and transfer them to Corneeq-Reculon. I'd like to keep those and the Centauri-Grabplanets for the rest of the round but come next round you can do whatever you want with them (as each planet will only have 1GF they won't be hard to take). If you want to contact Morgoth this round you can also move in and destroy the Carrier in Corneeq but I would ask you not to invade the planets. And this is instead of the earlier Silvano request. So how about it?


I liked the Silvano thing much better tbh


You sure? It means you'd have to spend a token retaking it next round if you wanted it again? But if you're really against my proposal we can do it (Silvano instead). I just need a bit of time to rethink through my moves (sorry!).

And the battle station?


This way I'd be leaving you 4 planets from my territory at your disposal, and I'd need twice as many infantry - 8 - to safely invade them next round, which is not exactly ideal as my intent was to mainly use cruisers to take them.
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#808 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM

Gnaw, are you up for trading commodities?
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#809 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:41 PM

View PostGnaw, on 21 July 2018 - 10:28 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too



What do you want for the battlestation?


Guess I'll be saving a CT to cancel that particular card...unless of course you factor in the payoff to me to let you use it.


How can an action card be cancelled, in general?
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#810 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:44 PM

View PostMorgoth, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

Gnaw, are you up for trading commodities?


Yeah, I’ll trade 3:3 with you and then trade goods for 3/4 of IH’s commodities.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#811 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:46 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:21 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 July 2018 - 08:01 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 12:45 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 07:00 AM, said:

Okay Nom, I have to ask now even though it seems ridiculous: Is there any way we can strike a deal whereby I take Silvano with 1 GF at the end of this round, and leave immediately at the beginning of the next round?


You leave Gral Centauri with all your GFs

Play logistics turn 2

Leave the wormhole on Mehar Xull to IH

And pay 2TGs

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 July 2018 - 11:51 AM, said:

Where are you placing the wormhole tatts? Still in xull?


Okay I no longer have any use for the wormhole in Xull but I don't wanna cancel the deal altogether after we agreed on it. Xull is worth 1/3 to me so I'm gonna ask for 3 TGs which I don't think is that much considering it's worth 1 whole VP to you and it's your 2nd VP and I make sure Khell leaves it to you. Still applies that you only come with minimal force and vacate it asap next round.

View PostGnaw, on 21 July 2018 - 09:00 AM, said:

I thought we had a deal. If we don’t I need to rethink my provisional.


I don't want to cancel our deal either but I have to ask for more too as our deal is less important to me when I can't take Mecatol and apparently the experimental battlestation is worth more than I thought.

So, you leave Lodor and all ships there alone altogether, same goes for the Tatyana's wormhole. I'm not gonna pillage you or go through while I'm there. Additionally I'm gonna ask for your trade agreement PN and that you settle the action card transaction with Tatyana.

Is that reasonable all of you?


Not really in my interests I'd effectively be spending 9 goods of resources for no long term gain in the early game.


If you're not interested in negotiating then I'm gonna ask Tatts he places the wormhole somewhere else as I wouldn't react friendly to you taking Mehar Xull, and wouldn't be happy about the wormhole altogether, as I've no use for it and it opens a backdoor right next to my hw. I've absolutely no issues with you rejecting the offer otherwise.


Ok I'm not to surprised at this.
0

#812 User is offline   Morgoth 

  • executor emeritus
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 11,448
  • Joined: 24-January 03
  • Location:the void

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:48 PM

View PostGnaw, on 21 July 2018 - 10:44 PM, said:

View PostMorgoth, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

Gnaw, are you up for trading commodities?


Yeah, I’ll trade 3:3 with you and then trade goods for 3/4 of IH’s commodities.


Then we have a deal! ;)
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
0

#813 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:49 PM

View PostGnaw, on 21 July 2018 - 10:44 PM, said:

View PostMorgoth, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

Gnaw, are you up for trading commodities?


Yeah, I’ll trade 3:3 with you and then trade goods for 3/4 of IH’s commodities.


I'll be neighbouring morgoth next turn so can trade 3:3 with you gnaw, then 3 for 3 with morgoth when he gets his commodities using TG.
0

#814 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 21 July 2018 - 10:50 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 21 July 2018 - 09:25 PM, said:

I'm not really here but juet popping in. Wormhole will be placed next turn. At moment only 2 offers are on the table.


What offers are on the table tatts, this whole thing has got very confusing.
0

#815 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:11 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:55 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too


I can move the Carrier from Centauri-Gral turn 1 yes. And I can play Logistics turn 2. In return for playing Logistics turn 2 and trading 2:2, I would like to take 2GFs from centauri-Gral and transfer them to Corneeq-Reculon. I'd like to keep those and the Centauri-Grabplanets for the rest of the round but come next round you can do whatever you want with them (as each planet will only have 1GF they won't be hard to take). If you want to contact Morgoth this round you can also move in and destroy the Carrier in Corneeq but I would ask you not to invade the planets. And this is instead of the earlier Silvano request. So how about it?


I liked the Silvano thing much better tbh


You sure? It means you'd have to spend a token retaking it next round if you wanted it again? But if you're really against my proposal we can do it (Silvano instead). I just need a bit of time to rethink through my moves (sorry!).

And the battle station?


This way I'd be leaving you 4 planets from my territory at your disposal, and I'd need twice as many infantry - 8 - to safely invade them next round, which is not exactly ideal as my intent was to mainly use cruisers to take them.


No I'm not gonna do this. Want to have a shot at the PO too.
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#816 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:14 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 11:11 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:55 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too


I can move the Carrier from Centauri-Gral turn 1 yes. And I can play Logistics turn 2. In return for playing Logistics turn 2 and trading 2:2, I would like to take 2GFs from centauri-Gral and transfer them to Corneeq-Reculon. I'd like to keep those and the Centauri-Grabplanets for the rest of the round but come next round you can do whatever you want with them (as each planet will only have 1GF they won't be hard to take). If you want to contact Morgoth this round you can also move in and destroy the Carrier in Corneeq but I would ask you not to invade the planets. And this is instead of the earlier Silvano request. So how about it?


I liked the Silvano thing much better tbh


You sure? It means you'd have to spend a token retaking it next round if you wanted it again? But if you're really against my proposal we can do it (Silvano instead). I just need a bit of time to rethink through my moves (sorry!).

And the battle station?


This way I'd be leaving you 4 planets from my territory at your disposal, and I'd need twice as many infantry - 8 - to safely invade them next round, which is not exactly ideal as my intent was to mainly use cruisers to take them.


No I'm not gonna do this. Want to have a shot at the PO too.


No you're not going to do the Silvano one, or no you're not going to do the Corneeq one?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#817 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:15 PM

I assume you're referring to Corneeq, which is fine, I understand. So where do we stand with Silvano?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#818 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:16 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 11:14 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 11:11 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:55 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:48 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 21 July 2018 - 09:45 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 21 July 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

@Khell, I've got some adjustments to my offer

Are you capable of both vacating Gral Centauri turn 1 and playing logistics turn 2? I can see a way that you could

Plus 1 tg.

Now, what can you offer if I throw in the experimental battlestation?

I guess I'm open to bribes not to sell it to him too


I can move the Carrier from Centauri-Gral turn 1 yes. And I can play Logistics turn 2. In return for playing Logistics turn 2 and trading 2:2, I would like to take 2GFs from centauri-Gral and transfer them to Corneeq-Reculon. I'd like to keep those and the Centauri-Grabplanets for the rest of the round but come next round you can do whatever you want with them (as each planet will only have 1GF they won't be hard to take). If you want to contact Morgoth this round you can also move in and destroy the Carrier in Corneeq but I would ask you not to invade the planets. And this is instead of the earlier Silvano request. So how about it?


I liked the Silvano thing much better tbh


You sure? It means you'd have to spend a token retaking it next round if you wanted it again? But if you're really against my proposal we can do it (Silvano instead). I just need a bit of time to rethink through my moves (sorry!).

And the battle station?


This way I'd be leaving you 4 planets from my territory at your disposal, and I'd need twice as many infantry - 8 - to safely invade them next round, which is not exactly ideal as my intent was to mainly use cruisers to take them.


No I'm not gonna do this. Want to have a shot at the PO too.


No you're not going to do the Silvano one, or no you're not going to do the Corneeq one?


Not Corneeq

Yes Silvano
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#819 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:19 PM

Cool. So I move the Carrier from Gral-Centauri now. Then Logistics next, and trade 2:2 in exchange for you moving out of Silvano, which I would need you to do by turn 3 or 4 I think.

Now: the battlestation ;)
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#820 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 21 July 2018 - 11:20 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 21 July 2018 - 10:49 PM, said:

View PostGnaw, on 21 July 2018 - 10:44 PM, said:

View PostMorgoth, on 21 July 2018 - 10:31 PM, said:

Gnaw, are you up for trading commodities?


Yeah, I'll trade 3:3 with you and then trade goods for 3/4 of IH's commodities.


I'll be neighbouring morgoth next turn so can trade 3:3 with you gnaw, then 3 for 3 with morgoth when he gets his commodities using TG.


Oops. Had the order wrong; you get your trade first.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

Share this topic:


  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users